Personalized Models of Psychopathology

Annual Review of Clinical Psychology

Volumn 16, Issue , 2020, Pages 49-74

  Wright, Aidan G C ^a   Woods, William C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

idiographic; multivariate time series; person specific; personalized medicine; precision assessment

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE MODEL; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONCEPTUAL MODEL; DISEASE MODEL; FUTUROLOGY; HUMAN; INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH; MENTAL DISEASE; MENTAL PATIENT; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; PERSONALIZED MODEL; PSYCHIATRIC DIAGNOSIS; PSYCHIATRIC TREATMENT; REVIEW; THERAPY EFFECT; TIME TO TREATMENT; PROCEDURES; STATISTICAL MODEL;

HUMANS; MENTAL DISORDERS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PRECISION MEDICINE; PSYCHOPATHOLOGY;

EID: 85080094079     PISSN: 15485943     EISSN: 15485951     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-102419-125032     Document Type: Review

References (152)

1. Allport G. 1937. Personality: A Psychological Interpretation. Oxford, UK: Holt
2. APA (Am. Psychiatr. Assoc.). 1980. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Washington, DC: Am. Psychiatr. Publ. 3rd ed.
3. Asaparouhov T, Hamaker EL, Muthén B. 2018. Dynamic structural equation models. Struct. Equ. Model. 25:359-88
4. Bae S, Chung T, FerreiraD, Dey AK, Suffoletto B. 2018. Mobile phone sensors and supervised machine learning to identify alcohol use events in young adults: implications for just-in-time adaptive interventions. Addict. Behav. 83:42-47
5. Barlow DH, Farchione TJ, Fairholme CP, Ellard KK, Boisseau CL, et al. 2011. Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders: Therapist Guide. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
6. Barlow DH, Nock M, Hersen M. 2009. Single Case Experimental Designs: Strategies for Studying Behavior for Change. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. 3rd ed.
7. Barton EE, Meadan H, Fettig A. 2019. Comparison of visual analysis, non-overlap methods, and effect sizes in the evaluation of parent implemented functional assessment based interventions. Res. Dev. Disabil. 85:31-41
8. Bastiaansen JA, Kunkels YK, Blaauw F, Boker SM, Ceulemans E, et al. 2019. Time to get personal? The impact of researchers' choices on the selection of treatment targets using the experience sampling methodology. PsyArXiv. https://doi. org/10. 31234/osf. io/c8vp7
9. Beck AT, Rush AJ, Shaw BF, Emery G. 1979. Cognitive Therapy of Depression. New York: Guilford
10. Beck E, Jackson JJ. 2019. Consistency and change in idiographic personality: a longitudinal ESM network study. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. In press. https://doi. org/10. 1037/pspp0000249
11. Beltz AM, Wright AGC, Sprague BN, Molenaar PCM. 2016. Bridging the nomothetic and idiographic approaches to the analysis of clinical data. Assessment 23:447-58
12. Bentley KH, Kleiman EM, Elliott G, Huffman JC, Nock MK. 2018. Real-time monitoring technology in single-case experimental design research: opportunities and challenges. Behav. Res. Ther. 117:87-96
13. Blaauw FJ, Schenk HM, Jeronimus BF, van der Krieke L, de Jonge P, et al. 2016. Let's get Physiqual-an intuitive and generic method to combine sensor technology with ecological momentary assessments. J. Biomed. Inf. 63:141-49
14. Blaauw FJ, van der Krieke L, Bos E, Emerencia A, Jeronimus BF, et al. 2014. HowNutsAreTheDutch: personalized feedback on a national scale. In Proceedings of the AAAI 2014 Fall Symposium Series, pp. 6-10. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI
15. Blaauw FJ, van der Krieke L, Emerencia AC, Aiello A. 2017. Personalized advice for enhancing well-being using automated impulse response analysis. arXiv:1706. 09268 [cs]
16. Booij SH, Bos EH, Bouwmans ME, Faassen MV, Kema IP, et al. 2015. Cortisol and amylase secretion patterns between and within depressed and non-depressed individuals. PLOS ONE 10:e0131002
