Human Appropriation of Net Primary Production (HANPP) in an Agriculturally-Dominated Watershed, Southeastern USA

Land

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 513-540

  Andersen, C Brannon ^a   Donovan, R Kyle ^a   Quinn, John E ^a  

^a FURMAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Anthrome; Biodiversity; Forest; HANPP; Land cover change; Pasture; Piedmont; Urbanization; Watershed management

Indexed keywords

EID: 85098694065     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2073445X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/land4020513     Document Type: Article

References (101)

1. Sterling, S.; Ducharne, A. Comprehensive data set of global land cover change for land surface model applications. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2008, 22, 1–20.
2. Ellis, E.; Ramunkutty, N. Putting people on the map: Anthropogenic biomes of the world. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2008, 6, 439–447.
3. Crutzen, P. Geology of mankind. Nature 2002, 415, 23.
4. Rockström, J.; Steffen, W.; Noone, K.; Persson, Å.; Chapin, F.S.; Lambin, E.F.; Lenton T.M.; Scheffer, M.; Folke, C.; Schellnhuber, H.J.; et al. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 2009, 461, 472–475.
5. Ellis, E. Anthropogenic transformation of the terrestrial biosphere. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 2011, 369, 1010–1035.
6. Hobbs, R.J.; Arico, S.; Aronson, J.; Baron, J.S.; Bridgewater, P.; Cramer, V.A.; Epstein, P.R.; Ewel, J.J.; Klink, C.A.; Lugo, A.E.; et al. Novel ecosystems: Theoretical and management aspects of the new ecological world order. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2006, 15, 1–7.
7. Lindenmayer, D.B.; Fischer, J.; Felton, A.; Crane, M.; Michael, D.; Macgregor, C.; Montague-Drake, R.; Manning, A.; Hobbs, R.J. Novel ecosystems resulting from landscape transformation create dilemmas for modern conservation practice. Conserv. Lett. 2008, 1, 129–135.
8. Ellis, E.; Goldewijk, K.K.; Siebert, S.; Lightman, D.; Ramunkutty, N. Anthropogenic transformation of biomes, 1700–2000. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2010, 19, 589–606.
9. Ramunkutty, N.; Evan, A.T.; Monfreda, C.; Foley, J.A. Farming the planet: 1. Geographic distribution of global agricultural lands in the year 2000. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2008, 22, doi:10.1029/2007GB002952.
10. Haberl, H.; Erb, K.-H.; Krausmann, F.; Running, S.; Searchinger, T.D.; Smith, W.K. Bioenergy: How much can we expect for 2050? Environ. Res. Lett. 2013, 8, doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/3/031004.
11. Liu, J.; Mooney, H.; Hull, V.; Davis, S.J.; Gaskell, J.; Hertel, T.; Lubchenco, J.; Seto, K.C.; Gleick, P.; Kremen, C.; et al. Sustainability. Systems Integration for Global Sustainability. Science 2015, 347, doi:10.1126/science.1258832.
12. Abt, K.L.; Abt, R.C.; Galik, C.S.; Skog, K.E. Effect of Policies on Pellet Production and Forests in the U.S. South: A Technical Document Supporting the Forest Service Update of the 2010 RPA Assessment; General Technical Report SRS-202; US Forest Service, Southern Research Station: Asheville, NC, USA, 2014.
13. Johansson, D.J.A.; Azar, C. A scenario based analysis of land competition between food and bioenergy production in the U.S. Clim. Chang. 2007, 82, 267–291.
14. Miyake, S.; Renouf, M.; Peterson, A.; McAlpine, C.; Smith, C. Land-use and environmental pressures resulting from current and future bioenergy crop expansion: A review. J. Rural Stud. 2012, 28, 650–658.
15. Zumkehr, A.; Campbell, J.E. Historical U.S. cropland areas and potential for bioenergy production on abandoned croplands. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 3840–3847.
