Estimating maximum land use change potential from a regional biofuel industry

Energy Policy

Volumn 65, Issue , 2014, Pages 261-269

  Sharp, Benjamin E ^a   Miller, Shelie A ^b  

^a AMRL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Cellulosic ethanol; Diffusion of innovation; Environmental impact

Indexed keywords

DIFFUSION OF INNOVATIONS; ECONOMIC FORCES; LAND-USE CHANGE; MARGINAL LANDS; NORTH CAROLINA; POLICY MECHANISMS; SOUTH CAROLINA; VARIABLE YIELD;

CELLULOSIC ETHANOL; COSTS; CROPS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ETHANOL; LAND USE;

PLANTS (BOTANY);

ALTERNATIVE ENERGY; BIOFUEL; ECONOMIC IMPACT; ENERGY MARKET; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ETHANOL; INNOVATION; LAND USE CHANGE; PRICE DYNAMICS; RENEWABLE RESOURCE;

GEORGIA; NORTH CAROLINA; SOUTH CAROLINA; UNITED STATES;

PANICUM VIRGATUM;

EID: 84890309314     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.062     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Anderson W.F., Dien B.S., Brandon S.K., Peterson J.D. Assessment of bermudagrass and bunch grasses as feedstock for conversion to ethanol. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2007, 145:13-21.
2. Anselin L., Bongiovanni R., Lowenberg-DeBoer J. A spatial econometric approach to the economics of site-specific nitrogen management in corn production. Am. J. Agr. Econ. 2004, 86:675-687.
3. Aravindhakshan S.C., Epplin F.M., Taliaferro C.M. Economics of switchgrass and miscanthus relative to coal as feedstock for generating electricity. Biomass Bioenergy 2010, 34:1375-1383.
4. Aravindhakshan S.C., Epplin F.M., Taliaferro C.M. Switchgrass, Bermudagrass, Flaccidgrass, and Lovegrass biomass yield response to nitrogen for single and double harvest. Biomass Bioenergy 2011, 35:308-319.
5. Barr K.J., Babcock B.A., Carriquiry M.A., Nassar A.M., Harfuch L. Agricultural land elasticities in the United States and Brazil. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 2011, 33:449-462.
6. Boyer C.N., Roberts R.K., English B.C., Tyler D.D., Larson J.A., Mooney D.F. Effects of soil type and landscape on yield and profit maximizing nitrogen rates for switchgrass production. Biomass Bioenergy 2013, 48:33-42.
7. Boyer C.N., Tyler D.D., Roberts R.K., English B.C., Larson J.A. Switchgrass yield response functions and profit-maximizing nitrogen rates on four landscapes in Tennessee. Agron. J 2012.
8. Bullock D.S., Lowenberg-DeBoer J., Swinton S.M. Adding value to spatially managed inputs by understanding site-specific yield response. Agric. Econ. 2002, 27:233-245.
9. Bush, P.V., Branaby, D.I., Smith, H.A., Taylor, C.R., Boylan, D.M., 2001. Evaluation of Switchgrass as a Co-Firing Fuel in the Southeast. No. DE-FC36-98GO10349). Southern Research Institute, Birmingham, AL.
10. Campbell J.E., Lobell D.B., Field C.B. Greater transportation energy and GHG offsets from bioelectricity than ethanol. Science 2009, 324:1055-1057.
11. Campbell J.E., Lobell D.B., Genova R.C., Field C.B. The global potential of bioenergy on abandoned agriculture lands. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42:5791-5794.
12. Chamberlain J.F. Environmental and Policy Implications of Switchgrass Grown for Bioenergy in the Southeastern United States (Dissertation) 2011, Clemson University.
13. Chamberlain J.F., Miller S.A. Policy incentives for switchgrass production using valuation of non-market ecosystem services. Energy Policy 2012, 48:526-536.
14. Chamberlain J.F., Miller S.A., Frederick J.R. Using DAYCENT to quantify on-farm GHG emissions and N dynamics of land use conversion to N-managed switchgrass in the southern US. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2011, 141:332-341.
15. Cundiff J.S., Fike J.H., Parrish D.J., Alwang J. Logistic constraints in developing dedicated large-scale bioenergy systems in the Southeastern United States. J. Environ. Eng. 2009, 135:1086-1096.
