Enhancing the critical edge of (L2) teacher-education: Some issues in advanced literacy

Developing Advanced Literacy in First and Second Languages: Meaning With Power

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 187-207

  Ramanathan, Vai ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85071594927     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410612298-15     Document Type: Chapter

References (72)

1. Auerbach, E. (1996). Adult ESL/literacy from the community-to the community: A guidebook for participatory literacy training. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Aronowitz, S., & Giroux, H. (1993). Education under siege. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.
3. Atkinson, D. (1998). Scientific discourse in sociohistorical context: The philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675-1975. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
4. Bailey, K., Curtis, A., &Nunan, D. (1998). Undeniable insights: The collaborative use of three professional development practices. TESOL Quarterly, 32(3), 546-556.
5. Bailey, K., &Nunan, D. (1996). Voices from the language classroom: Qualitative research in second language education. NY: Cambridge University Press.
6. Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to the Ecology of Mind. (2nd ed.). New York: Ballantine Books.
7. Benesch, S. (Ed.). (1991). ESL in America: Myths and possibilities. Portsmouth, NH:Boynton/Cook Publishers.
8. Berkenkotter, C., &Huckin. T. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: cognition/culture/power. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
9. Bizzell, P (1992). Academic discourse and critical consciousness. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
10. Blanton, L. (1998). Discourse, artifacts, and the Ozarks: Understanding academic literacy. In V. Zamel &R. Spack (Eds.), Negotiating academic literacies, (pp. 219-325). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Bordieu, E (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12. Burton, J. (1998). A cross-case analysis of teacher-involvement in TESOL research. TESOL Quarterly, 32(3), 397-446.
13. Campbell, C. (1996). Socializing with the teachers and prior language learning experience:A diary study. In K. Bailey & D. Nunan (Eds.), Voices from the Language Classroom, (pp. 201-223). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Fress.
14. Canagarajah, S. (1993). Critical ethnography of a Sri Lankan classroom: Ambiguities in student opposition to reproduction through TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 601-626.
15. Cazden, C. (1989). Contributions of the Bakhtin Circle to Communicative Competence. Applied Linguistics 10(2), 116-127.
16. Clair, N. (1998). Teacher study groups: Fersistent questions in a promising approach. TESOL Quarterly, 32(3), 465-492.
17. Cole, M., Engestrom, Y., & Vasquez, O. (1997). Introduction. In M. Cole, Y. Engestrom, & O. Vasquez (Eds.), Mind, culture, and activity (pp. 1-21). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Fress.
18. Cole, M., & Wertsch, J. (1996). Contemporary implications of Vygotsky and Luria. Worcester, MA: Clark University Fress.
19. Eckert, E, & McConnell-Ginet, S. (1992). Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21,461-490.
20. Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London, UK: Longman.
21. Fairclough, N. (1992). Critical language awareness. New York: Longman.
22. Ferris, D. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), 1-11.
23. Fleck, L. (1981). Genesis and development of a scientific fact. Chicago: University of Chicago Fress.
24. Flor, N., & Hutchins, E. (1991). Analyzing distributed cognition in software teams: A case study of team programming during perfective software maintenance. In J. Koenemann-Belliveau, T. G. Moher, & S. E Robertson (Eds.), Proceedings of the fourth annual workshop on empirical studies of programmers, (pp. 36-59). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
25. Flowerdew, J. (1998). Language learning experience in L2 teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 32(3), 529-536.
26. Freeman, D. (1996). Renaming experience/reconstructing practice: Developing new understandings of teaching. In D. Freeman &J. Richards (Eds.), Teacher learning in language teaching (pp. 221-241). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
27. Freeman, D., & Johnson, K. (1998). Reconceptualizing the knowledge-base of language teacher education. TESOL Quarterly 32(3), 417.
28. Gee, J. (1991). Social linguistics and literatus: Ideologies in discourses. Philadelphia, PA: Falmer Press.
29. Gee, J. (1997). Meanings in Discourses: Coordinating and being coordinated. In S. Muspratt, A. Luke, & E Freebody (Eds.), Constructing critical literatus: Teaching and learning textual practice (pp. 273-302). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Fress.
30. Gee, J. (1999). Learning language as a matter of learning social languages within discourses. Paper presented at the College Composition and Communication Conference, Atlanta, GA.
31. Giroux, H. (1992). Border crossings: Cultural workers and the politics of education. New York:Routledge.
32. Golombek. R (1998). A study of language teachers’ personal practical knowledge. TESOL Quarterly, 32(3), 447-464.
33. Hanks, W. (1996). Language and communicative practices. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
