Introduction to special issue vygotskian perspectives in early childhood education: Translating ideas into classroom practice

Early Education and Development

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 253-270

  Winsler, Adam ^a  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85071214108     PISSN: 10409289     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15566935eed1403_1     Document Type: Article

References (150)

1. Anton, M. (1999). The discourse of a learner-centered classroom: Sociocultural perspectives on teacher-learner interaction in the second-language classroom. Modern Language Journal, 83 (3), 303-318.
2. Antonacci, P. A. (2000). Reading in the zone of proximal development: Mediating literacy development in beginner readers through guided reading. Reading Horizons, 41 (1), 19-33.
3. Au, K. H. (1996). A sociocultural model of reading instruction: The Kamehameha Elementary Education Program. In S. A. Stahl & D. A. Hayes (Eds.). Instructional models in reading (pp. 181-202). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Bellamy, R. K. E. (1996). Designing educational technology: Computer-mediated change. In B. A. Nardi (Ed). Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 123-146). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Berenson, S. B. (1997). Language, diversity, and assessment in mathematics learning. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 19 (4), 1-10.
6. Berk, L. E. (1994a, November). Vygotsky’s theory: The importance of make-believe play. Young Children, 50 (1), 30–39.
7. Berk, L. E. (1994b, November). Why children talk to themselves. Scientific American, 271 (5), 78–83.
8. Berk, L. E. & Spuhl, S. T. (1995). Maternal interaction, private speech and task performance in preschool children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 10, 145-169.
9. Berk, L. E., & Winsler, A. (1995). Scaffolding children’s learning: Vygotsky and early childhood education. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
10. Blanck, G. (1990). Vygotsky: The man and his cause. In L. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 31-58). New York: Cambridge University Press.
11. Blanton, W. E., Simmons, E., & Warner, M. W. (2001). The 5th Dimension: Application of cultural-historical activity theory, inquiry-based learning, computers, and telecommunications to change prospective teachers’ preconceptions. The Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2, 214-225.
12. Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (1996). Tools of the mind: The Vygotskian approach to early childhood education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill.
13. Bodrova, E., & Leong, D. J. (1998). Adult influences on play: The Vygotskian approach. In D. P. Fromberg & D. Bergen (Eds.), Play from birth to twelve and beyond: Contexts, perspectives, and meanings (pp. 277-282). New York: Garland Publishing.
14. Bodrova, E., Leong, D. J., Hensen, R., & Henninger, M. (2000). Imaginative, child-directed play: Leading the way in development and learning. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 28 (4), 25-30.
15. Bredekamp, S., & Copple, C. (1997). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
16. Brooks, F. B., & Donato, R. (1994). Vygotskyan approaches to understanding foreign language learner discourse during communicative tasks. Hispania, 77 (2), 262-274.
17. Brown, A. L., Metz, K. E., & Campione, J. C. (1996). Social interaction and individual understanding in a community of learners: The influence of Piaget and Vygotsky. In A. Tryphon & J. Voneche (Eds.), Piaget-Vygotsky: The social genesis of thought (pp. 145-170). London: Psychology Press.
18. Bussi, M., & Bartolini, G. (1998). Joint activity in mathematics classrooms: A Vygotskian analysis. In F. Seeger, J. Voigt, & U. Waschescio (Eds.), The culture of the mathematics classroom. (pp. 13-49). New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Buzzelli, C. A. (1993). Morality in context: A sociocultural approach to enhancing young children’s moral development. Child & Youth Care Forum, 22, 375-386.
20. Buzzelli, C. A. (1995). The development of moral reflection in the early childhood classroom. Contemporary Education, 66 (3),143-145.
21. Buzzelli, C. A. (1997). Origins, differences, and the origins of differences in moral development: Parent-child discourse as moral activity. Developmental Review, 17, 101-109.
22. Carlton, M. P., & Winsler, A. (1999). School readiness: The need for a paradigm shift. School Psychology Review, 28, 338-352.
23. Cazden, C. B., & Starfield, S. (1994). Language, cognition, and ESL literacy. Tesol Quarterly, 28, 172-179.
24. Chaiklin, S. (Ed.). (2001). The theory and practice of cultural-historical psychology. Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
25. Clifford, E. F. (1999). Mentors and proteges: Establishing systems of assisted performance in preservice teacher education. Early Child Development & Care, 156, 35-52.
26. Cole, M. (1985). The zone of proximal development: Where culture and cognition create each other. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication and cognition (pp. 146-161). New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28. Cole, M., & Engestrom, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1-46). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
29. Coufal, K. L. (2002). Technology teaching or mediated learning, Part I: Are computers Skinnerian or Vygotskian? Topics in Language Disorders, 22, 1-28.
30. Daniels, H. (Ed). (1996). An introduction to Vygotsky. London: Routledge
31. Daniels, H., & Lunt, I. (1993). Vygotskian theory and special education practice in Russia. Educational Studies, 19, 79-89.
32. Daugherty, M., & Logan, J. (1996). Private speech assessment: A medium for studying the cognitive processes of young creative children. Early Child Development & Care, 115, 7-17.
33. De Abreu, G. (2000). Relationships between macro and micro socio-cultural contexts: Implications for the study of interactions in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 41 (1), 1-29.
34. De Almeida Mattos, A. (2000). A Vygotskian approach to evaluation in foreign language learning contexts. ELT Journal, 54 (4), 335-345.