16. Curtright A.E., Johnson D.R., Willis H.H., Skone T. Scenario uncertainties in estimating direct land-use change emissions in biomass-to-energy life cycle assessment. Biomass Bioenergy 2012, 47:240-249.
17. Debolt S., Campbell J.E., SMITH R., Montross M., Stork J. Life cycle assessment of native plants and marginal lands for bioenergy agriculture in Kentucky as a model for south-eastern USA. GCB Bioenergy 2009, 1:308-316.
18. Dumortier J. Co-firing in coal power plants and its impact on biomass feedstock availability. Energy Policy 2013, 60:396-405.
19. EIA, 2011. US State Profiles and Energy Estimates [WWW Document]. Energy Information Administration US Department of Energy. URL 〈〉 (accessed 5.21.13). http://www.eia.gov/state/.
20. English B.C., Jensen K., Menard J., Walsh M.E., Brandt C., Van Dyke J., Hadley S. Economic impacts of carbon taxes and biomass feedstock usage in Southeastern United States coal utilities. J. Agric. Appl. Econ. 2007, 39:103.
21. Evans J.M., Cohen M.J. Regional water resource implications of bioethanol production in the southeastern United States. Global Change Biol. 2009, 15:2261-2273.
22. Fargione J., Hill J., Tilman D., Polasky S., Hawthorne P. Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 2008, 319:1235-1238.
23. Fike J.H., Parrish D.J., Wolf D.D., Balasko J.A., Green J.T., Rasnake M., Reynolds J.H. Long-term yield potential of switchgrass-for-biofuel systems. Biomass Bioenergy 2006, 30:198-206.
24. Flyvbjerg B. Curbing optimism bias and strategic misrepresentation in planning: reference class forecasting in practice. Eur. Plann. Stud. 2008, 16:3-21.
25. Frank A.B., Berdahl J.D., Hanson J.D., Liebig M.A., Johnson H.A. Biomass and carbon partitioning in switchgrass. Crop Sci. 2004, 44:1391-1396.
26. Gallagher K.S., Holdren J.P., Sagar A.D. Energy-technology innovation. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2006, 31:193-237.
27. Gopalakrishnan, G., Negri, C.M., Wang, M., Wu, M., Snyder, S., 2008. Use of marginal land and water to maximize biofuel production. In: Biofuels, Bioenergy, and Bioproducts from Sustainable Agricultural and Forest Crops: Proceedings of the Short Rotation Crops International Conference.
28. Haque M., Epplin F.M. Cost to produce switchgrass and cost to produce ethanol from switchgrass for several levels of biorefinery investment cost and biomass to ethanol conversion rates. Biomass Bioenergy 2012.
29. Haque M., Epplin F.M., Taliaferro C.M. Nitrogen and harvest frequency effect on yield and cost for four perennial grasses. Agron. J. 2009, 101:1463.
30. Hoekman S.K. Biofuels in the U.S.-challenges and opportunities. Renewable Energy 2009, 34:14-22.
31. Jaeger W.K., Egelkraut T.M. Biofuel economics in a setting of multiple objectives and unintended consequences. Renew. Sustainable Energy Rev. 2011, 15:4320-4333.
32. Jensen J.R., Halvorsen K.E., Shonnard D.R. Ethanol from lignocellulosics, U.S. federal energy and agricultural policy, and the diffusion of innovation. Biomass Bioenergy 2011, 35:1440-1453.
33. Jensen K., Clark C.D., Ellis P., English B., Menard J., Walsh M., de la Torre Ugarte D. Farmer willingness to grow switchgrass for energy production. Biomass Bioenergy 2007, 31:773-781.
34. Khanna M., Dhungana B., Clifton-Brown J. Costs of producing miscanthus and switchgrass for bioenergy in Illinois. Biomass Bioenergy 2008, 32:482-493.
35. Kim H., Kim S., Dale B.E. Biofuels, land use change, and greenhouse gas emissions: some unexplored variables. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43:961-967.
36. Kutner M.H., Nachtsheim C.J., Neter J., Li W. Applied Linear Statistical Models 2005, McGraw-Hill, New York.
37. Landers G.W., Thompson A.L., Kitchen N.R., Massey R.E. Comparative breakeven analysis of annual grain and perennial switchgrass cropping systems on claypan soil landscapes. Agron. J. 2012, 104:639-648.