17. Booij SH, Bos EH, de Jonge P, Oldehinkel AJ. 2016. The temporal dynamics of cortisol and affective states in depressed and non-depressed individuals. Psychoneuroendocrinology 69:16-25
18. Borsboom D, Cramer AO. 2013. Network analysis: an integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 9:91-121
19. Bos EH, de Jonge P. 2014. "Critical slowing down in depression" is a great idea that still needs empirical proof. PNAS 111:e878
20. Bos EH, Hoenders R, de Jonge P. 2012. Wind direction and mental health: a time-series analysis of weather influences in a patient with anxiety disorder. BMJ Case Rep. 2012:bcr2012006300
21. Bos FM, Blaauw FJ, Snippe E, van der Krieke L, de Jonge P, Wichers M. 2018. Exploring the emotional dynamics of subclinically depressed individuals with and without anhedonia: an experience sampling study. J. Affect. Disord. 228:186-93
22. Bosley HG, Fisher AJ, Taylor CB. 2018. Differential responses of positive affect, negative affect, and worry in CBT for generalized anxiety disorder: a person-specific analysis of symptom course during therapy. Psychother. Res. 28:630-42
23. Boswell JF, Anderson LM, Barlow DH. 2014. An idiographic analysis of change processes in the unified transdiagnostic treatment of depression. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 82:1060-71
24. Boswell JF, Bugatti M. 2016. An exploratory analysis of the impact of specific interventions: Some clients reveal more than others. J. Couns. Psychol. 63:710-20
25. Boswell JF, Schwartzman CM. 2018. An exploration of intervention augmentation in a single case. Behav. Modif. https://doi. org/10. 1177/0145445518796202
26. Boukhechba M, Cai L, Chow PI, Fua K, Gerber MS, et al. 2018. Contextual analysis to understand compliance with smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment. In Proceedings of the 12th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, pp. 232-38. New York: ACM
27. Bouwmans ME, Beltz AM, Bos EH, Oldehinkel AJ, de Jonge P, Molenaar PC. 2018. The person-specific interplay of melatonin, affect, and fatigue in the context of sleep and depression. Personal. Individ. Differ. 123:163-70
28. Bouwmans ME, Bos EH, Booij SH, FaassenMV, Oldehinkel AJ, de Jonge P. 2015. Intra-and inter-individual variability of longitudinal daytime melatonin secretion patterns in depressed and non-depressed individuals. Chronobiol. Int. 32:441-46
29. Brake CA, Sauer-Zavala S, Boswell JF, Gallagher MW, Farchione TJ, Barlow DH. 2016. Mindfulness-based exposure strategies as a transdiagnostic mechanism of change: an exploratory alternating treatment design. Behav. Ther. 47:225-38
30. Brandt PT, Williams JT. 2006. Multiple Time Series Models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
31. Bringmann LF, Elmer T, Epskamp S, Krause R, Schoch D, et al. 2019. What do centrality measures measure in psychological networks J. Abnorm. Psychol. 128:892-903
32. Bringmann LF, Eronen MI. 2018. Don't blame the model: reconsidering the network approach to psychopathology. Psychopathology 125:606-15
33. Bringmann LF, Ferrer E, Hamaker EL, Borsboom D, Tuerlinckx F. 2018. Modeling nonstationary emotion dynamics in dyads using a time-varying vector-autoregressive model. Multivar. Behav. Res. 53:293-314
34. Bringmann LF, Pe ML, Vissers N, Ceulemans E, Borsboom D, et al. 2016. Assessing temporal emotion dynamics using networks. Assessment 23:425-35
35. Brose A, Voelkle MC, Lövdén M, Lindenberger U, Schmiedek F. 2015. Differences in the between-person and within-person structures of affect are a matter of degree. Eur. J. Personal. 29:55-71
36. Cattell RB, Cattell AKS, Rhymer RM. 1947. P-technique demonstrated in determining psychophysiological source traits in a normal individual. Psychometrika 12:267-88
37. Clarkin JF, Yeomans FE, Kernberg OF. 2006. Psychotherapy for Borderline Personality: Focusing on Object Relations. Washington, DC: Am. Psychiatr. Publ.
