메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 16, Issue 5 May, 2021, Pages

A scoping review on biomedical journal peer review guides for reviewers

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHECKLIST; HUMAN; PEER REVIEW; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDLINE; PUBLICATION;

EID: 85106347743     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251440     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (23)

References (88)
  • 1
    • 84880697966 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reporting medical research
    • PMID: 23656235
    • Simera I, Altman DG. Reporting medical research. International journal of clinical practice. 2013; 67 (8):710–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.12168 PMID: 23656235
    • (2013) International journal of clinical practice , vol.67 , Issue.8 , pp. 710-716
    • Simera, I1    Altman, DG.2
  • 2
    • 84938630091 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How to review a manuscript
    • PMID: 26218722
    • Alam M. How to review a manuscript. Dermatologic surgery. 2015; 41(8):883–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000000421 PMID: 26218722
    • (2015) Dermatologic surgery , vol.41 , Issue.8 , pp. 883-888
    • Alam, M.1
  • 3
    • 84860447131 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Are peer reviewers encouraged to use reporting guidelines? A survey of 116 health research journals
    • PMID: 22558178
    • Hirst A, Altman DG. Are peer reviewers encouraged to use reporting guidelines? A survey of 116 health research journals. PloS one. 2012; 7(4):e35621. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035621 PMID: 22558178
    • (2012) PloS one , vol.7 , Issue.4 , pp. e35621
    • Hirst, A1    Altman, DG.2
  • 4
    • 85056694438 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach
    • PMID: 30453902
    • Munn Z, Peters MDJ, Stern C, Tufanaru C, McArthur A, Aromataris E. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2018; 18(1):143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x PMID: 30453902
    • (2018) BMC Medical Research Methodology , vol.18 , Issue.1 , pp. 143
    • Munn, Z1    Peters, MDJ2    Stern, C3    Tufanaru, C4    McArthur, A5    Aromataris, E.6
  • 5
    • 85076782005 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Practical Guidance for Knowledge Synthesis: Scoping Review Methods
    • PMID: 31756513
    • Lockwood C, dos Santos KB, Pap R. Practical Guidance for Knowledge Synthesis: Scoping Review Methods. Asian Nursing Research. 2019; 13(5):287–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anr.2019.11.002 PMID: 31756513
    • (2019) Asian Nursing Research , vol.13 , Issue.5 , pp. 287-294
    • Lockwood, C1    dos Santos, KB2    Pap, R.3
  • 7
    • 85054287365 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation
    • PMID: 30178033
    • Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, O’Brien KK, Colquhoun H, Levac D, et al. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation. Annals of internal medicine. 2018; 169(7):467–73. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850 PMID: 30178033
    • (2018) Annals of internal medicine , vol.169 , Issue.7 , pp. 467-473
    • Tricco, AC1    Lillie, E2    Zarin, W3    O’Brien, KK4    Colquhoun, H5    Levac, D6
  • 8
    • 85069265238 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Methods for Research Evidence Synthesis: The Scoping Review Approach
    • PMID: 31251164
    • Sucharew H, Macaluso M. Methods for Research Evidence Synthesis: The Scoping Review Approach. J Hosp Med. 2019; 7:3. https://doi.org/10.12788/jhm.3248 PMID: 31251164
    • (2019) J Hosp Med , vol.7 , pp. 3
    • Sucharew, H1    Macaluso, M.2
  • 9
    • 85072655227 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Writing a peer review: a primer for junior researchers
    • PMID: 31334806
    • Small HY, Eisner D. Writing a peer review: a primer for junior researchers. Cardiovascular Research. 2019; 115(10):e93–e5. https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvz174 PMID: 31334806
    • (2019) Cardiovascular Research , vol.115 , Issue.10 , pp. e93-e5
    • Small, HY1    Eisner, D.2
  • 10
    • 84857978834 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Peer review: a constatntly-evolving scientific process
    • PMID: 22378341
    • Araujo CGSd. Peer review: a constatntly-evolving scientific process. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2012; 98:e32–e5. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0066-782x2012000200017 PMID: 22378341
    • (2012) Arq Bras Cardiol , vol.98 , pp. e32-e5
    • Araujo, CGSd.1
  • 11
    • 0036832145 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Appraising the Evidence: Reviewing Disparate Data Systematically
