메뉴 건너뛰기
American Journal of Physiology - Advances in Physiology Education
Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 52-58
Manuscript peer review: A helpful checklist for students and novice referees
Author keywords

Analysis; Critical thinking; Journal
Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; METHODOLOGY; PEER REVIEW; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; STANDARD;
EID: 8344272908     PISSN: 10434046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1152/advances.2000.23.1.s52     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (52)
References (10)
  • 1
    • 0028304432 scopus 로고
    • Peer review is an effective screening process to evaluate medical manuscripts
    • Abby M, Massey MD, Galandiuk S, and Polk HC Jr. Peer review is an effective screening process to evaluate medical manuscripts. JAMA 272: 105-107, 1994.
    • (1994) JAMA , vol.272 , pp. 105-107
    • Abby, M.1    Massey, M.D.2    Galandiuk, S.3    Polk Jr., H.C.4
  • 2
    • 0032527568 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal?
    • Black N, van Rooyen S, Godlee F, Smith R, and Evans S. What makes a good reviewer and a good review for a general medical journal? JAMA 280: 231-233, 1998.
    • (1998) JAMA , vol.280 , pp. 231-233
    • Black, N.1    Van Rooyen, S.2    Godlee, F.3    Smith, R.4    Evans, S.5
  • 3
    • 0033524998 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The importance of reviewers
    • Bloom FE. The importance of reviewers. Science 283: 789, 1999.
    • (1999) Science , vol.283 , pp. 789
    • Bloom, F.E.1
  • 4
    • 0030155658 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Thoughts of a manuscript reviewer
    • Bluestone N. Thoughts of a manuscript reviewer. Pharos 59: 14-18, 1996.
    • (1996) Pharos , vol.59 , pp. 14-18
    • Bluestone, N.1
  • 5
    • 0031974522 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Masking, blinding, and peer review: The blind leading the blinded
    • Davidhoff F. Masking, blinding, and peer review: the blind leading the blinded. Ann Intern Med 128: 66-68, 1998.
    • (1998) Ann Intern Med , vol.128 , pp. 66-68
    • Davidhoff, F.1
  • 6
    • 0032151339 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Manuscript reviewing: What reviewers have to say
    • Emden C and Schubert S. Manuscript reviewing: what reviewers have to say. Contemp Nurse 7: 117-124, 1998.
    • (1998) Contemp Nurse , vol.7 , pp. 117-124
    • Emden, C.1    Schubert, S.2
  • 7
    • 0028576904 scopus 로고
    • Manuscript quality before and after peer review and editing at Annals of Internal Medicine
    • Goodman SN, Berlin J, Fletcher SW, and Fletcher RH. Manuscript quality before and after peer review and editing at Annals of Internal Medicine. Ann Intern Med 121: 11-21, 1994.
    • (1994) Ann Intern Med , vol.121 , pp. 11-21
    • Goodman, S.N.1    Berlin, J.2    Fletcher, S.W.3    Fletcher, R.H.4
  • 8
    • 0032086131 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A different method of teaching peer review systems
    • Lightfoot JT. A different method of teaching peer review systems. Am J Physiol Adv Physiol Educ 274: S57-S61, 1998.
    • (1998) Am J Physiol Adv Physiol Educ , vol.274
    • Lightfoot, J.T.1
  • 9
    • 0029317374 scopus 로고
    • A checklist to help students analyze published articles in basic medical sciences
    • Rangachari PK and Mierson S. A checklist to help students analyze published articles in basic medical sciences. Am J Physiol Adv Physiol Educ 268: S21-S25, 1995.
    • (1995) Am J Physiol Adv Physiol Educ , vol.268
    • Rangachari, P.K.1    Mierson, S.2
  • 10
    • 0030870950 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Peer review: Reform or revolution?
    • Smith R. Peer review: reform or revolution? Br Med J 315: 759-760, 1997.
    • (1997) Br Med J , vol.315 , pp. 759-760
    • Smith, R.1

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.