A comparison of signal- and event-contingent ambulatory assessment of interpersonal behavior and affect in social situations

Psychological Assessment

Volumn 31, Issue 7, 2019, Pages 952-960

  Himmelstein, Philip H ^a   Woods, William C ^a   Wright, Aidan G C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Affect; Ambulatory assessment; Ecological momentary assessment; Event contingent; Interpersonal behavior

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECOLOGICAL MOMENTARY ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCIENTIST; SOCIAL INTERACTION; AFFECT; AMBULATORY MONITORING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN RELATION; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; STUDENT; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AFFECT; ECOLOGICAL MOMENTARY ASSESSMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MONITORING, AMBULATORY; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; STUDENTS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85063985283     PISSN: 10403590     EISSN: 1939134X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/pas0000718     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Armey, M. F., Crowther, J. H., & Miller, I. W. (2011). Changes in ecological momentary assessment reported affect associated with episodes of nonsuicidal self-injury. Behavior Therapy, 42, 579-588. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2011.01.002
2. Bolger, N., & Laurenceau, J. P. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
3. Bradburn, N. M., Rips, L. J., & Shevell, S. K. (1987, April 10). Answering autobiographical questions: The impact of memory and inference on surveys. Science, 236, 157-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.3563494
4. Carney, M. A., Tennen, H., Affleck, G., Del Boca, F. K., & Kranzler, H. R. (1998). Levels and patterns of alcohol consumption using timeline follow-back, daily diaries and real-time "electronic interviews." Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 59, 447-454. http://dx.doi.org/10.15288/jsa.1998.59.447
5. Collins, L. M. (2006). Analysis of longitudinal data: The integration of theoretical model, temporal design, and statistical model. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 505-528. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190146
6. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2011). Foreword. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. xii-xvi). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
7. Ebner-Priemer, U. W., & Trull, T. J. (2009). Ambulatory assessment: An innovative and promising approach for clinical psychology. European Psychologist, 14, 109-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.14.2.109
8. Fahrenberg, J., Myrtek, M., Pawlik, K., & Perrez, M. (2007). Ambulatory assessment-Monitoring behavior in daily life settings: A behavioralscientific challenge for psychology. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 206-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.23.4.206
9. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. 2007). G∗Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
10. Fleeson, W., & Law, M. (2015). Trait enactments as density distributions: The role of actors, situations, and observers in explaining stability and variability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 1090-1104.
11. Gorin, A., & Stone, A. (2001). Recall biases and cognitive errors in retrospective self-reports: A call for momentary assessments. In A. Baum, T. Revenson, & J. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of health psychology (pp. 405-413). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Greeno, C. G., Wing, R. R., & Shiffman, S. (2000). Binge antecedents in obese women with and without binge eating disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 95-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.68.1.95
13. Hamaker, E. L., & Wichers, M. (2017). No time like the present: Discovering the hidden dynamics in intensive longitudinal data. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 10-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963721416666518
14. Markey, P. M., & Markey, C. N. (2009). A brief assessment of the interpersonal circumplex: The IPIP-IPC. Assessment, 16, 352-361. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073191109340382
15. Mehl, M. R., Robbins, M. L., & Deters, F. G. (2012). Naturalistic observation of health-relevant social processes: The electronically activated recorder methodology in psychosomatics. Psychosomatic Medicine, 74, 410-417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0b013e3182545470
16. MetricWire (Version 4.0.6) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://apkpure.com/metricwire/com.metricwire.android3/download/37-APK?from-versions%2Fversion
17. Moskowitz, D. S. (1994). Cross-situational generality and the interpersonal circumplex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 921-933. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.5.921
18. Moskowitz, D. S., Russell, J. J., Sadikaj, G., & Sutton, R. (2009). Measuring people intensively. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 50, 131-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0016625
