Responsible Authorship and Peer Review

Science and Engineering Ethics

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 155-174

  Wilson, James R ^a  

^a North Carolina State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Authorship principles; Peer review; Refereeing guidelines

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; HUMAN; MEDICAL ETHICS; PEER REVIEW; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLICATION; WRITING;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

AUTHORSHIP; ETHICS, PROFESSIONAL; GUIDELINES; HUMANS; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS;

EID: 0036528377     PISSN: 13533452     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11948-002-0016-3     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Feynman, Richard P. (1985) "Surely You're Joking. Mr. Feynman!": Adventures of a Curious Character, W. W. Norton & Co., New York.
2. Langmuir, Irving, and Hall, Robert N. (1989) Pathological science, Physics Today 42: 36-48.
3. Nye, Mary Jo (1980) N-rays: An episode in the history and psychology of science, Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences 11: 127-156.
4. Wood, Robert W. (1904) The n-rays, Nature 70: 530-531.
5. Huizenga, John R. (1993) Cold Fusion: The Scientific Fiasco of the Century, Oxford University Press, New York.
6. Fleischmann, Martin, and Pons, Stanley (1989a) Electrochemically induced nuclear fusion of deuterium, Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 261: 301-308.
7. Fleischmann, Martin, and Pons, Stanley (1989b) Errata, Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry 263: 187-188.
8. Glass, B. (1965) The ethical basis of science, Science 150: 1254-1261.
9. Bronowski, J. (1965) Science and Human Values, rev. ed., Harper & Row, New York.
10. CBE Style Manual Committee (1983) CBE Style Manual: A Guide for Authors, Editors, and Publishers in the Biological Sciences, 5th ed. rev. and expanded, Council of Biology Editors, Bethesda, Md.
11. CBE Style Manual Committee (1994) Scientific Style and Format: The CBE Manual for Authors, Editors, and Publishers, 6th ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
12. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (1997) Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals, Journal of the American Medical Association 277: 927-934.
13. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (2001) Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals [online], available online via 〈www.icmje.org〉 [accessed February 10, 2002].
14. Rennie, Drummond, Yank, Veronica, and Emanuel, Linda (1997) When authorship fails: A proposal to make contributors accountable, Journal of the American Medical Association 278: 579-585.
15. Houk, V. N., and Thacker, S. B. (1990) The responsibilities of authorship, in: CBE Editorial Policy Committee, eds. Ethics and Policy in Scientific Publication, Council of Biology Editors, Bethesda, Md., pp. 181-184.
16. Davidoff, Frank (2000) Who's the author: Problems with biomedical authorship, and some possible solutions, Science Editor 23: 111-119.
17. Taylor, Craig (1999) The cold fusion debacle, presented at Research Ethics Institute, 13-16 June, at North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
18. Macrina, Francis L. (2000) Scientific Integrity: An Introductory Text with Cases, 2d ed., ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
19. Wilson, James R. (2001) Some guidelines on technical writing [online], Department of Industrial Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, available as 〈http://www.ie.ncsu.edu/jwilson/guide.html〉 [accessed February 26, 2002].
20. Chalmers, I. (1991) Underreporting research is scientific misconduct, in: Peer Review in Scientific Publishing: Papers from the First International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication, Council of Biology Editors, Chicago, pp. 169-177, also available as: Chalmers, I. (1990) Underreporting research is scientific misconduct, Journal of the American Medical Association 263: 1405-1408.
21. Chalmers, I. (1991) Underreporting research is scientific misconduct, in: Peer Review in Scientific Publishing: Papers from the First International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication, Council of Biology Editors, Chicago, pp. 169-177, also available as: Chalmers, I. (1990) Underreporting research is scientific misconduct, Journal of the American Medical Association 263: 1405-1408.
