Decisions from experience

The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision Making

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 239-267

  Hertwig, Ralph ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN DEVELOPMENT   (Germany)

Author keywords

Decision making theory; Decisions under uncertainty; Description experience dichotomy; Probability distribution; Risk uncertainty gap

Indexed keywords

EID: 85103046372     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9781118468333.ch8     Document Type: Chapter

References (100)

1. Abdellaoui, M., L’Haridon, O., & Paraschiv, C. (2011). Experienced vs. described uncertainty: Do we need two prospect theory specifications? Management Science, 57(10), 1879-1895.
2. Allais, M. (1953). Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulats et axiomes de l’école américaine [Rational man’s behavior in face of risk: Critique of the American School’s postulates and axioms]. Econometrica, 21(4), 503-546.
3. Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. (2003). The Newell test for a theory of cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26(5), 587-601.
5. Avrahami, J., Güth, W., Hertwig, R., Kareev, Y., & Otsubo, H. (2013). Learning (not) to yield: An experimental study of evolving ultimatum game behavior. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 47, 47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.socec.2013.08.009
6. Barron, G., & Erev, I. (2003). Small feedback-based decisions and their limited correspondence to description-based decisions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16(3), 215-233.
7. Barron, G., Leider, S., & Stack, J. (2008). The effect of safe experience on a warnings’ impact: Sex, drugs, and rock-n-roll. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 106(2), 125-142.
8. Brandstätter, E., Gigerenzer, G., & Hertwig, R. (2006). The priority heuristic: Making choices without trade-offs. Psychological Review, 113(2), 409-432.
9. Brehmer, B. (1980). In one word: Not from experience. Acta Psychologica, 45, 223-241.
10. Bruni, F. (2003, August 26). San Giuseppe Vesuviano Journal: Who’s afraid of Vesuvius? (Pompeii is history). The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com
11. Busemeyer, J. R. (1985). Decision making under uncertainty: A comparison of simple scalability, fixed-sample, and sequential-sampling models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11(3), 538-564.
12. Camilleri, A. R., & Newell, B. R. (2011a). Description- and experience-based choice: Does equivalent information equal equivalent choice? Acta Psychologica, 136(3), 276-284.
13. Camilleri, A. R., & Newell, B. R. (2011b). When and why rare events are underweighted: A direct comparison of the sampling, partial feedback, full feedback and description choice paradigms. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(2), 377-384.
14. Camilleri, A. R., & Newell, B. R. (2013). The long and short of it: Closing the description- experience “gap” by taking the long-run view. Cognition, 126(1), 54-71.
15. Denrell, J. (2007). Adaptive learning and risk taking. Psychological Review, 114(1), 177-187.
16. Edwards, W. (1954). The theory of decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 51(4), 380-417.
17. Edwards, W. (1961). Probability learning in 1000 trials. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(4), 385-394.
18. Edwards, W. (1968). Conservatism in human information processing. In B. Kleinmuntz (Ed.), Formal representation of human judgment (pp. 17-52). New York, NY: Wiley.
19. Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75(4), 643-669.
20. Erev, I., & Barron, G. (2005). On adaptation, maximization, and reinforcement learning among cognitive strategies. Psychological Review, 112(4), 912-931.
21. Erev, I., Ert, E., Roth, A. E., Haruvy, E., Herzog, S. M., Hau, R.,. .. Lebiere, C. (2010). A choice prediction competition: Choices from experience and from description. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23, 15-47.
22. Erev, I., Ert, E., & Yechiam, E. (2008). Loss aversion, diminishing sensitivity, and the effect of experience on repeated decisions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21(5), 575-597.
23. Erev, I., Glozman, I., & Hertwig, R. (2008). What impacts the impact of rare events. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 36(2), 153-177.
24. Erev, I., & Roth, A. E. (1998). Predicting how people play games: Reinforcement learning in experimental games with unique, mixed strategy equilibria. American Economic Review, 88(4), 848-881.
25. Fox, C. R., & Hadar, L. (2006). “Decisions from experience” = sampling error plus prospect theory: Reconsidering Hertwig, Barron, Weber & Erev (2004). Judgment and Decision Making Journal, 1(2), 159-161.
26. Fox, C. R., & Tversky, A. (1998). A belief-based account of decision under uncertainty. Management Science, 44(7), 879-895.
27. Frey, R., Hertwig, R., & Rieskamp, J. (2014). Fear shapes information acquisition in decisions from experience. Cognition, 132, 90-99.
28. Frey, R., Mata, R., & Hertwig, R. (2015). The role of cognitive abilities in decisions from experience: Age differences emerge as a function of choice set size. Cognition 142, 60-80.
29. Gigerenzer, G., Hertwig, R., Van den Broek, E., Fasolo, B., & Katsikopoulos, K. V. (2005). “A 30% chance of rain tomorrow”: How does the public understand probabilistic weather forecasts? Risk Analysis, 25(3), 623-629.
30. Glaser, C., Trommershäuser, J., Mamassian, P., & Maloney, L. T. (2012). Comparison of the distortion of probability information in decision under risk and in an equivalent visual task. Psychological Science, 23(4), 419-426.
31. Gonzalez, C., & Dutt, V. (2011). Instance-based learning: Integrating sampling and repeated decisions from experience. Psychological Review, 118(4), 523-551.