38. Cohen ZD, DeRubeis RJ. 2018. Treatment selection in depression. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 14:209-36
39. Collins FS, Varmus H. 2015. A new initiative on precision medicine. N. Engl. J. Med. 372:793-95
40. Conner TS, Tennen H, Fleeson W, Barrett LF. 2009. Experience sampling methods: a modern idiographic approach to personality research. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 3:292-313
41. Costa PT, McCrae RR. 2008. The Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R). In The SAGE Handbook of Personality Theory and Assessment, Vol. 2, ed. GJ Boyle, G Matthews, DH Saklofske, pp. 179-98. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
42. David SJ, Marshall AJ, Evanovich EK, Mumma GH. 2018. Intraindividual dynamic network analysis: implications for clinical assessment. J. Psychopathol. Behav. Assess. 40:235-48
43. de Roover K, Ceulemans E, Timmerman ME, Nezlek JB, Onghena P. 2013. Modeling differences in the dimensionality of multiblock data by means of clusterwise simultaneous component analysis. Psychometrika 78:648-68
44. de Vos SD, Wardenaar KJ, Bos EH, Wit EC, Bouwmans ME, de Jonge P. 2017. An investigation of emotion dynamics in major depressive disorder patients and healthy persons using sparse longitudinal networks. PLOS ONE 12:e0178586
45. Doryab A, Dey AK, Kao G, Low C. 2019. Modeling biobehavioral rhythms with passive sensing in the wild: a case study to predict readmission risk after pancreatic surgery. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 3:8
46. Dotterer HL, Beltz AM, Foster KT, Simms LJ, Wright AGC. 2019. Personalized models of personality disorders: using a temporal networkmethod to understand symptomatology and daily functioning in a clinical sample. Psychol. Med. In press. https://doi. org/10. 1017/S0033291719002563
47. Edershile EA, Woods WC, Sharpe BM, Crowe ML, Miller JD, Wright AGC. 2019. A day in the life of Narcissus: measuring narcissistic grandiosity and vulnerability in daily life. Psychol. Assess. 31:913-24
48. Elliott R, Wagner J, Sales C, Rodgers B, Alves P, CaféMJ. 2016. Psychometrics of the personal questionnaire: a client-generated outcome measure. Psychol. Assess. 28:263-78
49. Epskamp S, Borkulo CV, Veen DC, Servaas M, Isvoranu A, et al. 2018. Personalized network modeling in psychopathology: the importance of contemporaneous and temporal connections. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 6:416-27
50. Fernandez KC, Fisher AJ, Chi C. 2017. Development and initial implementation of the dynamic assessment treatment algorithm (DATA). PLOS ONE 12:e0178806
51. Fisher AJ. 2015. Toward a dynamic model of psychological assessment. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 83:825-36
52. Fisher AJ, Bosley HG, Fernandez KC, Reeves JW, Diamond AE, et al. 2019. Open trial of a personalized modular treatment for mood and anxiety. Behav. Res. Ther. 116:69-79
53. Fisher AJ, Boswell JF. 2016. Enhancing the personalization of psychotherapy with dynamic assessment and modeling. Assessment 23:496-506
54. Fisher AJ, Reeves JW, Lawyer G, Medaglia JD, Rubel JA. 2017. Exploring the idiographic dynamics of mood and anxiety via network analysis. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 126:1044-56
55. Fisher AJ, Soyster PD. 2019. Generating accurate personalized predictions of future behavior: a smoking exemplar. PsyArXiv. https://doi. org/10. 31234/osf. io/e24v6
56. Ganz JB, Ayres KM. 2018. Methodological standards in single-case experimental design: raising the bar. Res. Dev. Disabil. 79:3-9
57. Gates KM, Fisher ZF, Bollen KA. 2020. Latent variable GIMME using model implied instrumental variables (MIIVs). Psychol. Methods 25:227-42
58. Gates KM, Molenaar PCM. 2012. Group search algorithm recovers effective connectivitymaps for individuals in homogeneous and heterogeneous samples. NeuroImage 63:310-19
59. Groen RN, Snippe E, Bringmann LF, Simons CJP, Hartmann JA, et al. 2019. Capturing the risk of persisting depressive symptoms: a dynamic network investigation of patients' daily symptom experiences. Psychiatr. Res. 271:640-48
60. Hamaker EL, Ceulemans E, Grasman RPPP, Tuerlinckx F. 2015. Modeling affect dynamics: state of the art and future challenges. Emot. Rev. 7:316-22
61. Hamaker EL, Schuurman NK, Zijlmans EAO. 2017. Using a few snapshots to distinguish mountains from waves: weak factorial invariance in the context of trait-state research. Multivar. Behav. Res. 52:47-60
62. Hamaker EL, Wichers M. 2017. No time like the present: discovering the hidden dynamics in intensive longitudinal data. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 26:10-15
63. Hamilton JD, Kendall PC, Gosch E, Furr JM, Sood E. 2008. Flexibility within fidelity. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychol. 47:987-93
64. Hartogs BM, Ploeg KV, Bos EH, Bartels-Velthuis AA. 2017. Heart rate variability biofeedback stress relief program for depression. Methods Inf. Med. 56:419-26
65. Hayes SC, Hofmann SG, Stanton CE, Carpenter JK, Sanford BT, et al. 2019. The role of the individual in the coming era of process-based therapy. Behav. Res. Ther. 117:40-53
66. Hayes SC, Strosahl KD, Wilson KG. 2012. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: The Process and Practice of Mindful Change. New York: Guilford. 2nd ed.
