The financial sustainability of cultural heritage reuse projects: An integrated approach for the historical rural landscape

Sustainability (Switzerland)

Volumn 13, Issue 23, 2021, Pages

  Rossitti, Marco ^a   Oppio, Alessandra ^a   Torrieri, Francesca ^b  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cultural heritage; Financial sustainability; Methodological framework; Reuse; Values

Indexed keywords

CULTURAL HERITAGE; FINANCIAL SYSTEM; INTEGRATED APPROACH; INVESTMENT; LANDSCAPE HISTORY; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; RURAL LANDSCAPE; SUSTAINABILITY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

ITALY; PANTELLERIA; SICILY; TRAPANI;

EID: 85119967107     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20711050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su132313130     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. United Nations General Assembly. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. 2015. Available online: https://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/migration/generalassembly/docs/globalcom-pact/A_RES_70_1_E.pdf (accessed on 1 October 2021).
2. ICOMOS. ICOMOS Action Plan: Cultural Heritage and Localizing the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). 2017. Available online: https://www.icomos.org/images/DOCUMENTS/Secretariat/2017/ICOMOS_Action_Plan_Cult_Heritage_and_Lo-calizing_SDGs_20170721.pdf (accessed on 1 October 2021).
3. Cerreta, M.; Elefante, A.; La Rocca, L. A creative living lab for the adaptive reuse of the Morticelli Church: The SSMOLL project. Sustainability 2020, 12, 10561, doi:10.3390/su122410561.
4. Dell’Ovo, M.; Dell’Anna, F.; Simonelli, R.; Sdino, L. Enhancing the cultural heritage through adaptive reuse. A multicriteria approach to evaluate the Castello Visconteo in Cusago (Italy). Sustainability 2021, 13, 4440, doi:10.3390/su13084440.
5. Sowinska‐Heim, J. Adaptive reuse of architectural heritage and its role in the post‐disaster reconstruction of urban identity: Post‐communist Łódź. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8054, doi:10.3390/su12198054.
6. Oppio, A.; Bottero, M. Conflicting values in designing adaptive reuse for cultural heritage. A case study of social multicriteria evaluation. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2017, 10406, 607–623, doi:10.1007/978‐3‐319‐62398‐6_43.
7. Oppio, A.; Bottero, M.; Ferretti, V. Designing adaptive reuse strategies for cultural heritage with choice experiments. Green Energy Technol. 2017, doi:10.1007/978‐3‐319‐49676‐4_23.
8. Plevoets, B.; Van Cleempoel, K. Adaptive reuse as a strategy towards conservation of cultural heritage: A literature review. WIT Trans. Built Environ. 2011, 118, 155–164, doi:10.2495/STR110131.
9. Mehr, S.H. Analysis of 19th and 20th century conservation key theories in relation to contemporary adaptive reuse of heritage buildings. Heritage 2019, 2, 61, doi:10.3390/heritage2010061.
10. Bottero, M.; D’Alpaos, C.; Oppio, A. Ranking of adaptive reuse strategies for abandoned industrial heritage in vulnerable con-texts: A multiple criteria decision aiding approach. Sustainability 2019, 11, 785, doi:10.3390/su11030785.
11. Latham, D. Creative Re‐Use of Building; Donehead Publishing: Shaftesbury, UK, 2000.
12. D’Auria, A. Il valore dei beni culturali: Paradigmi per un approccio non strumentale ad uno sviluppo heritage‐based. In Il Patrimonio Riscoperto, l’Eredità Culturale da Valorizzare; De Vito, G., Ed.; Enzo Albano: Napoli, Italy, 2017; pp. 102–127.
13. Pearce, D.W.; Turner, R.K. Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment; Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD, USA, 1990.
14. Fusco Girard, L.; Nijkamp, P. (Eds.) Le Valutazioni per lo Sviluppo Sostenibile della Città e del Territorio; Franco Angeli: Milano, Italy, 2003.
