Data collection methods in speech act performance DCTs, role plays, and verbal reports

Language Learning and Language Teaching

Volumn 26, Issue , 2010, Pages 41-56

  Félix Brasdefer, J César ^a  

^a Indiana University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85127211026     PISSN: 15699471     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (53)

1. Alcón, E. (ed.). 2008. Learning How to Request in an Instructed Language Learning Context. Bern: Peter Lang.
2. Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Hartford, B.S. 1993. Redefining the DCT: Comparing open questionnaires and dialogue completion tasks. In Pragmatics and Language Learning (vol. 4), L.F. Bouton & Y. Kachru (eds.), 143–165. Urbana-Champaign IL: Division of English as an Intenational Language, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
3. Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Hartford, B.S. 2005. Interlanguage Pragmatics. Exploring Institutional Talk. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Barron, A. 2003. Acquisition in Interlanguage Pragmatics: Learning How to Do Things with Words in a Study Abroad Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
5. Beebe, L.M. & Cummings, M.C. 1996. Natural speech act data versus written questionnaire data: How data collection method affects speech act performance. In Speech Acts across Cultures: Challenges to Communication in a Second Language, S.M. Gass & J. Neu (eds.), 65–86. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
6. Billmyer, K. & Varghese, M. 2000. Investigating instrument-based pragmatic variability: Effects of enhancing discourse completion tests. Applied Linguistics 21(4): 517–552.
7. Blum-Kulka, S. 1982. Learning to say what you mean in a second language: A study of the speech act performance of learners of Hebrew as a second language. Applied Linguistics 3(1): 29–59.
8. Blum-Kulka, S., House, J. & Kasper, G. 1989. Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood NJ: Ablex.
9. Brown. J.D. 2001. Pragmatic tests: different purposes, different tests. In Pragmatics in Language Teaching, K. Rose & G. Kasper (eds.), 301–325. Cambridge: CUP.
10. Brown, J.D. 2008. Raters, functions, item types and the dependability of L2 pragmatics tests. In Investigating Pragmatics in Foreign Language Learning, Teaching and Testing, E. Alcón & A. Martínez-Flor (eds.), 224–248. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
11. Cohen, A.D. 2004. Assessing speech acts in a second language. In Studying Speaking to Inform Second Language Learning, D. Boxer & A.D. Cohen (eds.), 302–327. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
12. Cohen, A.D. & Macaro, E. 2010. Research methods in second language acquisition. In Con-tin-uum Companion to Second Language Acquisition, E. Macaro (ed.), 107–133. London: Continuum.
13. Cohen, A.D. & Olshtain, E. 1981. Developing a measure of sociolinguistic competence: The case of apology. Language Learning 31(1): 112–134.
14. Cohen, A.D. & Olshtain, E. 1993. The production of speech acts by EFL learners. TESOL Quarterly 27(1): 33–56.
15. Dörnyei, Z. 2007. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: OUP.
16. Ericsson, K.A. & Simon, H.A. 1993[1984]. Protocol Analysis. Verbal Reports as Data. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
17. Félix-Brasdefer, J.C. 2003a. Validity in data collection methods in pragmatics research. In Theory, Practice, and Acquisition. Papers from the 6th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium and the 5th Conference on the Acquisition of Spanish and Portuguese, P. Kempchinsky & C.E. Piñeros (eds.), 239–257. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
18. Félix-Brasdefer, J.C. 2003b. Declining an invitation: A cross-cultural study of pragmatic strategies in Latin American Spanish and American English. Multilingua 22(3): 225–255.
19. Felix-Brasdefer, J.C. 2007a. Natural speech vs. elicited data: A comparison of natural and role play requests in Mexican Spanish. Spanish in Context 4(2): 159–185.
20. Félix-Brasdefer, J.C. 2007b. Pragmatic development in the Spanish as a FL classroom: A cross-sectional study of learner requests. Intercultural Pragmatics 4(2): 253–286.
21. Félix-Brasdefer, J.C. 2008a. Politeness in Mexico and the United States: A Contrastive Study of the Realization and Perception of Refusals. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
22. Félix-Brasdefer, J.C. 2008b. Perceptions of refusals to invitations: Exploring the minds of foreign language learners. Language Awareness 17(3): 195–211.
23. Félix-Bradefer, J.C. 2008c. Pedagogical intervention and the development of pragmatic competence in learning Spanish as a foreign language. Issues in Applied Linguistics 16(1): 49–84.