67. Haynes SN, Mumma GH, Pinson C. 2009. Idiographic assessment: conceptual and psychometric foundations of individualized behavioral assessment. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 29:179-91
68. Himmelstein PH, Woods WC, Wright AGC. 2019. A comparison of signal-and event-contingent ambulatory assessment of interpersonal behavior and affect in social situations. Psychol. Assess. 31:952-60
69. Hoenders HR, Bos EH, de Jong JTM, de Jonge P. 2012. Temporal dynamics of symptom and treatment variables in a lifestyle-oriented approach to anxiety disorder: a single-subject time-series analysis. Psychother. Psychosom. 81:253-55
70. Hofmann SG, Hayes SC. 2019a. The future of intervention science: process-based therapy. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 7:37-50
71. Hofmann SG, Hayes SC. 2019b. Functional analysis is dead: Long live functional analysis. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 7:63-67
72. Hopwood CJ, Thomas KM, Luo X, Bernard N, Lin Y, Levendosky AA. 2016. Implementing dynamic assessments in psychotherapy. Assessment 23:507-17
73. Hosenfeld B, Bos EH, Wardenaar KJ, Conradi HJ, van der Maas HLJ, et al. 2015. Major depressive disorder as a nonlinear dynamic system: bimodality in the frequency distribution of depressive symptoms over time. BMC Psychiatry 15:222
74. Hyman SE. 2010. The diagnosis ofmental disorders: the problem of reification. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 6:155-79
75. Insel TR. 2014. The NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) project: precision medicine for psychiatry. Am. J. Psychiatry 171:395-97
76. Jameson JL, Longo DL. 2015. Precisionmedicine-personalized, problematic, and promising. N. Engl. J. Med. 372:2229-34
77. Jones S, Hurrell E. 2019. A single case experimental design: How do different psychological outcome measures capture the experience of a client undergoing CBT for chronic pain? Br. J. Pain 13:6-12
78. Kaiser T, Laireiter A-R. 2018. Process-symptom-bridges in psychotherapy: an idiographic network approach. J. Pers.-Oriented Res. 4:49-62
79. Kim J, ZhuW, Chang L, Bentler PM, Ernst T. 2007. Unified structural equation modeling approach for the analysis of multisubject, multivariate functional MRI data. Hum. Brain Mapp. 28:85-93
80. Kotov R, Krueger RF, WatsonD, Achenbach TM, Althoff RR, et al. 2017. TheHierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP): a dimensional alternative to traditional nosologies. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 126:454-77
81. Kramer I, Simons CJ, Hartmann JA, Menne-Lothmann C, Viechtbauer W, et al. 2014. A therapeutic application of the experience sampling method in the treatment of depression: a randomized controlled trial. World Psychiatry 13:68-77
82. Kroeze R, Veen DC, Servaas MN, Bastiaansen JA, Voshaar RC, et al. 2017. Personalized feedback on symptom dynamics of psychopathology: a proof-of-principle study. J. Pers.-Oriented Res. 3:1-10
83. Kuyken W, Padesky CA, Dudley R. 2011. Collaborative Case Conceptualization: Working Effectively with Clients in Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy. New York: Guilford
84. Lane ST, Gates KM, Pike HK, Beltz AM, Wright AGC. 2019. Uncovering general, shared, and unique temporal patterns in ambulatory assessment data. Psychol. Methods 24:54-69
85. Lee CM, Cronce JM, Baldwin SA, Fairlie AM, AtkinsDC, et al. 2017. Psychometric analysis and validity of the daily alcohol-related consequences and evaluations measure for young adults. Psychol. Assess. 29:253-63
86. Lewis KC, Ridenour JM. 2019. The integration of EMA and single-occasion multimethod assessment data for a complex psychiatric patient. Assessment. In press. https://doi. org/10. 1177/1073191118825313
87. Litten RZ, Ryan ML, Falk DE, Reilly M, Fertig JB, Koob GF. 2015. Heterogeneity of alcohol use disorder: understanding mechanisms to advance personalized treatment. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 39:579-84
88. Linehan M. 1993. Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder. New York: Guilford
