-
1
-
-
84880697966
-
Reporting medical research
-
PMID: 23656235
-
Simera I, Altman DG. Reporting medical research. International journal of clinical practice. 2013; 67 (8):710–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.12168 PMID: 23656235
-
(2013)
International journal of clinical practice
, vol.67
, Issue.8
, pp. 710-716
-
-
Simera, I1
Altman, DG.2
-
2
-
-
84938630091
-
How to review a manuscript
-
PMID: 26218722
-
Alam M. How to review a manuscript. Dermatologic surgery. 2015; 41(8):883–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000421 PMID: 26218722
-
(2015)
Dermatologic surgery
, vol.41
, Issue.8
, pp. 883-888
-
-
Alam, M.1
-
3
-
-
84860447131
-
Are peer reviewers encouraged to use reporting guidelines? A survey of 116 health research journals
-
PMID: 22558178
-
Hirst A, Altman DG. Are peer reviewers encouraged to use reporting guidelines? A survey of 116 health research journals. PloS one. 2012; 7(4):e35621. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035621 PMID: 22558178
-
(2012)
PloS one
, vol.7
, Issue.4
, pp. e35621
-
-
Hirst, A1
Altman, DG.2
-
4
-
-
85056694438
-
Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach
-
PMID: 30453902
-
Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2018; 18(1):143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x PMID: 30453902
-
(2018)
BMC Medical Research Methodology
, vol.18
, Issue.1
, pp. 143
-
-
Munn, Z1
Peters, MDJ2
Stern, C3
Tufanaru, C4
McArthur, A5
Aromataris, E.6
-
5
-
-
85076782005
-
Practical Guidance for Knowledge Synthesis: Scoping Review Methods
-
PMID: 31756513
-
Lockwood C, dos Santos KB, Pap R. Practical Guidance for Knowledge Synthesis: Scoping Review Methods. Asian Nursing Research. 2019; 13(5):287–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2019.11.002 PMID: 31756513
-
(2019)
Asian Nursing Research
, vol.13
, Issue.5
, pp. 287-294
-
-
Lockwood, C1
dos Santos, KB2
Pap, R.3
-
6
-
-
84966397522
-
Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews
-
PMID: 26134548
-
Peters MD, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares CB. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. International journal of evidence-based healthcare. 2015; 13(3):141–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050 PMID: 26134548
-
(2015)
International journal of evidence-based healthcare
, vol.13
, Issue.3
, pp. 141-146
-
-
Peters, MD1
Godfrey, CM2
Khalil, H3
McInerney, P4
Parker, D5
Soares, CB.6
-
7
-
-
85054287365
-
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation
-
PMID: 30178033
-
Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Annals of internal medicine. 2018; 169(7):467–73. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850 PMID: 30178033
-
(2018)
Annals of internal medicine
, vol.169
, Issue.7
, pp. 467-473
-
-
Tricco, AC1
Lillie, E2
Zarin, W3
O’Brien, KK4
Colquhoun, H5
Levac, D6
-
8
-
-
85069265238
-
Methods for Research Evidence Synthesis: The Scoping Review Approach
-
PMID: 31251164
-
Sucharew H, Macaluso M. Methods for Research Evidence Synthesis: The Scoping Review Approach. J Hosp Med. 2019; 7:3. https://doi.org/10.12788/jhm.3248 PMID: 31251164
-
(2019)
J Hosp Med
, vol.7
, pp. 3
-
-
Sucharew, H1
Macaluso, M.2
-
9
-
-
85072655227
-
Writing a peer review: a primer for junior researchers
-
PMID: 31334806
-
Small HY, Eisner D. Writing a peer review: a primer for junior researchers. Cardiovascular Research. 2019; 115(10):e93–e5. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvz174 PMID: 31334806
-
(2019)
Cardiovascular Research
, vol.115
, Issue.10
, pp. e93-e5
-
-
Small, HY1
Eisner, D.2
-
10
-
-
84857978834
-
Peer review: a constatntly-evolving scientific process
-
PMID: 22378341
-
Araujo CGSd. Peer review: a constatntly-evolving scientific process. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2012; 98:e32–e5. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0066-782x2012000200017 PMID: 22378341
-
(2012)
Arq Bras Cardiol
, vol.98
, pp. e32-e5
-
-
Araujo, CGSd.1
-
11
-
-
0036832145
-
Appraising the Evidence: Reviewing Disparate Data Systematically
-
PMID: 12448672
-
Hawker S, Payne S, Kerr C, Hardey M, Powell J. Appraising the Evidence: Reviewing Disparate Data Systematically. Qualitative health research. 2002; 12(9):1284–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1049732302238251 PMID: 12448672
-
(2002)
Qualitative health research
, vol.12
, Issue.9
, pp. 1284-1299