    • PMID: 12448672
    • Hawker S, Payne S, Kerr C, Hardey M, Powell J. Appraising the Evidence: Reviewing Disparate Data Systematically. Qualitative health research. 2002; 12(9):1284–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1049732302238251 PMID: 12448672
    • (2002) Qualitative health research , vol.12 , Issue.9 , pp. 1284-1299
    • Hawker, S1    Payne, S2    Kerr, C3    Hardey, M4    Powell, J.5
  • 12
    • 68049122102 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and metaanalyses: the PRISMA statement
    • PMID: 19621072
    • Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and metaanalyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(7):e1000097. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 PMID: 19621072
    • (2009) PLoS Med , vol.6 , Issue.7 , pp. e1000097
    • Moher, D1    Liberati, A2    Tetzlaff, J3    Altman, DG.4
  • 13
    • 84879775275 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Evidence synthesis for decision making 7: a reviewer’s checklist
    • PMID: 23804511
    • Ades AE, Caldwell DM, Reken S, Welton NJ, Sutton AJ, Dias S. Evidence synthesis for decision making 7: a reviewer’s checklist. Medical decision making. 2013; 33(5):679–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0272989X13485156 PMID: 23804511
    • (2013) Medical decision making , vol.33 , Issue.5 , pp. 679-691
    • Ades, AE1    Caldwell, DM2    Reken, S3    Welton, NJ4    Sutton, AJ5    Dias, S.6
  • 14
    • 21444453008 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A guide to reviewing manuscripts
    • PMID: 15880980
    • Alexander GR. A guide to reviewing manuscripts. Maternal and child health journal. 2005; 9(1):113–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-005-2423-y PMID: 15880980
    • (2005) Maternal and child health journal , vol.9 , Issue.1 , pp. 113-117
    • Alexander, GR.1
  • 15
    • 67650102949 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Suggestions for reviewing manuscripts
    • PMID: 19602875
    • Alexandrov AV, Hennerici MG, Norrving B. Suggestions for reviewing manuscripts. Cerebrovascular diseases. 2009; 28(3):243–6. https://doi.org/10.1159/000228588 PMID: 19602875
    • (2009) Cerebrovascular diseases , vol.28 , Issue.3 , pp. 243-246
    • Alexandrov, AV1    Hennerici, MG2    Norrving, B.3
  • 16
    • 85038640990 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Peer Review of a Manuscript Submission: A How-To Guide for Effective and Efficient Commentary
    • Allen LA, Ho PM. Peer Review of a Manuscript Submission: A How-To Guide for Effective and Efficient Commentary. Circulation Cardiovascular quality and outcomes. 2017; 10(12).
    • (2017) Circulation Cardiovascular quality and outcomes , vol.10 , Issue.12
    • Allen, LA1    Ho, PM.2
  • 18
    • 85082191264 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Mentor of the Month Series: How to Review a Manuscript from an Editor’s Perspective?
    • PMID: 32207076
    • Altieri MS, Pawlik TM. Mentor of the Month Series: How to Review a Manuscript from an Editor’s Perspective? Journal of gastrointestinal surgery 2020; 24:1452–1454. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-020-04567-w PMID: 32207076
    • (2020) Journal of gastrointestinal surgery , vol.24 , pp. 1452-1454
    • Altieri, MS1    Pawlik, TM.2
  • 19
    • 84879700140 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Writing an Effective Manuscript Review: The 6 “Be’s” to Success
    • PMID: 23741073
    • Annesley TM. Writing an Effective Manuscript Review: The 6 “Be’s” to Success. Clinical chemistry. 2013; 59(7):1028–35. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2013.208280 PMID: 23741073
    • (2013) Clinical chemistry , vol.59 , Issue.7 , pp. 1028-1035
    • Annesley, TM.1
  • 20
    • 0347763589 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How to review a paper
    • PMID: 12760840
    • Benos DJ, Kirk KL, Hall JE. How to review a paper. Advances in physiology education. 2003; 27(1–4):47–52. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00057.2002 PMID: 12760840
    • (2003) Advances in physiology education , vol.27 , Issue.1–4 , pp. 47-52
    • Benos, DJ1    Kirk, KL2    Hall, JE.3
  • 21
    • 84866376934 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reviewing for clinical orthopaedics and related research
    • PMID: 22752799
    • Brand RA. Reviewing for clinical orthopaedics and related research. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 2012; 470(9):2622–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2447-8 PMID: 22752799
    • (2012) Clinical orthopaedics and related research , vol.470 , Issue.9 , pp. 2622-2625
    • Brand, RA.1
  • 22