15. Fusco Girard, L.; Cerreta, M.; De Toro, P. Towards a local comprehensive productive development strategy: A methodological proposal for the metropolitan city of Naples. QIP 2017, 21, 223–240, doi:10.12776/QIP.V21I1.779.
16. Ribera, F.; Nesticò, A.; Cucco, P.; Maselli, G. A multicriteria approach to identify the highest and best use for historical buildings. J. Cult. Herit. 2019, 41, 166–177, doi:10.1016/j.culher.2019.06.004.
17. ANCSA; CRESME. Centri Storici e Futuro del Paese. Indagine Nazionale sulla Situazione dei Centri Storici. 2017. Available online: http://www.cresme.it/doc/rapporti/Centri‐storici‐e‐futuro‐del‐Paese.pdf (accessed on 7 October 2021).
18. Commissione Franceschini per la Salvezza dei Beni Culturali in Italia. Atti e Documenti della Commissione d’Indagine per la Tutela e la Valorizzazione del Patrimonio Storico, Archeologico, Artistico e del Paesaggio; Casa Editrice Colombo: Rome, Italy, 1967.
19. Greffe, X. Heritage conservation as a driving force for development. In Heritage and Beyond; Council of Europe, Ed.; Council of Europe Publishing: Strasbourg, France, 2009; pp. 101–112.
20. Torrieri, F.; Fumo, M.; Sarnataro, M.; Ausiello, G. An integrated decision support system for the sustainable reuse of the former monastery of “Ritiro del Carmine” in Campania Region. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5244, doi:10.3390/su11195244.
21. Potts, A. European Cultural Heritage Green Paper Executive Summary. 2021. Available online: https://www.europanos-tra.org/our‐work/policy/european‐cultural‐heritage‐green‐paper/(accessed on 7 October 2021).
22. Eppigh, R.; Garcia Grinda, J.L. Sustainable financial management of tangible cultural heritage sites. JCHMSD 2019, 9, 282–299, doi:10.1108/JCHMSD‐11‐2018‐0081.
23. Limonov, L.E.; Nesea, M.V.; Semenov, A.A. Application of cost ‐benefit analysis to evaluate the efficiency of cultural heritage preservation projects in historic towns of Russia. Reg. Res. Russ. 2020, 10, 530–537, doi:10.1134/S2079970520040164.
24. Jelincic, D.A.; Tisma, S. Ensuring the sustainability of cultural heritage through effective public policies. Urbani Izziv 2020, 31, 78–87, doi:10.5379/urbani‐izziv‐en‐2020‐31‐02‐002.
25. Forum per la Finanza Sostenibile. Impact Investing: La Finanza a Supporto dell’Impatto Socio‐Ambientale. 2017. Available online: https://www.etifor.com/it/wp‐content/uploads/sites/2/2017/11/Manuale‐impact‐investing‐WEB‐1.pdf (accessed on 7 October 2021).
26. Sacco, P.L.; Teti, E. Cultura 3.0: Un nuovo paradigma per la creazione di valore. E&M 2017, 1, 79–95.
27. Jelincic, D.A.; Glivetic, D. Cultural Heritage and Sustainability: Practical Guide. 2017. Available online: http://www.inter-regeurope.eu/fileadmin/user_upload/tx_tevprojects/library/file_1586942702.pdf (accessed on 7 October 2021).
28. Rossi, P. Partenariato pubblico‐privato e valorizzazione economica dei beni culturali nella riforma del codice degli appalti. Federilismi 2017, 2, 1–23.
29. Fabbri, R.; Gabrielli, L.; Ruggeri, A.G. Interaction between restoration and financial analysis: The case of Cuneo War Wounded House. JCHMSD 2018, 8, 145–161, doi:10.1108/JCHMSD‐05‐2017‐0026.
30. Tisma, S.; Skrtic, M.M.; Malekovic, S.; Jelincic, D.A. Cost‐benefit analysis in the evaluation of cultural heritage project funding. J. Risk Financ. Manag. 2021, 14, 466, doi:10.3390/jrfm14100466.