-
-
Hawker, S1
Payne, S2
Kerr, C3
Hardey, M4
Powell, J.5
-
12
-
-
68049122102
-
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and metaanalyses: the PRISMA statement
-
PMID: 19621072
-
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and metaanalyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(7):e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 PMID: 19621072
-
(2009)
PLoS Med
, vol.6
, Issue.7
, pp. e1000097
-
-
Moher, D1
Liberati, A2
Tetzlaff, J3
Altman, DG.4
-
13
-
-
84879775275
-
Evidence synthesis for decision making 7: a reviewer’s checklist
-
PMID: 23804511
-
Ades AE, Caldwell DM, Reken S, Welton NJ, Sutton AJ, Dias S. Evidence synthesis for decision making 7: a reviewer’s checklist. Medical decision making. 2013; 33(5):679–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0272989X13485156 PMID: 23804511
-
(2013)
Medical decision making
, vol.33
, Issue.5
, pp. 679-691
-
-
Ades, AE1
Caldwell, DM2
Reken, S3
Welton, NJ4
Sutton, AJ5
Dias, S.6
-
14
-
-
21444453008
-
A guide to reviewing manuscripts
-
PMID: 15880980
-
Alexander GR. A guide to reviewing manuscripts. Maternal and child health journal. 2005; 9(1):113–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-005-2423-y PMID: 15880980
-
(2005)
Maternal and child health journal
, vol.9
, Issue.1
, pp. 113-117
-
-
Alexander, GR.1
-
15
-
-
67650102949
-
Suggestions for reviewing manuscripts
-
PMID: 19602875
-
Alexandrov AV, Hennerici MG, Norrving B. Suggestions for reviewing manuscripts. Cerebrovascular diseases. 2009; 28(3):243–6. https://doi.org/10.1159/000228588 PMID: 19602875
-
(2009)
Cerebrovascular diseases
, vol.28
, Issue.3
, pp. 243-246
-
-
Alexandrov, AV1
Hennerici, MG2
Norrving, B.3
-
16
-
-
85038640990
-
Peer Review of a Manuscript Submission: A How-To Guide for Effective and Efficient Commentary
-
Allen LA, Ho PM. Peer Review of a Manuscript Submission: A How-To Guide for Effective and Efficient Commentary. Circulation Cardiovascular quality and outcomes. 2017; 10(12).
-
(2017)
Circulation Cardiovascular quality and outcomes
, vol.10
, Issue.12
-
-
Allen, LA1
Ho, PM.2
-
18
-
-
85082191264
-
Mentor of the Month Series: How to Review a Manuscript from an Editor’s Perspective?
-
PMID: 32207076
-
Altieri MS, Pawlik TM. Mentor of the Month Series: How to Review a Manuscript from an Editor’s Perspective? Journal of gastrointestinal surgery 2020; 24:1452–1454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04567-w PMID: 32207076
-
(2020)
Journal of gastrointestinal surgery
, vol.24
, pp. 1452-1454
-
-
Altieri, MS1
Pawlik, TM.2
-
19
-
-
84879700140
-
Writing an Effective Manuscript Review: The 6 “Be’s” to Success
-
PMID: 23741073
-
Annesley TM. Writing an Effective Manuscript Review: The 6 “Be’s” to Success. Clinical chemistry. 2013; 59(7):1028–35. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2013.208280 PMID: 23741073
-
(2013)
Clinical chemistry
, vol.59
, Issue.7
, pp. 1028-1035
-
-
Annesley, TM.1
-
20
-
-
0347763589
-
How to review a paper
-
PMID: 12760840
-
Benos DJ, Kirk KL, Hall JE. How to review a paper. Advances in physiology education. 2003; 27(1–4):47–52. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00057.2002 PMID: 12760840
-
(2003)
Advances in physiology education
, vol.27
, Issue.1–4
, pp. 47-52
-
-
Benos, DJ1
Kirk, KL2
Hall, JE.3
-
21
-
-
84866376934
-
Reviewing for clinical orthopaedics and related research
-
PMID: 22752799
-
Brand RA. Reviewing for clinical orthopaedics and related research. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 2012; 470(9):2622–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2447-8 PMID: 22752799
-
(2012)
Clinical orthopaedics and related research
, vol.470
, Issue.9
, pp. 2622-2625
-
-
Brand, RA.1
-
22
-
-
85019401892
-
Reviewing scientific manuscripts: A comprehensive guide for peer reviewers
-
PMID: 28526112
-
Brown LM, David EA, Karamlou T, Nason KS. Reviewing scientific manuscripts: A comprehensive guide for peer reviewers. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2017; 153(6):1609–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.12.067 PMID: 28526112
-
(2017)
The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
, vol.153
, Issue.6
, pp. 1609-1614
-
-
Brown, LM1
David, EA2
Karamlou, T3
Nason, KS.4
-
23
-
-
67650931344
-
Veterinary Pathology and Peer Review
-
PMID: 19261628
-