16. Brook, B.W.; Ellis, E.C.; Perring, M.P.; Mackay, A.W.; Blomqvist, L. Does the terrestrial biosphere have planetary tipping points? Trends Ecol. Evol. 2013, 28, 396–401.
17. Vitousek, P.M.; Ehrlich, P.R.; Ehrlich, A.H.; Matson, P.A. Human Appropriation of the Products of Photosynthesis. Bioscience 1986, 36, 368–373.
18. Haberl, H.; Wackernagel, M.; Krausmann, F.; Erb, K.H.; Monfreda, C. Ecological footprints and human appropriation of net primary production: A comparison. Land Use Policy 2004, 21, 279–288.
19. Haberl, H.; Erb, K.H.; Krausmann, F.; Gaube, V.; Bondeau, A.; Piutzar, C.; Gingrich, S.; Lucht, W.; Fischer-Kowalski, M. Quantifying and mapping the human appropriation of net primary production in earth’s terrestrial ecosystems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 12942–12947.
20. Bishop, J.D.K.; Amaratunga, G.A.J.; Rodriguez, C. Quantifying the limits of HANPP and carbon emissions which prolong total species well-being. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2010, 12, 213–231.
21. Krausmann, F.; Erb, K.H.; Gingrich, S.; Haberl, H.; Bondeau, A.; Gaube, V.; Lauk, C.; Plutzar, C.; Searchinger, T.D. Global human appropriation of net primary production doubled in the 20th century. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 10324–10329.
22. Erb, K.H.; Krausmann, F.; Gaube, V.; Gingrich, S.; Bondeau, A.; Fischer-Kowalski, M.; Haberl, H. Analyzing the global human appropriation of net primary production—Processes, trajectories, implications. An introduction. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 69, 250–259.
23. Rojstaczer, S.; Sterling, S.M.; Moore, N.J. Human appropriation of photosynthesis products. Science 2001, 294, 2549–2552.
24. Imhoff, M.L.; Bounoua, L.; Ricketts, T.; Loucks, C.; Harriss, R.; Lawrence, W.T. Global patterns in human consumption of net primary productivity. Nature 2004, 429, 870–873.
25. Krausmann, F.; Gingrich, S.; Haberl, H.; Erb, K.H.; Musel, A.; Kastner, T.; Kohlheb, N.; Niedertscheider, M.; Schwartzmüller, E. Long-term trajectories of the human appropriation of net primary production: Lessons from six national case studies. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 77, 129–138.
26. O’Neill, D.W.; Tyedmers, P.H.; Beazley, K.F. Human appropriation of net primary production (HANPP) in Nova Scotia, Canada. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2007, 7, 1–14.
27. Fetzel, T.; Gradwohl, M.; Erb, K.H. Conversion, intensification, and abandonment: A human appropriation of net primary production approach to analyze historic land use dynamics in New Zealand, 1860–2005. Ecol. Econ. 2014, 97, 201–208.
28. Kastner, T. Trajectories in human domination of ecosystems: Human appropriation of net primary production in the Philippines during the 20th century. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 69, 260–269.
29. Niedertscheider, M.; Kuemmerle, T.; Muller, D.; Erb, K.-H. Exploring the effects of drastic institutional and socio-economic changes on land system dynamics in Germany between 1883 and 2007. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2014, 28, 98–108.
30. Niedertscheider, M.; Erb, K.-H. Land system change in Italy from 1884 to 2007: Analyzing north-south divergence on the basis of an integrated indicator framework. Land Use Policy 2014, 39, 366–375.
31. Krausmann, F. Land use and industrial modernization: An empirical analysis of human influence on the functioning of ecosystems in Austria 1830–1995. Land Use Policy 2001, 18, 17–26.
32. Kohlheb, N.; Krausmann, F. Land use change, biomass production and HANPP: The case of Hungary 1961–2005. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 69, 292–300.