19. Moskowitz, D. S., & Zuroff, D. C. (2004). Flux, pulse, and spin: Dynamic additions to the personality lexicon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 880-893. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.880
20. Moskowitz, D. S., & Zuroff, D. C. (2005). Robust predictors of flux, pulse, and spin. Journal of Research in Personality, 39, 130-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2004.09.004
21. Pinheiro, J., Bates, D. DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., & R Core Team. (2018). nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models (R package Version 3.1-137) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme
22. Robbins, M. L., & Kubiak, T. (2014). Ecological momentary assessment in behavioral medicine: Research and practice. In D. I. Mostofsky (Ed.), The handbook of behavioral medicine (Vol. 1, pp. 429-446). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118453940.ch20
23. Roche, M. J., Pincus, A. L., Conroy, D. E., Hyde, A. L., & Ram, N. (2013). Pathological narcissism and interpersonal behavior in daily life. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 4, 315-323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030798
24. Sadikaj, G., Moskowitz, D. S., Russell, J. J., Zuroff, D. C., & Paris, J. (2013). Quarrelsome behavior in borderline personality disorder: Influence of behavioral and affective reactivity to perceptions of others. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 195-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030871
25. Schwarz, N. (2007). Retrospective and concurrent self-reports: The rationale for real-time data capture. In A. A. Stone, S. Shiffman, A. A. Atienza, & L. Nebeling (Eds.), The science of real-time data capture: Self-reports in health research (pp. 11-26). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
26. Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., & Hufford, M. R. (2008). Ecological momentary assessment. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 1-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415
27. Smyth, J. M., Wonderlich, S. A., Sliwinski, M. J., Crosby, R. D., Engel, S. G., Mitchell, J. E., & Calogero, R. M. (2009). Ecological momentary assessment of affect, stress, and binge-purge behaviors: Day of week and time of day effects in the natural environment. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 42, 429-436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/eat.20623
28. Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2017). The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 117-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000096
29. Stone, A. A., & Broderick, J. E. (2007). Real-time data collection for pain: Appraisal and current status. Pain Medicine, 8(Suppl. 3), S85-S93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2007.00372.x
30. Timm, C., Ubl, B., Zamoscik, V., Ebner-Priemer, U., Reinhard, I., Huffziger, S., Kuehner, C. (2017). Cognitive and affective trait and state factors influencing the long-term symptom course in remitted depressed patients. PLoS ONE, 12, e0178759. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178759
31. Tourangeau, R. (2000). Remembering what happened: Memory errors and survey reports. In A. A. Stone, (Eds.), The science of self-report: Implications for research and practice (pp. 29-47). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1999). The PANAS-X: Manual for the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Expanded Form. Ames: Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences Publications, University of Iowa.
33. Wilhelm, P., Perrez, M., & Pawlik, K. (2012). Conducting research in daily life: A historical review. In M. R. Mehl & T. S. Conner (Eds.), Handbook of research methods for studying daily life (pp. 62-86). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
34. Wouters, S., Thewissen, V., Duif, M., Lechner, L., & Jacobs, N. (2016). Assessing energy intake in daily life: Signal-contingent smartphone application versus event-contingent paper and pencil estimated diet diary. Psychologica Belgica, 56, 357-369. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/pb.339
35. Wright, A. G. C., Aslinger, E. N., Bellamy, B., Edershile, E. A., & Woods, W. C. (2019). Daily hassles and stress. In K. Harkness & E. Hayden (Eds.), Oxford handbook of stress and mental health. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190681777.013.2
36. Wright, A. G. C., & Hopwood, C. J. (2016). Advancing the assessment of dynamic psychological processes. Assessment, 23, 399-403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073191116654760
37. Wright, A. G. C., Stepp, S. D., Scott, L. N., Hallquist, M. N., Beeney, J. E., Lazarus, S. A., & Pilkonis, P. A. (2017). The effect of pathological narcissism on interpersonal and affective processes in social interactions. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 126, 898-910. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/abn0000286
38. Wright, A. G. C., & Zimmermann, J. (in press). Applied ambulatory assessment: Integrating idiographic and nomothetic principles of measurement. Psychological Assessment.
39. Wycoff, A. M., Metrik, J., & Trull, T. J. (2018). Affect and cannabis use in daily life: A review and recommendations for future research. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 191, 223-233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.07.001