Social projection and the psychology of choice

The Self in Social Judgment

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 17-41

  Krueger, Joachim I ^a   Acevedo, Melissa ^b  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Valencia Community College   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85083183779     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203943250-7     Document Type: Chapter

References (79)

1. Acevedo, M., & Krueger, J. I. (2004). Two egocentric sources of the decision to vote: The voter’s illusion and the belief in personal relevance. Political Psychology, 25, 115-134.
2. Acevedo, M., & Krueger, J. I. (2005). Evidential reasoning in the prisoner’s dilemma game. American Journal of Psychology, 118, 431-457.
3. Allport, F. H. (1924). Social psychology. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
4. Arndt, J., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Pyszcynski, T., & Schimel, J. (1999). Creativity and terror management: Evidence that creative activity increases guilt and social projection following mortality salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 19-32.
5. Asch, S. E. (1952). Social psychology. Oxford: Prentice-Hall.
6. Baker, F., & Rachlin, H. (2001). Probability of reciprocation in repeated prisoner’s dilemma games. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 14, 51-67.
7. Bargh, J. A., & Ferguson, M. J. (2000). Beyond behaviorism: On the automaticity of higher mental processes. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 925-945.
8. Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G., & Weber, M. (1989). The curse of knowledge in economic settings: An experimental analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 97, 1232-1254.
9. Campbell, R., & Sowden, L. (1985). Paradoxes of rationality and cooperation: Prisoner’s dilemma and Newcomb’s problem. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
10. Clement, R. W., & Krueger, J. (2002). Social ategorization moderates social projection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 219-231.
11. Colman, A. M (2003). Cooperation, psychological game theory, and limitations of tationality in social interaction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 139-198.
12. Cronbach, L. (1955). Processes affecting scores on “understanding of others” and “assumed similarity.” Psychological Bulletin, 52, 177-193.
13. Dawes, R. M. (1989). Statistical criteria for establishing a truly false consensus effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-17.
14. Dawes, R. M. (1991). Probabilistic versus causal reasoning. In D. Cicchetti & W. M. Grove (Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology, Volume I: Matters of public interest (pp. 235-264). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
15. Dawes, R. M., McTavish, J., & Shaklee, H. (1977). Behavior, communication, and assumptions about other people’s behavior in a commons dilemma situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 1-11.
16. Dawes, R. M., & Messick, D. M. (2000). Social dilemmas. International Journal of Psychology, 35, 111-116.
17. De Cremer, D., & Van Lange, R.A.M. (2001). Why prosocials exhibit greater cooperation than proselfs: The role of social responsibility and reciprocity. European Journal of Personality, 15, S5-S18.
18. Eells, E. (1985). Causality, decision, and Newcomb’s Problem. In R. Campbell & L. Sowden (Eds.). Paradoxes of rationality and cooperation: Prisoner’s dilemma and Newcomb’s problem (pp. 183-213). Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
19. Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 203-210.
20. Flood, M. M. (1952). Some experimental games. Research Memorandum RM-789. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
21. Forer, B. R. (1949). The fallacy of personal validation: a classroom demonsttation of gullibility. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 44, 118-123.
22. Gaertner, L., Sedikides, C., & Graetz, K. (1999). In search of self-definition: Motivational primacy of the individual self, motivational primacy of the collective self, or contextual primacy? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 5-18.
23. Gigerenzer, G., & McElreath, R. (2003). Social intelligence in games. Journalof Institutionaland Theoretical Economics, 159, 188-194.
24. Gigerenzer, G., & Selten, R. (2001). Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
25. Gilovich, T., Jennings, D. L., & Jennings, S. (1983). Causal focus and estimates of consensus: An examination of the false-consensus effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 550-559.
26. Gilovich, T., Savitsky, K., & Medvec, V. H. (1998). The illusion of transparency: Biased assessments of others’ ability to read one’s emotional states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 332-346.
27. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: Tlie implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
28. Heider, E. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29. Howson, G., & Urbach, P. (1989). Scientific reasoning: The Bayesian approach. Chicago: Open Court Publishing.
30. Hurley, S. L. (1991). Newcomb’s Problem, Prisoners’ dilemma, and collective action. Synthese, 86, 173-196.
31. Katz, D., & Allport, F. L. (1931). Students’ attitudes. Syracuse, NY: Craftsman Press.
32. Kay, A. C., & Ross, L. (2003). The perceptual push: The interplay between implicit cues and explicit situational construals on behavioral intentions in the Prisoner’s Dilemma, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 634-643.
33. Keynes, J. M. (1921). A treatise on probability. London: Macmillan.
34. Komorita, S. S., & Parks, C. D. (1995). Interpersonal relations: Mixed motive interaction. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 183-207.
35. Komorita, S. S., Sweeney, J., & Kravitz, D. A. (1980). Cooperative choice in the n-petson dilemma situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 504-516.
36. Krueget, J. (1998). On the perception of social consensus. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 163-240). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