89. Low CA, Dey AK, Ferreira D, Kamarck T, Sun W, et al. 2017. Estimation of symptom severity during chemotherapy from passively sensed data: exploratory study. J. Med. Internet Res. 19:e420
90. Lutz W, Schwartz B, Hofmann SG, Fisher AJ, Husen K, Rubel JA. 2018. Using network analysis for the prediction of treatment dropout in patients with mood and anxiety disorders: a methodological proofof-concept study. Sci. Rep. 8:7819
91. Mohr DC, Zhang M, Schueller SM. 2017. Personal sensing: understanding mental health using ubiquitous sensors and machine learning. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 13:23-47
92. Molenaar PCM. 1985. A dynamic factor model for the analysis of multivariate time series. Psychometrika 50:181-202
93. Molenaar PCM. 2004. A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Meas. Interdiscip. Res. Perspect. 2:201-18
94. Molenaar PCM, Campbell CG. 2009. The new person-specific paradigm in psychology. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 18:112-17
95. Molenaar PCM, Lo L. 2012. Dynamic factor analysis and control of developmental processes. In Handbook of Developmental Research Methods, ed. B Laursen, TD Little, NA Card, pp. 333-49. New York: Guilford
96. Molenaar PCM, Nesselroade JR. 2012. Merging the idiographic filter with dynamic factor analysis to model process. Appl. Dev. Sci. 16:210-19
97. Mumma GH. 2004. Validation of idiosyncratic cognitive schema in cognitive case formulations: an intraindividual idiographic approach. Psychol. Assess. 16:211-30
98. Mumma GH, Fluck J. 2016. How valid is your case formulation? Empirically testing your cognitive behavioural case formulation for tailored treatment. Cogn. Behav. Ther. 9:e12
99. Mumma GH, Marshall AJ, Mauer C. 2018. Person-specific validation and testing of functional relations in cognitive-behavioural case formulation: guidelines and options. Clin. Psychol. Psychother. 25:672-91
100. Mumma GH, Mooney SR. 2007a. Comparing the validity of alternative cognitive case formulations: a latent variable, multivariate time series approach. Cogn. Ther. Res. 31:451-81
101. Mumma GH, Mooney SR. 2007b. Incremental validity of cognitions in a clinical case formulation: an intraindividual test in a case example. J. Psychopathol. Behav. Assess. 29:17-28
102. Nesselroade JR, Gerstorf D, Hardy SA, Ram N. 2007. Idiographic filters for psychological constructs. Measurement 5:217-35
103. Norcross JC, Wampold BE. 2011. What works for whom: tailoring psychotherapy to the person. J. Clin. Psychol. 67:127-32
104. Odgers CL, Mulvey EP, Skeem JL, Gardner W, Lidz CW, Schubert C. 2009. Capturing the ebb and flow of psychiatric symptoms with dynamical systems models. Am. J. Psychiatry 166:575-82
105. Pe ML, Kircanski K, Thompson RJ, Bringmann LF, Tuerlinckx F, et al. 2015. Emotion-network density in major depressive disorder. Clin. Psychol. Sci. 3:292-300
106. Pew Res. Cent. 2019. Mobile fact sheet. Pew Res. Cent., Washington, DC. https://www. pewinternet. org/factsheet/ mobile/
107. Pettersson E, Boker SM, Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. 2013. Modeling daily variation in the affective circumplex: a dynamical systems approach. J. Res. Personal. 47:57-69
108. Piccirillo ML, Rodebaugh TL. 2019. Foundations of idiographic methods in psychology and applications for psychotherapy. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 71:90-100
109. Price RB, Lane S, Gates K, Kraynak TE, Horner MS, et al. 2017. Parsing heterogeneity in the brain connectivity of depressed and healthy adults during positive mood. Biol. Psychiatry 81:347-57
110. Pustejovsky JE. 2018. Procedural sensitivities of effect sizes for single-case designs with directly observed behavioral outcome measures. Psychol. Methods 24:217-35
111. Reber R, Canning EA, Harackiewicz JM. 2018. Personalized education to increase interest. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 27:449-54
112. Ridenour TA. 2019. Precision strategies as a timely and unifying framework for ongoing prevention science advances. Prev. Sci. 20:110-14