31. Nijkamp, P. Economic evaluation of cultural heritage. In The Economic of Uniqueness: Investing in Historic City Cores and Cultural Heritage Assets for Sustainable Development; Licciardi, G., Amirtahmasebi, R., Eds.; The World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2012; pp. 75–106.
32. Fusco Girard, L.; Nijkamp, P. Energia, Bellezza, Partecipazione, La Sfida della Sostenibilità. Valutazioni Integrate Tra Conservazione e Sviluppo; Franco Angeli: Milano, Italy, 2005.
33. European Commission. Guida all’Analisi Costi‐Benefici dei Progetti d’Investimento; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2014, 372–413.
34. Checkland, P.B.; Poulter, J. Learning from Action; John Wiley and Sons: Chichester, UK, 2006.
35. Hosseini, S.M.; Rezaei, A. Developing an information system for sustainable natural resource management in Alborz Water-shed, Northern Iran. SPAR 2013, 26, 131–152, doi:10.1007/s11213‐012‐9240‐1.
36. Sisaye, S.; Stommes, E. Green revolution as a planned intervention for agricultural development: A systems perspective. Public Adm. Dev. 1985, 5, 39–55, doi:10.1002/pad.4230050105.
37. De Marchi, B.; Funtowicz, S.O.; Lo Cascio, S.; Munda, G. Combining participative and institutional approaches with multicrite-ria evaluation. An empirical study for water issues in Troina, Sicily. Ecol. Econom. 2000, 34, 267–282, doi:10.1016/S0921‐ 8009(00)00162‐2.
38. Oppio, A.; Bottero, M.; Ferretti, V.; Fratesi, U.; Ponzini, D.; Pracchi, V. Giving space to multicriteria analysis for complex cultural heritage systems: The case of the castles in Valle D’Aosta Region, Italy. J. Cult. Herit. 2015, 16, 779–789, doi:10.1016/j.culher.2015.03.003.
39. Girard, L.F.; Vecco, M. The “intrinsic value” of cultural heritage as driver for circular human‐centered adaptive reuse. Sustain-ability 2021, 13, 3231, doi:10.3390/su13063231.
40. Lo Faro, A.; Miceli, A. New life for disused religious heritage: A sustainable approach. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8187, doi:10.3390/su13158187.
41. Liritzis, I.; Korka, E. Archaeometry’s role in cultural heritage sustainability and development. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1972, doi:10.3390/su11071972.
42. Haddad, N.A.; Fakhoury, L.A.; Sakr, Y.M. A critical anthology of international charters, conventions & principles on documen-tation of cultural heritage for conservation, monitoring & management. Mediterr. Archaeol. Archaeom. 2021, 21, 291–310, doi:10.5281/zenodo.4575718.
43. Provo, J.; Ruona, W.E.A.; Lynham, S.A.; Miller, R.F. Scenario building: An integral methodology for learning, decision‐making, and human resource development. Hum. Resour. Dev. Int. 1998, 1, 327–340, doi:10.1080/13678869800000041.
44. Stanganelli, M.; Torrieri, F.; Gerundo, C.; Rossitti, M. A strategic performance‐based planning methodology to promote the regeneration of fragile territories. In Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, Proceedings of the 11th INPUT Conference, Catania, Italy, 8– 10 September 2021; La Rosa, D., Privitera, R., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 149–157.
45. Capolongo, S.; Sdino, L.; Dell’Ovo, M.; Moioli, R.; Della Torre, S. How to assess urban regeneration proposals by considering conflicting values. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3877, doi:10.3390/su11143877.
46. Bottero, M.; Datola, G. Addressing social sustainability in urban regeneration processes. An application of the social multicrite-ria evaluation. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7579, doi:10.3390/su12187579.
47. Del Giudice, V. Estimo e Valutazione Economica dei Progetti. Profili Metodologici e Applicazioni al Settore Immobiliare; Loffredo Editore University Press: Napoli, Italy, 2010; pp. 221–230.
48. Manganelli, B. Real Estate Investing. Market Analysis, Valuation Techniques and Risk Management; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015.
