On the theory and practice of critical pragmatism: Deliberative practice and creative negotiations

Planning Theory

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 5-22

  Forester, John ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

critical pragmatism; deliberation; negotiation; Planning practice; reflection

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC RESEARCH; NEGOTIATION PROCESS; STUDENT; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 84872738811     PISSN: 14730952     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1473095212448750     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Argyris C,Schön DOrganizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley; 1978:.
2. Bernstein RJBeyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1983:.
3. Churchman CWThe Design of Inquiring Systems. New York: Basic Books; 1972:.
4. Dewey JThe Public and Its Problems. Athens, OH: Swallow Press; 1927:.
5. Fischler RPlanning Ideas That Matter. Sanyal BVale LRosan C, ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2012:.
6. Fisher R,Ury WGetting to Yes. New York: Penguin; 1983:.
7. Flyvbjerg BMaking Social Science Matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001:.
8. Forester JPlanning in the Face of Power. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1989:.
9. Forester JCritical Theory, Public Policy, and Planning Practice. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press; 1993:.
10. Forester JThe Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1999:.
11. Forester J.Exploring urban practice in a democratizing society: Opportunities, techniques, and challenges.Development South Africa. 2006;23 (5):.
12. Forester JDealing With Differences: Dramas of Mediating Public Disputes. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009:.
13. Forester J.Interface: Learning from practice in the face of conflict: Integrating technical expertise with participatory planning (Critical commentaries on the practice of planner-architect Laurence Sherman).Planning Theory and Practice. 2011;12 (2):.
14. Forester J.Learning to improve practice: Lessons from practice stories and practitioners' own discourse analyses (or why only the loons show up).Planning Theory and Practice. 2012a;13 (1): 11-26.
15. Forester JDemocracy, Conflict and Participation. Griggs SNorval AWagenaar H, ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012b:.
16. Forester JChallenges and Opportunities of Facilitative Leadership in Planning. Forester J, ed.
17. Freire PThe Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Seabury Press; 1970:.
18. Gilligan CIn A Different Voice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1982:.
19. Habermas JCommunication and the Evolution of Society. Boston, MA: Beacon; 1979:.
20. Harper T,Stein SM.Out of the postmodern abyss: Preserving the rationale for liberal planning.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 1995;14:233-244.
21. Healey P.The pragmatic tradition in planning thought.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2009;28 (3): 277-292.
22. Hoch CWhat Planners Do. Chicago, IL: Planner's Press; 1994:.
23. Hoch CExplorations in Planning Theory. Mandelbaum SMazza LBurchell R, ed. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Public Policy; 1996:.
24. Hoch C.Pragmatic communicative action theory.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2007;26 (3): 272-283.
25. Innes J,Booher D.Consensus building as role playing and bricolage: Toward a theory of collaborative planning.Journal of the American Planning Association. 1999;65 (1): 9-26.
26. Innes J,Booher DPlanning With Complexity: An Introduction to Collaborative Rationality for Public Policy. London: Routledge; 2010:.
27. Kadlec A.Reconstructing Dewey: The philosophy of critical pragmatism.Polity. 2006;38 (4): 519-542.
28. Kelman H.Negotiation as interactive problem-solving.International Negotiation. 1996;1:99-123.
29. Laws D,Forester JHandbook of Public Policy Analysis. Fischer FMiller GSidney M, ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2007a:.
30. Laws D,Forester J.Learning in practice: Public policy mediation.Critical Policy Analysis. 2007b;1 (4): 342-370.
31. Margerum RBeyond Consensus: Improving Collaborative Planning and Management. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2011:.
32. Nussbaum MLove's Knowledge. New York: Oxford; 1990:.
33. Reardon K,Welch J,Kreiswirth B,Forester JThe American Sociologist. Spring:; 1993:69-91.
34. Sandercock LStory and Sustainability. Eckstein BThrogmorton J, ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2003:42-164.
35. Schön DThe Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think In Action. New York: Basic Books; 1983:.
36. Schön D,Rein MFrame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies. New York: Basic Books; 1994:.
37. Umemoto K.Walking in another's shoes: Epistemological challenges in participatory planning.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 2001;21:17-31.
38. Verma N.Pragmatic rationality and planning theory.Journal of Planning Education and Research. 1996;16 (1): 5-14.
39. Wagenaar HMeaning in Action: Interpretation and Dialogue in Policy Analysis. New York: ME Sharpe; 2011a:.
40. Wagenaar H."A beckon to the makings, workings and doings of human beings": The critical pragmatism of John Forester.Public Administration Review. 2011b;:293-298.
41. Yankelovich DThe Magic of Dialogue. NY: Touchstone; 2001:.