Enhancing the cultural heritage through adaptive reuse. A multicriteria approach to evaluate the Castello Visconteo in Cusago (Italy)

Sustainability (Switzerland)

Volumn 13, Issue 8, 2021, Pages

  Dell’ovo, Marta ^a   Dell’anna, Federico ^b   Simonelli, Raffaella ^a   Sdino, Leopoldo ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

^b POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Adaptive reuse; COVID 19; Cultural heritage; Intangible values; Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA); Novel Approach to Imprecise Assessment and Decision Environments (NAIADE); Simple Multi Attribute Rating Technique Extended (SMARTER); Stakeholder interaction; Sustainable development

Indexed keywords

CULTURAL HERITAGE; ECONOMIC CONDITIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; MULTICULTURALISM; NATURAL RESOURCE; STAKEHOLDER; STRATEGIC APPROACH; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

ITALY;

EID: 85104696848     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20711050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su13084440     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Cerreta, M.; Elefante, A.; La Rocca, L. A creative living lab for the adaptive reuse of the morticelli church: The ssmoll project. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1–20.
2. Bottero, M.C.; Dell’Anna, F.; Gobbo, G.L. A PROMETHEE‐Based Approach for Designing the Reuse of an Abandoned Railway in the Monferrato Region, Italy. Int. J. Multicriteria Decis. Mak. 2019, 8, 60–83.
3. Cerreta, M.; Daldanise, G. Community branding (Co‐bra): A collaborative decision making process for urban regeneration. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications, Trieste, Italy, 3–6 July 2017; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 730–746, doi:10.1007/978‐3‐319‐62398‐6_52.
4. Bottero, M.; Caprioli, C.; Berta, M. Urban Problems and Patterns of Change: The Analysis of a Downgraded Industrial Area in Turin. In Values and Functions for Future Cities; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 385–401.
5. Yoon, J.; Lee, J. Adaptive reuse of apartments as heritage assets in the Seoul station urban regeneration area. Sustainability 2019, 11, doi:10.3390/su11113124.
6. Torrieri, F.; Fumo, M.; Sarnataro, M.; Ausiello, G. An integrated decision support system for the sustainable reuse of the former monastery of “ritiro del carmine” in campania region. Sustainability 2019, 11, doi:10.3390/su11195244.
7. Bottero, M.; D’Alpaos, C.; Oppio, A. Ranking of adaptive reuse strategies for abandoned industrial heritage in vulnerable contexts: A multiple criteria decision aiding approach. Sustainability 2019, 11, doi:10.3390/su11030785.
8. De Medici, S.; De Toro, P.; Nocca, F. Cultural heritage and sustainable development: Impact assessment of two adaptive reuse projects in Siracusa, Sicily. Sustainability 2020, 12, doi:10.3390/su12010311.
9. Della Spina, L. Adaptive sustainable reuse for cultural heritage: A multiple criteria decision aiding approach supporting urban development processes. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1–20, doi:10.3390/su12041363.
10. Stival, C.A.; Berto, R.; Morano, P.; Rosato, P. Reuse of Vernacular Architecture in Minor Alpine Settlements: A Multi‐Attribute Model for Sustainability Appraisal. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6562, doi:10.3390/su12166562.
11. Oppio, A.; Bottero, M.; Ferretti, V. Designing Adaptive Reuse Strategies for Cultural Heritage with Choice Experiments. In Appraisal: From Theory to Practice; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 303–315.
12. Department of the Environment and Heritage. Adaptive Reuse: Preserving our Past, Building our Future; Department of the Environment and Heritage: Camberra, Australia, 2004.
13. Salerno, E. Identifying value‐increasing actions for cultural heritage assets through sensitivity analysis of multicriteria evaluation results. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1–13, doi:10.3390/su12219238.
14. Vehbi, B.O.; Günçe, K.; Iranmanesh, A. Multi‐Criteria Assessment for Defining Compatible New Use: Old Administrative Hospital, Kyrenia, Cyprus. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1922.