    • 85019401892 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reviewing scientific manuscripts: A comprehensive guide for peer reviewers
    • PMID: 28526112
    • Brown LM, David EA, Karamlou T, Nason KS. Reviewing scientific manuscripts: A comprehensive guide for peer reviewers. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2017; 153(6):1609–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.12.067 PMID: 28526112
    • (2017) The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery , vol.153 , Issue.6 , pp. 1609-1614
    • Brown, LM1    David, EA2    Karamlou, T3    Nason, KS.4
  • 24
    • 78650921886 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Manuscript peer review: a guide for advanced practice nurses
    • PMID: 21208330
    • Christenbery TL. Manuscript peer review: a guide for advanced practice nurses. Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners. 2011; 23(1):15–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-7599.2010.00572.x PMID: 21208330
    • (2011) Journal of the American Academy of Nurse Practitioners , vol.23 , Issue.1 , pp. 15-22
    • Christenbery, TL.1
  • 25
    • 0032159084 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What We Owe The Author: rethinking editorial peer review
    • PMID: 9782929
    • Crigger NJ. What We Owe The Author: rethinking editorial peer review. Nursing ethics. 1998; 5(5):451–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/096973309800500508 PMID: 9782929
    • (1998) Nursing ethics , vol.5 , Issue.5 , pp. 451-458
    • Crigger, NJ.1
  • 26
    • 84961966571 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Systematically Reviewing a Journal Manuscript: A Guideline for Health Reviewers
    • e3. PMID: 31047176
    • Currie G, McCuaig C, Di Prospero L. Systematically Reviewing a Journal Manuscript: A Guideline for Health Reviewers. Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences. 2016; 47(2):129–38.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmir.2016.01.005 PMID: 31047176
    • (2016) Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences , vol.47 , Issue.2 , pp. 129-138
    • Currie, G1    McCuaig, C2    Di Prospero, L.3
  • 27
    • 84945961133 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A guide to performing a peer review of randomised controlled trials
    • PMID: 26521647
    • Del Mar C, Hoffmann TC. A guide to performing a peer review of randomised controlled trials. BMC Med. 2015; 13:248. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0471-8 PMID: 26521647
    • (2015) BMC Med , vol.13 , pp. 248
    • Del Mar, C1    Hoffmann, TC.2
  • 28
    • 85099945926 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How to be a good peer reviewer of scientific manuscripts
    • PMID: 33486891
    • Dhillon P. How to be a good peer reviewer of scientific manuscripts. The FEBS journal. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.15705 PMID: 33486891
    • (2021) The FEBS journal
    • Dhillon, P.1
  • 29
    • 38849186029 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Proposing a manuscript peer-review checklist
    • PMID: 18053748
    • Duchesne S, Jannin P. Proposing a manuscript peer-review checklist. NeuroImage. 2008; 39(4):1783–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.065 PMID: 18053748
    • (2008) NeuroImage , vol.39 , Issue.4 , pp. 1783-1787
    • Duchesne, S1    Jannin, P.2
  • 31
    • 84868374292 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • To accept or reject? A guide to peer reviewing of medical journal papers
    • PMID: 22885272
    • Einarson TR, Koren G. To accept or reject? A guide to peer reviewing of medical journal papers. Journal of population therapeutics and clinical pharmacology. 2012; 19(2):e328–33. PMID: 22885272
    • (2012) Journal of population therapeutics and clinical pharmacology , vol.19 , Issue.2 , pp. e328-e333
    • Einarson, TR1    Koren, G.2
  • 32
    • 85061996197 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Artificial Intelligence for Medical Image Analysis: A Guide for Authors and Reviewers
    • PMID: 30557049
    • England JR, Cheng PM. Artificial Intelligence for Medical Image Analysis: A Guide for Authors and Reviewers. American journal of roentgenology. 2019; 212(3):513–9. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.18. 20490 PMID: 30557049
    • (2019) American journal of roentgenology , vol.212 , Issue.3 , pp. 513-519
    • England, JR1    Cheng, PM.2
  • 33
    • 33645124527 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How to be an outstanding reviewer for the Journal of General Internal Medicine . . . and other journals
    • Estrada C, Kalet A, Smith W, Chin MH. How to be an outstanding reviewer for the Journal of General Internal Medicine . . . and other journals. Journal of general internal medicine. 2006; 21(3):281.
