Parsing to stanford dependencies: Trade-offs between speed and accuracy

Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1628-1632

  Cer, Daniel ^a   De Marneffe, Marie Catherine ^b   Jurafsky, Daniel ^b   Manning, Christopher D ^a,b  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; FORESTRY;

BALANCED CONFIGURATIONS; DEPENDENCY PARSING; LINEAR CLASSIFIERS; PARSE TREES; PHRASE STRUCTURE; RE-RANKING; SEARCH SPACES; TREEBANKS;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 85035783387     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Rod Adams, Gabriel Nicolae, Cristina Nicolae, and Sanda Harabagiu. 2007. Textual entailment through extended lexical overlap and lexico-semantic matching. In Proceedings of the ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, pages 119-124, Prague, June.
2. Michele Banko, Michael J. Cafarella, Stephen Soderland, Matt Broadhead, and Oren Etzioni. 2007. Open information extraction from the web. In Proceedings of the 20th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2007).
3. Daniel M. Bikel. 2004. A distributional analysis of a lexicalized statistical parsing model. In Proceedings of the 2004 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP 2004).
4. Jari Björne, Juho Heimonen, Filip Ginter, Antti Airola, Tapio Pahikkala, and Tapio Salakoski. 2009. Extracting complex biological events with rich graph-based feature sets. In Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics Workshop on BioNLP: Shared Task.
5. Catherine Blake. 2007. The role of sentence structure in recognizing textual entailment. In Proceedings of the ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, pages 101-106, Prague, June.
6. Eugene Charniak and Mark Johnson. 2005. Coarse-to-fine n-best parsing and maxent discriminative reranking. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the ACL.
7. Eugene Charniak. 2000. A maximum-entropy-inspired parser. In Proceedings of NAACL-2000.
8. Andrew B. Clegg and Adrian J. Shepherd. 2007. Benchmarking natural-language parsers for biological applications using dependency graphs. BMC Bioinformatics, 8(24).
9. Andrew B. Clegg. 2008. Computational-Linguistic Approaches to Biological Text Mining. Ph.D. thesis, School of Crystallography, Birkbeck, University of London.
10. Michael A. Covington. 2001. A fundamental algorithm for dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual ACM Southeast Conference.
11. Marie-Catherine de Marneffe and Christopher D. Manning. 2008. The Stanford typed dependencies representation. In COLING Workshop on Cross-framework and Crossdomain Parser Evaluation.
12. Marie-Catherine de Marneffe, Bill MacCartney, and Christopher D. Manning. 2006. Generating typed dependency parses from phrase structure parses. In 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2006).
13. Jason Eisner. 1996. Three new probabilistic models for dependency parsing: An exploration. In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-96), pages 340-345, Copenhagen, August.
14. Cory B. Giles and Jonathan D. Wren. 2008. Large-scale directional relationship extraction and resolution. BMC Bioinformatics, 9(Suppl 9):S11.
15. Mark A. Greenwood and Mark Stevenson. 2007. A semi-supervised approach to learning relevant proteinprotein interaction articles. In Proceedings of the Second BioCreAtIvE Challenge Workshop, Madrid, Spain.
16. Stefan Harmeling. 2007. An extensible probabilistic transformation-based approach to the third recognizing textual entailment challenge. In Proceedings of the ACL-PASCAL Workshop on Textual Entailment and Paraphrasing, pages 137-142, Prague, June.
17. Jason S. Kessler. 2008. Polling the blogosphere: a rule-based approach to belief classification. In International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.
18. Dan Klein and Christopher D. Manning. 2003. Accurate unlexicalized parsing. In Proceedings of the 41st Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
19. Ryan McDonald, Fernando Pereira, Kiril Ribarov, and Jan Hajic. 2005. Non-projective dependency parsing using spanning tree algorithms. In Proceedings of HLT-EMNLP.
20. Arun Meena and T. V. Prabhakar. 2007. Sentence level sentiment analysis in the presence of conjuncts using linguistic analysis. In Advances in Information Retrieval, Volume 4425 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer.
21. Yusuke Miyao, Rune Saetre, Kenji Sagae, Takuya Matsuzaki, and Jun'ichi Tsujii. 2008. Task-oriented evaluation of syntactic parsers and their representations. In Proceedings of ACL-08:HLT.
22. Joakim Nivre, Johan Hall, and Jens Nilsson. 2006. Malt-Parser: A data-driven parser-generator for dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2006).
23. Joakim Nivre. 2003. An efficient algorithm for projective dependency parsing. In Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Parsing Technologies (IWPT 03).
24. Slav Petrov, Leon Barrett, Romain Thibaux, and Dan Klein. 2006. Learning accurate, compact, and interpretable tree annotation. In Proceedings of COLING-ACL 2006.
25. Sampo Pyysalo, Filip Ginter, Katri Haverinen, Juho Heimonen, Tapio Salakoski, and Veronika Laippala. 2007. On the unification of syntactic annotations under the Stanford dependency scheme: A case study on BioInfer and GENIA. In Proceedings of BioNLP 2007: Biological, translational, and clinical language processing (ACL07).
26. Mike Ross and Linas Vepstas, 2008. RelEx. OpenCog Project. http://opencog.org/wiki/RelEx.
27. Kristina Toutanova, Dan Klein, Christopher D. Manning, and Yoram Singer. 2003. Feature-rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. In Proceedings of HLT-NAACL 2003.
28. Jay Urbain, Nazli Goharian, and Ophir Frieder. 2007. IIT TREC 2007 genomics track: Using concept-based semantics in context for genomics literature passage retrieval. In The Sixteenth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2007) Proceedings.
29. Sofie Van Landeghem, Yvan Saeys, Bernard De Baets, and Yves Van de Peer. 2009. Analyzing text in search of bio-molecular events: a high-precision machine learning framework. In Proceedings of the Association for Computational Linguistics Workshop on BioNLP: Shared Task.
30. Amal Zouaq, Roger Nkambou, and Claude Frasson. 2007. Building domain ontologies from text for educational purposes. In Proceedings of the Second European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning: Creating new learning experiences on a global scale.