Proposing a manuscript peer-review checklist

NeuroImage

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1783-1787

  Duchesne, Simon ^a,b   Jannin, Pierre ^a,b  

^a CENTRE DE RECHERCHE DE L INSTITUT UNIVERSITAIRE EN SANTÉ MENTALE DE QUÉBEC   (Canada)

^b INRIA   (France)

Author keywords

Manuscripts; Peer review; Productivity

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 38849186029     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.09.065     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Balci O. Verification, validation and certification of modeling and simulation applications. Proceedings of 35th Conference on Winter Simulation: Driving Innovation, New Orleans, Louisiana. Winter Simulation Conference (2003) 150-158
2. Benos D.J., Kirk K.L., and Hall J.E. How to review a paper. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 27 2 (2003) 47-52
3. Bossuyt P.M., Reitsma J.B., Bruns D.E., Gatsonis P.P., Glasziou P.P., Irwig L.M., Lijmer J.G., Moher D., Rennie D., and De Vet H.C. Standards for reporting of diagnostic accuracy. Toward complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. Radiology 226 (2003) 24-28
4. Hook O. Scientific communications: history, electronic journals and impact factors. Scand. J. Rehabil. Med. 31 1 (1999) 3-7
5. Hailey D. Toward transparency in health technology assessment: a checklist for HTA Reports. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care, 19 1 (2003) 1-7
6. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors [http://www.ICMJE.org]. Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publication. Accessed July 02, 2007. Available from: http://www.ICMJE.org.
7. ISO 9000:2000. Quality management systems-Fundamentals and vocabulary. International Organization for Standardization (2000)
8. Jannin P., Grova C., and Maurer C. Model for designing and reporting reference based validation procedures in medical image processing. Int. J. Comput. Assisted Radiol. Surg. 1 2 (2006) 1001-1115
9. Moher D., Cook D.J., Eastwood S., Olkin I., Rennie D., and Stroup D.F. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet 354 (1999) 1896-1900
10. Moher D., Schulz K.F., and Altman D.G. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 357 9263 (2001) 1191-1194
11. Tenopir C., and King D.W. Towards electronic journals: realities for scientists, librarians, and publishers. Psychology 11 84 (2000)
12. The AGREE Collaboration. Writing Group: Cluzeau, F.A., Burgers, J.S., Brouwers, M., Grol, R., Mäkelä, M., Littlejohns, P., Grimshaw, J., Hunt, C., 2003. Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Quality and Safety in Health Care 12 (1), 18-23.