    • (2006) Journal of general internal medicine , vol.21 , Issue.3 , pp. 281
    • Estrada, C1    Kalet, A2    Smith, W3    Chin, MH.4
  • 34
    • 85085715316 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How to Review a Manuscript: Tips and Suggestions
    • PMID: 32153218
    • Genter MB. How to Review a Manuscript: Tips and Suggestions. International journal of toxicology. 2020; 39(3):263. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091581820911280 PMID: 32153218
    • (2020) International journal of toxicology , vol.39 , Issue.3 , pp. 263
    • Genter, MB.1
  • 36
    • 70449111994 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reviewing manuscripts: tips and responsibilities
    • PMID: 19761546
    • Heddle NM, Ness PM. Reviewing manuscripts: tips and responsibilities. Transfusion. 2009; 49 (11):2265–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1537-2995.2009.02390.x PMID: 19761546
    • (2009) Transfusion , vol.49 , Issue.11 , pp. 2265-2268
    • Heddle, NM1    Ness, PM.2
  • 37
    • 84959558600 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How to Review a Manuscript
    • PMID: 26850498
    • Hill JA. How to Review a Manuscript. Journal of electrocardiology. 2016; 49(2):109–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2016.01.001 PMID: 26850498
    • (2016) Journal of electrocardiology , vol.49 , Issue.2 , pp. 109-111
    • Hill, JA.1
  • 38
    • 85089866780 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Rapid Peer Reviewer Checklist for Rapid Reviews—RAPeer (DRAFT)
    • PMID: 32837897
    • Hunter J. Rapid Peer Reviewer Checklist for Rapid Reviews—RAPeer (DRAFT). Adv Integr Med. 2020; 7(4):183–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aimed.2020.07.003 PMID: 32837897
    • (2020) Adv Integr Med , vol.7 , Issue.4 , pp. 183-186
    • Hunter, J.1
  • 40
    • 85102673145 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How to read and review papers on machine learning and artificial intelligence in radiology: a survival guide to key methodological concepts
    • Kocak B, Kus EA, Kilickesmez O. How to read and review papers on machine learning and artificial intelligence in radiology: a survival guide to key methodological concepts. Eur Radiol. 2020.
    • (2020) Eur Radiol
    • Kocak, B1    Kus, EA2    Kilickesmez, O.3
  • 41
    • 84898739965 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Manuscript rejection: how to submit a revision and tips on being a good peer reviewer
    • PMID: 24675196
    • Kotsis SV, Chung KC. Manuscript rejection: how to submit a revision and tips on being a good peer reviewer. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2014; 133(4):958–64. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS. 0000000000000002 PMID: 24675196
    • (2014) Plastic and reconstructive surgery , vol.133 , Issue.4 , pp. 958-964
    • Kotsis, SV1    Chung, KC.2
  • 42
    • 85002145899 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How to peer review and revise manuscripts submitted for publication in academic nursing journals
    • PMID: 27692443
    • Kottner J, Norman I. How to peer review and revise manuscripts submitted for publication in academic nursing journals. International journal of nursing studies. 2016; 64:A1–a3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2016.09.011 PMID: 27692443
    • (2016) International journal of nursing studies , vol.64 , pp. A1-a3
    • Kottner, J1    Norman, I.2
  • 43
    • 79959716223 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Methods and Biostatistics: a concise guide for peer reviewers
    • (Suppl 1): PMID: 21487486
    • Kyrgidis A, Triaridis S. Methods and Biostatistics: a concise guide for peer reviewers. Hippokratia. 2010; 14(Suppl 1):13–22. PMID: 21487486
    • (2010) Hippokratia , vol.14 , pp. 13-22
    • Kyrgidis, A1    Triaridis, S.2
  • 44
    • 85086746477 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Considerations for Reporting and Reviewing Studies Including Health-Related Quality of Life
    • (Supplement)
    • Lapin BR. Considerations for Reporting and Reviewing Studies Including Health-Related Quality of Life. Chest. 2020; 158(1, Supplement):S49–S56.