33. Schwarzlmüller, E. Human appropriation of aboveground net primary production in Spain, 1955–2003: An empirical analysis of the industrialization of land use. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 69, 282–291.
34. Musel, A. Human appropriation of net primary productivity in the United Kingdom, 1800–2000. Changes in society’s impact on ecological energy flows during the agrarian-industrial transition. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 69, 270–281.
35. Niedertschnieder, M.; Gingrich, S.; Erb, K.H. Changes in land use in South Africa between 1961 and 2006: An integrated socio-ecological analysis based on the human appropriation of net primary production framework. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2012, 12, 715–727.
36. Haberl, H.; Erb, K.H.; Krausmann, F.; Loibl, W.; Schulz, N.; Weisz, H. Changes in ecosystem processes induced by land use: Human appropriation of aboveground NPP and its influence on standing crop in Austria. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2001, 15, 929–942.
37. Vačkář, D.; Orlitová, E. Human appropriation of aboveground photosynthetic production in the Czech Republic. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2011, 11, 519–529.
38. Abdi, A.M.; Seaquist, J.; Tenenbaum, D.E.; Eklundh, L.; Ardö, J. The supply and demand of net primary production in the Sahel. Environ. Res. Lett. 2014, 9, doi:10.1088/1748-9326/9/9/094003.
39. Haberl, H.; Schulz, N.B.; Plutzar, C.; Erb, K.H.; Krausmann, F.; Loibl, W.; Moser, D.; Sauberer, N.; Weisz, H.; Zechmeister, H.G.; et al. Human appropriation of net primary production and species diversity in agricultural landscapes. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2004, 102, 213–218.
40. Clark, B.T.; Burkardt, N.; King, D. Watershed management and organizational dynamics: Nationwide findings and regional variation. Environ. Manag. 2005, 36, 297–310.
41. Zedler, J.B. Wetlands at your service: Reducing impacts of agriculture at the watershed scale. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2003, 1, 65–72.
42. Muthukrishnan, S.; Lewis, G.P.; Andersen, C.B. Chapter 24. Relations among land cover, vegetation index, and nitrate concentrations in streams of the Enoree River Basin, piedmont region of South Carolina, USA. In Concepts and Applications in Environmental Geochemistry; Sarkar, D., Datta, R., Hannigan, R., Eds.; Elsevier Press: New York, NY, USA, 2007; pp. 515–539.
43. Raich, J.W.; Rastetter, E.B.; Melillo, J.M.; Kicklighter, D.W.; Steudler, P.A.; Peterson, B.J.; Grace, A.L.; Moore, B., III; Vorosmarty, C.J. Potential net primary productivity in South America: Application of a global model. Ecol. Appl. 1991, 4, 399–429.
44. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. National Climate Data Center. Available online: http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cdo-web/datasets/GHCNDMS/locations/CITY:US450005/detail (accessed on 5 December 2014).
45. Leith, H. Modeling the primary productivity of the world. In Primary Production of the Biosphere; Leith, H., Whittaker, R., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: New York, NY, USA, 1975; pp. 237–263.
46. Olson, D.M.; Dinerstein, E.; Wikramanayake, E.D.; Burgess, N.D.; Powell, G.V.; Underwood, E.C.; D’Amico, J.A.; Itoua, I.; Strand, H.E.; Morrison, J.C. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: A new map of life on Earth. Bioscience 2001, 51, 933–938.
47. Terando, A.J.; Costanza, J.; Belyea, C.; Dunn, R.R.; McKerrow, A.; Collazo, J.A. The Southern Megalopolis: Using the past to predict the future of urban sprawl in the Southeast US. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e102261.
48. Drummond, M.A.; Loveland, T.R. Land-use pressure and a transition to forest-cover loss in the eastern United States. Bioscience 2010, 60, 286–298.
49. Waisanen, P.J.; Bliss, N.B. Changes in population and agricultural land in conterminous United States counties, 1790 to 1997. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2002, 16, doi:10.1029/2001GB001843.