34. Heath, S. B. (1985). Literacy or literate skills: Considerations of ESL/EFL learners. In R Larson, E. Judd, & D. Messerschidt (Eds.), On TESOL 84 (pp. 15-28). Washington, DC: TESOL.
35. Holliday, A. (1994). Appropriate methodology in context. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36. Huckin, T. (1987). Surprise value in scientific discourse. Paper presented at College Composition Communication Conference, Atlanta, GA.
37. Johnson, K. (1996). The role of theory in L2 teacher education. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 765-771.
38. Kaplan, R. B., Cantor, S., Hagstrom, C., Kamhi’Stein, L., Shiotani, Y., & Zimmerman, C. (1994). On abstract writing. Text 14(3), 401-426.
39. Killingsworth, K. J., & Palmer, J. S. (1988). Ecospeak: Rhetoric and environmental politics in America. Carbondale: Southern Illinois Press.
40. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41. Leitch, V. (1983). Deconstructive criticism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
42. Lemke, J. (1995). Textual politics: Discourses and social dynamics. Bristol, PA: Taylor and Francis.
43. Lemke, J. (1989). Using language in the classroom. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
44. Marcus, G. (1998). Ethnography through thick and thin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
45. McLaren, R (1989). Life in schools. New York: Longman.
46. Miller, C. (1994). Rhetorical community: The cultural basis of genre. In A. Freedman & R Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 67-78). London: Taylor and Francis.
47. Nardi, B. (Ed). (1996). Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48. Nunan, D. (1996). Hidden voices: Inside’s perspectives on classroom. In K. Bailey & D. Nunan (Eds.), Voices in the language classroom (pp. 41-56). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
49. Pennycook, A. (1994). The cultural politics of English as an international language. New York:Longman.
50. Porter, J. (1986). Intertextuality and the discourse community. Rhetoric Review, 5, 34-47.
51. Porter, J. (1992). Audience rhetoric: An archeological composition of the discourse community. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
52. Raimes, A., & Zamel, V. (1997). Response to Ramanathan and Kaplan. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6, 79-81.
53. Ramanathan, V., & Atkinson, A. (1999). Individualism, academic writing and ESL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), 45-75.
54. Ramanathan, V., & Kaplan, R. B. (1996a). Audience and voice in current composition textbooks:Implications for L2 student-writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5,21-34.
55. Ramanathan, V., & Kaplan, R. B. (1996b). Some problematic “channels�? in the teaching of critical thinking in current LI composition text-books: Implications for L2 studentwriters. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 7, 225-249.
56. Ramanathan, V., & Kaplan, R. B. (1997). Response to Raimes and Zamel. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6, 83-88.
57. Ramanathan, V., & Kaplan, R. B. (2000). Genres, authors, discourse communities: Theory & application for L2 writing instructors.Journal of Second Language Writing, 9 (2),171-191.
58. Richards, J., & Lockhart, C. (1996). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. New York: Cambridge University Press.
59. Richards, J., Ho, B., &Giblin, K. (1996). Learning how to teach in the RSA cert. In D. Freeman & J. Richards (Eds.), Teacher learning and language teaching (pp. 242-259). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
60. Russell, D. (1995). Activity theory and its implications for writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
61. Salomon, G. (Ed.). (1993). Distributed cognitions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
62. Schleppegrell, M. (1997). Teacher research through dialogic inquiry. Canadian Modern Language Review, 54(1), 68-83.
63. Shamim, F. (1996). In or out of the action zone: Location as a feature of interaction in large ESL classes in Pakistan. In K. Bailey & D. Nunan (Eds.), Voices in the language classroom (pp. 123-144). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
64. Shor, I., &Freire, P (1987). A pedagogy for liberation. South Hadley, MA: Bergin and Garvey Publishers.
65. Spack, R. (1997). The rhetorical construction of multilingual students. TESOL Quarterly, 31,765-774.
66. Swales, J. (1998). Other floors, other voices. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
67. Truscott, J. (1999). The case for “The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes�?: A response to Ferris. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8 (2),111-122.
68. Vacca, R., Vacca, J., & Bruneau, B. (1997). Teachers reflecting on practice. In J. Flood, S. Brice Heath, & D. Lapp (Eds.), Handbook of Research on teaching literacy through the communicative and visual arts (pp. 445-450). New York: Simon & Schuster, Macmillan.
69. van Maanen, M. (1977). Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical. Curriculum Inquiry, 6, 205-228.
70. Van Nostrand, A. D. (1994). A genre map of R & D knowledge production for the U.S. Department of Defense. In A. Freedman & P Medway (Eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 133-145). London: Taylor and Francis.
71. Wells, G. (1996). Using the tooLkit of discourse in the activity of teaching and learning. Mind, Culture, Activity, 3(2), 74-101.
72. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic Inquiry. Cambridge, U K: Cambridge University Press.