Public-private partnership in cultural heritage sector

Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences

Volumn 2017, Issue , 2017, Pages 74-89

  Jelinčić, Daniela Angelina ^a   Tišma, Sanja ^a   Senkić, Matea ^a   Dodig, Domagoj ^b  

^a Institute of International Relations   (Croatia)

^b Agency for Investments and Competitiveness   (Croatia)

Author keywords

Croatia; Cultural heritage; Poland; Public private partnership; Slovakia; Slovenia

Indexed keywords

EID: 85064920669     PISSN: 18422845     EISSN: 22478310     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.24193/TRAS.SI2017.5     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bašić, T., ‘Kako se uključiti u novi val JPP-a’, 27 January 2017, Lider, pp. 26-30.
2. Coulson, A. ‘Value for Money in PFI Proposals: A Commentary on the UK Treasury Guidelines for Public Sector Comparators’, 2008, Public Administration, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 483-498.
3. Digital Meets Culture, ‘Public-Private Partnerships for Cultural Heritage: Opportunities, Challenges, Future Steps’, Think Papers Collection/07, Riches Resources, 2016, [Online] available at available www.digitalmeetsculture.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/ 04/rch_thinkpapers_07.pdf, accessed on June 9, 2017.
4. European Commission, Directorate-General for Education, Youth, Sport and Culture, ‘Towards More Efficient Financial Ecosystems. Innovative Instruments to Facilitate Access to Finance for the Cultural and Creative Sectors (CCS): Good Practice Report’, Luxembourg, 2016, [Online] available at https://publications.europa.eu/en/publica-tion-detail/-/publication/f433d9df-deaf-11e5-8fea-01aa75ed71a1/language-en, accessed on March 5, 2017.
5. European Expertise Centre, ‘Market Update Review of the European PPP Market in 2016’, [Online] available at www.eib.org/epec/resources/publications/epec_market_ update_2016_en, accessed on June 8, 2017.
6. European Parliament, Directorate General for Internal Policies, Policy Department B, ‘Structural and Cohesion Policies, Encouraging Private Investment in the Cultural Sector. Study’, Brussels, 2011, [Online] available at www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/ etudes/etudes/join/2011/460057/IPOL-CULT_ET%282011%29460057_EN.pdf, accessed on March 4, 2017.
7. Interreg: Central Europe, ‘RESTAURA: Revitalizing Historic Buildings through Public-Private Partnership Schemes (CE339), Country Report on the Legal Framework on Public-Private Partnership (PPP): CROATIA’, Version 1, November 2016, [Online] available at www.interreg-central.eu/Content.Node/RESTAURA/D.T1.2.1-Country-report-Croatia-V1.pdf, accessed on March 3, 2017.
8. Interreg: Central Europe, ‘RESTAURA: Revitalizing Historic Buildings through Public-Private Partnership Schemes (CE339), Country Report on the Legal Framework on Public-Private Partnership (PPP): POLAND’, Version 1, November 2016, [Online] available at www.interreg-central.eu/Content.Node/RESTAURA/D.T1.2.1-Country-report-Poland-V1.pdf, accessed on March 3, 2017.
9. Interreg: Central Europe, ‘RESTAURA: Revitalizing Historic Buildings through Public-Private Partnership Schemes (CE339), Country Report on the Legal Framework on Public-Private Partnership (PPP): SLOVENIA’, Version 1, November 2016, [Online] available at www.interreg-central.eu/Content.Node/RESTAURA/D.T1.2.1-Country-report-Slovenia-V1.pdf, accessed on March 3, 2017.
10. Interreg: Central Europe, ‘RESTAURA: Revitalizing Historic Buildings through Public-Private Partnership Schemes (CE339), Country Report on the Legal Framework on Public-Private Partnership (PPP): SLOVAKIA, Version 1, November 2016, [Online] available at www.interreg-central.eu/Content.Node/RESTAURA/RESTAURA-Country-rep orts.html, accessed on March 3, 2017.
11. Interreg: Central Europe, ‘RESTAURA: Revitalizing Historic Buildings through Public-Private Partnership Schemes (CE339), Outcome from Questionnaire on the Public-Private Partnership: Summary Report’, FOK, Version 1, 2017.
12. th General Assembly, Paris, France, 2011, [Online] available at http://openarchive.icomos.org/1303/1/IV-3-Article2_Macdonald.pdf, accessed on June 4, 2017.
13. Macdonald, S. and Cheong, C., ‘The Role of Public-Private Partnerships and the Third Sector in Conserving Heritage Buildings, Sites, and Historic Urban Areas’, Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute, 2014, [Online] available at www.getty.edu/con servation/publications_resources/pdf_publications/pdf/public_private.pdf, accessed on February 5, 2017.
14. Ministry of Finance of the Slovak Republic, 2017, [Online] available at www.finance. gov.sk/en/Default.aspx?CatID=418, accessed on March 3, 2017.
15. Nováćková, D. and Saxunová, D., ‘The Public-Private Partnership Projects Legislation and PPP Project Experience in Slovakia’, Management International Conference, Portorož, Slovenia, May 28-30, 2015, [Online] available at www.fm-kp.si/zalozba/ ISBN/978-961-266-181-6/155.pdf, accessed on February 9, 2017.
16. Oppio, A. and Torrieri, F., ‘Supporting Public-Private Partnership for Economic and Financial Feasibility of Urban Development’, 2016, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 223, pp. 62-68.
17. Politika, ‘Javno-privatna prijevara’, 2008, [Online] available at http://pollitika.com/jav-no-privatna-prijevara, accessed on February 9, 2017.
18. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), ‘OECD Principles for Public Governance of Public-Private Partnerships’, 2016, www.oecd.org/gov/budgeting/oecd-principles-for-public-governance-of-public-pri vate-partnerships.htm, accessed on February 9, 2017.
19. PPP Knowledge Lab, ‘What is the PPP Reference Guide?’, 2015, [Online] available at https://pppknowledgelab.org/ppp-cycle/what-ppp, accessed on February 9, 2017.
20. Ventura, C., Cassalia, G. and Della Spina, L., ‘New Models of Public-Private Partnership in Cultural Heritage Sector: Sponsorships between Models and Traps’, 2016, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 223, pp. 257-264.