50. Napton, D.E.; Auch, R.F.; Headly, R.; Taylor, J.L. Land use changes and their driving factors in the Southeastern United States. Reg. Environ. Chang. 2010, 10, 37–53.
51. Daniels, R.B. Chapter 12. Soil erosion and degradation in the southern Piedmont of the USA. In Land Transformation in Agriculture; Wolman, M.G., Fournier, F.G.A., Eds.; John Wiley and Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1987; pp. 407–428.
52. United States Department of Agriculture. Census of Agriculture: 2012 Census Volume 1, Chapter 2: County Level Data. Available online: http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/Publications/2012/Full_Report/Volume_1,_Chapter_2_County_Level/South_Carolina/(accessed on 15 October 2014).
53. Cramer, W.; Field, C.B. Comparing global models of terrestrial net primary productivity (NPP): Introduction. Glob. Chang. Biol. 1999, 5, doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.1999.00001.x.
54. Adams, B.; White, A.; Lenton, T. An analysis of some diverse approaches to modelling terrestrial net primary productivity. Ecol. Model. 2004, 177, 353–391.
55. Zaks, D.P.M.; Ramankutty, N.; Barford, C.C.; Foley, J.A. From Miami to Madison: Investigating the relationship between climate and terrestrial net primary production. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 2007, 21, doi:10.1029/2006GB002705.
56. Haberl, H.; Erb, K.H.; Krausmann, F. Human appropriation of net primary production: Patterns, trends, and planetary boundaries. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2014, 39, 363–391.
57. Thomas, S.C.; Martin, A.R. Carbon content of tree tissues: A synthesis. Forests 2012, 3, 332–352.
58. Mokany, K.; Raison, R.; Prokushkin, A.S. Critical analysis of root:shoot ratios in terrestrial biomes. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2006, 12, 84–96.
59. Milesi, C.; Elvidge, C.D.; Nemani, R.R.; Running, S.W. Assessing the impact of urban land development on net primary productivity in the southeastern United States. Remote Sens. Environ. 2003, 86, 401–410.
60. Tian, H.; Chen, G.; Liu, M.; Zhang, C.; Sun, G.; Lu, C.; Xu, X.; Ren, W.; Pan, S.; Chappelka, A. Model estimates of net primary productivity, evapotranspiration, and water use efficiency in the terrestrial ecosystems of the southern United States during 1895–2007. For. Ecol. Manag. 2010, 259, 1311–1327.
61. Lefsky, M.A.; Cohen, W.B.; Harding, D.J.; Parker, G.G.; Acker, S.A.; Gower, S.T. Lidar remote sensing of above‐ground biomass in three biomes. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2001, 11, 393–399.
62. United States Geological Survey. Earth Explorer. Available online: http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/(accessed on 22 July 2013).
63. USFS Forest Inventory Data Online Web-Application Version: FIDO 1.5.1.05b; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: St. Paul, MN, USA. Available online http://apps.fs.fed.us/fia/fido/index.html (accessed on 31 January 2015).
64. United States Department of Agriculture. Census of Agriculture: 1969 Census, Volume 1, Part 27, Chapters 1 and 4. Available online: http://agcensus.mannlib.cornell.edu/AgCensus/getVolumeOnePart.do?year=1969&part_id=301&number=27&title=South%20Carolina (accessed on 15 October 2014).
65. Lobell, D.; Hicke, J.; Asner, G.; Field, C.; Tucker, C.; Los, S. Satellite estimates of productivity and light use efficiency in United States agriculture, 1982–1998. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2002, 8, 722–735.
66. Hicke, J.A.; Lobell, D.B.; Asner, G.P. Cropland area and net primary production computed from 30 years of USDA agricultural harvest data. Earth Interact. 2004, 8, 1–20.
67. Wu, J.; Bauer, M.E. Estimating net primary production of turfgrass in an urban-suburban landscape with QuickBird imagery. Remote Sens. 2012, 4, 849–866.
