On the unification of syntactic annotations under the Stanford dependency scheme: A case study on BioInfer and GENIA

ACL 2007 - Proceedings of the Workshop on BioNLP 2007: Biological, Translational, and Clinical Language Processing

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 25-32

  Pyysalo, Sampo ^a   Ginter, Filip ^a   Haverinen, Katri ^a   Heimonen, Juho ^a   Salakoski, Tapio ^a   Laippala, Veronika ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; TRANSLATION (LANGUAGES);

APPLICATION-ORIENTED; BIOMEDICAL INFORMATION EXTRACTIONS; HIGHLY RELIABLE; LINK GRAMMAR; STANFORD; SYNTACTIC ANNOTATION; TREEBANKS;

SYNTACTICS;

EID: 84886762111     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Erick Alphonse, Sophie Aubin, Philippe Bessières, Gilles Bisson, Thierry Hamon, Sandrine Laguarigue, Adeline Nazarenko, Alain-Pierre Manine, Claire Nédellec, Mohamed Ould Abdel Vetah, Thierry Poibeau, and Davy Weissenbacher. 2004. Event-Based Information Extraction for the biomedical domain: the Caderige project. In N. Collier, P. Ruch, and A. Nazarenko, editors, COLING NLPBA/BioNLP Workshop, pages 43–49, Geneva, Switzerland.
2. Sophie Aubin, Adeline Nazarenko, and Claire Nédellec. 2005. Adapting a general parser to a sublanguage. In G. Angelova, K. Bontcheva, R. Mitkov, N. Nicolov, and N. Nikolov, editors, Proceedings of the International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP 05), Borovets, Bulgaria, pages 89–93. Incoma, Bulgaria.
3. Sophie Aubin. 2005. LLL challenge - syntactic analysis guidelines. Technical report, LIPN, Université Paris Nord, Villetaneuse.
4. Ann Bies, Mark Ferguson, Karen Katz, and Robert Mac-Intyre. 1995. Bracketing guidelines for treebank ii style. Technical report, Penn Treebank Project, University of Pennsylvania.
5. Eugene Charniak and Matthew Lease. 2005. Parsing biomedical literature. In R. Dale, K. F. Wong, J. Su, and O. Y. Kwong, editors, Proceedings of the Second International Joint Conference on Natural Lan-gage Processing, Jeju Island, Korea, pages 58–69.
6. Eugene Charniak. 1999. A maximum-entropy-inspired parser. Technical report, Brown University.
7. Andrew Brian Clegg and Adrian Shepherd. 2007. Benchmarking natural-language parsers for biological applications using dependency graphs. BMC Bioinformatics, 8(1):24.
8. Michael Collins. 1999. Head-Driven Statistical Models for Natural Language Parsing. Ph.D. thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
9. Marie-Catherine de Marneffe, Bill MacCartney, and Christopher D. Manning. 2006. Generating typed dependency parses from phrase structure parses. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, A. Gangemi, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, J. Odijk, and D. Tapias, editors, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2006), pages 449–454.
10. Janez Demšar. 2006. Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7:1–30.
11. Jing Ding, Daniel Berleant, Jun Xu, and Andy W. Fulmer. 2003. Extracting biochemical interactions from med-line using a link grammar parser. In B. Werner, editor, Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, pages 467–471. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, CA.
12. Katrin Fundel, Robert Kuffner, and Ralf Zimmer. 2007. RelEx–Relation extraction using dependency parse trees. Bioinformatics, 23(3):365–371.
13. Jin-Dong Kim, Tomoko Ohta, Yuka Tateisi, and Jun'ichi Tsujii. 2003. GENIA corpus–a semantically annotated corpus for bio-textmining. Bioinformatics, 19:i180–182.
14. Roger Levy and Galen Andrew. 2006. Tregex and Tsur-geon: tools for querying and manipulating tree data structures. In N. Calzolari, K. Choukri, A. Gangemi, B. Maegaard, J. Mariani, J. Odijk, and D. Tapias, editors, Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2006), pages 2231–2234.
15. Dekang Lin. 1998. A dependency-based method for evaluating broad-coverage parsers. Natural Language Engineering, 4(2):97–114.
16. Sampo Pyysalo, Tapio Salakoski, Sophie Aubin, and Adeline Nazarenko. 2006. Lexical adaptation of link grammar to the biomedical sublanguage: a comparative evaluation of three approaches. BMC Bioinformatics, 7(Suppl 3).
17. Sampo Pyysalo, Filip Ginter, Juho Heimonen, Jari Björne, Jorma Boberg, Jouni Järvinen, and Tapio Salakoski. 2007. BioInfer: A corpus for information extraction in the biomedical domain. BMC Bioinformatics, 8(50).
18. Fabio Rinaldi, Gerold Schneider, Kaarel Kaljurand, James Dowdall, Andreas Persidis, and Ourania Kon-stanti. 2004. Mining relations in the genia corpus. In Proceedings of the Workshop W9 on Data Mining and Text Mining for Bioinformatics (ECML/PKDD’04), pages 61–68, Pisa, Italy.
19. Gerold Schneider. 1998. A linguistic comparison of constituency, dependency and link grammar. Master’s thesis, University of Zürich.
20. Daniel D. Sleator and Davy Temperley. 1993. Parsing English with a Link Grammar. In Third International Workshop on Parsing Technologies.
21. Yoshimasa Tsuruoka, Yuka Tateishi, Jin-Dong Kim, Tomoko Ohta, John McNaught, Sophia Ananiadou, and Jun'ichi Tsujii. 2005. Developing a robust part-of-speech tagger for biomedical text. In P. Bozanis and E. N. Houstis, editors, 10th Panhellenic Conference on Informatics, volume 3746, pages 382–392.