Geodesic finite mixture models

BMVC 2014 - Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference 2014

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages

  Simo Serra, Edgar ^a   Torras, Carme ^a   Moreno Noguer, Francesc ^a  

^a INSTITUT DE ROBÒTICA I INFORMÀTICA INDUSTRIAL CSIC UPC   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GEODESY; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; LARGE DATASET; MAXIMUM PRINCIPLE; MIXTURES;

EUCLIDEAN METRICS; EXPECTATION-MAXIMIZATION ALGORITHMS; FINITE MIXTURE MODELING; FINITE MIXTURE MODELS; GEODESIC DISTANCES; MINIMUM MESSAGE LENGTHS; MULTIVARIATE DATA; RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLD;

GEOMETRY;

EID: 85087241314     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.5244/c.28.91     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. C. Archambeau and M. Verleysen. Manifold constrained finite gaussian mixtures. In Computational Intelligence and Bioinspired Systems, pages 820-828. Springer, 2005.
2. A. Banerjee, I. S. Dhillon, J. Ghosh, S. Sra, and G. Ridgeway. Clustering on the unit hypersphere using von mises-fisher distributions. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 6(9):1345-1382, 2005.
3. W. M. Boothby. An Introduction to Differentiable Manifolds and Riemannian Geometry. Revised 2nd Ed. Academic, New York, 2003.
4. M. Brand. Charting a Manifold. In Neural Information Processing Systems, 2003.
5. M. A. Brubaker, M. Salzmann, and R. Urtasun. A Family of MCMC Methods on Implicitly Defined Manifolds. Journal of Machine Learning Research - Proceedings Track, 22:161-172, 2012.
6. R. Caseiro, P. Martins, J. F. Henriques, F. S. Leite, and J. Batista. Rolling riemannian manifolds to solve the multi-class classification problem. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2013.
7. B. C. Davis, E. Bullitt, P. T. Fletcher, and S. Joshi. Population Shape Regression from Random Design Data. In International Conference on Computer Vision, 2007.
8. J.-P. Dedieu and D. Nowicki. Symplectic methods for the approximation of the exponential map and the newton iteration on riemannian submanifolds. Journal of Complexity, 21(4):487-501, 2005.
9. M. Figueiredo and A. Jain. Unsupervised Learning of Finite Mixture Models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 24(3):381-396, 2002.
10. P. Fletcher, C. Lu, S. Pizer, and S. Joshi. Principal Geodesic Analysis for the Study of Nonlinear Statistics of Shape. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 23(8):995-1005, 2004.
11. O. Freifeld and M. J. Black. Lie Bodies: A Manifold Representation of 3D Human Shape. In European Conference on Computer Vision, 2012.
12. S. Hauberg, S. Sommer, and K. S. Pedersen. Natural metrics and least-committed priors for articulated tracking. Image and Vision Computing, 30(6):453-461, 2012.
13. S. Huckemann, T. Hotz, and A. Munk. Intrinsic Shape analysis: Geodesic PCA for Riemannian Manifolds Modulo Isometric Lie Group Actions. Statistica Sinica, 20: 1-100, 2010.
14. C. Ionescu, F. Li, and C. Sminchisescu. Latent Structured Models for Human Pose Estimation. In International Conference on Computer Vision, 2011.
15. C. Ionescu, D. Papava, V. Olaru, and C. Sminchisescu. Human3.6m: Large scale datasets and predictive methods for 3d human sensing in natural environments. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2014.
16. S. Jayasumana, R. Hartley, M. Salzmann, H. Li, and M. Harandi. Kernel methods on the riemannian manifold of symmetric positive definite matrices. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2013.
17. H. Karcher. Riemannian center of mass and mollifier smoothing. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 30(5):509-541, 1977.
18. N. D. Lawrence. Probabilistic Non-linear Principal Component Analysis with Gaussian Process Latent Variable Models. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 6:1783-1816, 2005.
19. N. D. Lawrence. Learning for Larger Datasets with the Gaussian Process Latent Variable Model. Journal of Machine Learning Research - Proceedings Track, 2:243-250, 2007.
20. F. Moreno-Noguer and P. Fua. Stochastic exploration of ambiguities for nonrigid shape recovery. IEEE Transactions Pattern Analylis and Machine Intelligence, 35(2):463-475, 2013.
21. A. Ozakin and A. Gray. Submanifold Density Estimation. In Neural Information Processing Systems, 2009.
22. B. Pelletier. Kernel Density Estimation on Riemannian Manifolds. Statistics & Probability Letters, 73(3):297-304, 2005.
23. X. Pennec. Intrinsic Statistics on Riemannian Manifolds: Basic Tools for Geometric Measurements. J. Math. Imaging Vis., 25(1):127-154, July 2006.
24. J. Quiñonero-candela, C. E. Rasmussen, and R. Herbrich. A Unifying View of Sparse Approximate Gaussian Process Regression. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 6: 1939-1959, 2005.
25. S. Said, N. Courtry, N. L. Bihan, and S. Sangwine. Exact Principal Geodesic Analysis for data on SO(3). In European Signal Processing Conference, 2007.
26. E. Serradell, A. Romero, R. Leta, C. Gatta, and F. Moreno-Noguer. Simultaneous correspondence and non-rigid 3d reconstruction of the coronary tree from single x-ray images. In International Conference on Computer Vision, 2011.
27. E. Serradell, P. Glowacki, J. Kybic, F. Moreno-Noguer, and P. Fua. Robust non-rigid registration of 2d and 3d graphs. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2012.
28. E. Serradell, P. Glowacki, J. Kybic, F. Moreno-Noguer, and P. Fua. Robust elastic 2d/3d geometric graph matching. In SPIE Medical Imaging, 2012.
29. E. Simo-Serra, A. Ramisa, G. Alenyà, C. Torras, and F. Moreno-Noguer. Single Image 3D Human Pose Estimation from Noisy Observations. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2012.
30. E. Simo-Serra, A. Quattoni, C. Torras, and F. Moreno-Noguer. A Joint Model for 2D and 3D Pose Estimation from a Single Image. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2013.
31. S. Sommer, A. Tatu, C. Chen, D. Jurgensen, M. De Bruijne, M. Loog, M. Nielsen, and F. Lauze. Bicycle Chain Shape Models. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009.
32. S. Sommer, F. Lauze, S. Hauberg, and M. Nielsen. Manifold Valued Statistics, Exact Principal Geodesic Analysis and the Effect of Linear Approximations. In European Conference on Computer Vision, 2010.
33. M. Tournier, X. Wu, N. Courty, E. Arnaud, and L. Reveret. Motion compression using principal geodesics analysis. In Computer Graphics Forum, volume 28. Wiley Online Library, 2009.
34. O. Tuzel, F. Porikli, and P. Meer. Pedestrian Detection via Classification on Riemannian Manifolds. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 30(10): 1713-1727, 2008.
35. A. Varol, M. Salzmann, P. Fua, and R. Urtasun. A Constrained Latent Variable Model. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2012.