A single case experimental design: how do different psychological outcome measures capture the experience of a client undergoing CBT for chronic pain

British Journal of Pain

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2019, Pages 6-12

  Jones, Steve ^a   Hurrell, Ellie ^a  

^a SHEFFIELD HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

CBT; chronic pain; health; outcomes; psychology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANXIETY; ANXIETY DISORDER; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CHRONIC PAIN; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; COGNITIVE BEHAVIORAL THERAPY; DEPRESSION; DEPRESSION ANXIETY STRESS SCALE; DISTRESS SYNDROME; EMBARRASSMENT; GUILT; HUMAN; LIKERT SCALE; MALE; MENTAL DISEASE; MENTAL HEALTH; MIDDLE AGED; MOOD; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN CATASTROPHIZING SCALE; PAIN INTENSITY; PAIN SELF EFFICACY QUESTIONNAIRE; PATIENT HEALTH QUESTIONNAIRE 9; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOEDUCATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOTHERAPY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RELIABILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 85058444137     PISSN: 20494637     EISSN: 20494645     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/2049463718802873     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Naylor C, Parsonage M, McDaid D. Long-term conditions and mental health: the cost of co-morbidities. London: The Kings Fund, 2012
2. NHS Choices. How to get NHS help for your pain, 2014. Available at: http://www.nhs.uk/Livewell/Pain/Pages/Longtermpain.aspx (accessed 24 September 2018)
3. Tsang A, Von Korff M, Lee S. Common chronic pain conditions in developed and developing countries: gender and age differences and comorbidity with depression-anxiety disorders. J Pain 2008; 9(10): 883–891
4. NICE. Nice Clinical Guideline 91: depression in adults with a chronic physical health condition, 2009. Available at: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg91 (accessed 24 September 2018)
5. The British Pain Society. Guidelines for pain management programmes for adults. An evidence-based review prepared on behalf of the British Pain Society, 2013. Available at: https://www.britishpainsociety.org/static/uploads/resources/files/pmp2013_main_FINAL_v6.pdf (accessed 14 July 2018)
6. C. Eccleston A.C. Williams S. Morley Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; 11: CD007407
7. Lowe B, Decker O, Muller S. Validation and standardization of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener (GAD-7) in the general population. Med Care 2008; 46: 266–274
8. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL., The PHQ-9: a new depression diagnostic and severity measure. Psychiatr Ann 2002; 32: 509–515
9. NHS England. Integrated IAPT Early Implementers, 2017. Available at: https://www.england.nhs.uk/mental-health/adults/iapt/mus/sites/ (accessed 24 September 2018)
10. Cleeland CS, Ryan KM., Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singapore 1994; 23(2): 129–138
11. Vlayen JWS, de Jong J, Geilen M,. Graded exposure in vivo in the treatment of pain-related fear: a replicated single-case experimental designs in four patients with chronic low back pain. Behav Res Ther 2001; 39: 151–166
12. Smith JD., Single-case experimental designs: a systematic review of published research and current standards. Psychol Methods 2012; 17(4): 510–550
13. Barlow D, Nock M, Hersen M., Single case experimental designs: strategies for studying behaviour change, 3rd edn. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon, 2008
14. R. Melzack From the gate to the neuromatrix. Pain 1999; 82(Suppl. 6): S121–S126
15. Sullivan MJL. The Pain Catastrophising Scale: User Manual, 1995. Available at: http://sullivan-painresearch.mcgill.ca/pdf/pcs/PCSManual_English.pdf (accessed 24 September 2018)
16. M.K. Nicholas Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (Unpublished tool). London: Pain Management Centre, St. Thomas Hospital, 1988
17. Di Pietro F, Catley MJ, McAuley JH. Rasch analysis supports the use of the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire. Phys Ther 2013; 94(1): 91–100
18. Jones RR, Weinrott MR, Vaught RS., Effects of serial dependence on the agreement between visual and statistical inference. J Appl Behav Anal 1978; 11: 277–283
19. Morgan DL, Morgan RK., Single-case research methods for the behavioural and health sciences. London: SAGE, 2008
20. Parker RI, Vannest K., An improved effect size for single-case research: nonoverlap of all pairs. Behav Ther 2009; 40(4): 357–367
21. Manolov R, Solanas A, Leiva D., Comparing ‘visual’ effect size indices for single-case designs. Methodology 2010; 6: 49–58
22. Jacobson NS, Truax P., Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991; 59: 12–19
23. A. Gyani R. Shafran R. Layard. Enhancing recovery rates in IAPT services: lessons from analysis of year one data. Improving access to psychological therapies. London: NICE, 2011, 40–41, 71–75
24. Macey K, Clarke S, Golijani-Moghaddam N. Evaluating a person-centred chronic pain service using indices of reliable and clinically significant change. Eur J Person Cent Healthcare 2015; 3: 19–25
25. Mehlsen M, Heegaard L, Frostholm L., A prospective evaluation of the chronic pain self-management programme in a Danish population of chronic pain patients. Patient Educ Counsel 2015; 98(5): 677–680
26. M.A. Hadi G.A. McHugh S.J. Closs Impact of chronic pain on patients’ quality of life: a comparative mixed-methods study. J Patient Exper. Epub ahead of print 5 July 2018. DOI: 10.1177/2374373518786013
27. Sideridis GD., Data smoothing: prediction of human behaviour, detection of behavioural patterns, and monitoring treatment effectiveness in single-subject behavioural studies. J Behav Educ 1997; 7: 191–203