    • (2020) Chest , vol.158 , Issue.1 , pp. S49-S56
    • Lapin, BR.1
  • 45
    • 85086341921 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Do’s and Don’ts for a Good Reviewer of Scientific Papers: A Beginner’s Brief Decalogue
    • PMID: 32525721
    • Lazarides MK, Georgiadis GS, Papanas N. Do’s and Don’ts for a Good Reviewer of Scientific Papers: A Beginner’s Brief Decalogue. The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds. 2020; 19(3):227–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534734620924349 PMID: 32525721
    • (2020) The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds , vol.19 , Issue.3 , pp. 227-229
    • Lazarides, MK1    Georgiadis, GS2    Papanas, N.3
  • 46
    • 85103890743 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How do I peer-review a scientific article?-a personal perspective
    • PMID: 29610756
    • Lippi G. How do I peer-review a scientific article?-a personal perspective. Annals of translational medicine. 2018; 6(3):68. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2017.12.15 PMID: 29610756
    • (2018) Annals of translational medicine , vol.6 , Issue.3 , pp. 68
    • Lippi, G.1
  • 47
    • 18844446650 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Guide for peer reviewers of scientific articles in the Croatian Medical Journal
    • PMID: 15849858
    • Marusić M, Sambunjak D, Marusić A. Guide for peer reviewers of scientific articles in the Croatian Medical Journal. Croat Med J. 2005; 46(2):326–32. PMID: 15849858
    • (2005) Croat Med J , vol.46 , Issue.2 , pp. 326-332
    • Marusić, M1    Sambunjak, D2    Marusić, A.3
  • 48
    • 84945955144 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Optimal strategies to consider when peer reviewing a systematic review and meta-analysis
    • PMID: 26521692
    • Moher D. Optimal strategies to consider when peer reviewing a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medicine. 2015; 13(1):274. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0509-y PMID: 26521692
    • (2015) BMC Medicine , vol.13 , Issue.1 , pp. 274
    • Moher, D.1
  • 49
    • 85071304686 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Emerging nursing scholars guide to peer reviewing an academic manuscript
    • PMID: 31660154
    • Oerther S, Watson R. Emerging nursing scholars guide to peer reviewing an academic manuscript. Nursing open. 2019; 6(4):1284–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.368 PMID: 31660154
    • (2019) Nursing open , vol.6 , Issue.4 , pp. 1284-1288
    • Oerther, S1    Watson, R.2
  • 50
    • 85081043230 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How to referee a paper—and save the world
    • PMID: 32129302
    • Pai SA. How to referee a paper—and save the world. Indian journal of cancer. 2020; 57(1):110–4. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijc.IJC_12_20 PMID: 32129302
    • (2020) Indian journal of cancer , vol.57 , Issue.1 , pp. 110-114
    • Pai, SA.1
  • 51
    • 0035292128 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How to write a peer review
    • PMID: 11291469
    • Paice E. How to write a peer review. Hospital medicine. 2001; 62(3):172–5. https://doi.org/10.12968/hosp.2001.62.3.2392 PMID: 11291469
    • (2001) Hospital medicine , vol.62 , Issue.3 , pp. 172-175
    • Paice, E.1
  • 52
    • 77952806271 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A practical guide to effective journal peer reviewing
    • PMID: 20485095
    • Pietrzak WS. A practical guide to effective journal peer reviewing. The Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2010; 21(3):631–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181d8403c PMID: 20485095
    • (2010) The Journal of craniofacial surgery , vol.21 , Issue.3 , pp. 631-636
    • Pietrzak, WS.1
  • 53
    • 29844444319 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript
    • PMID: 16177399
    • Provenzale JM, Stanley RJ. A systematic guide to reviewing a manuscript. AJR American journal of roentgenology. 2005; 185(4):848–54. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.05.0782 PMID: 16177399
    • (2005) AJR American journal of roentgenology , vol.185 , Issue.4 , pp. 848-854
    • Provenzale, JM1    Stanley, RJ.2
  • 54
    • 77949461505 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How to review journal manuscripts
    • PMID: 20304264
    • Rosenfeld RM. How to review journal manuscripts. Otolaryngology—head and neck surgery. 2010; 142 (4):472–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2010.02.010 PMID: 20304264
    • (2010) Otolaryngology—head and neck surgery , vol.142 , Issue.4 , pp. 472-486
    • Rosenfeld, RM.1
  • 56
    • 77649213395 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How to review scientific manuscripts and clinical case reports for Journal of Oral Implantology
    • PMID: 20017649
    • Rutkowski JL, Cairone JV. How to review scientific manuscripts and clinical case reports for Journal of Oral Implantology. The Journal of oral implantology. 2009; 35(6):310–4. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAIDJOI-D-09-00053R1.1 PMID: 20017649
    • (2009) The Journal of oral implantology , vol.35 , Issue.6 , pp. 310-314
    • Rutkowski, JL1    Cairone, JV.2
  • 57
    • 0030810680 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How to "peer review" a medical journal manuscript
    • PMID: 9217794