Cantor GH, Caswell JL, Crissman JW, Gillette DM, Gunson DE, Hogenesch H, et al. Veterinary Pathology and Peer Review. Veterinary Pathology. 2009; 46(2):173–5. https://doi.org/10.1354/vp.46-2-173 PMID: 19261628
-
(2009)
Veterinary Pathology
, vol.46
, Issue.2
, pp. 173-175
-
-
Cantor, GH1
Caswell, JL2
Crissman, JW3
Gillette, DM4
Gunson, DE5
Hogenesch, H6
-
24
-
-
78650921886
-
Manuscript peer review: a guide for advanced practice nurses
-
PMID: 21208330
-
Christenbery TL. Manuscript peer review: a guide for advanced practice nurses. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners. 2011; 23(1):15–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2010.00572.x PMID: 21208330
-
(2011)
Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners
, vol.23
, Issue.1
, pp. 15-22
-
-
Christenbery, TL.1
-
25
-
-
0032159084
-
What We Owe The Author: rethinking editorial peer review
-
PMID: 9782929
-
Crigger NJ. What We Owe The Author: rethinking editorial peer review. Nursing ethics. 1998; 5(5):451–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/096973309800500508 PMID: 9782929
-
(1998)
Nursing ethics
, vol.5
, Issue.5
, pp. 451-458
-
-
Crigger, NJ.1
-
26
-
-
84961966571
-
Systematically Reviewing a Journal Manuscript: A Guideline for Health Reviewers
-
e3. PMID: 31047176
-
Currie G, McCuaig C, Di Prospero L. Systematically Reviewing a Journal Manuscript: A Guideline for Health Reviewers. Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences. 2016; 47(2):129–38.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2016.01.005 PMID: 31047176
-
(2016)
Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences
, vol.47
, Issue.2
, pp. 129-138
-
-
Currie, G1
McCuaig, C2
Di Prospero, L.3
-
27
-
-
84945961133
-
A guide to performing a peer review of randomised controlled trials
-
PMID: 26521647
-
Del Mar C, Hoffmann TC. A guide to performing a peer review of randomised controlled trials. BMC Med. 2015; 13:248. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0471-8 PMID: 26521647
-
(2015)
BMC Med
, vol.13
, pp. 248
-
-
Del Mar, C1
Hoffmann, TC.2
-
28
-
-
85099945926
-
How to be a good peer reviewer of scientific manuscripts
-
PMID: 33486891
-
Dhillon P. How to be a good peer reviewer of scientific manuscripts. The FEBS journal. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.15705 PMID: 33486891
-
(2021)
The FEBS journal
-
-
Dhillon, P.1
-
29
-
-
38849186029
-
Proposing a manuscript peer-review checklist
-
PMID: 18053748
-
Duchesne S, Jannin P. Proposing a manuscript peer-review checklist. NeuroImage. 2008; 39(4):1783–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.065 PMID: 18053748
-
(2008)
NeuroImage
, vol.39
, Issue.4
, pp. 1783-1787
-
-
Duchesne, S1
Jannin, P.2
-
30
-
-
69249117390
-
On becoming a peer reviewer for a neuropsychology journal
-
PMID: 19640873
-
Duff K, O’Bryant SE, Westervelt HJ, Sweet JJ, Reynolds CR, van Gorp WG, et al. On becoming a peer reviewer for a neuropsychology journal. Archives of clinical neuropsychology. 2009; 24(3):201–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acp031 PMID: 19640873
-
(2009)
Archives of clinical neuropsychology
, vol.24
, Issue.3
, pp. 201-207
-
-
Duff, K1
O’Bryant, SE2
Westervelt, HJ3
Sweet, JJ4
Reynolds, CR5
van Gorp, WG6
-
31
-
-
84868374292
-
To accept or reject? A guide to peer reviewing of medical journal papers
-
PMID: 22885272
-
Einarson TR, Koren G. To accept or reject? A guide to peer reviewing of medical journal papers. Journal of population therapeutics and clinical pharmacology. 2012; 19(2):e328–33. PMID: 22885272
-
(2012)
Journal of population therapeutics and clinical pharmacology
, vol.19
, Issue.2
, pp. e328-e333
-
-
Einarson, TR1
Koren, G.2
-
32
-
-
85061996197
-
Artificial Intelligence for Medical Image Analysis: A Guide for Authors and Reviewers
-
PMID: 30557049
-
England JR, Cheng PM. Artificial Intelligence for Medical Image Analysis: A Guide for Authors and Reviewers. American journal of roentgenology. 2019; 212(3):513–9. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.18. 20490 PMID: 30557049
-
(2019)
American journal of roentgenology
, vol.212
, Issue.3
, pp. 513-519
-
-
England, JR1
Cheng, PM.2
-
33
-
-
33645124527
-
How to be an outstanding reviewer for the Journal of General Internal Medicine . . . and other journals
-
Estrada C, Kalet A, Smith W, Chin MH. How to be an outstanding reviewer for the Journal of General Internal Medicine . . . and other journals. Journal of general internal medicine. 2006; 21(3):281.
