Converting Italian treebanks: Towards an Italian Stanford dependency treebank

LAW 2013 and ID 2013 - 7th Linguistic Annotation Workshop and Interoperability with Discourse, Proceedings of the Workshop

Volumn , Issue , 2020, Pages 61-69

  Bosco, Cristina ^a   Montemagni, Simonetta ^b   Simi, Maria ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

^b CNR Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PISA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTEROPERABILITY; LINGUISTICS;

STANFORD; TREEBANKS;

FORESTRY;

EID: 85084339323     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. G. Attardi and F. Dell'Orletta. 2009. Reverse revision and linear tree combination for dependency parsing. In Proceedings of of NAACL HLT (2009).
2. G. Attardi. 2006. Experiments with a multilanguage non-projective dependency parser. In Proceedings of the CoNLL-X '06, New York City, New York.
3. C. Bosco and A. Mazzei. 2012. The evalita 2011 parsing task: the dependency track. In Working Notes of Evalita'11, Roma, Italy.
4. C. Bosco, V. Lombardo, L. Lesmo, and D. Vassallo. 2000. Building a treebank for italian: a data-driven annotation schema. In Proceedings of the LREC'00, Athens, Greece.
5. C. Bosco, S. Montemagni, A. Mazzei, V. Lombardo, F. Dell'Orletta, A. Lenci, L. Lesmo, G. Attardi, M. Simi, A. Lavelli, J. Hall, J. Nilsson, and J. Nivre. 2010. Comparing the influence of different treebank annotations on dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the LREC'10, Valletta, Malta.
6. C. Bosco, M. Simi, and S. Montemagni. 2012. Harmonization and merging of two italian dependency treebanks. In Proceedings of the LREC 2012 Workshop on Language Resource Merging, Istanbul, Turkey.
7. Sabine Buchholz and Erwin Marsi. 2006. Conll-x shared task on multilingual dependency parsing. In In Proc. of CoNLL, pages 149-164.
8. D. Cer, M.C. de Marneffe, D. Jurafsky, and C.D. Manning. 2010. Parsing to stanford dependencies: Trade-offs between speed and accuracy. In Proceedings of the LREC'10), Valletta, Malta.
9. M.C. de Marneffe and C. Manning. 2008a. The stanford typed dependencies representation. In Coling 2008: Proceedings of the workshop on Cross-Framework and Cross-Domain Parser Evaluation, pages 1-8, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics.
10. M.C. de Marneffe and C.D. Manning. 2008b. Stanford typed dependencies manual. Technical report, Stanford University.
11. M.C. de Marneffe, B. MacCartney, and C.D. Manning. 2006. Generating typed dependency parses from phrase structure parses. In Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2006).
12. T. Declerck. 2008. A framework for standardized syntactic annotation. In Proceedings of the LREC'08, Marrakech, Morocco.
13. F. Dell'Orletta, S. Marchi, S. Montemagni, G. Venturi, T. Agnoloni, and E. Francesconi. 2012. Domain adaptation for dependency parsing at evalita 2011. In Working Notes of Evalita'11, Roma, Italy.
14. K. Haverinen, T. Viljanen, V. Laippala, S. Kohonen, F. Ginter, and T. Salakoski. 2010. Treebanking Finnish. In Proceedings of the 9th Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT-9), pages 79-90, Tartu, Estonia.
15. R. Hudson. 1984. Word Grammar. Basil Blackwell, Oxford and New York.
16. N. Ide and L. Romary. 2006. Representing linguistic corpora and their annotations. In Proceedings of the LREC'06, Genova, Italy.
17. N. Ide and K. Suderman. 2007. GrAF: A graph-based format for linguistic annotations. In Proceedings of the Linguistic Annotation Workshop, Prague, Czech Republic.
18. M. Kemps-Snijders, M. Windhouwer, P. Wittenburg, and S.E. Wright. 2009. Isocat: remodelling meta-data for language resources. IJMSO, 4(4):261-276.
19. S. Kübler, R.T. McDonald, and J. Nivre. 2009. Dependency Parsing. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, Oxford and New York.
20. John Lee and Yin Hei Kong. 2012. A dependency treebank of classical chinese poems. In Proceedings of the 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 191-199, Montréal, Canada, June. Association for Computational Linguistics.
21. G. Leech, R. Barnett, and P. Kahrel. 1996. Eagles recommendations for the syntactic annotation of corpora. Technical report, EAG-TCWG-SASG1.8.
22. A. Lenci, S. Montemagni, V. Pirrelli, and C. Soria. 2008. A syntactic meta-scheme for corpus annotation and parsing evaluation. In Proceedings of the LREC'00, Athens, Greece.
23. S. Montemagni, F. Barsotti, M. Battista, N. Calzolari, O. Corazzari, A. Lenci, A. Zampolli, F. Fanciulli, M. Massetani, R. Raffaelli, R. Basili, M. T. Pazienza, D. Saracino, F. Zanzotto, N. Mana, F. Pianesi, and R. Delmonte. 2003. Building the Italian Syntactic-Semantic Treebank. In A. Abeillé, editor, Building and Using syntactically annotated corpora. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
24. S. Pyysalo, F. Ginter, K. Haverinen, J. Heimonen, T. Salakoski, and V. Laippala. 2007. On the unification of syntactic annotations under the Stanford dependency scheme: A case study on Bioinfer and GENIA. In BioNLP 2007: Biological, translational, and clinical language processing, pages 25-32, Prague.
25. M. Seraji, B. Megyesi, and J. Nivre. 2012. Bootstrapping a persian dependency treebank. Special Issue of Linguistic Issues in Language Technology (LiLT) on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories, 7.