    • Salasche SJ. How to "peer review" a medical journal manuscript. Dermatologic surgery. 1997; 23 (6):423–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.1997.tb00081.x PMID: 9217794
    • (1997) Dermatologic surgery , vol.23 , Issue.6 , pp. 423-428
    • Salasche, SJ.1
  • 60
    • 8344272908 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Manuscript peer review: a helpful checklist for students and novice referees
    • PMID: 10902527
    • Seals DR, Tanaka H. Manuscript peer review: a helpful checklist for students and novice referees. Advances in physiology education. 2000; 23(1):52–8. https://doi.org/10.1152/advances.2000.23.1.S52 PMID: 10902527
    • (2000) Advances in physiology education , vol.23 , Issue.1 , pp. 52-58
    • Seals, DR1    Tanaka, H.2
  • 61
    • 78649767363 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reviewing an Original Research Manuscript for the International Journal of Exercise Science: A Guide for Students and Professionals
    • PMID: 27182294
    • Simpson KJ. Reviewing an Original Research Manuscript for the International Journal of Exercise Science: A Guide for Students and Professionals. International journal of exercise science. 2008; 1(2):43–9. PMID: 27182294
    • (2008) International journal of exercise science , vol.1 , Issue.2 , pp. 43-49
    • Simpson, KJ.1
  • 62
    • 85057243842 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Navigating manuscript assessment: The new practitioner’s guide to primary literature peer review
    • PMID: 29498322
    • Smith DV, Stokes LB, Marx K, Aitken SL. Navigating manuscript assessment: The new practitioner’s guide to primary literature peer review. Journal of oncology pharmacy practice. 2019; 25(1):94–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078155218761222 PMID: 29498322
    • (2019) Journal of oncology pharmacy practice , vol.25 , Issue.1 , pp. 94-100
    • Smith, DV1    Stokes, LB2    Marx, K3    Aitken, SL.4
  • 63
    • 84908145883 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Peer-review policy and guidelines for Biochemia Medica Journal
    • PMID: 25351350
    • Smolčić V, Simundić AM. Peer-review policy and guidelines for Biochemia Medica Journal. Biochemia medica. 2014; 24(3):321–8. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2014.034 PMID: 25351350
    • (2014) Biochemia medica , vol.24 , Issue.3 , pp. 321-328
    • Smolčić, V1    Simundić, AM.2
  • 64
    • 85105468598 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Guidelines for reviewing manuscripts submitted to Animal Bioscience
    • PMID: 33152211
    • Son AR, Kim BG. Guidelines for reviewing manuscripts submitted to Animal Bioscience. Animal bioscience. 2021; 34(2):161–2. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.20.0361 PMID: 33152211
    • (2021) Animal bioscience , vol.34 , Issue.2 , pp. 161-162
    • Son, AR1    Kim, BG.2
  • 65
    • 84957889989 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How to review a surgical paper: a guide for junior referees
    • PMID: 26874834
    • Stahel PF, Moore EE. How to review a surgical paper: a guide for junior referees. BMC Med. 2016; 14:29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-016-0578-6 PMID: 26874834
    • (2016) BMC Med , vol.14 , pp. 29
    • Stahel, PF1    Moore, EE.2
  • 66
    • 85089395931 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How to . . . assess the quality of qualitative research
    • PMID: 32790137
    • Stenfors T, Kajamaa A, Bennett D. How to . . . assess the quality of qualitative research. The clinical teacher. 2020; 17(6):596–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13242 PMID: 32790137
    • (2020) The clinical teacher , vol.17 , Issue.6 , pp. 596-599
    • Stenfors, T1    Kajamaa, A2    Bennett, D.3
  • 67
    • 85079701020 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • From the Editors: A Guide for Peer Review in the Field of Exercise Science
    • PMID: 30338014
    • Stone WJ, Navalta JW, Lyons TS, Schafer MA. From the Editors: A Guide for Peer Review in the Field of Exercise Science. International journal of exercise science. 2018; 11(1):1112–9. PMID: 30338014
    • (2018) International journal of exercise science , vol.11 , Issue.1 , pp. 1112-1119
    • Stone, WJ1    Navalta, JW2    Lyons, TS3    Schafer, MA.4
  • 68
    • 85050167009 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reviewing Manuscripts: A Systematic Approach
    • PMID: 29936302
    • Sucato GS, Holland-Hall C. Reviewing Manuscripts: A Systematic Approach. Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology. 2018; 31(5):441–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2018.06.005 PMID: 29936302
    • (2018) Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology , vol.31 , Issue.5 , pp. 441-445
    • Sucato, GS1    Holland-Hall, C.2
  • 69
    • 0035072577 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Manuscript peer review—a guide for health care professionals
    • PMID: 11310511
    • Sylvia LM, Herbel JL. Manuscript peer review—a guide for health care professionals. Pharmacotherapy. 2001; 21(4):395–404. https://doi.org/10.1592/phco.21.5.395.34493 PMID: 11310511
    • (2001) Pharmacotherapy , vol.21 , Issue.4 , pp. 395-404
    • Sylvia, LM1    Herbel, JL.2
  • 70
    • 84903581732 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • JRCR—updated author and reviewer guidelines for 2014
    • Talanow R. JRCR—updated author and reviewer guidelines for 2014. J Radiol Case Rep. 2014; 8 (6):39–40.