37. Krueger, J. (2000). The projective perception of the social world: A building block of social comparison processes. In J. Suls & L. Wheeler (Eds.), Handbook of social comparison: Theory and research (pp. 323-351). New York: Plenum/KJuwer.
38. Krueger, J. I., & Acevedo, M. (unpublished). Person perception in the Prisoner’s Dilemma. Brown University.
39. Krueger, J. I., Acevedo, M., & Robbins, J. M. (2005). Self as sample. In K. Fiedler & P. Juslin (Eds.), Information sampling and adaptive cognition (pp. 353-377). New York: Cambridge University Press.
40. Krueger, J., & Clement, R. W. (1996). Inferring category characteristics from sample characteristics: Inductive reasoning and social projection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 52-68.
41. Krueger, J., & Zeiger, J. S. (1993). Social categorization and the truly false consensus effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 670-680.
42. Laplace, P. S. (1814). Essai philosophique sure les probabilities. Paris: Courcier.
43. Levi, I. (1975). Newcomb’s many problems. ‘Theory and Decision, 6, 161-375.
44. Lewis, D. K. (1969). Convention: A philosophical study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45. Lewis, D. K. (1979). Prisoner’s dilemma is a Newcomb problem. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 8, 235-240.
46. Lorenz, E. N. (1993). The essence of chaos. Seattle: University ol Washington Press.
47. Markus, H. R. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63-78.
48. Messe, L. A., & Sivacek, J. M. (1979). Predictions of others’ responses in a mixed-motive game: Self-justification or false consensus? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 602-607.
49. Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 371-378.
50. Morris, M. W., Sim, D. L., & Girorto, V. (1998). Distinguishing sources of cooperation in the one-round prisoner’s dilemma: evidence for cooperative decisions based on the illusion ol control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 494-512.
51. Mullen, B., Migdal, M. J., & Hewstone, M. (2001). Crossed categorization versus simple categorization and intetgroup evaluations: A meta-analysis. European fournal of Social Psychology, 31, 721-736.
52. Nisbett, R. E., & Norenzayan, A. (2002). Culture and cognition. In H. Pashler & D. L. Medin (Eds.), Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology: Cognition (3rd ed., vol. 2, pp. 561-597). New York: Wiley.
53. Nozick, R. (1969). Newcomb’s problem and two principles of choice. In. N. Rescher (Ed.), Essays in honour of Carl G. Hempel (pp. 114-146). Dordrecht, Holland: Reidel.
54. Nozick, R. (1993). The nature of rationality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
55. Nozick, R. (2001). Invariances: The structure of the objective world. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
56. Onorato, R. S., & Turner, J. C. (2004). Fluidity of the self-concept: ‘Lhe shift from personal to social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 257-278.
57. Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
58. Popper, K. R. (1957). The poverty of historicism. New York: Harper & Row.
59. Poundstone, W. (1992). Prisoner’s dilemma. New York: Doubleday.
60. Quattrone, G. A., & Tversky, A. (1984). Causal versus diagnostic contingencies: on sell-deception and on the voters illusion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 237-248.
61. Rachlin, H. (2002). Altruism and selfishness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 239-296.
62. Rapoport, A. (1967). A note on the index of cooperation for prisoner’s dilemma. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 11, 101-103.
63. Render, B., & Hastie, R. (1996). The moderating influence of variability on belief revision. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 499-503.
64. Robbins, J. M., & Krueger, J. I. (2005). Social projection to ingroups and outgroups: A review and metaanalysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 32-47.
65. Ross, L., Greene, D., & House, P. (1977). The false consensus effect: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279-301.
66. Sagarin, B. J., Rhoads, K. L., & Cialdini, R. B. (1998). Deceivers distrust: Denigration as a consequence of undiscovered deception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 1167-1176.
67. Sally, D. (1995). Conversation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analysis of experiments from 1958-1992. Rationality and Society, 7, 58-92.
68. Savage, L.J. (1954). Ihe foundations of statistics. New York: Wiley.
69. Schopenhauer, A. (1999). On the freedom of the will. New York: Blackwell.
70. Sears, D. O. (1986). College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data set on social psychology’s view of human nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 515-530.
71. Shafir, E. (1994). Uncertainty and the difficulty of thinking through disjunctions. Cognition, 50, 403-430.
72. Shafir, E., & Tversky, A. (1992). Thinking through uncertainty: NonconsequentiaJ reasoning and choice. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 449-474.
73. Shedler, J., Mayman, M., & Manis, M. (1993). The illusion of mental health. American Psychologist, 48, 1117-1131.
74. Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds. New York: Doublday.
75. Tetlock, P. E. (2002). Theory-driven reasoning about plausible pasts and probable futures in world politics. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin & D. Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: Ihe psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 749-762). New York: Cambridge University Press.
76. Van Boven, L., & Loewenstein, G. (2003). Social projection of transient drive states. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1159-1168.
77. Wegner, D. M. (2002). The illusion of conscious will. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
78. Wilson, T. D., & Dunn, E. W. (2004). Self-knowledge: Its limits, value and potential for improvement. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 493-518.
79. Wohlschlager, A., Haggard, P., Gesierich, B., & Prinz, W. (2003). The perceived onset time of self- and other-generated actions. Psychological Science, 14, 586-591.