Dynamic Structural Equation Models

Structural Equation Modeling

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2018, Pages 359-388

  Asparouhov, Tihomir ^a   Hamaker, Ellen L ^b   Muthén, Bengt ^a  

^a Muthe n and Muthe n   (United States)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Baysian methods; dynamic factor analysis; intensive longitudinal data; time series analysis

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; MARKOV PROCESSES; MONTE CARLO METHODS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

BAYSIAN METHODS; DYNAMIC FACTOR ANALYSIS; DYNAMIC STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; LONGITUDINAL ANALYSIS; LONGITUDINAL DATA; MARKOV CHAIN MONTE-CARLO; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS;

TIME SERIES ANALYSIS;

EID: 85039160037     PISSN: 10705511     EISSN: 15328007     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2017.1406803     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Arminger, G., & Muthen, B., (1998). A Bayesian approach to nonlinear latent variable models using the Gibbs sampler and the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm. Psychometrika, 63, 271–300. doi:10.1007/BF02294856
2. Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B., (2010). Bayesian analysis using Mplus: Technical implementation (Technical report, Version 3). Retrieved from http://statmodel.com/download/Bayes3.pdf
3. Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B., (2016). General random effect latent variable modeling: Random subjects, items, contexts, and parameters. In J. R., Harring, L. M., Stapleton, & S. N., Beretvas (Eds.), Advances in multilevel modeling for educational research: Addressing practical issues found in real-world applications (pp. 163–192). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
4. Bolger, N., & Laurenceau, J., (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. New York, NY: Guilford.
5. Browne, W., & Draper, D., (2006). A comparison of Bayesian and likelihood-based methods for fitting multilevel models. Bayesian Analysis, 1, 473–514. doi:10.1214/06-BA117
6. Buja, A., Hastie, T. J., & Tibshirani, R., (1989). Linear smoothers and additive models. Annals of Statistics, 17, 453–510. doi:10.1214/aos/1176347115
7. Celeux, G., Forbes, F., Robert, C. P., & Titterington, D. M., (2006). Deviance information criteria for missing data models. Bayesian Analysis, 1, 651–673. doi:10.1214/06-BA122
8. Cowles, M. K., (1996). Accelerating Monte Carlo Markov Chain Convergence for Cumulative-Link Generalized Linear Models. Statistics and Computing, 6, 101–111.
9. Deboeck, P., & Preacher, K., (2016). No need to be discrete: A method for continuous time mediation analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 23, 61–75. doi:10.1080/10705511.2014.973960
10. Granger, C. W. J., & Morris, M. J., (1976). Time series modelling and interpretation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 139, 246–257. doi:10.2307/2345178
11. Greene, W. H., (2014). Econometric analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
12. Hamaker, E. L., (2005). Conditions for the equivalence of the autoregressive latent trajectory model and a latent growth curve model with autoregressive disturbances. Sociological Methods & Research, 33, 404–416. doi:10.1177/0049124104270220
13. Hamaker, E. L., Asparouhov, T., Brose, A., Schmiedek, F., & Muthén, B., (2017). At the frontiers of modeling intensive longitudinal data: Dynamic structural equation models for the affective measurements from the COGITO study. Manuscript submitted for publication.
14. Hamaker, E. L., & Grasman, R. P. P. P., (2015). To center or not to center? Investigating inertia with a multilevel autoregressive model. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1492. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01492
15. Jahng, S., Wood, P. K., & Trull, T. J., (2008). Analysis of affective instability in ecological momentary assessment: Indices using successive difference and group comparison via multilevel modeling. Psychological Methods, 13, 354–375. doi:10.1037/a0014173
16. Jongerling, J., Laurenceau, J. P., & Hamaker, E., (2015). A multilevel AR(1) model: Allowing for inter-individual differences in trait-scores, inertia, and innovation variance. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 50, 334–349. doi:10.1080/00273171.2014.1003772
17. Kalman, R. E., (1960). A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. Journal of Basic Engineering, 82, 35–45.
18. Lee, S. Y., (2007). Structural equation modelling: A Bayesian approach. London UK: Wiley.
19. Lüdtke, O., Marsh, H. W., Robitzsch, A., Trautwein, U., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B., (2008). The multilevel latent covariate model: A new, more reliable approach to group-level effects in contextual studies. Psychological Methods, 13, 203–229. doi:10.1037/a0012869
20. Molenaar, P. C. M., (1985). A dynamic factor model for the analysis of multivariate time series. Psychometrika, 50, 181–202. doi:10.1007/BF02294246
21. Molenaar, P. C. M., (2017). Equivalent dynamic models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 52, 242–258. doi:10.1080/00273171.2016.1277681
22. Nickell, S., (1981). Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 49, 1417–1426. doi:10.2307/1911408
23. Oravecz, Z., Tuerlinckx, F., & Vandekerckhove, J., (2011). A hierarchical latent stochastic differential equation model for affective dynamics. Psychological Methods, 16, 468–490. doi:10.1037/a0024375
24. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S., (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. Schuurman, N., Houtveen, J., & Hamaker, E., (2015). Incorporating measurement error in n = 1 psychological autoregressive modeling. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1038. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01038
26. Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B. P., & van der Linde, A. (2002). Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B. 64, 583–639.
27. Trull, T., & Ebner-Priemer, U., (2014). The role of ambulatory assessment in psychological science. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 466–470. doi:10.1177/0963721414550706
28. Vaida, F., & Blanchard, S., (2005). Conditional Akaike information for mixed-effects models. Biometrika, 92, 351–370. doi:10.1093/biomet/92.2.351
29. Voelkle, M. C., & Oud, J. H. L., (2013). Continuous time modelling with individually varying time intervals for oscillating and non-oscillating processes. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 66, 103–126. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.2012.02043.x
30. Zhang, Z., Hamaker, E., & Nesselroade, J., (2008). Comparisons of four methods for estimating a dynamic factor model. Structural Equation Modeling, 15, 377–402. doi:10.1080/10705510802154281
31. Zhang, Z., & Nesselroade, J., (2007). Bayesian estimation of categorical dynamic factor models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 729–756. doi:10.1080/00273170701715998