    • (2014) J Radiol Case Rep , vol.8 , Issue.6 , pp. 39-40
    • Talanow, R.1
  • 71
    • 84912050350 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How to review a scientific paper
    • PMID: 25248566
    • Tandon R. How to review a scientific paper. Asian journal of psychiatry. 2014; 11:124–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2014.08.007 PMID: 25248566
    • (2014) Asian journal of psychiatry , vol.11 , pp. 124-127
    • Tandon, R.1
  • 72
    • 85077769116 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Peer reviewing an original research paper
    • PMID: 31898597
    • Tullu MS, Karande S. Peer reviewing an original research paper. Journal of postgraduate medicine. 2020; 66(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/jpgm.JPGM_492_19 PMID: 31898597
    • (2020) Journal of postgraduate medicine , vol.66 , Issue.1 , pp. 1-6
    • Tullu, MS1    Karande, S.2
  • 73
    • 84925511662 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reviewing manuscripts for the Journal of Genetic Counseling: practical suggestions
    • PMID: 25527418
    • Venne V. Reviewing manuscripts for the Journal of Genetic Counseling: practical suggestions. Journal of genetic counseling. 2015; 24(2):189–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-014-9802-8 PMID: 25527418
    • (2015) Journal of genetic counseling , vol.24 , Issue.2 , pp. 189-192
    • Venne, V.1
  • 75
    • 0036528377 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Responsible authorship and peer review
    • PMID: 12092488
    • Wilson JR. Responsible authorship and peer review. Science and engineering ethics. 2002; 8(2):155–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-002-0016-3 PMID: 12092488
    • (2002) Science and engineering ethics , vol.8 , Issue.2 , pp. 155-174
    • Wilson, JR.1
  • 76
    • 84922571449 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The relationship between a reviewer’s recommendation and editorial decision of manuscripts submitted for publication in obstetrics
    • e5
    • Vintzileos AM, Ananth CV, Odibo AO, Chauhan SP, Smulian JC, Oyelese Y. The relationship between a reviewer’s recommendation and editorial decision of manuscripts submitted for publication in obstetrics. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014; 211(6):703.e1–.e5.
    • (2014) American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology , vol.211 , Issue.6 , pp. 703e1
    • Vintzileos, AM1    Ananth, CV2    Odibo, AO3    Chauhan, SP4    Smulian, JC5    Oyelese, Y.6
  • 77
    • 85067601838 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals
    • PMID: 31217033
    • Glonti K, Cauchi D, Cobo E, Boutron I, Moher D, Hren D. A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals. BMC Med. 2019; 17(1):118. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-019-1347-0 PMID: 31217033
    • (2019) BMC Med , vol.17 , Issue.1 , pp. 118
    • Glonti, K1    Cauchi, D2    Cobo, E3    Boutron, I4    Moher, D5    Hren, D.6
  • 78
    • 85067617315 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reviewing the review: a qualitative assessment of the peer review process in surgical journals
    • PMID: 29850109
    • Davis CH, Bass BL, Behrns KE, Lillemoe KD, Garden OJ, Roh MS, et al. Reviewing the review: a qualitative assessment of the peer review process in surgical journals. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2018; 3:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-018-0048-0 PMID: 29850109
    • (2018) Res Integr Peer Rev , vol.3 , pp. 4
    • Davis, CH1    Bass, BL2    Behrns, KE3    Lillemoe, KD4    Garden, OJ5    Roh, MS6
  • 79
    • 0022580818 scopus 로고
    • Use of check lists in assessing the statistical content of medical studies
    • (Clinical research ed). PMID: 3082452
    • Gardner MJ, Machin D, Campbell MJ. Use of check lists in assessing the statistical content of medical studies. British medical journal (Clinical research ed). 1986; 292(6523):810–2. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.292.6523.810 PMID: 3082452
    • (1986) British medical journal , vol.292 , Issue.6523 , pp. 810-812
    • Gardner, MJ1    Machin, D2    Campbell, MJ.3
  • 80
    • 0027314204 scopus 로고
    • An intervention to improve the reliability of manuscript reviews for the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
    • PMID: 8494074
    • Strayhorn J, McDermott JF, Tanguay P. An intervention to improve the reliability of manuscript reviews for the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry. 1993; 150(6):947–52. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.150.6.947 PMID: 8494074
    • (1993) Am J Psychiatry , vol.150 , Issue.6 , pp. 947-952
    • Strayhorn, J1    McDermott, JF2    Tanguay, P.3
  • 81
    • 0033179174 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The role of the reviewer in editorial decision-making
    • Coronel R, Opthof T. The role of the reviewer in editorial decision-making. Cardiovascular Research. 1999; 43(2):261–4.