15. Tu, H.‐M. Sustainable Heritage Management: Exploring Dimensions of Pull and Push Factors. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8219.
16. Aigwi, I.E.; Egbelakin, T.; Ingham, J.; Phipps, R.; Rotimi, J.; Filippova, O. A performance‐based framework to prioritise underutilised historical buildings for adaptive reuse interventions in New Zealand. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2019, 48, doi:10.1016/j.scs.2019.101547.
17. Ribera, F.; Nesticò, A.; Cucco, P.; Maselli, G. A multicriteria approach to identify the Highest and Best Use for historical buildings. J. Cult. Herit. 2020, 41, 166–177.
18. Daldanise, G. From place‐branding to community‐branding: A collaborative decision‐making process for cultural heritage enhancement. Sustainability 2020, doi:10.3390/su122410399.
19. United Nations. The Millennium Development Goals Report 2015; Millennium Development Goals Report; UN: New York, NY, USA, 2016; ISBN 9789210574662.
20. De Gregorio, S.; De Vita, M.; De Berardinis, P.; Palmero, L.; Risdonne, A. Designing the sustainable adaptive reuse of industrial heritage to enhance the local context. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1–20.
21. Foster, G.; Kreinin, H.; Stagl, S. The future of circular environmental impact indicators for cultural heritage buildings in Europe. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2020, 32, doi:10.1186/s12302‐020‐00411‐9.
22. Dell’Ovo, M.; Bassani, S.; Stefanina, G.; Oppio, A. Memories at risk. How to support decisions about abandoned industrial heritage regeneration. Valori e Valutazioni 2020, 2020, 107–115.
23. Assumma, V.; Bottero, M; Monaco, R. Landscape Economic Attractiveness: An Integrated Methodology for Exploring the Rural Landscapes in Piedmont (Italy). Land 2019, 8, 105.
24. Mangialardo, A.; Micelli, E. Reconstruction or Reuse? How Real Estate Values and Planning Choices Impact Urban Redevelopment. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4060.
25. Fabbri, R.; Gabrielli, L.; Ruggeri, A.G. Interactions between restoration and financial analysis: The case of Cuneo War Wounded House. J. Cult. Herit. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 2018, 8, 145–161.
26. Bottero, M.; Dell’Anna, F.; Nappo, M. Evaluating Tangible and Intangible Aspects of Cultural Heritage: An Application of the PROMETHEE Method for the Reuse Project of the Ceva–Ormea Railway. In Integrated Evaluation for the Management of Contemporary Cities; Mondini, G., Fattinnanzi, E., Oppio, A., Bottero, M., Stanghellini, S., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 285–295.
27. Abastante, F.; Lami, I.M.; Mecca, B. How to revitalise a historic district: A stakeholders‐oriented assessment framework of adaptive reuse. Green Energy Technol. 2020, 3–20, doi:10.1007/978‐3‐030‐23786‐8_1.
28. Bottero, M.; Datola, G. Addressing social sustainability in urban regeneration processes. An application of the social multi-criteria evaluation. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7579.
29. Napoli, G.; Leone, M. The urban park as a “social island”. the ANP in the participatory project of Parco Uditore in Palermo. In Green Energy and Technology; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2020; pp. 229–248.
30. Giuliani, F.; De Falco, A.; Santini, L. A Stakeholder Analysis for the Adaptive Reuse Assessment of Architectural Heritage: Towards an Integrated Approach; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 311–333.
31. Munda, G. Multicriteria Evaluation in a Fuzzy Environment: The Naiade Method. In Multicriteria Evaluation in a Fuzzy Environment. Contributions to Economics; Physica‐Verlag HD: Berlin, Germany, 1995; pp. 131–148.
32. Munda, G. A NAIADE based approach for sustainability benchmarking. Int. J. Environ. Technol. Manag. 2006, 6, 65.
33. Oppio, A.; Bottero, M. Conflicting values in designing adaptive reuse for cultural heritage. A case study of social multicriteria evaluation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications, Trieste, Italy, 3–6 July 2017; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 607–623.
34. Nadkarni, R.R.; Puthuvayi, B. A comprehensive literature review of Multi‐Criteria Decision Making methods in heritage buildings. J. Build. Eng. 2020, 32, 101814.