-
(2006)
Journal of general internal medicine
, vol.21
, Issue.3
, pp. 281
-
-
Estrada, C1
Kalet, A2
Smith, W3
Chin, MH.4
-
34
-
-
85085715316
-
How to Review a Manuscript: Tips and Suggestions
-
PMID: 32153218
-
Genter MB. How to Review a Manuscript: Tips and Suggestions. International journal of toxicology. 2020; 39(3):263. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091581820911280 PMID: 32153218
-
(2020)
International journal of toxicology
, vol.39
, Issue.3
, pp. 263
-
-
Genter, MB.1
-
35
-
-
79952261951
-
Peer reviewing made easy
-
Halder N, Ramsay R, Tyrer P, Casey P. Peer reviewing made easy. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment. 2011; 17(2):150–7. https://doi.org/10.1192/apt.bp.109.007294
-
(2011)
Advances in Psychiatric Treatment
, vol.17
, Issue.2
, pp. 150-157
-
-
Halder, N1
Ramsay, R2
Tyrer, P3
Casey, P.4
-
36
-
-
70449111994
-
Reviewing manuscripts: tips and responsibilities
-
PMID: 19761546
-
Heddle NM, Ness PM. Reviewing manuscripts: tips and responsibilities. Transfusion. 2009; 49 (11):2265–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02390.x PMID: 19761546
-
(2009)
Transfusion
, vol.49
, Issue.11
, pp. 2265-2268
-
-
Heddle, NM1
Ness, PM.2
-
37
-
-
84959558600
-
How to Review a Manuscript
-
PMID: 26850498
-
Hill JA. How to Review a Manuscript. Journal of electrocardiology. 2016; 49(2):109–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2016.01.001 PMID: 26850498
-
(2016)
Journal of electrocardiology
, vol.49
, Issue.2
, pp. 109-111
-
-
Hill, JA.1
-
38
-
-
85089866780
-
Rapid Peer Reviewer Checklist for Rapid Reviews—RAPeer (DRAFT)
-
PMID: 32837897
-
Hunter J. Rapid Peer Reviewer Checklist for Rapid Reviews—RAPeer (DRAFT). Adv Integr Med. 2020; 7(4):183–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aimed.2020.07.003 PMID: 32837897
-
(2020)
Adv Integr Med
, vol.7
, Issue.4
, pp. 183-186
-
-
Hunter, J.1
-
39
-
-
85039798266
-
Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide
-
Kelly J, Sadeghieh T, Adeli K. Peer Review in Scientific Publications: Benefits, Critiques, & A Survival Guide. Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry. 2014; 25(3):227–43.
-
(2014)
Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry
, vol.25
, Issue.3
, pp. 227-243
-
-
Kelly, J1
Sadeghieh, T2
Adeli, K.3
-
40
-
-
85102673145
-
How to read and review papers on machine learning and artificial intelligence in radiology: a survival guide to key methodological concepts
-
Kocak B, Kus EA, Kilickesmez O. How to read and review papers on machine learning and artificial intelligence in radiology: a survival guide to key methodological concepts. Eur Radiol. 2020.
-
(2020)
Eur Radiol
-
-
Kocak, B1
Kus, EA2
Kilickesmez, O.3
-
41
-
-
84898739965
-
Manuscript rejection: how to submit a revision and tips on being a good peer reviewer
-
PMID: 24675196
-
Kotsis SV, Chung KC. Manuscript rejection: how to submit a revision and tips on being a good peer reviewer. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2014; 133(4):958–64. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS. 0000000000000002 PMID: 24675196
-
(2014)
Plastic and reconstructive surgery
, vol.133
, Issue.4
, pp. 958-964
-
-
Kotsis, SV1
Chung, KC.2
-
42
-
-
85002145899
-
How to peer review and revise manuscripts submitted for publication in academic nursing journals
-
PMID: 27692443
-
Kottner J, Norman I. How to peer review and revise manuscripts submitted for publication in academic nursing journals. International journal of nursing studies. 2016; 64:A1–a3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.09.011 PMID: 27692443
-
(2016)
International journal of nursing studies
, vol.64
, pp. A1-a3
-
-
Kottner, J1
Norman, I.2
-
43
-
-
79959716223
-
Methods and Biostatistics: a concise guide for peer reviewers
-
(Suppl 1): PMID: 21487486
-
Kyrgidis A, Triaridis S. Methods and Biostatistics: a concise guide for peer reviewers. Hippokratia. 2010; 14(Suppl 1):13–22. PMID: 21487486
-
(2010)
Hippokratia
, vol.14
, pp. 13-22
-
-
Kyrgidis, A1
Triaridis, S.2
-
44
-
-
85086746477
-
Considerations for Reporting and Reviewing Studies Including Health-Related Quality of Life
-
(Supplement)
-
Lapin BR. Considerations for Reporting and Reviewing Studies Including Health-Related Quality of Life. Chest. 2020; 158(1, Supplement):S49–S56.