32. Gonzalez, C., & Dutt, V. (2012). Refuting data aggregation arguments and how the instancebased learning model stands criticism: A reply to Hills and Hertwig (2012). Psychological Review, 119(4), 893-898.
33. Hadar, L., & Fox, C. R. (2009). Information asymmetry in decision from description versus decision from experience. Judgment and Decision Making, 4(4), 317-325.
34. Hau, R., Pleskac, T. J., & Hertwig, R. (2010). Decisions from experience and statistical probabilities: Why they trigger different choices than a priori probabilities. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23(1), 48-68.
35. Hau, R., Pleskac, T. J., Kiefer, J., & Hertwig, R. (2008). The description-experience gap in risky choice: The role of sample size and experienced probabilities. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 21(5), 493-518.
36. Hertwig, R. (2012). The psychology and rationality of decisions from experience. Synthese, 187(1), 269-292.
37. Hertwig, R., Barron, G., Weber, E. U., & Erev, I. (2004). Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events in risky choice. Psychological Science, 15(8), 534-539.
38. Hertwig, R., Barron, G., Weber, E. U., & Erev, I. (2006). The role of information sampling in risky choice. In K. Fiedler & P. Juslin (Eds.), Information sampling and adaptive cognition (pp. 72-91). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
39. Hertwig, R., & Erev, I. (2009). The description-experience gap in risky choice. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(12), 517-523.
40. Hertwig, R., & Frey, R. (2015). The challenge of the descripton-experience gap to the communication of risks. In H. Cho, T. O. Reimer, & K. A. McComas (Eds.), The Sage handbook of risk communication (pp. 24-40). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41. Hertwig, R., Hoffrage, U., & the ABC Research Group (2013). Simple heuristics in a social world. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
42. Hertwig, R., & Ortmann, A. (2001). Experimental practices in economics: A methodological challenge for psychologists? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 383-451.
43. Hertwig, R., & Pleskac, T. J. (2008). The game of life: How small samples render choice simpler. In N. Chater & M. Oaksford (Eds.), The probabilistic mind: Prospects for Bayesian cognitive science (pp. 209-236). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
44. Hertwig, R., & Pleskac, T. J. (2010). Decisions from experience: Why small samples? Cognition, 115(2), 225-237.
45. Hills, T. T., & Hertwig, R. (2010). Information search in decisions from experience: Do our patterns of sampling foreshadow our decisions? Psychological Science, 21(12), 1787-1792.
46. Hills, T. T., & Hertwig, R. (2012). Two distinct exploratory behaviors in decisions from experience: Comment on Gonzalez and Dutt (2011). Psychological Review, 119(4), 888-892.
47. Hoffman, P. J. (1960). The paramorphic representation of clinical judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 57(2), 116-131.
48. Hogarth, R. M., & Einhorn, H. J. (1992). Order effects in belief updating: The beliefadjustment model. Cognitive Psychology, 24(1), 1-55.
49. Jarvstad, A., Hahn, U., Rushton, S. K., & Warren, P. A. (2013). Perceptuo-motor, cognitive, and description-based decision making seem equally good. PNAS, 110, 16271-16276. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1300239110
50. Jessup, R. K., Bishara, A. J., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2008). Feedback produces divergence from prospect theory in descriptive choice. Psychological Science, 19(10), 1015-1022.
51. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology, 3(3), 430-454.
52. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). Psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80(4), 237-251.
53. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: Analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.
54. Kaufmann, C., Weber, M., & Haisley, E. C. (2012). The role of experience sampling and graphical displays on one’s investment risk appetite. Management Science. Advance online publication. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1616186
55. Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
56. Koehler, J. J. (1996). The base rate fallacy reconsidered: Normative, descriptive and methodological challenges. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 1-53.
57. Lejarraga, T. (2010). When experience is better than description: Time delays and complexity. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23(1), 100-116.
58. Lejarraga, T., Dutt, V., & Gonzalez, C. (2012). Instance-based learning: A general model of repeated binary choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25(2), 143-153.
59. Lejarraga, T., & Gonzalez, C. (2011). Effects of feedback and complexity on repeated decisions from description. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 117, 286-295.
60. Lejarraga, T., Hertwig, R., & Gonzalez, C. (2012). How choice ecology influences search in decisions from experience. Cognition, 124(3), 334-342.
61. Locke, J. (1690/1959). An essay concerning human understanding. A. C. Fraser (Ed.). New York, NY: Dover.
62. Luce, R. D., & Suppes, P. (1965). Preference, utility, and subjective probability. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, & E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 249-410). New York, NY: Wiley.
63. Ludvig, E. A., & Spetch, M. L. (2011). Of black swans and tossed coins: Is the description- experience gap in risky choice limited to rare events? PLoS ONE, 6(6), (Article e20262).
64. March, J. G. (1996). Learning to be risk averse. Psychological Review, 103(2), 309-319.
65. Mastrolorenzo, G., Petrone, P., Pappalardo, L., & Sheridan, M. F. (2006). The Avellino 3780- yr-BP catastrophe as a worst-case scenario for a future eruption at Vesuvius. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(12), 4366-4370.