113. Ridenour TA, Pineo TZ, Molina MMM, Lich KH. 2013. Toward rigorous idiographic research in prevention science: comparison between three analytic strategies for testing preventive intervention in very small samples. Prev. Sci. 14:267-78
114. Robins E, Guze SB. 1970. Establishment of diagnostic validity in psychiatric illness: its application to schizophrenia. Am. J. Psychiatry 126:983-87
115. Roche MJ, Pincus AL. 2016. Precision assessment: an individualized and temporally dynamic approach to understanding patients in their daily lives. In The Wiley Handbook of Personality Assessment, ed. U Kumar, pp. 192-204. New York:Wiley
116. Roche MJ, Pincus AL, Rebar AL, Conroy DE, Ram N. 2014. Enriching psychological assessment using a person-specific analysis of interpersonal processes in daily life. Assessment 21:515-28
117. Rodgers J, Herrema R, Honey E, Freeston M. 2018. Towards a treatment for intolerance of uncertainty for autistic adults: a single case experimental design study. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 48:2832-45
118. Rosmalen JG, Wenting AM, Roest AM, de Jonge P, Bos EH. 2012. Revealing causal heterogeneity using time series analysis of ambulatory assessments: application to the association between depression and physical activity after myocardial infarction. Psychosom. Med. 74:377-86
119. Rubel JA, Fisher AJ, Husen K, Lutz W. 2018. Translating person-specific network models into personalized treatments: development and demonstration of the dynamic assessment treatment algorithm for individual networks (DATA-IN). Psychother. Psychosom. 87:249-51
120. Shapiro MB. 1961. Amethod ofmeasuring psychological changes specific to the individual psychiatric patient. Br. J. Med. Psychol. 34:151-55
121. Shiffman S, Stone AA, Hufford MR. 2008. Ecological momentary assessment. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 4:1-32
122. Skinner BF. 1966. Operant behavior. In Operant Behavior: Areas of Research and Application, ed. WK Honig, pp. 12-32. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts
123. Smith JD. 2012. Single-case experimental designs: a systematic review of published research and current standards. Psychol. Methods 17:510-50
124. Smith JD, Eichler WC, Norman KR, Smith SR. 2015. The effectiveness of collaborative/therapeutic assessment for psychotherapy consultation: a pragmatic replicated single-case study. J. Personal. Assess. 97:261-70
125. Snippe E, Bos EH, Ploeg KM, Sanderman R, Fleer J, Schroevers MJ. 2015. Time-series analysis of daily changes in mindfulness, repetitive thinking, and depressive symptoms during mindfulness-based treatment. Mindfulness 6:1053-62
126. StavrakakisN, Booij SH, Roest AM, de Jonge P, Oldehinkel AJ, Bos EH. 2015. Temporal dynamics of physical activity and affect in depressed and nondepressed individuals. Health Psychol. 34:1268-77
127. Tomko R, SolhanM, Carpenter R, BrownW, Jahng S, Wood P, Trull TJ. 2014. Measuring impulsivity in daily life: the momentary impulsivity scale. Psychol. Assess. 26:339-49
128. Toonen RB, Wardenaar KJ, Booij SH, Bos EH, de Jonge P. 2016a. Using local linear models to capture dynamic interactions between cortisol and negative affect. J. Pers.-Oriented Res. 2:142-54
129. Toonen RB, Wardenaar KJ, van Ockenburg SL, Bos EH, de Jonge P. 2016b. Using state space methods to reveal dynamical associations between cortisol and depression. Nonlinear Dyn. Psychol. Life Sci. 20:1-21
130. Trull TJ, Ebner-Priemer U. 2013. Ambulatory assessment. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 9:151-76
131. van de Leemput IA, Wichers M, Cramer AO, Borsboom D, Tuerlinckx F, et al. 2014. Critical slowing down as early warning for the onset and termination of depression. PNAS 111:87-92
132. van der Krieke L, Blaauw FJ, Emerencia AC, Schenk HM, Slaets JP, et al. 2016. Temporal dynamics of health and well-being: a crowdsourcing approach to momentary assessments and automated generation of personalized feedback. Psychosom. Med. 79:213-23
133. van der Krieke L, Emerencia AC, Bos EH, Rosmalen JG, Riese H, et al. 2015. Ecological momentary assessments and automated time series analysis to promote tailored health care: a proof-of-principle study. JMIR Res. Protoc. 4:e100