-
(2020)
Chest
, vol.158
, Issue.1
, pp. S49-S56
-
-
Lapin, BR.1
-
45
-
-
85086341921
-
Do’s and Don’ts for a Good Reviewer of Scientific Papers: A Beginner’s Brief Decalogue
-
PMID: 32525721
-
Lazarides MK, Georgiadis GS, Papanas N. Do’s and Don’ts for a Good Reviewer of Scientific Papers: A Beginner’s Brief Decalogue. The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds. 2020; 19(3):227–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534734620924349 PMID: 32525721
-
(2020)
The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds
, vol.19
, Issue.3
, pp. 227-229
-
-
Lazarides, MK1
Georgiadis, GS2
Papanas, N.3
-
46
-
-
85103890743
-
How do I peer-review a scientific article?-a personal perspective
-
PMID: 29610756
-
Lippi G. How do I peer-review a scientific article?-a personal perspective. Annals of translational medicine. 2018; 6(3):68. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2017.12.15 PMID: 29610756
-
(2018)
Annals of translational medicine
, vol.6
, Issue.3
, pp. 68
-
-
Lippi, G.1
-
47
-
-
18844446650
-
Guide for peer reviewers of scientific articles in the Croatian Medical Journal
-
PMID: 15849858
-
Marusić M, Sambunjak D, Marusić A. Guide for peer reviewers of scientific articles in the Croatian Medical Journal. Croat Med J. 2005; 46(2):326–32. PMID: 15849858
-
(2005)
Croat Med J
, vol.46
, Issue.2
, pp. 326-332
-
-
Marusić, M1
Sambunjak, D2
Marusić, A.3
-
48
-
-
84945955144
-
Optimal strategies to consider when peer reviewing a systematic review and meta-analysis
-
PMID: 26521692
-
Moher D. Optimal strategies to consider when peer reviewing a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medicine. 2015; 13(1):274. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0509-y PMID: 26521692
-
(2015)
BMC Medicine
, vol.13
, Issue.1
, pp. 274
-
-
Moher, D.1
-
49
-
-
85071304686
-
Emerging nursing scholars guide to peer reviewing an academic manuscript
-
PMID: 31660154
-
Oerther S, Watson R. Emerging nursing scholars guide to peer reviewing an academic manuscript. Nursing open. 2019; 6(4):1284–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.368 PMID: 31660154
-
(2019)
Nursing open
, vol.6
, Issue.4
, pp. 1284-1288
-
-
Oerther, S1
Watson, R.2
-
50
-
-
85081043230
-
How to referee a paper—and save the world
-
PMID: 32129302
-
Pai SA. How to referee a paper—and save the world. Indian journal of cancer. 2020; 57(1):110–4. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijc.IJC_12_20 PMID: 32129302
-
(2020)
Indian journal of cancer
, vol.57
, Issue.1
, pp. 110-114
-
-
Pai, SA.1
-
51
-
-
0035292128
-
How to write a peer review
-
PMID: 11291469
-
Paice E. How to write a peer review. Hospital medicine. 2001; 62(3):172–5. https://doi.org/10.12968/hosp.2001.62.3.2392 PMID: 11291469
-
(2001)
Hospital medicine
, vol.62
, Issue.3
, pp. 172-175
-
-
Paice, E.1
-
52
-
-
77952806271
-
A practical guide to effective journal peer reviewing
-
PMID: 20485095
-
Pietrzak WS. A practical guide to effective journal peer reviewing. The Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2010; 21(3):631–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181d8403c PMID: 20485095
-
(2010)
The Journal of craniofacial surgery
, vol.21
, Issue.3
, pp. 631-636
-
-
Pietrzak, WS.1
-
53
-
-
29844444319
-
A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript
-
PMID: 16177399
-
Provenzale JM, Stanley RJ. A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript. AJR American journal of roentgenology. 2005; 185(4):848–54. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.05.0782 PMID: 16177399
-
(2005)
AJR American journal of roentgenology
, vol.185
, Issue.4
, pp. 848-854
-
-
Provenzale, JM1
Stanley, RJ.2
-
54
-
-
77949461505
-
How to review journal manuscripts
-
PMID: 20304264
-
Rosenfeld RM. How to review journal manuscripts. Otolaryngology—head and neck surgery. 2010; 142 (4):472–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2010.02.010 PMID: 20304264
-
(2010)
Otolaryngology—head and neck surgery
, vol.142
, Issue.4
, pp. 472-486
-
-
Rosenfeld, RM.1
-
55
-
-
79952855514
-
How to evaluate a manuscript for publication?