22. Woodward, James, and Goodstein, David (1996) Conduct, misconduct and the structure of science, American Scientist 84: 479-490.
23. Medawar, Peter B. (1979) Advice to a Young Scientist, BasicBooks, New York.
24. Wilson, James R. (1997) Doctoral colloquium keynote address: Conduct, misconduct, and cargo cult science, in: Andradóttir, S., Healy, K.J., Withers, D. H., and Nelson, B. L., eds. Proceedings of the 1997 Winter Simulation Conference, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, New Jersey, pp. 1405-1413. Available via 〈www.informs-cs.org/wsc97papers/1405.PDF〉 [accessed February 26, 2002].
25. Kronick, D. A. (1991) Peer review in 18th century scientific journalism, in: Peer Review in Scientific Publishing: Papers from the First International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication, Council of Biology Editors, Chicago, pp. 5-8, also available as: Kronick, D. A. (1990) Peer review in 18th century scientific journalism, Journal of the American Medical Association 263: 1321-1322.
26. Kronick, D. A. (1991) Peer review in 18th century scientific journalism, in: Peer Review in Scientific Publishing: Papers from the First International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication, Council of Biology Editors, Chicago, pp. 5-8, also available as: Kronick, D. A. (1990) Peer review in 18th century scientific journalism, Journal of the American Medical Association 263: 1321-1322.
27. Burnham, J. C. (1991) The evolution of editorial peer review, in: Peer Review in Scientific Publishing: Papers from the First International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication, Council of Biology Editors, Chicago, pp. 9-26, also available as: Burnham, J. C. (1990) The evolution of editorial peer review, Journal of the American Medical Association 263: 1323-1329.
28. Burnham, J. C. (1991) The evolution of editorial peer review, in: Peer Review in Scientific Publishing: Papers from the First International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication, Council of Biology Editors, Chicago, pp. 9-26, also available as: Burnham, J. C. (1990) The evolution of editorial peer review, Journal of the American Medical Association 263: 1323-1329.
29. Raymond, E. S. (2000) The cathedral and the bazaar [online], available on the web via 〈www.tuxedo.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/cathedral-bazaar〉 [accessed February 26, 2002].
30. Relman, A. S. (1990) The value of peer review, in: CBE Editorial Policy Committee, eds., Ethics and Policy in Scientific Publication, Council of Biology Editors, Bethesda, Md., pp. 272-277.
31. Culliton, B. J. (1983) Coping with fraud: The Darsee case, Science 220: 31-35.
32. Relman, A. S. (1983) Lessons from the Darsee affair. The New England Journal of Medicine 308: 1415-1417.
33. Goodstein, D. (1995) Peer review after the big crunch, American Scientist 83: 401-402.
34. Yalow, R. S. (1978) Radioimmunoassay: A probe for the fine structure of biologic systems, Science 200: 1236-1245.
35. Yalow, R. S. (1982) Competency testing for reviewers and editors, The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5: 244-245.
36. McCutchen, C. W. (1997) Peer review: Treacherous servant, disastrous master, in: Elliott, D. E., and Stern, J. E., eds. Research Ethics: A Reader, University Press of New England for the Institute for the Study of Applied and Professional Ethics at Dartmouth College, Hanover N.H., pp. 151-164, also available as: McCutchen, C. W. (1991) Peer review: Treacherous servant, disastrous master, Technology Review 94: 27-40.
37. McCutchen, C. W. (1997) Peer review: Treacherous servant, disastrous master, in: Elliott, D. E., and Stern, J. E., eds. Research Ethics: A Reader, University Press of New England for the Institute for the Study of Applied and Professional Ethics at Dartmouth College, Hanover N.H., pp. 151-164, also available as: McCutchen, C. W. (1991) Peer review: Treacherous servant, disastrous master, Technology Review 94: 27-40.
38. Horrobin, D. F. (1991) The philosophical basis of peer review and the suppression of innovation, in: Peer Review in Scientific Publishing: Papers from the First International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication, Council of Biology Editors, Chicago, pp. 250-259, also available as: Horrobin, D. F. (1990) The philosophical basis of peer review and the suppression of innovation, Journal of the American Medical Association 263: 1438-1441.
