Two Egocentric Sources of the Decision to Vote: The Voter's Illusion and the Belief in Personal Relevance

Political Psychology

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 115-134

  Acevedo, Melissa ^a   Krueger, Joachim I ^b  

^a Department of Biology   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Counterfactual reasoning; Projection; Social dilemmas; Voting

Indexed keywords

EID: 1342283763     PISSN: 0162895X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00359.x     Document Type: Review

References (53)

1. Aldrich, J. H. (1993). Rational choice and turnout. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 246-278.
2. Barnea, M. F., & Schwartz, S. H. (1998). Values and voting. Political Psychology, 19, 17-40.
3. Baron, J. (1997). The illusion of morality as self-interest: A reason to cooperate in social dilemmas. Psychological Science, 8, 330-335.
4. Brennan, G., & Lomasky, L. (1993). Democracy and decision: The pure theory of electoral politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Brodsky, D. M., & Thompson, E., III. (1993). Ethos, public choice, and referendum voting. Social Science Quarterly, 74, 287-299.
6. Chaitas, S., Solodkin, A., & Baron, J. (1998). Students' attitudes toward social dilemmas in Argentina, Mexico, and the United States. Available at http://www.sas.upenn.edu/̃jbaron/virt.htm.
7. Clement, R. W., & Krueger, J. (2002). Social categorization moderates social projection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 219-231.
8. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Colman, A. M. (2003). Cooperation, psychological game theory, and limitations of rationality in social interaction. Behavioral and Brain Science, 26, 139-198.
10. Dawes, R. M. (1998). Decision making. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., vol. 1, pp. 497-584). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
11. Dawes, R. M., & Messick, D. M. (2000). Social dilemmas. International Journal of Psychology, 35, 111-116.
12. Dawes, R. M., Orbell, J. M., Simmons, R. T., & van de Kragt, A. J. C. (1986). Organizing groups for collective action. American Political Science Review, 80, 1171-1185.
13. Dovidio, J. F. (1984). Helping behavior and altruism: An empirical and conceptual overview. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 361-427.
14. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper.
15. Federal Election Commission (1999). National voter turnout in federal elections: 1960-1996. Available at http://www.fec.gov/pages/htmlto5.htm.
16. Ferejohn, J. A., & Fiorina, M. P. (1974). The paradox of not voting: A decision theoretic analysis. American Political Science Review, 68, 525-536.
17. Gilbert, D. T., & Malone, P. S. (1995). The correspondence bias. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 21-38.
18. Harkins, S. G., & Latané, B. (1998). Population and political participation: A social impact analysis of voter responsibility. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 2, 192-207.
19. Kagay, M. R. (2000, 27 August). The mystery of nonvoters and whether they matter. New York Times, pp. 1, 4.
20. Karniol, R., & Ross, M. (1996). The motivational impact of temporal focus: Thinking about the future and the past. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 593-620.
21. Kerr, N. L. (1989). Illusions of efficacy: The effects of group size on perceived efficacy in social dilemmas. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 287-313.
22. Komorita, S. S., & Parks, C. D. (1997). Social dilemmas. Boulder, CO: Westview.
23. Kraus, S. J. (1995). Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 58-75.
24. Krueger, J., & Clement, R. W. (1996). Inferring category characteristics from sample characteristics: Inductive reasoning and social projection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 52-68.
25. Landman, J. (1987). Regret and elation following action and inaction: Affective responses to positive versus negative outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 524-536.
26. Langer, E. J. (1975). The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 311-328.
27. Lanoue, D. J., & Bowler, S. (1998). Picking the winners: Perceptions of party viability and their impact on voter behavior. Social Science Quarterly, 79, 361-377.
28. Markman, K. D., Gavanski, I., Sherman, S. J., & McMullen, M. N. (1995). The impact of perceived control on the imagination of better and worse possible worlds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 588-595.
29. Meehl, P. E. (1977). The selfish voter paradox and the thrown-away vote argument. American Political Science Review, 71, 11-30.
30. Mellers, B., Schwartz, A., & Ritov, I. (1999). Emotion-based choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 332-345.
31. Morris, M. W., Sim, D. L., & Girotto, V. (1998). Distinguishing sources of cooperation in the one-round prisoner's dilemma: Evidence for cooperative decisions based on the illusion of control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 494-512.
32. Nozick, R. (1969). Newcomb's problem and two principles of choice. In N. Rescher (Ed.), Essays in honour of Carl G. Hempel (pp. 114-146). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Reidel.
33. Nozick, R. (1993). The nature of rationality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34. Olkin, I., & Finn, J. D. (1995). Correlations redux. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 155-164.
35. Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of games. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36. Orbell, J. M., van de Kragt, A. J. C., & Dawes, R. M. (1988). Explaining discussion-induced cooperation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 811-819.
37. Ostrom, E. (1998). A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action. American Political Science Review, 92, 1-22.
38. Overbye, E. (1995). Making a case for the rational, self-regarding, "ethical" vote ... and solving the "paradox of not voting" in the process. European Journal of Political Research, 27, 369-396.
39. Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. Oxford: Clarendon.
40. Quattrone, G. A., & Tversky, A. (1984). Causal versus diagnostic contingencies: On self-deception and on the voter's illusion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 237-248.
41. Regan, D. T., & Kilduff, M. (1988). Optimism about elections: Dissonance reduction at the ballot box. Political Psychology, 9, 101-107.
42. Riker, W. H., & Ordeshook, P. C. (1968). A theory of the calculus of voting. American Political Science Review, 62, 25-43.
43. Roese, N. J. (1994). The functional basis of counterfactual thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 805-818.
44. Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1982). A simple, general purpose display of magnitude of experimental effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 166-169.
45. Sabucedo, J. M., & Cramer, D. (1991). Sociological and psychological predictors of voting in Great Britain. Journal of Social Psychology, 13, 647-654.
46. Samuelson, P. A. (1993). Altruism as a problem involving group versus individual selection in economics and biology. American Economic Review, 83, 143-148.
47. Shafir, E., & Tversky, A. (1992). Thinking through uncertainty: Nonconsequential reasoning and choice. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 449-474.
48. Shapman, L., & Stephenson, K. (1994). A critique of the self-interested voter model: The case of a local single issue referendum. Journal of Economic Issues, 28, 1173-1186.
49. Silver, B. D., Anderson, B. A., & Abramson, P. R. (1986). Who overreports voting? American Political Science Review, 80, 613-624.
50. Southwell, P. L., & Everest, M. J. (1998). The electoral consequences of alienation: Nonvoting and protest voting in the 1992 presidential election. Social Science Journal, 35, 43-51.
51. Tullock, G. (1975). The paradox of not voting for oneself. American Political Science Review, 69, 919.
52. van de Kragt, A. J. C., Dawes, R. M., Orbell, J. M., Braver, S. R., & Wilson, L. A. (1986). Doing well and doing good as ways of resolving social dilemmas. In H. A. M. Wilke, D. M. Messick, & C. G. Ruttle (Eds.), Experimental social dilemmas (pp. 177-204). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
53. Yamagishi, T., & Kiyonari, T. (2000). The group as the container of generalized reciprocity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 116-132.