L2 Spanish Acquisition of English Phrasal Verbs: A Cognitive Linguistic Analysis of L1 Infl uence

Corpus-Based Approaches to English Language Teaching

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 149-166

  González, Rafael Alejo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXTREMADURA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS; LINGUISTIC ANALYSIS;

EID: 85105778626     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (29)

1. Cadierno, T. (2004), ‘Expressing motion events in a second language: A cognitive typological perspective’, in Achard, M. and Niemeirer, S. (eds), Cognitive Linguistics, Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Teaching. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 13-49.
2. Cappelle, B. (2005), Particle Patterns in English. A Comprehensive Coverage. Ph.D. Dissertation at the Faculteit Letteren, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
3. Cobb, T. (2003), ‘Analyzing late interlanguage with learner corpora: Quebec replication of three European studies’. Canadian Modern Language Review, 59, 393-423.
4. Dagut, M. and Laufer, B. (1985), ‘Avoidance of Phrasal Verbs: A Case for Contrastive Analysis’. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 73-79.
5. Dirven, R. (2001), ‘English phrasal verbs: Theory and didactic applicaton’, in Pütz, M., Niemeier, S. and Dirven, R. (ed.), Applied Cognitive Linguistics. 2 Vols. Berlin. Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 3-27.
6. Dulay, H. and Burt, M. (1974), ‘Natural sequences in child second language acquisition’. Language Learning, 24, 37-53.
7. Ellis, N. (2007), ‘The associative-cognitive CREED’, in Van Patten, B. and Williams, J. (eds), Theories in Second Language Acquisition. An Introduction, Mahwah, New Jersey/London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp, 77-98.
8. Ellis, N. C. (2002), ‘Frequency effects in language processing. A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition’. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143-188.
9. Hulstijn, J. H. and Marchena, E. (1989), ‘Avoidance: Grammatical or Semantic causes?' Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 241-255.
10. Ishii, Y. and Sohmiya, K. (2006), ‘On the semantic structure of English. Spatial particles involving metaphors’, in A. Yohitomi (ed.), Readings in a Second Language Pedagogy and Second Language Acquisition: In Japanese Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 381-402.
11. Jarvis, S. and Pavlenko, A. (2008), Crosslingistic Infl uence in Language and Cognition. New York/London: Routledge.
12. Krashen, S. (1981), Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
13. Laufer, B. and Eliasson, S. (1993), ‘What causes avoidance in L2 learning: L1-L2 difference, L1-L2 similarity, or L2 complexity?', Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 35-48.
14. Lee, D. (2001), Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Victoria, Australia: Oxford University Press.
15. Liao, Y. and Fukuya, Y. J. (2004), ‘Avoidance of phrasal verbs: The case of Chinese learners of English’. Language Learning, 54, (2), 193-226.
16. Lindner, S. (1981), A Lexico-Semantic Analysis of Verb-Particle Constructions with up and Out. San Diego: University of California.
17. Odlin, T. (1989), Language Transfer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. O’Dowd, E. M. (1998), Preposition and Particles in English. A Discourse-Functional Account. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G.N. and Svartvik, J. (1985), A Comprehensive Grammar of English. London: Longman.
20. Siyanova, A. and Schmitt, N. (2007), ‘Native and non-native use of multi-word vs. one-word verbs’. IRAL, 45, 119-139.
21. Sjöholm, K. (1995), The Infl uence of Crosslinguistic, Semantic, and Input Factors on the Acquisition of Phrasal Verbs. Abo: Abo Akademi University Press.
22. Slobin, D. I. (1996), ‘Two ways to travel: Verbs of motion in English and Spanish’, in Shibatani, M. and Thompson, S. A. (eds), Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Meaning. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 195-220.
23. Slobin, D. I. (1997), ‘Mind, code, and text’, in Bybee, J., Haiman, J. and Thompson, S. A. (eds), Essays on Language Function and Language Type: Dedicated to T. Givón. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 437-467.
24. Slobin, D. I. (2000), ‘Verbalized events: A dynamic approach to linguistic relativity and determinism’, in Niemeier, S. and Dirven, R. (eds), Evidence for Linguistic Relativity. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 107-138.
25. Slobin, D. I. (2003), ‘Language and thought online: Cognitive consequences of linguistic relativity’, in Gentner, D. and Goldin-Meadow, S. (eds), Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 157-192.
26. Talmy, L. (1985), ‘Lexicalization patterns: Semantic structure in lexical forms’, in Shopen, T. (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Talmy, L. (2000), Toward a Cognitive Semantics, Vol. 1: Concepts Structuring Systems. Cambridge, Massachusetts, MA: MIT Press.
28. Tyler, A. and Evans, V. (2003), The Semantics of English Prepositions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Wray, A. (2002), Formulaic Language and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.