68. Falk, J.H. The primary productivity of lawns in a temperate environment. J. Appl. Ecol. 1980, 17, 689–695.
69. Thomsen, I.K.; Olesen, J.E.; Møller, H.B.; Sørensen, P.; Christensen, B.T. Carbon dynamics and retention in soil after anaerobic digestion of dairy cattle feed and faeces. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2013, 58, 82–87.
70. Hansen, M.C.; Potapov, P.V.; Moore, R.; Hancher, M.; Turubanova, S.A.; Tyukavina, A.; Thau, D.; Stehman, S.V.; Goetz, S.J.; Loveland, T.R.; et al. High-Resolution global maps of 21stcentury forest cover change. Science 2013, 342, 850–853.
71. Birdsey, R.A. Carbon Storage and Accumulation in United States Forest Ecosystems; Forest Service General Technical Report WO-59; United States Department of Agriculture: Washington DC, USA, 1992. Available online: http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/pubs/gtr/gtr_wo059.pdf (accessed on 12 February 2015).
72. Lefsky, M.A.; Harding, D.J.; Keller, M.; Cohen, W.B.; Carabajal, C.C.; Espirito-Santo, F.D.B.; Hunter, M.O.; de Oliveira, R., Jr. Estimates of forest canopy height and aboveground biomass using ICESat. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2005, 32, doi:10.1029/2005GL023971.
73. Sobol, I.M. Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates. Math. Comput. Simul. 2001, 55, 271–280.
74. Pujol, P.; Iooss, B.; Janon, A. Sensitivity: Sensitivity Analysis. 2015, R Package Version 1.11. Available online: http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sensitivity (accessed on 11 March 2015).
75. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. 2014, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available online: http://www.R-project.org/(accessed on 11 March 2015).
76. United States Department of Agriculture. National Agricultural Statistics Service Cropscape-Cropland Data Layer. Available online: http://nassgeodata.gmu.edu/CropScape/(accessed on 23 July 2013).
77. Krausmann, F.; Haberl, H.; Erb, K.; Wiesinger, M.; Gaube, V.; Gingrich, S. What determines geographical patterns of the global human appropriation of net primary production? J. Land Use Sci. 2009, 4, 15–33.
78. Bain, D.J.; Hale, R.L.; Wollheim, W.M. Hotbeds of biogeochemical diversity: Insights from urban long-term ecological research sites. Elements 2012, 8, 435–438.
79. Hazel, P.; Wood, S. Drivers of change in global agriculture. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2008, 363, 495–515.
80. Tilman, D.; Cassman, K.G.; Matson, P.A.; Naylor, R.; Polasky, S. Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 2002, 418, 671–677.
81. Krausmann, F.; Fischer-Kowalski, M.; Schandl, H.; Eisenmenger, N. The global sociometabolic transition: Past and present metabolic profiles and their future trajectories. J. Ind. Ecol. 2008, 12, 637–656.
82. Rudel, T.K.; Schneider, L.; Uriarte, M.; Turner, B.L., 2nd; DeFries, R.; Lawrence, D.; Geoghegan, J.; Hecht, S.; Ickowitz, A.; Lambin, E.F.; et al. Agricultural intensification and changes in cultivated Areas, 1970–2005. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 20675–20680.
83. Foley, J.A.; Ramankutty, N.; Brauman, K.A.; Cassidy, E.S.; Gerber, J.S.; Johnston, M.; Mueller, N.D.; O’Connell, C.; Ray, D.K.; West, P.C. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature 2011, 478, 337–342.
84. Ray, D.K.; Ramankutty, N.; Mueller, N.D.; West, P.C.; Foley, J.A. Recent patterns of crop yield growth and stagnation. Nat. Commun. 2012, 3, 1293 doi:10.1038/ncomms2296
85. Francis, C.A.; Hansen, T.E.; Fox, A.A.; Hesje, P.J.; Nelson, H.E.; Lawseth, A.E.; English, A. Farmland Conversion to Non-Agricultural Uses in the US and Canada: Current Impacts and Concerns for the Future. Int. J. Agric. Sustain. 2012, 10, 8–24.