-
PMID: 24834158
-
Rostami K, Khadjooi K, Abasaeed-Elhag R, Ishaq S. How to evaluate a manuscript for publication? Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench. 2011; 4(2):58–62. PMID: 24834158
-
(2011)
Gastroenterology and hepatology from bed to bench
, vol.4
, Issue.2
, pp. 58-62
-
-
Rostami, K1
Khadjooi, K2
Abasaeed-Elhag, R3
Ishaq, S.4
-
56
-
-
77649213395
-
How to review scientific manuscripts and clinical case reports for Journal of Oral Implantology
-
PMID: 20017649
-
Rutkowski JL, Cairone JV. How to review scientific manuscripts and clinical case reports for Journal of Oral Implantology. The Journal of oral implantology. 2009; 35(6):310–4. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAIDJOI-D-09-00053R1.1 PMID: 20017649
-
(2009)
The Journal of oral implantology
, vol.35
, Issue.6
, pp. 310-314
-
-
Rutkowski, JL1
Cairone, JV.2
-
57
-
-
0030810680
-
How to "peer review" a medical journal manuscript
-
PMID: 9217794
-
Salasche SJ. How to "peer review" a medical journal manuscript. Dermatologic surgery. 1997; 23 (6):423–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.1997.tb00081.x PMID: 9217794
-
(1997)
Dermatologic surgery
, vol.23
, Issue.6
, pp. 423-428
-
-
Salasche, SJ.1
-
58
-
-
85078849585
-
How to Read, Write, and Review the Imaging Literature
-
PMID: 32024599
-
Sasson A, Okojie O, Verano R, Moshiri M, Patlas MN, Hoffmann JC, et al. How to Read, Write, and Review the Imaging Literature. Current problems in diagnostic radiology. 2021; 50(2):109–14. https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2020.01.002 PMID: 32024599
-
(2021)
Current problems in diagnostic radiology
, vol.50
, Issue.2
, pp. 109-114
-
-
Sasson, A1
Okojie, O2
Verano, R3
Moshiri, M4
Patlas, MN5
Hoffmann, JC6
-
59
-
-
84881638671
-
Recommendations for reviewing a manuscript for the GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung
-
PMID: 21818220
-
Schüttpelz-Brauns K, Stosch C, Matthes J, Himmelbauer M, Herrler A, Bachmann C, et al. Recommendations for reviewing a manuscript for the GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung. GMS Zeitschrift fur medizinische Ausbildung. 2010; 27(5):Doc75. https://doi.org/10.3205/zma000712 PMID: 21818220
-
(2010)
GMS Zeitschrift fur medizinische Ausbildung
, vol.27
, Issue.5
, pp. Doc75
-
-
Schüttpelz-Brauns, K1
Stosch, C2
Matthes, J3
Himmelbauer, M4
Herrler, A5
Bachmann, C6
-
60
-
-
8344272908
-
Manuscript peer review: a helpful checklist for students and novice referees
-
PMID: 10902527
-
Seals DR, Tanaka H. Manuscript peer review: a helpful checklist for students and novice referees. Advances in physiology education. 2000; 23(1):52–8. https://doi.org/10.1152/advances.2000.23.1.S52 PMID: 10902527
-
(2000)
Advances in physiology education
, vol.23
, Issue.1
, pp. 52-58
-
-
Seals, DR1
Tanaka, H.2
-
61
-
-
78649767363
-
Reviewing an Original Research Manuscript for the International Journal of Exercise Science: A Guide for Students and Professionals
-
PMID: 27182294
-
Simpson KJ. Reviewing an Original Research Manuscript for the International Journal of Exercise Science: A Guide for Students and Professionals. International journal of exercise science. 2008; 1(2):43–9. PMID: 27182294
-
(2008)
International journal of exercise science
, vol.1
, Issue.2
, pp. 43-49
-
-
Simpson, KJ.1
-
62
-
-
85057243842
-
Navigating manuscript assessment: The new practitioner’s guide to primary literature peer review
-
PMID: 29498322
-
Smith DV, Stokes LB, Marx K, Aitken SL. Navigating manuscript assessment: The new practitioner’s guide to primary literature peer review. Journal of oncology pharmacy practice. 2019; 25(1):94–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078155218761222 PMID: 29498322
-
(2019)
Journal of oncology pharmacy practice
, vol.25
, Issue.1
, pp. 94-100
-
-
Smith, DV1
Stokes, LB2
Marx, K3
Aitken, SL.4
-
63
-
-
84908145883
-
Peer-review policy and guidelines for Biochemia Medica Journal
-
PMID: 25351350
-
Smolčić V, Simundić AM. Peer-review policy and guidelines for Biochemia Medica Journal. Biochemia medica. 2014; 24(3):321–8. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2014.034 PMID: 25351350
-
(2014)
Biochemia medica
, vol.24
, Issue.3
, pp. 321-328
-
-
Smolčić, V1
Simundić, AM.2
-
64
-
-
85105468598
-
Guidelines for reviewing manuscripts submitted to Animal Bioscience
-
PMID: 33152211
-