24. Félix-Brasdefer, J.C. & Bardovi-Harlig, K. In press. “I’m sorry. Can I think about it?” The negotiation of refusals in academic and non-academic contexts. In Pragmatics from Research to Practice: Teaching Speech Acts, D. Taksuki & N. Houck (eds.). Alexandria VA: TESOL.
25. Flores-Salgado, E. 2009. A Pragmatic Study of Developmental Patterns in Mexican Students Making English Requests and Apologies. Ph.D. dissertation, Macquarie University, Australia.
26. Gay, L.R., Mills, G.E. & Airasian, P. 2009. Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications, 9th edn. Upper saddle River NJ: Pearson Education.
27. Hudson, T. 2001. Indicators for pragmatic instruction: Some quantitative tools. In Pragmatics in Language Teaching, K.R. Rose & G. Kasper (eds.), 283–300. Cambridge: CUP.
28. Jefferson, G. 2004. Glossary of transcript symbols with an introduction. In Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation, G. Lerner (ed.), 13–31. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
29. Kasper, G. 2000. Data collection in pragmatics research. In Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport through Talk across Cultures, H. Spencer-Oatey (ed.), 316–369. London: Continuum.
30. Kasper, G. & Dahl, M. 1991. Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13(2): 215–247.
31. Kasper, G. & Rose, K.R. 2002. Pragmatic Development in a Second Language. Malden MA: Blackwell.
32. Leech, G.N. 1983. Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
33. Levenston, E. & Blum, S. 1978. Discourse – completion as a technique for studying lexical features in interlanguage. Working Papers in Bilingualism 15: 13–21.
34. Mackey, A. & Gass, S. 2005. Second Language Research: Methodology and Design. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Association.
35. Márquez, Reiter, R., Rainey, I. & Fulcher, G. 2005. A comparative study of certainty and conventional indirectness: Evidence from British English and Peninsular Spanish. Applied Linguistics 26: 1–31.
36. Martínez-Flor, A. 2008. The effect of an inductive-deductive teaching approach to develop learners’ use of request modifiers in the EFL classroom. In Learning How to Request in an Instructed Language Learning Context, E. Alcón (ed.), 191–225. Bern: Peter Lang.
37. Pinto, D. 2005. The acquisition of requests by second language learners of Spanish. Spanish in Context 2 (1): 1–27.
38. Robinson, M.A. 1992. Introspective methodology in interlanguage pragmatics research. In Pragmatics of Japanese as a Native and Target Language [Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center Technical Report #3], G. Kasper (ed.), 27–82. Honolulu HI: University of Hawai‘i Press.
39. Roever, C. 2004. Difficulty and practicality in tests of interlanguage pragmatics. In Studying Speaking to Inform Second Language Learning, D. Boxer & A.D. Cohen (eds.), 283–301. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
40. Rose, K.R. 1992. Speech acts and questionnaires: The effect of hearer response. Journal of Pragmatics 17(1): 49–62.
41. Rose, K.R. 2000. An exploratory cross-sectional study of interlanguage pragmatic development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22(1): 27–67.
42. Sasaki, M. 1998. Investigating EFL students’ production of speech acts: A comparison of production questionnaires and role-plays. Journal of Pragmatics 30(4): 457–484.
43. Saville-Troike, M. 1996. The ethnography of communication. In Sociolinguistics and Language Teaching, S. McKay & N. Hornberger (eds.), 351–382. Cambridge: CUP.
44. Schauer, G. 2004. May you speak louder maybe? Interlanguage pragmatic development in requests. EUROSLA Yearbook 4: 253–272.
45. Schegloff, E.A. 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction. Cambridge: CUP.
46. Schneider, K. 2008. Small talk in England, Ireland, and the U.S.A. In Variational Pragmatics: A Focus on Regional Varieties in Pluricentric Languages, K. Schneider & A. Barron (eds.), 97–139. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
47. Spencer-Oatey, H. 2005. (Im)Politeness, face and perceptions of rapport: Unpackaging their bases and interrelationships. Journal of Politeness Research 1(1): 95–119.
48. Thomas, J. 1983. Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics 4(2): 91–112.
49. Wichmann, A. 2004. The intonation of please-requests: A corpus based study. Journal of Pragmatics 36(9): 1521–1549.
50. Widjaja, C. 1997. A study of date refusal: Taiwanese females vs. American females. University of Hawai‘i Working Papers in ESL 15(2): 1–43.
51. Wolfson, N. 1981. Invitations, compliments and the competence of the native speakers. International Journal of Psycholinguistics 24(4): 7–22.
52. Woodfield, H. 2008. Problematising discourse completion task: Voices from verbal report. Evaluation and Research Education 21(1): 43–69.
53. Yuan, Y. 2001. An inquiry into empirical pragmatics data gathering methods: Written DCTs, oral DCTs, field notes, and natural conversations. Journal of Pragmatics 33(2): 271–292.