How to assess urban regeneration proposals by considering conflicting values

Sustainability (Switzerland)

Volumn 11, Issue 14, 2019, Pages

  Capolongo, Stefano ^a   Sdino, Leopoldo ^a   Dell'Ovo, Marta ^a   Moioli, Rossella ^a   Della Torre, Stefano ^a  

^a POLITECNICO DI MILANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Built cultural heritage; Multi Criteria Analysis; Territorial health center; Urban regeneration; Values

Indexed keywords

CONFLICT MANAGEMENT; CULTURAL HERITAGE; DECISION MAKING; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; HEALTH CARE; METHODOLOGY; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; REGENERATION; STAKEHOLDER; SUSTAINABILITY; URBAN AREA; URBAN POLICY;

EID: 85072056835     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20711050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su11143877     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Franco, L.A. Problem structuring methods as intervention tools: Reflections from their use with multi-organisational teams. Omega 2009, 37, 193-203
2. Lami, I.M.; Tavella, E. On the usefulness of soft OR models in decision making: A comparison of Problem Structuring Methods supported and self-organized workshops. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2019, 275, 1020-1036
3. Franco, L.A.; Montibeller, G. Facilitated modelling in operational research. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2010, 205, 489-500
4. Smith, C.M.; Shaw, D. The characteristics of problem structuring methods: A literature review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2019, 274, 403-416
5. Rosenhead, J.; Mingers, J. (Eds.) Rational Analysis for A Problematic World Revisited;Wiley: Chichester, UK, 2001
6. Cervelló-Royo, R.; Garrido-Yserte, R.; Segura-García del Río, B. An urban regeneration model in heritage areas in search of sustainable urban development and internal cohesion. J. Cult. Herit. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 2012, 2, 44-61
7. Baarveld, M.; Smit, M.; Dewulf, G. Negotiation processes in urban redevelopment projects: Dealing with conflicts by balancing integrative and distributive approaches. Plan. Theory Pract. 2015, 16, 363-384
8. Abastante, F.; Corrente, S.; Greco, S.; Ishizaka, A.; Lami, I.M. Choice architecture for architecture choices: Evaluating social housing initiatives putting together a parsimonious AHP methodology and the Choquet integral. Land Use Policy 2018, 78, 748-762
9. Iavarone, R.; Alberico, I.; Gravagnuolo, A.; De Vita, G.E. The Role of Cultural Heritage in Urban Resilience Enhancement. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on New Metropolitan Perspectives, Reggio Calabria, Italy, 22-25 May 2018; Springer: Cham, Switzerland; pp. 369-377
10. Boeri, A.; Bortoli, G.; Longo, D. Cultural heritage as a driver for urban regeneration: Comparing two processes. WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ. 2018, 217, 587-598
11. Della Lucia, M.; Trunfio, M.; Go, F.M. Heritage and urban regeneration: Towards creative tourism. In Tourism in the City; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 179-191
12. Della Lucia, M.; Franch, M. Culture-led urban regeneration and place brand building in Alpine Italian cities. In Harnessing Place Branding through Cultural Entrepreneurship; Go, F.M., Lemmetyinen, A., Hakala, U., Eds.; Palgrave Macmillan: New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 122-140
13. Lee, C.B. Cultural policy as regeneration approach in western cities: A case study of Liverpool's RopeWalks. Geogr. Compass 2009, 3, 495-517
14. Sharifi, M.A.; Rodriguez, E. Design and development of a planning support system for policy formulation in water resources rehabilitation: The case of Alcazar De San Juan District in Aquifer 23, La Mancha, Spain. J. Hydroinform. 2002, 4, 157-175
15. Dente, B. Who decides? Actors and their resources. In Understanding Policy Decisions; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2014
16. Gamboa, G.; Munda, G. The problem of windfarm location: A social multi-criteria evaluation framework. Energy Policy 2007, 35, 1564-1583
