What we owe the author: Rethinking editorial peer review

Nursing Ethics

Volumn 5, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 451-458

  Crigger, Nancy J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Beneficence; Editorial peer review; Epistemology; Ethics; Impartiality; Universalizability

Indexed keywords

BENEFICENCE; BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MORALITY; PEER REVIEW; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLISHING; REVIEW; STANDARD; WRITING;

BIOETHICS AND PROFESSIONAL ETHICS; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

AUTHORSHIP; BENEFICENCE; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CODES OF ETHICS; EDITORIAL POLICIES; ETHICS, PROFESSIONAL; GUIDELINES; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; MORAL OBLIGATIONS; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH;

EID: 0032159084     PISSN: 09697330     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/096973309800500508     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Rennie D. More peering into peer review. JAMA 1993; 270: 2856-58.
2. Horrobin DF. The philosophical basis of peer review and the suppression of innovation. JAMA 1990; 263: 1438-41.
3. Markie PJ. A professor's duties. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1994.
4. King CR, McCuire B, Longman AJ, Carroll-Johnson RM. Peer review, authorship, ethics, and conflict of interest. Image 1997; 29: 163-66.
5. Rennie D. Guarding the guardians: a conference on editorial peer review, JAMA 1986; 256: 2391-92.
6. Sharp DW. What can and should be done to reduce publication bias? JAMA 1990; 263: 1390-91.
7. Fondiller SH. Is nursing at risk? Nurs Healthcare 1994; 15: 142-48.
8. Davis M. Codes of ethics, professions, and conflict of interests. Prof Ethics 1992; 1(1-2): 179-95
9. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics, fourth edition. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.
10. Brandt R. Morality, utilitarianism and rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
11. Davis M. Science: after such knowledge what responsibility? Prof Ethics 1995; 4(1): 49-74.
12. Battin MP. Applied professional ethics and organized religion. Prof Ethics 1994; 3(2): 5-15.
13. Kuhn TS. The structure of scientific revolutions, second edition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, 1970.
14. Clark AJ. Responsible dissemination of scholarly work. J Neurosci Nurs 1993; 25: 113-17.
15. Shrader-Frechette K. Ethics of scientific research. Landham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1994.
16. Cottingham J. Ethics and impartiality. Philos Stud 1983; 43: 83-99.
17. Hare RM. Moral thinking. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981.
18. Potter NT, Timmons M. Introduction. In: Potter NT, Timmons M eds. Morality and universality. Boston, MA: Reidel, 1985: i-xxxii.
19. Gert B, Culver CM, Clouser KD. Bioethics: a return to fundamentals. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
20. Singer P. How are we to live? Melbourne: Text Publishing, 1993.