Watershed management and organizational dynamics: Nationwide findings and regional variation

Environmental Management

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 297-310

  Clark, Brad T ^a   Burkardt, Nina ^b   King, M Dawn ^a  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^b FORT COLLINS SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaborative decision making; Organizational characteristics; Place based conservation; Regional variation; Watershed management

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING; NATURAL RESOURCES; RIVER BASIN PROJECTS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

COLLABORATIVE DECISION-MAKING; ORGANIZATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS; PLACE-BASED CONSERVATION; REGIONAL VARIATION; WATERSHED MANAGEMENT;

WATERSHEDS;

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; WATERSHED;

ARTICLE; BUDGET; DECISION MAKING; LITERATURE; UNITED STATES; WATERSHED MANAGEMENT;

BUDGETS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; DATA COLLECTION; DECISION MAKING; GEOGRAPHY; MOTIVATION; ORGANIZATIONS; UNITED STATES; WATER SUPPLY;

EID: 23944432633     PISSN: 0364152X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-004-1039-0     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. American Rivers. 2002. http://www.americanrivers.org Accessed 1 September 2002.
2. Bentrup, G. 2001. Evaluation of a collaborative model: a case study analysis of watershed planning in the Intermountain West. Environmental Management 27:739-748.
3. Born, S. M., and K. D. Genskow. 1999. Exploring the watershed approach: Critical dimensions of state-local partnerships, The Four Corners Watershed Innovators Initiative Final Report. River Network, Portland 124 pp.
4. Born, S. M., and K. D. Genskow. 2000. The watershed approach: An empirical assessment of innovation in environmental management. Learning from innovations in environmental protection, research paper #7. National Academy of Public Administration, Washington, DC 70 pp.
5. Chess, C., and G. Gibson. 2001. Watersheds are not equal. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 37:775-782.
6. Clarke, J. N., and D. C. McCool. 1996. Staking out the terrain: Power and performance among natural resource agencies. 2nd ed. SUNY Press, New York 279 pp.
7. Coburn, J. 1999. Integrating science into watershed management decisions at Lake Tahoe. In E. Kendy (ed.), Science into policy: Water in the public realm. American Water Resources Association, Herndon, VA.
8. Dillman, D. A. 2000. Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method. 2nd ed. John Wiley, New York 464 p.
9. Duram, L. A., and K. G. Brown. 1999. Assessing public participation in US watershed planning initiatives. Society and Natural Resources 125:455-467.
10. Griffin, C. B. 1999. Evaluating watershed councils. Pages 227-232 in E. Kendy (eds.), Science into policy: Water in the public realm. American Water Resources Association, Herndon, Virginia.
11. Habron, G. 2003. Role of adaptive management for watershed councils. Environmental Management 31:29-41.
12. Holland, M. M. 1996. Ensuring sustainability of natural resources: Focus on institutional arrangements. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science 53:432-439.
13. Imperial, M. T. 1999. Institutional analysis and ecosystem-based management: The institutional analysis and development framework. Environmental Management 24:449-465.
14. Information Center for the Environment. 2002. http://www.ice.ucdavis.edu. Accessed 20 September 2002.
15. John, D. 1993. Civic environmentalism: Alternatives to regulation in states and communities. CQ Press, Washington, DC 347 pp.
16. Johnson, B. R., and R. Campbell. 1999. Ecology and participation in landscape-based planning in the Pacific Northwest. Policy Studies Journal 27:502-529.
17. Kenney, D., S. T. McAllister, W. H. Caile, and J. S. Peckman. 2000. The new watershed source book: A directory and review of watershed initiatives in the western United States. Natural Resources Law Center, Boulder 344 pp.
18. Korfmacher, K. S. 1999. Public participation in watershed modeling: What is appropriate? In E. Kendy (ed.), Science into policy: Water in the public realm. American Water Resources Association, Herndon, VA.
19. Landre, B. K., and B. A. Knuth. 1993. Success of citizen advisory committees in consensus-based water resources planning in the Great Lakes Basin. Society and Natural Resources 63:229-257.
20. Leach W. D., and N. W. Pelkey. 2001. Making watershed partnerships work: A review of empirical literature. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management November/December:378-385.
21. Lubell, M., M. S. Schneider, J. T. Scholz, and M. Mete. 2002. Watershed partnerships and the emergence of collective action institutions. American Journal of Political Science 461:148-163.
22. Mazmanian, D. A., and M. E. Kraft. 1999. Toward sustainable communities: Transition and transformations in environmental policy. MIT Press, Cambridge 323.
23. Michaels, S. 1999. Configuring who does what in watershed management: The Massachusetts Watershed Initiative. Policy Studies Journal 27:565-577.
24. Moore, E. A., and T. M. Koontz. 2003. A typology of watershed groups: Citizen-based, agency-based, and mixed partnerships. Society and Natural Resources 16:451-460.
25. National Resource Conservation Service. 2004. A story of land and people. Accessed 22 June 2004. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/about/history/story.html.
26. Randolph, J., and M. Bauer. 1999. Improving environmental decision-making through collaborative methods. Policy Studies Review 16:12-29.
27. Rieke, E. A., and D. S. Kenney. 1997. Resource management at the watershed level: an assessment of the changing federal role in the emerging era of community based watershed management: Report to the Western Water Policy Review Advisory Commission. The Commission, Springfield 198 pp.
28. River Network. 2002. http://www.rivernetwork.org. Accessed 20 September 2002.
29. Scheberle, D. 1997. Federalism and environmental policy: Trust and the politics of implementation. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC 207 pp.
30. Selin, S. W., M. A. Schuett, and D. S. Carr. 1997. Has collaborative planning taken root in the national forests?. Journal of Forestry 5:25-28.
31. Sheehan, K. 2001. E-mail survey response rates: A review. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 6:44-51.
32. Singleton, S. 2000. Cooperation or capture? The paradox of co-management and community participation in natural resource management and environmental policy-making. Environmental Politics 9:319-328.
33. Steelman, T. A., and J. Carmin. 2002. Community based watershed remediation: Connecting organizational resources to social and substantive outcomes. In D. Rahm (ed.), Toxic waste and environmental policy in the 21st century. McFarland, 284 pp.
34. Thomas, C. W. 1999. Linking public agencies with community based watershed organizations: Lessons from California. Policy Studies Journal 27:544-565.
35. Weber, E. P. 1998. Successful collaboration. Environment 40:10-18.
36. Weber, E. P. 2000. A new vanguard for the environment: Grass-roots ecosystem management as a new environmental movement. Society and Natural Resources 13:237-259.
37. Wooley, J. T., and M. V. McGinnis. 1999. The politics of watershed policy making. Policy Studies Journal 3:578-594.