38. Larson J.A., Yu T.-H., English B.C., Mooney D.F., Wang C. Cost evaluation of alternative switchgrass producing, harvesting, storing, and transporting systems and their logistics in the Southeastern USA. Agric. Finance Rev. 2010, 70:184-200.
39. McKone T.E., Nazaroff W.W., Berck P., Auffhammer M., Lipman T., Torn M.S., Masanet E., Lobscheid A., Santero N., Mishra U., Barrett A., Bomberg M., Fingerman K., Scown C., Strogen B., Horvath A. Grand challenges for life-cycle assessment of biofuels. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45:1751-1756.
40. McLaughlin S.B. New Switchgrass Biofuels Research Program for the Southeast 1992, Oak Ridge National Lab, TN, United States.
41. McLaughlin S.B., Adams Kszos L. Development of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) as a bioenergy feedstock in the United States. Biomass Bioenergy 2005, 28:515-535.
42. McLaughlin S.B., Kiniry J.R., Taliaferro C.M., De La Torre Ugarte D. Projecting yield and utilization potential of switchgrass as an energy crop. Adv. Agron. 2006, 90:267-297.
43. Miller S.A. Minimizing land use and nitrogen intensity of bioenergy. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44:3932-3939.
44. Miller S.A., Moysey S., Sharp B., Alfaro J. A stochastic approach to model dynamic systems in life cycle assessment. J. Ind. Ecol 2012.
45. Miranowski, J., Rosburg, A., 2010. An Economic Breakeven Model of Cellulosic Feedstock Production and Ethanol Conversion with Implied Carbon Pricing. Biobased Industry Center White Paper BICWP-2010-008. Iowa State University.
46. Mitchell R., Vogel K.P., Sarath G. Managing and enhancing switchgrass as a bioenergy feedstock. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefin. 2008, 2:530-539.
47. Mooney, D.F., Roberts, R.K., English, B.C., Tyler, D.D., Larson, J.A., 2008. Switchgrass production in marginal environments: a comparative economic analysis across four west Tennessee landscapes. In: Selected Paper Presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meetings, Orlando, FL, July, pp. 27-29.
48. Mooney D.F., Roberts R.K., English B.C., Tyler D.D., Larson J.A. Yield and breakeven price of "Alamo"switchgrass for biofuels in Tennessee. Agron. J. 2009, 101:1234-1242.
49. Myhre M., Barford C. Farm-level feasibility of bioenergy depends on variations across multiple sectors. Environ. Res. Lett. 2013, 8:015005.
50. National Research Council (US) Renewable Fuel Standard: Potential Economic and Environmental Effects of US Biofuel Policy 2011, National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
51. North Carolina General Assembly, S. 2007-397, 2007. Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard.
52. Parrish D.J., Fike J.H. The biology and agronomy of switchgrass for biofuels. BPTS 2005, 24:423-459.
53. Perlack R.D., Stokes B.J. U.S. Billion-Ton Update: Biomass Supply for a Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry. No. ORNL/TM-2011/224 2011, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.
54. Perrin R., Vogel K., Schmer M., Mitchell R. Farm-scale production cost of switchgrass for biomass. BioEnergy Res. 2008, 1:91-97.
55. Petrolia D.R., Ibendahl G.A. Conservation programs: will grain production reclaim acres in the south?. J. Agric. Appl. Econ. 2008, 40.
56. Qaim M. Bt cotton in India: field trial results and economic projections. World Dev. 2003, 31:2115-2127.
57. Qin X., Mohan T., El-Halwagi M., Cornforth G., McCarl B.A. Switchgrass as an alternate feedstock for power generation: an integrated environmental, energy and economic life-cycle assessment. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2006, 8:233-249.
58. Qualls D.J., Jensen K.L., Clark C.D., English B.C., Larson J.A., Yen S.T. Analysis of factors affecting willingness to produce switchgrass in the southeastern United States. Biomass Bioenergy 2012, 39:159-167.