134. van der Schans J, Cao Q, Bos EH, Rours I, Hoekstra PJ, et al. 2020. The temporal order of fluctuations in atopic disease symptoms and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder symptoms. Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 29:137-44
135. van Os J, Delespaul P, Wigman J, Myin-Germeys I, Wichers M. 2013a. Beyond DSM and ICD: introducing "precision diagnosis" for psychiatry usingmomentary assessment technology. World Psychiatry 12:113-17
136. van Os J, Delespaul P, Wigman J, Myin-Germeys I, WichersM. 2013b. Psychiatry beyond labels: introducing contextual precision diagnosis across stages of psychopathology. Psychol. Med. 43:1563-67
137. van Roekel E, Vrijen C, Heininga VE, MasselinkM, Bos EH, Oldehinkel AJ. 2017. An exploratory randomized controlled trial of personalized lifestyle advice and tandem skydives as a means to reduce anhedonia. Behav. Ther. 48:76-96
138. Voelkle MC, Brose A, Schmiedek F, Lindenberger U. 2014. Toward a unified framework for the study of between-person and within-person structures: building a bridge between two research paradigms. Multivar. Behav. Res. 49:193-213
139. Wang W, Harari GM, Wang R, Müller SR, Mirjafari S, et al. 2018. Sensing behavioral change over time: using within-person variability features from mobile sensing to predict personality traits. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 2:141
140. Wichers M. 2014. The dynamic nature of depression: a new micro-level perspective of mental disorder that meets current challenges. Psychol. Med. 44:1349-60
141. Wichers M, Schreuder MJ, Goekoop R, Groen RN. 2018. Can we predict the direction of sudden shifts in symptoms Transdiagnostic implications from a complex systems perspective on psychopathology. Psychol. Med. 49:380-87
142. Wigman JT, van Os J, Thiery E, Derom C, Collip D, et al. 2013. Psychiatric diagnosis revisited: towards a system of staging and profiling combining nomothetic and idiographic parameters of momentary mental states. PLOS ONE 8:e59559
143. Wood P, Brown D. 1994. The study of intraindividual differences by means of dynamic factor models: rationale, implementation, and interpretation. Psychol. Bull. 116:166-86
144. Woods WC, Arizmendi C, Gates KM, Stepp SD, Pilkonis PA, Wright AGC. 2020. Personalized models of psychopathology as contextualized dynamic processes: an example from individuals with borderline personality disorder. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 88:240-54
145. Wright AGC. 2011. Quantitative and qualitative distinctions in personality disorder. J. Personal. Assess. 93:370-79
146. Wright AGC, Beltz AM, Gates KM, Molenaar PCM, Simms LJ. 2015. Examining the dynamic structure of daily internalizing and externalizing behavior and multiple levels of analysis. Front. Psychol. 6:1914
147. Wright AGC, Gates KM, Arizmendi C, Lane ST, Woods WC, Edershile EA. 2019. Focusing personality assessment on the person: modeling general, shared, and person specific processes in personality and psychopathology. Psychol. Assess. 32:502-15
148. Wright AGC, Hallquist MN, Stepp SD, Scott LN, Beeney JE, et al. 2016. Modeling heterogeneity in momentary interpersonal and affective dynamic processes in borderline personality disorder. Assessment 23:484-95
149. Wright AGC, Simms LJ. 2016. Stability and fluctuation of personality disorder features in daily life. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 125:641-56
150. Wright AGC, Zimmermann J. 2019. Applied ambulatory assessment: integrating idiographic and nomothetic principles of measurement. Psychol. Assess. 31:1467-80
151. Yang X, Ram N, Gest SD, Lydon-Staley DM, Conroy DE, et al. 2018. Socioemotional dynamics of emotion regulation and depressive symptoms: a person-specific network approach. Innov. Aging 2:15-16
152. Yarkoni T, Westfall J. 2017. Choosing prediction over explanation in psychology: lessons from machine learning. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 12:1100-22