Son AR, Kim BG. Guidelines for reviewing manuscripts submitted to Animal Bioscience. Animal bioscience. 2021; 34(2):161–2. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.20.0361 PMID: 33152211
-
(2021)
Animal bioscience
, vol.34
, Issue.2
, pp. 161-162
-
-
Son, AR1
Kim, BG.2
-
65
-
-
84957889989
-
How to review a surgical paper: a guide for junior referees
-
PMID: 26874834
-
Stahel PF, Moore EE. How to review a surgical paper: a guide for junior referees. BMC Med. 2016; 14:29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0578-6 PMID: 26874834
-
(2016)
BMC Med
, vol.14
, pp. 29
-
-
Stahel, PF1
Moore, EE.2
-
66
-
-
85089395931
-
How to . . . assess the quality of qualitative research
-
PMID: 32790137
-
Stenfors T, Kajamaa A, Bennett D. How to . . . assess the quality of qualitative research. The clinical teacher. 2020; 17(6):596–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13242 PMID: 32790137
-
(2020)
The clinical teacher
, vol.17
, Issue.6
, pp. 596-599
-
-
Stenfors, T1
Kajamaa, A2
Bennett, D.3
-
67
-
-
85079701020
-
From the Editors: A Guide for Peer Review in the Field of Exercise Science
-
PMID: 30338014
-
Stone WJ, Navalta JW, Lyons TS, Schafer MA. From the Editors: A Guide for Peer Review in the Field of Exercise Science. International journal of exercise science. 2018; 11(1):1112–9. PMID: 30338014
-
(2018)
International journal of exercise science
, vol.11
, Issue.1
, pp. 1112-1119
-
-
Stone, WJ1
Navalta, JW2
Lyons, TS3
Schafer, MA.4
-
68
-
-
85050167009
-
Reviewing Manuscripts: A Systematic Approach
-
PMID: 29936302
-
Sucato GS, Holland-Hall C. Reviewing Manuscripts: A Systematic Approach. Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology. 2018; 31(5):441–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2018.06.005 PMID: 29936302
-
(2018)
Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology
, vol.31
, Issue.5
, pp. 441-445
-
-
Sucato, GS1
Holland-Hall, C.2
-
69
-
-
0035072577
-
Manuscript peer review—a guide for health care professionals
-
PMID: 11310511
-
Sylvia LM, Herbel JL. Manuscript peer review—a guide for health care professionals. Pharmacotherapy. 2001; 21(4):395–404. https://doi.org/10.1592/phco.21.5.395.34493 PMID: 11310511
-
(2001)
Pharmacotherapy
, vol.21
, Issue.4
, pp. 395-404
-
-
Sylvia, LM1
Herbel, JL.2
-
70
-
-
84903581732
-
JRCR—updated author and reviewer guidelines for 2014
-
Talanow R. JRCR—updated author and reviewer guidelines for 2014. J Radiol Case Rep. 2014; 8 (6):39–40.
-
(2014)
J Radiol Case Rep
, vol.8
, Issue.6
, pp. 39-40
-
-
Talanow, R.1
-
71
-
-
84912050350
-
How to review a scientific paper
-
PMID: 25248566
-
Tandon R. How to review a scientific paper. Asian journal of psychiatry. 2014; 11:124–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2014.08.007 PMID: 25248566
-
(2014)
Asian journal of psychiatry
, vol.11
, pp. 124-127
-
-
Tandon, R.1
-
72
-
-
85077769116
-
Peer reviewing an original research paper
-
PMID: 31898597
-
Tullu MS, Karande S. Peer reviewing an original research paper. Journal of postgraduate medicine. 2020; 66(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpgm.JPGM_492_19 PMID: 31898597
-
(2020)
Journal of postgraduate medicine
, vol.66
, Issue.1
, pp. 1-6
-
-
Tullu, MS1
Karande, S.2
-
73
-
-
84925511662
-
Reviewing manuscripts for the Journal of Genetic Counseling: practical suggestions
-
PMID: 25527418
-
Venne V. Reviewing manuscripts for the Journal of Genetic Counseling: practical suggestions. Journal of genetic counseling. 2015; 24(2):189–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-014-9802-8 PMID: 25527418
-
(2015)
Journal of genetic counseling
, vol.24
, Issue.2
, pp. 189-192
-
-
Venne, V.1
-
75
-
-
0036528377
-
Responsible authorship and peer review
-
PMID: 12092488
-
Wilson JR. Responsible authorship and peer review. Science and engineering ethics. 2002; 8(2):155–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-002-0016-3 PMID: 12092488
-
(2002)
Science and engineering ethics
, vol.8
, Issue.2
, pp. 155-174
-
-
Wilson, JR.1
-
76
-
-
84922571449
-
The relationship between a reviewer’s recommendation and editorial decision of manuscripts submitted for publication in obstetrics
-
e5
-
Vintzileos AM, Ananth CV, Odibo AO, Chauhan SP, Smulian JC, Oyelese Y. The relationship between a reviewer’s recommendation and editorial decision of manuscripts submitted for publication in obstetrics. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014; 211(6):703.e1–.e5.
