Open trial of a personalized modular treatment for mood and anxiety

Behaviour Research and Therapy

Volumn 116, Issue , 2019, Pages 69-79

  Fisher, Aaron J ^a   Bosley, Hannah G ^a   Fernandez, Katya C ^b   Reeves, Jonathan W ^a   Soyster, Peter D ^a   Diamond, Allison E ^a   Barkin, Jonathan ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Global Research and Evaluation   (United States)

^c San Francisco Bay Area Center for Cognitive Therapy   (United States)

Author keywords

Anxiety; Depression; Idiography; N of 1; Personalized treatment; Precision medicine; Psychotherapy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANXIETY DISORDER; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITIVE BEHAVIORAL THERAPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACTOR ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HAMILTON ANXIETY SCALE; HAMILTON DEPRESSION RATING SCALE; HUMAN; INTENTION TO TREAT ANALYSIS; MALE; MOOD DISORDER; OPEN STUDY; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TREATMENT PLANNING; ADOLESCENT; ALGORITHM; CLINICAL TRIAL; MAJOR DEPRESSION; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ALGORITHMS; ANXIETY DISORDERS; COGNITIVE BEHAVIORAL THERAPY; DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, MAJOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRECISION MEDICINE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85062206749     PISSN: 00057967     EISSN: 1873622X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2019.01.010     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Abraha, I., Cherubini, A., Cozzolino, F., De Florio, R., Luchetta, M.L., Rimland, J.M., Montedori, A., Deviation from intention to treat analysis in randomised trials and treatment effect estimates: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ, 350, 2015, h2445, 10.1136/bmj.h2445.
2. Alshurafa, M., Briel, M., Akl, E.A., Haines, T., Moayyedi, P., Gentles, S.J., Guyatt, G.H., Inconsistent definitions for intention-to-treat in relation to missing outcome data: Systematic review of the methods literature. PLoS One, 7(11), 2012, e49163, 10.1371/journal.pone.0049163.
3. American Psychiatric Association, The diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM, Vol. 5, 2013, bookpointUS.
4. Ashley, E.A., The precision medicine initiative: A new national effort. Journal of the American Medical Association 313:21 (2015), 2119–2120.
5. Barlow, D.H., Farchione, T.J., Fairholme, C.P., Ellard, K.K., Boisseau, C.L., Allen, L.B., et al. Unified protocol for transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders: Therapist guide. 2011, Oxford University Press, New York, NY.
6. Barlow, D.H., Nock, M.K., Why can't we be more idiographic in our research?. Perspectives on Psychological Science 4:1 (2009), 19–21.
7. Barlow, D.H., Sauer-Zavala, S., Carl, J.R., Bullis, J.R., Ellard, K.K., The nature, diagnosis, and treatment of neuroticism: Back to the future. Clinical Psychological Science 2:3 (2014), 344–365, 10.1177/2167702613505532.
8. Beck, A.T., Steer, R.A., Relationship between the Beck anxiety inventory and the Hamilton anxiety rating scale with anxious outpatients. Journal of Anxiety Disorders 5:3 (1991), 213–223, 10.1016/0887-6185(91)90002-B.
9. Borsboom, D., A network theory of mental disorders. World Psychiatry 16:1 (2017), 5–13, 10.1002/wps.20375.
10. Boswell, J.F., Intervention strategies and clinical process in transdiagnostic cognitive–behavioral therapy. Psychotherapy, 50(3), 2013, 381.
11. Brown, T.A., Barlow, D.H., A proposal for a dimensional classification system based on the shared features of the DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders: Implications for assessment and treatment. Psychological Assessment 21:3 (2009), 256–271.
12. Brown, T.A., Barlow, D.H., Anxiety and related disorders interview schedule for DSM-5: Clinician manual. 2014, Oxford University Press.
13. Brown, T.A., Chorpita, B.F., Barlow, D.H., Structural relationships among dimensions of the DSM-IV anxiety and mood disorders and dimensions of negative affect, positive affect, and autonomic arousal. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 107:2 (1998), 179–192, 10.1037/0021-843X.107.2.179.
14. Bruss, G.S., Gruenberg, A.M., Goldstein, R.D., Barber, J.P., Hamilton anxiety rating scale interview guide: Joint interview and test-retest methods for interrater reliability. Psychiatry Research 53:2 (1994), 191–202, 10.1016/0165-1781(94)90110-4.
15. Burmeister, M., McInnis, M.G., Zöllner, S., Psychiatric genetics: Progress amid controversy. Nature Reviews Genetics, 9(7), 2008, 527.