86. Brown, D.G.; Johnson, K.M.; Loveland, T.R.; Theobald, D.M. Rural land-use trends in the conterminous United States, 1950–2000. Ecol. Appl. 2005, 15, 1851–1863.
87. Smith, W.K.; Cleveland, C.C.; Reed, S.C.; Miller, N.L.; Running, S.W. Bioenergy potential of the United States constrained by satellite observations of existing productivity. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 3536–3544.
88. Sharp, B.E.; Miller, S.A. Estimating maximum land use change potential from a regional biofuel industry. Energy Policy 2014, 65, 261–269.
89. Bergman, R.D.; Reed, D.L.; Taylor, A.M.; Harper, D.P.; Hodges, D.G. Cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of switchgrass fuel pellets manufactured in the southeastern United States. Wood Fiber Sci. 2015, 47, 1–13.
90. DeFries, R.S.; Ellis, E.C.; Chapin, F.S., III; Matson, P.A.; Turner, B.L., II; Agrawal, A.; Crutzen, P.; Field, C.; Gleick, P.; Karieva, P.; et al. Planetary opportunities: A social contract for global science change to contribute to a sustainable future. BioScience 2012, 62, 603–606.
91. Bennett, E.M.; Peterson, G.D.; Gordon, L.J. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol. Lett. 2009, 12, 1394–1404.
92. O’Neill, D.W. Measuring progress in the degrowth transition to a steady state economy. Ecol. Econ. 2014, 84, 221–231.
93. Polasky, S.; Nelson, E.; Camm, J.; Csuti, B.; Fackler, P.; Lonsdorf, E.; Montgomery, C.; White, D.; Arthur, J.; Garber-Yonts, B. Where to put things? Spatial land management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns. Biol. Conserv. 2008, 141, 1505–1524.
94. Fischer, J.; Abson, D.J.; Butsic, V.; Chappell, M.J.; Ekroos, J.; Hanspach, J.; Kuemmerle, T.; Smith, H.G.; Wehrden, H. Land sparing versus land sharing: Moving forward. Conserv. Lett. 2014, 7, 149–157.
95. Kragt, M.E.; Robertson, M.J. Quantifying ecosystem services trade-offs from agricultural practices. Ecol. Econ. 2014, 102, 147–157.
96. Zhang, W.A.; Ricketts, T.H.; Kremen, C.; Carney, K.; Swinton, S.M. Ecosystem services and disservices to agriculture. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 64, 253–260.
97. Haberl, H.; Gaube, V.; Diaz-Delgado, R.; Krauze, K.; Neuner, A.; Peterseil, J.; Plutzar, C.; Singh, S.J.; Vadineanu, A. Towards an integrated model of socioeconomic biodiversity drivers, pressures and impacts. A feasibility study based on three European long-term socio-ecological research platforms. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68, 1797–1812.
98. DeFries, R. Past and future sensitivity of primary production to human modification of the landscape. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2002, 29, doi:10.1029/2001GL013620.
99. Robertson, B.A.; Porter, C.; Landis, D.A.; Schemske, D.W. Agroenergy crops influence the diversity, biomass, and guild structure of terrestrial arthropod communities. BioEnergy Res. 2012, 5, 179–188.
100. Altieri, M.A. The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 1999, 74, 19–31.
101. Martin, L.J.; Quinn, J.E.; Ellis, E.C.; Shaw, M.R.; Dorning, M.; Kraft, C.E.; Hallett, L.; Heller, N.E.; Hobbs, R.J.; Law, E.; et al. Conservation opportunities across the world’s anthromes. Divers. Distrib. 2014, 20, 745–755.