-
(2014)
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
, vol.211
, Issue.6
, pp. 703e1
-
-
Vintzileos, AM1
Ananth, CV2
Odibo, AO3
Chauhan, SP4
Smulian, JC5
Oyelese, Y.6
-
77
-
-
85067601838
-
A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals
-
PMID: 31217033
-
Glonti K, Cauchi D, Cobo E, Boutron I, Moher D, Hren D. A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals. BMC Med. 2019; 17(1):118. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1347-0 PMID: 31217033
-
(2019)
BMC Med
, vol.17
, Issue.1
, pp. 118
-
-
Glonti, K1
Cauchi, D2
Cobo, E3
Boutron, I4
Moher, D5
Hren, D.6
-
78
-
-
85067617315
-
Reviewing the review: a qualitative assessment of the peer review process in surgical journals
-
PMID: 29850109
-
Davis CH, Bass BL, Behrns KE, Lillemoe KD, Garden OJ, Roh MS, et al. Reviewing the review: a qualitative assessment of the peer review process in surgical journals. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2018; 3:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-018-0048-0 PMID: 29850109
-
(2018)
Res Integr Peer Rev
, vol.3
, pp. 4
-
-
Davis, CH1
Bass, BL2
Behrns, KE3
Lillemoe, KD4
Garden, OJ5
Roh, MS6
-
79
-
-
0022580818
-
Use of check lists in assessing the statistical content of medical studies
-
(Clinical research ed). PMID: 3082452
-
Gardner MJ, Machin D, Campbell MJ. Use of check lists in assessing the statistical content of medical studies. British medical journal (Clinical research ed). 1986; 292(6523):810–2. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.292.6523.810 PMID: 3082452
-
(1986)
British medical journal
, vol.292
, Issue.6523
, pp. 810-812
-
-
Gardner, MJ1
Machin, D2
Campbell, MJ.3
-
80
-
-
0027314204
-
An intervention to improve the reliability of manuscript reviews for the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
-
PMID: 8494074
-
Strayhorn J, McDermott JF, Tanguay P. An intervention to improve the reliability of manuscript reviews for the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry. 1993; 150(6):947–52. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.150.6.947 PMID: 8494074
-
(1993)
Am J Psychiatry
, vol.150
, Issue.6
, pp. 947-952
-
-
Strayhorn, J1
McDermott, JF2
Tanguay, P.3
-
81
-
-
0033179174
-
The role of the reviewer in editorial decision-making
-
Coronel R, Opthof T. The role of the reviewer in editorial decision-making. Cardiovascular Research. 1999; 43(2):261–4.
-
(1999)
Cardiovascular Research
, vol.43
, Issue.2
, pp. 261-264
-
-
Coronel, R1
Opthof, T.2
-
82
-
-
84871234150
-
Bias in peer review
-
Lee CJ, Sugimoto CR, Zhang G, Cronin B. Bias in peer review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2013; 64(1):2–17.
-
(2013)
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
, vol.64
, Issue.1
, pp. 2-17
-
-
Lee, CJ1
Sugimoto, CR2
Zhang, G3
Cronin, B.4
-
83
-
-
77950926227
-
Authors’ and editors’ perspectives on peer review quality in three scholarly nursing journals
-
PMID: 20487187
-
Shattell MM, Chinn P, Thomas SP, Cowling WR 3rd. Authors’ and editors’ perspectives on peer review quality in three scholarly nursing journals. Journal of nursing scholarship. 2010; 42(1):58–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01331.x PMID: 20487187
-
(2010)
Journal of nursing scholarship
, vol.42
, Issue.1
, pp. 58-65
-
-
Shattell, MM1
Chinn, P2
Thomas, SP3
Cowling, WR4
-
84
-
-
77956323567
-
Editorial peer reviewers’ recommendations at a general medical journal: are they reliable and do editors care?
-
PMID: 20386704
-
Kravitz RL, Franks P, Feldman MD, Gerrity M, Byrne C, Tierney WM. Editorial peer reviewers’ recommendations at a general medical journal: are they reliable and do editors care? PloS one. 2010; 5(4): e10072. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010072 PMID: 20386704
-
(2010)
PloS one
, vol.5
, Issue.4
, pp. e10072
-
-
Kravitz, RL1
Franks, P2
Feldman, MD3
Gerrity, M4
Byrne, C5
Tierney, WM.6
-
85
-
-
85070407522
-
Assessment of variables that influence agreement between reviewers for Foot & Ankle International
-
PMID: 31416682
-
Kwon JY, Gonzalez T, Miller C, Cook SP, Briceno J, Velasco BT, et al. Assessment of variables that influence agreement between reviewers for Foot & Ankle International. Foot and Ankle Surgery. 2020; 26(5):573–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2019.07.007 PMID: 31416682
-
(2020)
Foot and Ankle Surgery
, vol.26
, Issue.5
, pp. 573-579
-
-
Kwon, JY1
Gonzalez, T2
Miller, C3
Cook, SP4
Briceno, J5
Velasco, BT6
-
87
-
-
85082092567
-
Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
-
PMID: 32198306
-
Speich B, Schroter S, Briel M, et al. Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e035114. https://doi.org/10.1136/ bmjopen-2019-035114 PMID: 32198306
-
(2020)
BMJ Open
, vol.10
, pp. e035114
-
-
Speich, B1
Schroter, S2
Briel, M3
-
88
-
-
85065901564
-
Opening the Black Box of Peer Review
-
PMID: 31173714
-
Saxe JP. Opening the Black Box of Peer Review. Cell stem cell. 2019; 24(6):843–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2019.05.017 PMID: 31173714
-
(2019)
Cell stem cell
, vol.24
, Issue.6
, pp. 843-848
-
-
Saxe, JP.1
|