16. Chou, C.P., Bentler, P.M., Model modification in covariance structure modeling: A comparison among likelihood ratio, Lagrange multiplier, and wald tests. Multivariate Behavioral Research 25:1 (1990), 115–136, 10.1207/s15327906mbr2501_13.
17. Cuijpers, P., Berking, M., Andersson, G., Quigley, L., Kleiboer, A., Dobson, K.S., A meta-analysis of cognitive-behavioural therapy for adult depression, alone and in comparison with other treatments. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 58:7 (2013), 376–385.
18. Cuijpers, P., Sijbrandij, M., Koole, S., Huibers, M., Berking, M., Andersson, G., Psychological treatment of generalized anxiety disorder: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review 34:2 (2014), 130–140 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2014.01.002.
19. Cuijpers, P., van Straten, A., Andersson, G., van Oppen, P., Psychotherapy for depression in adults: A meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76(6), 2008, 909.
20. Cusin, C., Yang, H., Yeung, A., Fava, M., Rating scales for depression. Handbook of clinical rating scales and assessment in psychiatry and mental health, 2009, Springer, 7–35.
21. Dzau, V.J., Ginsburg, G.S., Van Nuys, K., Agus, D., Goldman, D., Aligning incentives to fulfil the promise of personalised medicine. The Lancet 385:9982 (2015), 2118–2119.
22. Epskamp, S., Cramer, A.O.J., Waldorp, L.J., Schmittmann, V.D., Borsboom, D., qgraph: Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data. Journal of Statistical Software, 1(4), 2012, 2012, 10.18637/jss.v048.i04.
23. Fergusson, D., Aaron, S.D., Guyatt, G., Hébert, P., Post-randomisation exclusions: The intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis. BMJ British Medical Journal 325:7365 (2002), 652–654.
24. Fernandez, K.C., Fisher, A.J., Chi, C., Development and initial implementation of the dynamic assessment treatment algorithm (DATA). PLoS One, 12(6), 2017, e0178806, 10.1371/journal.pone.0178806.
25. Fisher, A.J., Toward a dynamic model of psychological assessment: Implications for personalized care. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 83:4 (2015), 825–836, 10.1037/ccp0000026.
26. Fisher, A.J., Boswell, J.F., Enhancing the personalization of psychotherapy with dynamic assessment and modeling. Assessment 23:4 (2016), 496–506, 10.1177/1073191116638735.
27. Fisher, A.J., Medaglia, J.D., Jeronimus, B.F., Lack of group-to-individual generalizability is a threat to human subjects research. 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
28. Fisher, A.J., Newman, M.G., Molenaar, P.C.M., A quantitative method for the analysis of nomothetic relationships between idiographic structures: Dynamic patterns create attractor states for sustained posttreatment change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 79:4 (2011), 552–563, 10.1037/a0024069.
29. Fisher, A.J., Reeves, J.W., Lawyer, G., Medaglia, J.D., Rubel, J.A., Exploring the idiographic dynamics of mood and anxiety via network analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 126:8 (2017), 1044–1056 https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000311.
30. Frank, E., Prien, R.F., Jarrett, R.B., Keller, M.B., Kupfer, D.J., Lavori, P.W., Weissman, M.M., Conceptualization and rationale for consensus definitions of terms in major depressive disorder. Remission, recovery, relapse, and recurrence. Archives of General Psychiatry 48:9 (1991), 851–855.
31. Galatzer-Levy, I.R., Bryant, R.A., 636,120 ways to have posttraumatic stress disorder. Perspectives on Psychological Science 8:6 (2013), 651–662, 10.1177/1745691613504115.
32. Hamburg, M.A., Collins, F.S., The path to personalized medicine. New England Journal of Medicine 363:4 (2010), 301–304, 10.1056/NEJMp1006304.
33. Hamilton, M., The assessment of anxiety states by rating. British Journal of Medical Psychology 32:1 (1959), 50–55.
34. Hamilton, M., A rating scale for depression. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 23(1), 1960, 56.
35. Hofmann, S.G., Smits, J.A., Cognitive-behavioral therapy for adult anxiety disorders: A meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 69(4), 2008, 621.
36. Hu, L.-t., Bentler, P.M., Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling 6:1 (1999), 1–55.
37. Hunsley, J., Aubry, T.D., Verstervelt, C.M., Vito, D., Comparing therapist and client perspectives on reasons for psychotherapy termination. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 36(4), 1999, 380.
38. Insel, T.R., Translating scientific opportunity into public health impact: A strategic plan for research on mental illness. Archives of General Psychiatry 66:2 (2009), 128–133, 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2008.540.
