Genres, Authors, Discourse Communities: Theory and Application for (L1 and) L2 Writing Instructors

Journal of Second Language Writing

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 171-191

  Ramanathan, Vai ^a   Kaplan, Robert B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037540756     PISSN: 10603743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00021-7     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Atkinson, D. (1998). Scientific Discourse in Sociohistorical Context: The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675-1975. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Bakhtin, M. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays (V.W. McGee, Transl.) C. Holquist & M. Holquist (Eds.), Austin: University of Texas Press.
3. Becher, T. (1981). Towards definition of disciplinary cultures. Studies in Higher Education 6(2), 109-122.
4. Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T. (1993). Rethinking genre from a sociocognitive perspective. Written Communication 10(4), 475-509.
5. Christie, F. (1992). The "received" tradition of literacy teaching: The decline of rhetoric and corruption of grammar. In B. Green (Ed.), The Insistence of the Letter: Literacy Studies and Curriculum Theorizing (pp. 75-106). London: Falmer Press.
6. Christie, F. (1993). Curriculum genres: Planning for effective teaching. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), The Powers of Literacy: A Genre Approach to Teaching Writing (pp. 154-178). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
7. Clifford, J., & Marcus, G. (1986). Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
8. Coe, R. (1994). Teaching genre as a process. In A. Freedman & P. Medway (Eds.), Learning and Teaching Genre (pp. 157-169). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Publishers.
9. Cookes, G. (1986). Towards a validated analysis of scientific text structure. Applied Linguistics 7(1), 57-70.
10. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (1986). The Powers of Literacy: A Genre Approach to Teaching Writing. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
11. Cronin, B. (1981). The need for a theory of citing. Journal of Documentation 37(1), 16-24.
12. Delpit, L. (1988). The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people’s children. Harvard Educational Review 58, 280-298.
13. Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. New York: Longman.
14. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.
15. Ferris, D., & Hedgcock, J. (1998). Teaching ESL Composition: Purpose, Process and Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Fowler, R. (1982). Literature as Social Discourse: The Practice of Linguistic Criticism. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
17. Fox, H. (1994). Listening to the World: Cultural Issues in Academic Writing. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers in English.
18. Freedman, A., & Medway, P. (1994). Learning and Teaching Genre. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Publishers.
19. Gee, J. (1990). Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideologies in Discourses. Philadelphia, PA: Falmer Press.
20. Giddens, A. (1979). Central Problems in Social Theory. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
21. Gould, S., & Lewontin, R. (1970). The Sprandels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptionist programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 205, 581-598.
22. Grabe, W., & Biber, D. (1987). Freshman student writing and the contrastive rhetoric hypothesis. Paper presented at the 7th Second Language Research Forum, Los Angeles, CA (September).
23. Hall, J. (1995). (Re)creating our worlds with words: A sociohistorical perspective of face-to-face interaction. Applied Linguistics 16(2), 206-232.
24. Harris, J. (1989). The idea of community in the study of writing. College Composition and Communication 40(1), 11-22.
25. Heath, S. B. (1983). Ways with Words. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Horner, B. (1997). Students, authorship, and the work of composition. College English 59(5), 505-529.
27. Huckin, T. (1987). Surprise value in scientific discourse. Paper presented at College Composition and Communication Conference, Atlanta, GA (March).
28. Hunt, R. (1994). Speech genres, writing genres, school genres, and computer genres. In A. Medway & P. Medway (Eds.), Learning and Teaching Genre (pp. 243-262). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook Publishers.
29. Johns, A. (1995). Genre and pedagogical purposes. Journal of Second Language Writing 4(2), 181-190.
30. Kamberelis, G. (1995). Genre as institutionally informed social practice. Journal of Contemporary Legal Issues 6, 115-170.
31. Kaplan, R. B. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. Language Learning 16, 1-20.
32. Kaplan, R. B., Cantor, S., Hagstrom, C., Kamhi-Stein, L., Shiotani, Y., & Zimmerman, C. (1994). On abstract writing. Text 14(3), 401-426.
33. Kirsch, G., & Roen, D. (Eds.). (1990). A Sense of Audience in Written Communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34. Kress, G., & Hodge, R. (1979). Language as Ideology. Boston, MA: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
35. MacDonald, S. (1987). Problem definition in academic writing. College English 49(3), 315-331.
36. Marcus, G., & Fischer, M. J. M. (1986). Anthropology as Cultural Critique: An Experimental Moment in the Human Sciences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
37. Miller, C. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70, 151-167.
38. Myers, F. (1988). Locating ethnographic practice: Romance, reality, and politics in the outback. American Ethnologist 15, 609-624.
39. Ochs, E. (1988). Culture and Language Development: Language Acquisition and Language Socialization in a Samoan Village. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
40. Ochs, E., Schegloff, E., & Thompson, S. (1996). Interaction and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Penrose, A., & Geisler, C. (1994). Reading and writing without authority. College Composition and Communication 45(4), 505-520.
42. Prior, P. (1995). Redefining the task: An ethnographic examination of writing and response in graduate seminars. In D. Belcher & G. Braine (Eds.), Academic Writing in a Second Language (pp. 47-82). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
43. Rafoth, B. (1990). The concept of discourse community: Descriptive and explanatory adequacy. In G. Kirsch & D. Roen (Eds.), A Sense of Audience in Written Communication (pp. 140-152). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
44. Raimes, A. (1991). Out of the woods: Emerging traditions in the teaching of writing. TESOL Quarterly 25, 407-430.
45. Ramanathan, V. (1997). Alzheimer Discourse: Some Sociolinguitic Dimensions. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
46. Ramanathan, V., & Kaplan, R. B. (1996). Audience and voice in current L1 composition textbooks: Some implications for L2 student-writers. Journal of Second Language Writing 5(1), 21-34.
47. Ramanathan, V., & Kaplan, R. B. (1997). Response to Raimes and Zamel. Journal of Second Language Writing 6(1), 83-87.
48. Ramanathan-Abbott, V. (1993). An examination of the relationship between social practices and the comprehension of narratives. Text 13, 117-141.
49. Rampton, B. (1995). Politics and change in research in applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics 16(2), 233-256.
50. Swales, J. (1990). Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
51. Swales, J. (1993). Genre and engagement. In Revue Belge de philologie et D'Histoire (pp. 687-698). Belgisch: Tijdschrift Voor Filologie En Geschiedenis.
52. Swales, J. (1998). Other Floors, Other Voices: A Textography of a Small University Building. New York: Cambridge University Press.
53. Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
54. Yates, J., & Orlikowski, W. (1992). Genres of organizational communication: a structural approach to studying communication and media. Academy of Management Review 17(2), 299-326.
55. Zamel, V. (1984). The author responds. TESOL Quarterly 18, 154-157.