E-assessment: Institutional development strategies and the assessment life cycle

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 588-596

  Tomas, Carmen ^a   Borg, Michaela ^a   McNeil, Jane ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^b NOTTINGHAM TRENT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIFE CYCLE; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

ANNUAL ASSESSMENT; DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES; ELECTRONIC MODE; ELECTRONIC PROCESS; HIGHER EDUCATION; INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT; QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENTS; SUMMATIVE ASSESSMENTS;

ELECTRONIC ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84929947782     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12153     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bull, J., Conole, G., Davis, H., White, S., Danson, M., &, Sclater, N., (2002). Rethinking assessment through learning technologies. Proceedings of ASCILITE Conference, December 8-11, 2002, UNITEC, Auckland, New Zealand. Retrieved February 27, 2009, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/auckland02/proceedings/papers/056.pdf
2. Bull, J., &, McKenna, C., (2004). Blueprint for computer-assisted assessment. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
3. Conole, G., &, Warburton, W., (2005). A review of computer-assisted assessment. ALT-J Research in Learning Technology, 13, 1, 17-31.
4. Craven, P., (2009). History and challenges of e-assessment. The "Cambridge Approach" perspective-e-assessment research and development 1989 to 2009. Cambridge: Cambridge Assessment. Retrieved March 7, 2014, from http://www.cambridgeassessment.org.uk/Images/138440-history-and-challenges-of-e-assessment-the-cambridge-approach-perspective-e-assessment-research-and-development-1989-to-2009-by-patrick-craven.pdf
5. Deepwell, F., (2007). Embedding quality in e-Learning implementation through evaluation. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10, 2, 34-43.
6. Dillon, A., (1992). Reading from paper versus screens: a critical review of the empirical literature. Ergonomics, 35, 10, 1297-1326. Retrieved March 7, 2014, from https://www.ischool.utexas.edu/~adillon/Journals/Reading.htm
7. Gilbert, L., Gale, V., Warburton, B., &, Wills, G., (2009). Report on summative e-assessment quality (REAQ). JISC. Online report. Retrieved March 7, 2014, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/projects/reaqfinalreport.pdf
8. Gilbert, L., Whitelock, D., &, Gale, V., (2011). Synthesis report on assessment and feedback with technology enhancement. Southampton: Electronics and Computer Science EPrints. Retrieved March 7, 2014, from http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/273221/
9. Gipps, C. V., (2005). What is the role for ICT-based assessment in universities? Studies in Higher Education, 30, 2, 171-180.
10. JISC. (2007). Effective practice with e-assessment. HEFCE. Retrieved April 5, 2010, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/themes/elearning/effpraceassess.pdf
11. Kirkwood, A., &, Price, L., (2013). Missing: evidence of a scholarly approach to teaching and learning with technology in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 18, 3, 327-337.
12. McCann, A. L., (2010). Factors affecting the adoption of an e-assessment system. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 7, 799-818.
13. McNeil, J., Borg, M., &, Tomas, C., (2011). The assessment lifecycle: a model for analysing institutional e-assessment development. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 2, E21-E24.
14. Milne, J., Heinrich, E., &, Morrison, D., (2008). Technological support for assignment assessment: a New Zealand higher education survey. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 24, 5, 487-504.
15. National Union of Students (2010) Charter on feedback and assessment. Retrieved September 9, 2013, from http://www.nusconnect.org.uk/asset/news/6010/FeedbackCharter-toview.pdf
16. Oldfield, A., Broadfoot, P., Sutherland, R., &, Timmis, S., (2012) Assessment in a digital age: a research review. Bristol: University of Bristol. Online report. Retrieved September 6, 2013, from http://www.bris.ac.uk/education/research/sites/tea/publications/index.html
17. Ridgway, J., McCusker, S., &, Pead, D., (2004). Literature review of e-assessment. Bristol: NESTA Futurelab. Retrieved March 7, 2014, from http://archive.futurelab.org.uk/resources/documents/lit-reviews/Assessment-Review.pdf
18. Stödberg, U., (2012). A research review of e-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, iFirst article, 37, 5, 591-604. Retrieved March 7, 2014, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.557496
19. Warburton, B., (2009). Quick win or slow burn: modelling UK HE CAA uptake. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34, 3, 257-272.
20. Whitelock, D., &, Cross, S., (2011). 99 measures of assessment processes and practice for use in benchmarking and reviewing teaching and learning. Not set. Retrieved May 1, 2012, from http://oro.open.ac.uk/28965/2/99-Benchmark-Measures-Whitelock-and-Cross-11.pdf
21. Whitelock, D. M., &, Brasher, A., (2006). Developing a roadmap for e-assessment: which way now? In, M. Danson, (Ed.), Proceedings of the 10th CAA international computer assisted assessment conference (pp. 487-501). Loughborough: Professional Development, Loughborough University. Retrieved March 9, 2012, from http://oro.open.ac.uk/11950/1/CAA-Conf-06-roadmap-paperfv.pdf