17. Della Torre, S.; Moioli, R.; Cantini, L. The Historic Centre of Vimercate: Investigation, Education, Community Involvement. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Transdisciplinary Multispectral Modeling and Cooperation for the Preservation of Cultural Heritage; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 319-328
18. ICOMOS. Nara Document on Authenticity 1994. Available online: http://icomos.org/index.php/en/chartersand-texts (accessed on 15 May 2019)
19. Van Balen, K. The Nara grid: An evaluation scheme based on the Nara document on authenticity. Assoc. Preserv. Technol. Int. (APT) 2008, 39, 39-46
20. Eshrati, P.; Bahramjerdi, S.F.N.; Mahabadi, S.E.; Azad, M. Evaluation of Authenticity on the Basis of the Nara Grid in Adaptive Reuse of Manochehri Historical House Kashan, Iran. ArchNet-IJAR Int. J. Archit. Res. 2017, 11, 214-231
21. Capolongo, S.; Mauri, M.; Peretti, G.; Pollo, R.; Tognolo, C. Facilities for territorial medicine: The experiences of Piedmont and Lombardy Regions. TECHNE J. Technol. Archit. Environ. 2015, 9, 230-236
22. Colorni, A.; Tsoukiàs, A. What is a decision problem? designing alternatives. In Preference Disaggregation in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 1-15
23. Colorni, A.; Ferretti, V.; Luè, A.; Oppio, A.; Paruscio, V.; Tomasini, L. Rethinking feasibility analysis for urban development: A multidimensional decision support tool. In International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 624-638
24. Sdino, L.; Rosasco, P.; Novi, F.; Porcile, G. The evaluation of actions aimed at enhancing the cultural heritage: The case study of the Colosseum roofing. Valori E Valutazioni 2018, 20, 1-13
25. Figueira, J.R.; Greco, S.; Ehrgott, M. (Eds.) Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2005; Volume 78
26. Janssen, R.; Van Herwijnen, M.; Beinat, E. DEFINITE for Windows. A System to Support Decisions on A Finite Set of Alternatives (Software and Package and User Manual); Kluwer Academic: Aarhus, Denmark, 1994
27. Bottomley, P.A.; Doyle, J.R.; Green, R.H. Testing the reliability of weight elicitation methods: Direct rating versus point allocation. J. Mark. Res. 2000, 37, 508-513
28. Keeney, R.L.; Raiffa, H. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 1976
29. Oppio, A.; Bottero, M.; Arcidiacono, A. Assessing urban quality: A proposal for a MCDA evaluation framework. Ann. Oper. Res. 2018, 1-18
30. Samson, D. Managerial Decision Analysis; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1992
31. Triantaphyllou, E.; Sánchez, A. A sensitivity analysis approach for some deterministic multi-criteria decision-making methods. Decis. Sci. 1997, 28, 151-194
32. Chen, Y.; Yu, J.; Khan, S. Spatial sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria weights in GIS-based land suitability evaluation. Environ. Model. Softw. 2010, 25, 1582-1591
33. Dell'Ovo, M.; Frej, E.A.; Oppio, A.; Capolongo, S.; Morais, D.C.; de Almeida, A.T. FITradeoff Method for the Location of Healthcare Facilities Based on Multiple Stakeholders' Preferences. In Group Decision and Negotiation in an Uncertain World. GDN 2018. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing; Chen, Y., Kersten, G., Vetschera, R., Xu, H., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; Volume 315, pp. 97-112
34. Blair, T. Labour Party Manifesto. 1997. Available online: http://www.labour-party.org.uk/manifestos/1997/1997-labour-manifesto.shtml (accessed on 22 May 2019)
35. Dell'Ovo, M.; Capolongo, S. Architectures for health: Between historical contexts and suburban areas. Tool to support location strategies. TECHNE J. Technol. Archit. Environ. 2016, 12, 269-276
36. Sdino, L.; Rosasco, P.; Magoni, S. True, Fair and Beautiful: Evaluative Paradigms Between the Encyclical Letter Laudato Sì and Keynes. In Green Energy and Technology; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 87-98
37. Bottero, M.; D'Alpaos, C.; Oppio, A. Ranking of Adaptive Reuse Strategies for Abandoned Industrial Heritage in Vulnerable Contexts: A Multiple Criteria Decision Aiding Approach. Sustainability 2019, 11, 785