66. Omer, S. B., Pan, W. K. Y., Halsey, N. A., Stokley, S., Moulton, L. H., Navar, A. M.,. .. Salmon, D. A. (2006). Nonmedical exemptions to school immunization requirements: Secular trends and association of state policies with pertussis incidence. Journal of the American Medical Association, 296(14), 1757-1763.
67. Pachur, T., & Scheibehenne, B. (2012). Constructing preference from experience: The endowment effect reflected in external information search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 38, 1108-1116.
68. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
69. Peters, E. (2012). Beyond comprehension: The role of numeracy in judgments and decisions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(1), 31-35.
70. Phillips, L. D., & Edwards, W. (1966). Conservatism in a simple probability inference task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(3), 346-354.
71. Pleskac, T. J., & Hertwig, R. (2014). Ecologically rational choice and the structure of the environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 2000-2019.
72. Quetelet, L. A. J. (1842/1969). A treatise on man and the development of his faculties. Translated by R. Knox. Facsimile edition of translation 1969. Introduction by S. Diamond. Gainesville, FL: Scholars’ Facsimiles & Reprints.
73. Rakow, T., Demes, K. A., & Newell, B. R. (2008). Biased samples not mode of presentation: Re-examining the apparent underweighting of rare events in experience-based choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 106(2), 168-179.
74. Rakow, T., & Newell, B. R. (2010). Degrees of uncertainty: An overview and framework for future research on experience-based choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 23(1), 1-14.
75. Rottenstreich, Y., & Tversky, A. (1997). Unpacking, repacking, and anchoring: Advances in support theory. Psychological Review, 104(2), 406-415.
76. Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
77. Schmandt-Besserat, D. (1996). How writing came about. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
78. Schulte-Mecklenbeck, M., Kühberger, A., & Ranyard, R. (Eds.). (2011). A handbook of process tracing methods for decision research: A critical review and user’s guide. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
79. Slovic, P. (2000). The perception of risk. London, UK: Earthscan.
80. Smith, V. L. (2001). From old issues to new directions in experimental psychology and economics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(3), 428-429.
81. Spaniol, J., & Wegier, P. (2012). Decisions from experience: Adaptive information search and choice in younger and older adults. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 6, Article 36.
82. Suter, R., Pachur, T., & Hertwig, R. (2013). How does prospect theory reflect heuristics’ probability sensitivity in risky choice? In M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz, & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Cooperative minds: Social interaction and group dynamics. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1408-1413). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
83. Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998). Reinforcement learning: An introduction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
84. Taleb, N. N. (2007). The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable. New York, NY: Random House.
85. Tversky, A., & Fox, C. R. (1995). Weighing risk and uncertainty. Psychological Review, 102(2), 269-283.
86. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131.
87. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297-323.
88. Ungemach, C., Chater, N., & Stewart, N. (2009). Are probabilities overweighted or underweighted, when rare outcomes are experienced (rarely)? Psychological Science, 20(4), 473-479.
89. Viscusi, W. K. (1990). Do smokers underestimate risks? Journal of Political Economy, 98(6), 1253-1269.
90. von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
91. Weber, E. U., & Kirsner, B. (1996). Reasons for rank-dependent utility evaluation. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14, 41-61.
92. Weber, E. U., Shafir, S., & Blais, A. R. (2004). Predicting risk sensitivity in humans and lower animals: Risk as variance or coefficient of variation. Psychological Review, 111(2), 430-445.
93. Weber, E. U., & Stern, P. C. (2011). Public understanding of climate change in the United States. American Psychologist, 66(4), 315-328.
94. Wilford, J. N. (2006, March 7). Long before burying Pompeii, Vesuvius vented its wrath. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com
95. Wu, S.-W., Delgado, M. R., & Maloney, L. T. (2009). Economic decision making compared with an equivalent motor task. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(15), 6088-6093.
96. Wu, S.-W., Delgado, M. R., & Maloney, L. T. (2011). The neural correlates of subjective utility of monetary outcome and probability weight in economic and in motor decision making. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(24), 8822-8831.
97. Wulff, D., Hertwig, R., & Mergenthaler, M. (2015). Ten years of the description-experience gap. A meta-analysis. Manuscript submitted for publication.
98. Wulff, D. U., Hills, T. T., & Hertwig, R. (2015). How short-and long-run aspirations impact search and choice in decisions from experience. Cognition, 144, 29-37.
99. Yechiam, E., & Busemeyer, J. R. (2006). The effect of foregone payoffs on underweighting small probability events. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19(1), 1-16.
100. Yechiam, E., & Hochman, G. (2013). Losses as modulators of attention: Review and analysis of the unique effects of losses over gains. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 497-518.