35. Bottero, M.; Bragaglia, F.; Caruso, N.; Datola, G.; Dell’Anna, F. Experimenting community impact evaluation (CIE) for assessing urban regeneration programmes: The case study of the area 22@ Barcelona. Cities 2020, 99, 102464.
36. Capolongo, S.; Sdino, L.; Dell’Ovo, M.; Moioli, R.; Della Torre, S. How to assess urban regeneration proposals by considering conflicting values. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3877.
37. Yau, Y. Multi‐criteria decision making for urban built heritage conservation: Application of the analytic hierarchy process. J. Build. Apprais. 2009, 4, 191–205.
38. Haroun, H.A.A.F.; Bakr, A.F.; Hasan, A.E.S. Multi‐criteria decision making for adaptive reuse of heritage buildings: Aziza Fahmy Palace, Alexandria, Egypt. Alex. Eng. J. 2019, 58, 467–478.
39. Nesticò, A.; Somma, P. Comparative analysis of multi‐criteria methods for the enhancement of historical buildings. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4526.
40. Pavlovskis, M.; Migilinskas, D.; Antucheviciene, J.; Kutut, V. Ranking of heritage building conversion alternatives by applying BIM and MCDM: A case of Sapieha Palace in Vilnius. Symmetry 2019, 11, 973.
41. Stević, I.; Stević, S.R.; de Jesus Breda, Z.M. Application of MCDM methods to tourism evaluation of cultural sites. In Cultural Urban Heritage; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 357–381, doi:10.1007/978‐3‐030‐10612‐6_24.
42. Della Spina, L. Strategic planning and decision making: A case study for the integrated management of cultural heritage assets in southern italy. Smart Innov. Syst. Technol. 2021, 178 SIST, 1116–1130, doi:10.1007/978‐3‐030‐48279‐4_104.
43. Turskis, Z.; Zavadskas, E.K.; Kutut, V. A model based on ARAS‐G and AHP methods for multiple criteria prioritizing of heritage value. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak. 2013, 12, 45–73, doi:10.1142/S021962201350003X.
44. Della Spina, L. Multidimensional assessment for “culture‐led” and “community‐driven” urban regeneration as driver for trigger economic vitality in urban historic centers. Sustainability 2019, 11, 1–20.
45. Ferretti, V.; Bottero, M.; Mondini, G. Decision making and cultural heritage: An application of the Multi‐Attribute Value Theory for the reuse of historical buildings. J. Cult. Herit. 2014, 15, 644–655.
46. Simon, H.A. Information Processing Models of Cognition. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 1979, 30, 363–396.
47. Korhonen, J.; Honkasalo, A.; Seppälä, J. Circular Economy: The Concept and its Limitations. Ecol. Econ. 2018, 143, 37–46.
48. Cadrien; Messaadia, M.; Majumdar, A.; Eynard, B. STEEP analysis as a tool for building technology roadmaps. In Proceedings of the Internationale Challenges e‐2011 Conference, Florence, Italy, 26–28 October 2011; pp. 26–28.
49. Teo, E.A.L.; Lin, G. Determination of strategic adaptation actions for public housing in Singapore. Build. Environ. 2011, 46, 1480– 1488, doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.01.021.
50. Dell’Anna, F. Green jobs and energy efficiency as strategies for economic growth and the reduction of environmental impacts. Energy Policy 2020, 112031, doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112031.
51. Roy, B. Decision‐aid and decision‐making. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1990, 45, 324–331.
52. Roy, B. Paradigms and challenges. In International Series in Operations Research and Management Science; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2005; Volume 78, pp. 3–24.
53. Fishburn, P.C. Additive utilities with finite sets: Applications in the management sciences. Nav. Res. Logist. Q. 1967, 14, 1–13.
54. Polatidis, H.; Haralambopoulos, D.A.; Munda, G.; Vreeker, R. Selecting an Appropriate Multi‐Criteria Decision Analysis Technique for Renewable Energy Planning. Energy Sources Part B Econ. Plan. Policy 2006, 1, 181–193.
55. Van de Geer, J.P. Some Aspects of Minkowski Distance; Leiden University: Leiden, The Neitherlands, 1995.
56. Roberts, R.; Goodwin, P. Weight approximations in multi‐attribute decision models. J. Multi‐Criteria Decis. Anal. 2002, 11, 291– 303.
57. Edwards, W. How to Use Multiattribute Utility Measurement for Social Decisionmaking. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 1977, 7, 326–340.