39. Insel, T.R., Cuthbert, B.N., Brain disorders? Precisely. Science 348:6234 (2015), 499–500.
40. Iyengar, R., Altman, R.B., Troyanskya, O., FitzGerald, G.A., Personalization in practice. Science 350:6258 (2015), 282–283.
41. Jacobson, N.S., Truax, P., Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59(1), 1991, 12.
42. Johnsen, T.J., Friborg, O., The effects of cognitive behavioral therapy as an anti-depressive treatment is falling: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 141:4 (2015), 747–768 https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000015.
43. Kessler, R.C., Chiu, W.T., Demler, O., Walters, E.E., Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the national comorbidity survey replication. Archives of General Psychiatry 62:6 (2005), 617–627.
44. Khoury, M.J., Evans, J.P., A public health perspective on a national precision medicine cohort: Balancing long-term knowledge generation with early health benefit. Journal of the American Medical Association 313:21 (2015), 2117–2118.
45. Kobak, K.A., Reynolds, W.M., Greist, J.H., Development and validation of a computer-administered version of the Hamilton Rating Scale. Psychological Assessment, 5(4), 1993, 487.
46. Lamiell, J.T., Toward an idiothetic psychology of personality. American Psychologist 36:3 (1981), 276–289 https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.36.3.276.
47. McHugh, M.L., Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica 22:3 (2012), 276–282.
48. Mischel, W., Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review 80:4 (1973), 252–283.
49. Molenaar, P.C.M., A dynamic factor model for the analysis of multivariate time series. Psychometrika 50:2 (1985), 181–202.
50. Molenaar, P.C.M., A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: Bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives 2:4 (2004), 201–218.
51. Moras, K., Di Nardo, P.A., Barlow, D.H., Distinguishing anxiety and depression: Reexamination of the reconstructed Hamilton scales. Psychological Assessment, 4(2), 1992, 224.
52. Paul, G.L., Strategy of outcome research in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 31(2), 1967, 109.
53. Revelle, W., psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research. 2013, Northwestern University.
54. Rubel, J. A., Fisher, A. J., Husen, K., & Lutz, W. (in press). Translating person-specific network models into personalized treatments: Development and demonstration of the dynamic assessment treatment algorithm for individual networks (DATA-IN). Psychotherapy and psychosomatics.
55. Rush, A.J., Trivedi, M.H., Ibrahim, H.M., Carmody, T.J., Arnow, B., Klein, D.N., Manber, R., The 16-item quick inventory of depressive symptomatology (QIDS), clinician rating (QIDS-C), and self-report (QIDS-SR): A psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic major depression. Biological Psychiatry 54:5 (2003), 573–583.
56. Schmittmann, V.D., Cramer, A.O.J., Waldorp, L.J., Epskamp, S., Kievit, R.A., Borsboom, D., Deconstructing the construct: A network perspective on psychological phenomena. New Ideas in Psychology 31:1 (2013), 43–53 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2011.02.007.
57. Schork, N.J., Personalized medicine: Time for one-person trials. Nature 520:7549 (2015), 609–611.
58. Steer, R.A., Beck, A.T., Riskind, J.H., Brown, G., Relationships between the Beck depression inventory and the Hamilton psychiatric rating scale for depression in depressed outpatients. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 9:3 (1987), 327–339.
59. Steer, R.A., McElroy, M.G., Beck, A.T., Correlates of self‐reported and clinically assessed depression in outpatient alcoholics. Journal of Clinical Psychology 39:1 (1983), 144–149.
60. Watson, D., Rethinking the mood and anxiety disorders: A quantitative hierarchical model for DSM-V. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. Special Issue: Toward a Dimensionally Based Taxonomy of Psychopathology 114:4 (2005), 522–536.
61. Wittchen, H.U., Generalized anxiety disorder: Prevalence, burden, and cost to society. Depression and Anxiety 16:4 (2002), 162–171.
62. World Health Organization, Investing in mental health: Evidence for action. 2013 Retrieved from http://www.who.int/mental_health/publications/financing/investing_in_mh_2013/en/.
63. Yelland, L.N., Sullivan, T.R., Voysey, M., Lee, K.J., Cook, J.A., Forbes, A.B., Applying the intention-to-treat principle in practice: Guidance on handling randomisation errors. Clinical Trials 12:4 (2015), 418–423, 10.1177/1740774515588097.