39. Horrobin, D. F. (1991) The philosophical basis of peer review and the suppression of innovation, in: Peer Review in Scientific Publishing: Papers from the First International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication, Council of Biology Editors, Chicago, pp. 250-259, also available as: Horrobin, D. F. (1990) The philosophical basis of peer review and the suppression of innovation, Journal of the American Medical Association 263: 1438-1441.
40. Dickersin, K. (1991) The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence, in: Peer Review in Scientific Publishing: Papers from the First International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication, Council of Biology Editors, Chicago, pp. 92-104, also available as: Dickersin, K. (1990) The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. Journal of the American Medical Association 263: 1385-1389.
41. Dickersin, K. (1991) The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence, in: Peer Review in Scientific Publishing: Papers from the First International Congress on Peer Review in Biomedical Publication, Council of Biology Editors, Chicago, pp. 92-104, also available as: Dickersin, K. (1990) The existence of publication bias and risk factors for its occurrence. Journal of the American Medical Association 263: 1385-1389.
42. Siegelman, Stanley S. (1991) Assassins and zealots: Variations in peer review, Radiology 178: 637-642.
43. Gleser, Leon J. (1986) Some notes on refereeing, The American Statistician 40: 310-312.
44. Halmos, P. R. (1985) I Want to Be a Mathematician, Springer-Verlag, New York.
45. Truesdell, C. (1951) Review of "Equations of finite vibratory motions in isotropic elastic media. Surface force sufficient to maintain equilibrium," by Garcia, G. (1950) Actas Acad. Ci. Lima 13: 29-38, Mathematical Reviews 12: 561.
46. Truesdell, C. (1951) Review of "Equations of finite vibratory motions in isotropic elastic media. Surface force sufficient to maintain equilibrium," by Garcia, G. (1950) Actas Acad. Ci. Lima 13: 29-38, Mathematical Reviews 12: 561.
47. Truesdell, C. (1951) Review of "Equations of finite vibratory motions in isotropic elastic media. Surface force sufficient to maintain equilibrium," by Garcia, G. (1950) Actas Acad. Ci. Lima 13: 29-38, Mathematical Reviews 12: 561.
48. Forscher, Bernard K. (1965) Rules for referees. Science 150: 319-321.
49. Callaham, M. L., Wears, R. L., and Waeckerle, J. F. (1998) Effect of attendance at a training session on peer reviewer quality and performance, Annals of Emergency Medicine 32: 318-322.
50. Callaham, M. L., Knopp, R. K., and Gallagher, E. J. (2002) Effect of written feedback by editors on quality of reviews: Two randomized trials, Journal of the American Medical Association to appear.
51. Jefferson, T., Alderson, P., Wager, E., and Davidoff, F. (2002) The effects of editorial peer review: A systematic review, Journal of the American Medical Association to appear.
52. Jefferson, T., Wager, E., and Davidoff, F. (2002) Measuring the quality of editorial peer review, Journal of the American Medical Association to appear.
53. Strayhorn, J., McDermott, J. F., and Tanguay, P. (1993) An intervention to improve the reliability of manuscript reviews for the Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, American Journal of Psychiatry 150: 947-952.
54. Purcell, Gretchen P., Donovan, Shannon L., and Davidoff, Frank (1998) Changes to manuscripts during the editorial process, Journal of the American Medical Association 280: 227-228.
55. Waser, Nickolas M., Price, Mary V., and Grosberg, Richard K. (1992) Writing an effective manuscript review, BioScience 42: 621-623.
56. Rosenzweig, M. L., Davis, J. I., and Brown, J. H. (1988) How to write an influential review, Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America 69: 152-155.
57. Spier, Raymond E. (2002) Peer review and innovation, Science and Engineering Ethics 8: 99-108.
58. Chubin, Daryl E. (2002) Much ado about peer review, Part 2, Science and Engineering Ethics 8: 109-112.
59. Abelson, P. H. (1992) Integrity of the research process, Science 256: 1257.