59. R Development Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2010, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
60. Rogers E.M. Diffusion of Innovations 1995, Simon and Schuster, New York, NY.
61. Sainz M.B. Commercial cellulosic ethanol: the role of plant-expressed enzymes. In: Tomes, D., Lakshmanan, P., Songstad, D. (Eds.), Biofuels 2011, 237-264. Springer, New York.
62. Sanderson M.A., Adler P.R. Perennial forages as second generation bioenergy crops. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2008, 9:768-788.
63. Sanderson M.A., Reed R.L., McLaughlin S.B., Wullschleger S.D., Conger B.V., Parrish D.J., Wolf D.D., Taliaferro C., Hopkins A.A., Ocumpaugh W.R. Switchgrass as a sustainable bioenergy crop. Bioresour. Technol. 1996, 56:83-93.
64. Sarkar S., Miller S.A., Frederick J.R., Chamberlain J.F. Modeling nitrogen loss from switchgrass agricultural systems. Biomass Bioenergy 2011, 35:4381-4389.
65. Schmer M.R., Vogel K.P., Mitchell R.B., Perrin R.K. Net energy of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2008, 105:464-469.
66. Searchinger T., Heimlich R., Houghton R.A., Dong F., Elobeid A., Fabiosa J., Tokgoz S., Hayes D., Yu T.-H. Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 2008, 319:1238-1240.
67. Somerville C., Youngs H., Taylor C., Davis S.C., Long S.P. Feedstocks for lignocellulosic biofuels. Science 2010, 329:790-792.
68. Song F., Zhao J., Swinton S.M. Switching to perennial energy crops under uncertainty and costly reversibility. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 2011, 93:768-783.
69. Spann M.S., Adams M., Souder W.E. Measures of technology transfer effectiveness: key dimensions and differences in their use by sponsors, developers and adopters. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 1995, 42:19-29.
70. Swinton S.M., Babcock B.A., James L.K., Bandaru V. Higher US crop prices trigger little area expansion so marginal land for biofuel crops is limited. Energy Policy 2011, 39:5254-5258.
71. Tyner W.E. Policy update: the 2011 National Research Council report on biofuels. Biofuels 2012, 3:17-19.
72. US DOE, 2011. Billion-Ton Update: Biomass supply for a Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry. No. ORNL/TM-2011/224. US Department of Energy, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.
73. US EPA, 2013. Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: 2013 Renewable Fuel Standards; Final Rule. Vol. 78 No. 158 Part II. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
74. USDA, 2010. A USDA Regional Roadmap to Meeting the Biofuels Goals of the Renewable Fuels Standard by 2022. USDA, Washington, DC.
75. USDA, 2013. USDA Census of Agriculture [WWW Document]. US Department of Agriculture Census of Agriculture. URL (accessed 4.10.13). http://www.agcensus.usda.gov/index.php.
76. USDA, N., 2007. Appendix B. General Explanation and Census of Agriculture Report Form.
77. USDA NASS, 2013. National Agricultural Statistics Service. Quick Stats 2.0 database. [WWW Document]. Quick Stats 2.0 database. URL (accessed 4.10.13). http://www.nass.usda.gov/.
78. Walsh M.E., Daniel G., Shapouri H., Slinsky S.P. Bioenergy crop production in the United States: potential quantities, land use changes, and economic impacts on the agricultural sector. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2003, 24:313-333.
79. Williams P.R.D., Inman D., Aden A., Heath G.A. Environmental and sustainability factors associated with next-generation biofuels in the U.S.: what do we really know?. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43:4763-4775.
80. Wright L., Turhollow A. Switchgrass selection as a "model" bioenergy crop: a history of the process. Biomass Bioenergy 2010, 34:851-868.
81. Wullschleger S.D., Davis E.B., Borsuk M.E., Gunderson C.A., Lynd L.R. Biomass production in switchgrass across the United States: database description and determinants of yield. Agron. J. 2010, 102:1158.