    • (1999) Cardiovascular Research , vol.43 , Issue.2 , pp. 261-264
    • Coronel, R1    Opthof, T.2
  • 83
    • 77950926227 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Authors’ and editors’ perspectives on peer review quality in three scholarly nursing journals
    • PMID: 20487187
    • Shattell MM, Chinn P, Thomas SP, Cowling WR 3rd. Authors’ and editors’ perspectives on peer review quality in three scholarly nursing journals. Journal of nursing scholarship. 2010; 42(1):58–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01331.x PMID: 20487187
    • (2010) Journal of nursing scholarship , vol.42 , Issue.1 , pp. 58-65
    • Shattell, MM1    Chinn, P2    Thomas, SP3    Cowling, WR4
  • 84
    • 77956323567 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Editorial peer reviewers’ recommendations at a general medical journal: are they reliable and do editors care?
    • PMID: 20386704
    • Kravitz RL, Franks P, Feldman MD, Gerrity M, Byrne C, Tierney WM. Editorial peer reviewers’ recommendations at a general medical journal: are they reliable and do editors care? PloS one. 2010; 5(4): e10072. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010072 PMID: 20386704
    • (2010) PloS one , vol.5 , Issue.4 , pp. e10072
    • Kravitz, RL1    Franks, P2    Feldman, MD3    Gerrity, M4    Byrne, C5    Tierney, WM.6
  • 85
    • 85070407522 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Assessment of variables that influence agreement between reviewers for Foot & Ankle International
    • PMID: 31416682
    • Kwon JY, Gonzalez T, Miller C, Cook SP, Briceno J, Velasco BT, et al. Assessment of variables that influence agreement between reviewers for Foot & Ankle International. Foot and Ankle Surgery. 2020; 26(5):573–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2019.07.007 PMID: 31416682
    • (2020) Foot and Ankle Surgery , vol.26 , Issue.5 , pp. 573-579
    • Kwon, JY1    Gonzalez, T2    Miller, C3    Cook, SP4    Briceno, J5    Velasco, BT6
  • 86
    • 85037865790 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Improving peer review: What reviewers can do
    • PMID: 29074482
    • DiDomenico RJ, Baker WL, Haines ST. Improving peer review: What reviewers can do. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy. 2017; 74(24):2080–4. https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp170190 PMID: 29074482
    • (2017) American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy , vol.74 , Issue.24 , pp. 2080-2084
    • DiDomenico, RJ1    Baker, WL2    Haines, ST.3
  • 87
    • 85082092567 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
    • PMID: 32198306
    • Speich B, Schroter S, Briel M, et al. Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e035114. https://doi.org/10.1136/ bmjopen-2019-035114 PMID: 32198306
    • (2020) BMJ Open , vol.10 , pp. e035114
    • Speich, B1    Schroter, S2    Briel, M3
  • 88
    • 85065901564 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Opening the Black Box of Peer Review
    • PMID: 31173714
    • Saxe JP. Opening the Black Box of Peer Review. Cell stem cell. 2019; 24(6):843–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2019.05.017 PMID: 31173714
    • (2019) Cell stem cell , vol.24 , Issue.6 , pp. 843-848
    • Saxe, JP.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.