Bicycle chain shape models

2009 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, CVPR Workshops 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 157-163

  Sommer, Stefan ^a   Tatu, Aditya ^a   Chen, Chen ^a   Jørgensen, Dan R ^a,b   De Bruijne, Marleen ^a,c   Loog, Marco ^a,d   Nielsen, Mads ^a,b   Lauze, François ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b NORDIC BIOSCIENCE A S   (Denmark)

^c ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^d DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHAINS; GEODESY;

ANATOMICAL LANDMARKS; GENERALIZED PROCRUSTES ANALYSIS; PLANAR ROTATION; PRESHAPE; PRINCIPAL GEODESIC ANALYSIS; RIEMANNIAN MANIFOLD; SAMPLE SETS; SHAPE MODEL;

COMPUTER VISION;

EID: 70449586759     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CVPR.2009.5204053     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. F. Bookstein. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. Cambrigde University Press, 1991.
2. W. M. Boothby. An Introduction to Differentiate Manifolds and Riemannian Geometry. Revised Second Edition. Academic Press, 2003.
3. J. Cates, P. T. Flechter, M. Styner, M. Shenton, and R. Whitaker. Shape Modeling and Analyis with Entropy-Based Particle Systems. In B. P. F. L. Nico Karssemeijer, editor, Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging, volume 4584 of LNCS, pages 333-345, Kerkrade, The Netherlands, 2007. Springer.
4. T. Cootes, C. Taylor, D. Cooper, and J. Graham. Active shape models-their training and application. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 61(1):38-59, 1995.
5. R. H. Davies, C. J. Twining, T. F. Cootes, J. C. Waterton, and C. J. Taylor. A Minimum Description Length Approach to Statistical Shape Modeling. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 21(5):525-538, may 2002.
6. J. Dedieu and D. Nowicki. Symplectic methods for the approximation of the exponential map and the newton iteration on riemannian submanifolds. Journal of Complexity, 21(4):487-501, Aug. 2005.
7. P. T. Fletcher, S. Joshi, C. Lu, and S. M. Pizer. Principal Geodesic Analysis for the Study of Nonlinear Statistics of Shape. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 23(8):995-1005, Aug 2004.
8. C. Goodall. Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 53(2):285-339, 1991.
9. D. Kendall. Shape manifolds, procrustean metrics and complex projective spaces. Bulletin of London Mathematical Society, 16:81-121, 1984.
10. D. G. Kendall, D. Barden, T. K. Carne, and H. Le. Shape and Shape Theory. Wiley and Sons, 1999.
11. E. Klassen and A. Srivastava. Geodesies Between 3D Closed Curves Using Path-Straightening, volume 3951 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 95-106. Springer, 2006.
12. E. Klassen, A. Srivastava, W. Mio, and S. Joshi. Analysis of planar shapes using geodesic paths on shape spaces. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 26:372-383, 2004.
13. P. W. Michor and D. Mumford. An overview of the riemannian metrics on spaces of curves using the hamiltonian approach, math/0605009, Apr. 2006. Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis 23 (2007), 74-113.
14. W. Mio and A. Srivastava. Elastic-string models for representation and analysis of planar shapes. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2:10-15, 2004.
15. L. Noakes. A global algorithm for geodesies. Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society, 64:37-50, 1998.
16. J. Sethian. Level Set Methods and Fast Marching Methods: Evolving Interfaces in Computational Geometry, Fluid Mechanics, Computer Vision, and Materials Sciences. Cambridge Monograph on Applied and Computational Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, 1999.