49. Borgonovo, E.; Peccati, L. Sensitivity analysis in investment project evaluation. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2004, 90, 17–25, doi:10.1016/S0925‐5273(03)00213‐5.
50. UNESCO. Traditional Agricultural Practice of Cultivating the ‘Vite ad Alberello’ (Head‐Trained Bush Vines) of the Community of Pantelleria. 2014. Available online: https://ich.unesco.org/en/RL/traditional‐agricultural‐practice‐of‐cultivating‐the‐vite‐ad-alberello‐head‐trained‐bush‐vines‐of‐the‐community‐of‐pantelleria‐00720 (accessed on 30 September 2021).
51. Rete Rurale Nazionale. Elenco dei Siti Iscritti al Registro. Available online: https://www.reterurale.it/flex/cm/pages/ServeB‐ LOB.php/L/IT/IDPagina/17423 (accessed on 30 September 2021).
52. Stanganelli, M.; Torrieri, F.; Gerundo, C.; Rossitti, M. An integrated strategic‐performative planning methodology towards enhancing the sustainable decisional regeneration of fragile territories. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 53, 101920, doi:10.1016/j.scs.2019.101920.
53. Matvejevich, P. Breviario Mediterraneo; Garzanti: Milano, Italy, 2014.
54. UNESCO. Art of Dry‐Stone Walling, Knowledge and Techniques. 2018. Available online: https://ich.unesco.org/en/RL/art‐of-dry‐stone‐walling‐knowledge‐and‐techniques‐01393 (accessed on 30 September 2021).
55. Orsi, P. Pantelleria: Risultati di una Missione Archeologica; Tipografia della R. Accademia dei Lincei: Rome, Italy, 1989.
56. D’Aietti, A. Il Libro dell’Isola di Pantelleria; Trevi Editore: Milano, Italy, 1978.
57. Brignone, F. I Giardini dell’Isola di Pantelleria, 2nd ed.; Trapani, Italy, 2012.
58. Giuntoli, G. Evoluzione del dammuso nel paesaggio antropizzato. In Relazione allegata al Piano Territoriale Paesistico; Pantelleria, Italy, 1997.
59. Comune di Pantelleria. Dossier di Candidatura del Paesaggio della Pietra a Secco dell’Isola di Pantelleria al Registro Nazionale dei Paesaggi Rurali Storici. 2017. Available online: https://www.reterurale.it/flex/cm/pages/ServeBLOB.php/L/IT/ID‐ Pagina/17752 (accessed on 1 October 2021).
60. Thomas, B.; Thomas, S.; Powell, L. The development of key characteristics of Welsh Island Cultural Identity and Sustainable Tourism in Wales. Sci. Cult. 2017, 3, 23–39, doi:10.5281/zenodo.192842.
61. Unal, S. Ceramic production from Neolithic Doganhisar Pottery Culture: Intangible heritage of technology transfer from past to present. Sci. Cult. 2021, 7, 77–91, doi:10.5281/zenodo.5062884.
62. Vodopivec, B.; Zarnic, R.; Tamosaitiene, J.; Lazauskas, M.; Selih, J. Renovation priority ranking by multicriteria assessment of architectural heritage: The case of castles. Int. J. Strateg. Prop. Manag. 2014, 18, 88–100, doi:10.3846/1648715X.2014.88977.
63. Figueira, J.R.; Greco, S.; Roy, B.; Slowinski, R. An overview of ELECTRE methods and their recent extensions. J. Multi‐Criteria Decis. Anal. 2013, 20, 61–85, doi:10.1002/mcda.1482.
64. Choo, E.U.; Wedley; W.C. A common framework for deriving preference values from pairwise comparison matrices. Comput. Oper. Res. 2004, 31, 893–908, doi:10.1016/S0305‐0548(03)00042‐X.
65. Christensen, K.S. Coping with uncertainty in planning. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 1985, 51, 63–73, doi:10.1080/01944368508976801.
66. Janssen, R. Multiobjective Decision Support for Environmental Problems. Ph.D. Thesis, Free University, Amsterdam, The Neth-erlands, 1991.
