Exploring effective dialogue act sequences in one-on-one computer science tutoring dialogues

Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, BEA 2011 at the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, ACL-HLT 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 65-75

  Chen, Lin ^a   Di Eugenio, Barbara ^a   Fossati, Davide ^b   Ohlsson, Stellan ^a   Cosejo, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

DIALOG ACTS; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; LEARN+; LEARNING OUTCOME; ONE-ON-ONE TUTORING; SCIENCE-DATA; TUTORING DIALOGUES;

LINEAR REGRESSION;

EID: 85111897186     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. John R. Anderson. 1986. Knowledge compilation: The general learning mechanism. Machine learning: An artificial intelligence approach, 2:289-310.
2. Ron Artstein and Massimo Poesio. 2008. Inter-coder agreement for computational linguistics. Computational Linguistics, 34(4):555-596. Survey Article.
3. Kristy Elizabeth Boyer, Robert Phillips, Amy Ingram, Eun Young Ha, Michael Wallis, Mladen Vouk, and James Lester. 2010. Characterizing the effectiveness of tutorial dialogue with Hidden Markov Models. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems, pages 55-64. Springer.
4. Whitney L. Cade, Jessica L. Copeland, Natalie K. Person, and Sidney K. D'Mello. 2008. Dialogue modes in expert tutoring. In Intelligent Tutoring Systems, volume 5091 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 470-479. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg.
5. Lin Chen and Barbara Di Eugenio. 2010. A lucene and maximum entropy model based hedge detection system. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning, pages 114-119, Uppsala, Sweden, July. Association for Computational Linguistics.
6. Michelene T. H. Chi, Nicholas de Leeuw, Mei-Hung Chiu, and Christian LaVancher. 1994. Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18(3):439-477.
7. Michelene T. H. Chi, Stephanie A. Siler, Takashi Yamauchi, and Robert G. Hausmann. 2001. Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science, 25:471-533.
8. Min Chi, Kurt VanLehn, and Diane Litman. 2010. The more the merrier? Examining three interaction hypotheses. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (CogSci2010), Portland,OR.
9. Michelene T.H. Chi. 1997. Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3):271-315.
10. Herbert H. Clark. 1992. Arenas of Language Use. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
11. Barbara Di Eugenio and Michael Glass. 2004. The Kappa statistic: a second look. Computational Linguistics, 30(1):95-101. Squib.
12. Barbara Di Eugenio, Trina C. Kershaw, Xin Lu, Andrew Corrigan-Halpern, and Stellan Ohlsson. 2006. Toward a computational model of expert tutoring: a first report. In FLAIRS06, the 19th International Florida AI Research Symposium, Melbourne Beach, FL.
13. Barbara Di Eugenio, Davide Fossati, Stellan Ohlsson, and David Cosejo. 2009. Towards explaining effective tutorial dialogues. In Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, pages 1430-1435, Amsterdam, July.
14. Martha W. Evens and Joel A. Michael. 2006. One-on-one Tutoring by Humans and Machines. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15. Davide Fossati, Barbara Di Eugenio, Christopher Brown, Stellan Ohlsson, David Cosejo, and Lin Chen. 2009. Supporting Computer Science curriculum: Exploring and learning linked lists with iList. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, Special Issue on Real-World Applications of Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 2(2):107-120, April-June.
16. Davide Fossati, Barbara Di Eugenio, Stellan Ohlsson, Christopher Brown, and Lin Chen. 2010. Generating proactive feedback to help students stay on track. In ITS 2010, 10th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Poster.
17. Barbara A. Fox. 1993. The Human Tutorial Dialogue Project: Issues in the design of instructional systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.
18. Arthur C. Graesser, Natalie K. Person, and Joseph P. Magliano. 1995. Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one-to-one tutoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9:495-522.
19. Arthur C. Graesser, Shulan Lu, George Tanner Jackson, Heather Hite Mitchell, Mathew Ventura, Andrew Olney, and Max M. Louwerse. 2004. AutoTutor: A tutor with dialogue in natural language. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36:180-193.
20. Mark R. Lepper, Michael F. Drake, and Teresa O'Donnell-Johnson. 1997. Scaffolding techniques of expert human tutors. In K. Hogan and M. Pressley, editors, Scaffolding student learning: Instructional approaches and issues. Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
21. Diane Litman and Kate Forbes-Riley. 2006. Correlations between dialogue acts and learning in spoken tutoring dialogues. Natural Language Engineering, 12(02):161-176.
22. Brian MacWhinney. 2000. The Childes Project: Tools for Analyzing Talk: Transcription format and programs, volume 1. Psychology Press, 3 edition.
23. Johanna D. Moore, Kaska Porayska-Pomsta, Sebastian Varges, and Claus Zinn. 2004. Generating Tutorial Feedback with Affect. In FLAIRS04, Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference.
24. Stellan Ohlsson, Barbara Di Eugenio, Bettina Chow, Davide Fossati, Xin Lu, and Trina C. Kershaw. 2007. Beyond the code-and-count analysis of tutoring dialogues. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pages 349-356, Los Angeles, CA, July. IOS Press.
25. Stellan Ohlsson. 2008. Computational models of skill acquisition. The Cambridge handbook of computational psychology, pages 359-395.
26. Ron Sun, Paul Slusarz, and Chris Terry. 2005. The Interaction of the Explicit and the Implicit in Skill Learning: A Dual-Process Approach. Psychological Review, 112:159-192.
27. Kurt VanLehn, Arthur C. Graesser, G. Tanner Jackson, Pamela W. Jordan, Andrew Olney, and Carolyn P. Rosé. 2007. When are tutorial dialogues more effective than reading? Cognitive Science, 31(1):3-62.