58. Stella, G.A. Il castello in rovina dimenticato da Milano. Corr. Della Sera 2011. Available online: https://milano.corriere.it/milano/notizie/cronaca/11_ottobre_17/stella‐castello‐1901843477011.shtml (accessed on 18 March 2021)
59. Bellini, A. Conservazione e fruizione del patrimonio architettonico: Un problema etico. Territorio 2013, 64, 9–17.
60. Fiorani, D.; Kealy, L.; Musso, S.F. Conservation/Adaptation. Keeping Alive the Spirit of the place. Adaptive reuse of Heritage with Symbolic Value; Fiorani, Donatella, K., Loughlin, M., Stefano, P., Bie, H., Claudine Van Cleempoel, K., Eds.; EAAE: Hasselt, Belgium, 2017; ISBN 9782930301655.
61. Torsello, B.P. Che cos’ è il restauro? In Che cos’ è il Restauro? Nove Studiosi a Confronto; Marsilio, Ed.; Marsilio: Venezia, Italy, 2005; pp. 9–17; 53–56 ISBN 978‐88‐317‐8645‐4.
62. Borgatti, S. Castelli Fratelli. Un Curioso Tentativo di Salvataggio; La Memoria del Mondo: Milan, Italy, 2011; ISBN 8895898575.
63. Del Tredici, F.; Rossetti, E. Percorsi Castellani: Da Milano a Bellinzona: Guida ai Castelli del Ducato; Edizioni, N., Ed.; Castelli del ducato: Parma, Italy, 2012; ISBN 8896451027, 9788896451021.
64. Della Torre, S. A coevolutionary approach to the reuse of built cultural heritage. In Proceedings of the in Atti del XXXV Convegno internazionale “Il Patrimonio Culturale in mutamento. Le sfide dell’uso”; Bressanone, Italy, 7–9 July 2019; pp. 25– 34.
65. Musso, S. Recupero e Restauro Degli Edifici Storici. Guida Pratica al Rilievo e alla Diagnostica; EPC Libri: Rome, Italy, 2004; ISBN 8881843285.
66. Sulfaro, N. L’Architettura Come Opera Aperta. Il tema dell’uso nel Progetto di Conservazione; ArcHistoR extra 2: Reggio Calabria, Italy, 2018; ISBN 978‐88‐85479‐02‐9.
67. Istituto Superiore di Sanità Conclusa L’indagine Sulle Rsa—ISS. Available online: https://www.iss.it/covid‐19‐primo‐piano/‐/asset_publisher/yX1afjCDBkWH/content/conclusa‐l‐indagine‐sulle‐rsa (accessed on 18 March 2021).
68. Rollino, L. Progettare e Adeguare le RSA in Epoca Post Covid: Aspetti Architettonici e Impiantistici per Assicurare Salubrità. Available online: https://www.ingenio‐web.it/27184‐progettare‐e‐adeguare‐le‐rsa‐in‐epoca‐post‐covid‐19 (accessed on 18 March 2021).
69. Anderson, D.C.; Grey, T.; Kennelly, S.; O’Neill, D. Nursing Home Design and COVID‐19: Balancing Infection Control, Quality of Life, and Resilience. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 2020, 21, 1519–1524.
70. Ministero Dell’istruzione Didattica a Distanza. Available online: https://www.istruzione.it/coronavirus/didattica‐a-distanza_rai.html (accessed on 19 March 2021).
71. Università dEgli Studi di Milano Facoltà di Scienze Agrarie e Alimentari. Available online: https://www.unimi.it/it/corsi/facolta‐e‐scuole/scienze‐agrarie‐e‐alimentari (accessed on 19 March 2021).
72. Federazione Italiana dei Pubblici Esercizi Crolla L’occupazione nei Pubblici Esercizi, Persi 243mila Posti di Lavoro. Fipe‐ Confcommercio: “Colpiti Soprattutto i Giovani”. Available online: https://www.fipe.it/comunicazione/note‐per‐la-stampa/item/7685‐crolla‐l‐occupazione‐nei‐pubblici‐esercizi‐persi‐243mila‐posti‐di‐lavoro‐fipe‐confcommercio‐colpiti-soprattutto‐i‐giovani.html (accessed on 19 March 2021).
73. il Sole 24 Focus di Settore per far Ripartire L’italia PMI, la Ripresa Post Covid. Available online: https://minisiti.ilsole24ore.com/focuspmi/wp‐content/uploads/pdf/Focus PMI‐Report complessivo.pdf (accessed on 19 March 2021).
74. Dell’Anna, F.; Vergerio, G.; Corgnati, S.P.; Mondini, G. A new price list for retrofit intervention evaluation on some archetypical buildings. Valori e Valutazioni 2019, 22, 3–17.
75. Genio Civile Prezziari Tipologici; DEI: Rome, Italy, 2019; ISBN 9788831284035.
76. Riabacke, M.; Danielson, M.; Ekenberg, L. State‐of‐the‐Art Prescriptive Criteria Weight Elicitation. Adv. Decis. Sci. 2012, 2012, 1– 24.
77. Gamboa, G.; Munda, G. The problem of windfarm location: A social multi‐criteria evaluation framework. Energy Policy 2007, 35, 1564–1583.
78. Barron, F.H.; Barrett, B.E. The efficacy of SMARTER—Simple Multi‐Attribute Rating Technique Extended to Ranking. Acta Psychol. (Amst). 1996, 93, 23–36.
79. Roy, B. Multicriteria Methodology for Decision Aiding. In Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications; Springer US: Boston, MA, USA, 1996; Volume 12; ISBN 978‐1‐4419‐4761‐1.