67. Butler, J.; Jia, J.; Dyer, J. Simulation techniques for the sensitivity analysis of multicriteria decision models. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1997, 103, 531–446, doi:10.1016/S0377‐2217(96)00307‐4.
68. Roszczynska‐Kurasinska, M.; Domaradzka, A.; Wnuk, A.; Oleksy, T. Intrinsic value and perceived essentialism of culture heritage sites as tools for planning interventions. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5078, doi:10.3390/su13095078.
69. Joint Research Center. NAIADE, Manual and Tutorial—Version 1.0.ENG; Joint Research Centre: Ispra, Italy, 1996.
70. Lichfield, N. Economics in Urban Conservation; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1989.
71. Collegio degli Ingegneri e Architetti di Milano. DEI—Prezzi Tipologie Edilizie; Quine SRL: Milano, Italy, 2019.
72. European Commission. Annex I to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 480/2014. 2014. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal‐content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32014R0480 (accessed on 11 October 2021).
73. Manganelli, B. Il Deprezzamento Degli Immobili Urbani. Franco Angeli: Milano, Italy, 2011.
74. Ortiz, P.; Antunez, V.; Martin, J.M.; Ortiz, R.; Vazquez, M.A.; Galan, E. Approach to environmental risk analysis for the main monuments in a historical city. J. Cult. Herit. 2014, 15, 432–440, doi:10.1016/j.culher.2013.07.009.
75. Lazzeroni, M.; Bellini, N.; Cortesi, G.; Loffredo, A. The territorial approach to cultural economy: New opportunities for the development of small towns. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2013, 21, 452–472, doi:10.1080/09654313.2012.722920.
76. Jelincic, D.A.; Sveb, M. Financial sustainability of cultural heritage: A review of crowdfunding in Europe. JRFM 2021, 14, 101, doi:10.3390/jrfm14030101.
77. European Commission. Culture and Cultural Heritage Orientation Paper. 2019. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/fu-turium/en/culturecultural‐heritage/culture‐and‐cultural‐heritage‐orientation‐paper.html (accessed on 12 October 2021).
78. Forbes. Understanding Return on Investment (ROI). 2021. Available online: https://www.forbes.com/advisor/investing/roi‐re-turn‐on‐investment/(accessed on 20 October 2021).
79. Jelincic, D.A.; Tisma, S.; Senkic, M.; Dodig, D. Public‐private partnership in cultural heritage sector. Transylv. Rev. Adm. Sci. 2017, doi:10.24193/tras.SI2017.5.
80. European Commission. Mapping of Cultural Heritage Actions in European Union Policies, Programmes and Activities. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/assets/eac/culture/library/reports/2014‐heritage‐mapping_en.pdf (accessed on 13 October 2021).
81. Calderini, M.; Chiodo, V.; Michelucci, F.V. The social impact investment race: Toward an interpretative framework. Eur. Bus. Rev. 2018, 30, 66–81, doi:10.1108/EBR‐10‐2016‐0134.
82. Gallou, E.; Fouseki, K. Applying social impact assessment (SIA) principles in assessing contribution of cultural heritage to social sustainability in rural landscapes. J. Cult. Herit. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 2019, 9, 352–375, doi:10.1108/JCHMSD‐05‐2018‐0037.
83. Tiresia International Research Center. Tiresia Impact Outlook. 2019. Available online: http://www.tiresia.polimi.it/wp‐con-tent/uploads/2019/11/Tiresia_Impact_Outlook_2019.polimi‐4.pdf (accessed on 1 October 2021).
84. Bottero, M.; Bragaglia, F.; Caruso, N.; Datola, G.; Dell’Anna, F. Experimenting community impact evaluation (CIE) for assessing urban regeneration programmes: The case study of the area 22@ Barcelona. Cities 2020, 99, 102464, doi:10.1016/j.cit-ies.2019.102464.
85. Corvo, L.; Pastore, L.; Manti, A.; Iannaci, D. Mapping social impact assessment models: A literature overview for a future research Agenda. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4750, doi:10.3390/su13094750.