35. De Guerrero, M. C. M., & Villamil, O. S. (2000). Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. Modern Language Journal, 84 (1), 51-68.
36. DeVries, R. (2000). Vygotsky, Piaget, and education: A reciprocal assimilation of theories and educational practices. New Ideas in Psychology, 18 (2-3), 187-213.
37. DiCamilla, F. J., & Anton, M. (1997). Repetition in the collaborative discourse of L2 learners: A Vygotskian perspective. Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, 609-633.
38. Dixon-Krauss, L. A. (1995). Partner reading and writing: Peer social dialogue and the zone of proximal development. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27 (1), 45-63.
39. Dixon-Krauss, L. (1996a). A mediation model for dynamic literacy instruction. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 34 (1), 78-85.
40. Dixon-Krauss, L (1996b). Vygotsky in the classroom: Mediated literacy instruction and assessment. Newbury Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
41. Duncan, R. M., & Pratt, M. W. (1997). Microgenetic change in the quantity and quality of preschoolers’ private speech. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 20, 367-383.
42. Engestrom, Y. (1997). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit.
43. Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamaki, U. (Eds.). (1999). Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
44. Fernyhough, C., & Russell, J. (1997). Distinguishing one’s own voice from those of others: A function for private speech? International Journal of Behavioral Development, 20, 651-665.
45. File, N. (1993). The teacher as guide of children’s competence with peers. Child & Youth Care Forum, 22, 351–360.
46. Fleer, M. (1992). Identifying teacher–child interaction which scaffolds scientific thinking in young children. Science Education, 76, 373–397.
47. Freeman, N. K., & Somerindyke, J. (2001). Social play at the computer: Preschoolers scaffold and support peers’ computer competence. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 13, 203-213.
48. Forman, E. A., & Cazden, C. B. (1994). Exploring Vygotskian perspectives in education: The cognitive value of peer interaction. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.). Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed.) (pp. 155-178). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
49. Forman, E. A., Minick, N., & Stone, C. A. (Eds.). (1993). Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children’s development. New York: Oxford University Press.
50. Gindis, B. (1995a). The social/cultural implication of disability: Vygotsky’s paradigm for special education. Educational Psychologist, 30, 77-81.
51. Gindis, B. (1995b). Viewing the disabled child in the sociocultural milieu: Vygotsky’s quest. School Psychology International, 16 (2), 155-166.
52. Gindis, B. (1999). Vygotsky’s vision: Reshaping the practice of special education for the 21st century. Rase: Remedial & Special Education, 20 (6), 333-340.
53. Glassman, M. (2001). Dewey and Vygotsky: Society, experience, and inquiry in educational practice. Educational Researcher, 30 (4), 3-14.
54. Göncü, A. (1993). Development of intersubjectivity in the dyadic play of preschoolers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 8, 99–116.
55. Göncü, A. (Ed.). (1999). Children’s engagement in the world: Sociocultural perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press.
56. Grigorenko, E. L. (1998). Mastering tools of the mind in school (Trying out Vygotsky’s ideas in classrooms). In R. J. Sternberg & W. M. Williams (Eds.). Intelligence, instruction, and assessment: Theory into practice. (pp. 201-231). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
57. Grigorenko, E. L. (2001). Psychology and educational practice: Snapshots of one relationship. Educational & Child Psychology, 17 (3), 32-50.
58. Grigorenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Dynamic testing. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 75-111.
59. Guthke, J. (1993). Developments in learning potential assessment. In J. H. M. Hamers, K. Sijtsma, & A. J. J. M. Ruijssenaars (Eds.). Learning potential assessment: Theoretical, methodological and practical issues (pp. 43-67). Berlin: Swets & Zeitlinger.
60. Haight, W. L., & Miller, P. J. (1993). Pretending at home: Early development in a sociocultural context. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
61. Haenen, J. (2001). Outlining the teaching-learning process: Piotr Gal’perin’s contribution. Learning & Instruction, 11 (2), 157-170.
62. Hirsh-Pasek, K. (1991). Pressure or challenge in preschool? How academic environments affect children. New Directions for Child Development, 55, 39-47.
63. Hogan, D. M., & Tudge, J. R. H. (1999). Implications of Vygotsky’s theory for peer learning. In A. M. O’Donnell & A. King (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 39-65). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
64. Holzman, L. (2000). Performative psychology: An untapped resource for educators. Educational & Child Psychology, 17 (3), 86-100.
65. Jacob, E. (1997). Context and cognition: Implications for educational innovators and anthropologists. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 28 (1), 3-21.
66. Jacobs, G. M. (2001). Providing the scaffold: A model for early childhood/primary teacher preparation. Early Childhood Education Journal, 29 (2), 125-30.
67. John-Steiner, V., & Mahn, H. (1996). Sociocultural approaches to learning and development: A Vygotskian framework. Educational Psychologist, 31, 191-206.
68. John-Steiner, V., Panofsky, C. P., & Smith, L. W. (Eds.). (1994). Sociocultural approaches to language and literacy: An interactionist perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
69. Jones, G. A., & Thornton, C. A. (1993). Vygotsky revisited: Nurturing young children’s understanding of number. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 15, 18–28.
70. Jones, M. G., Rua, M. J., & Carter, G. (1998). Science teachers’ conceptual growth within Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 967-985.
71. Karasavvidis, I., Pieters, J. M., & Plomp, T. (2000). Investigating how secondary school students learn to solve correlational problems: Quantitative and qualitative discourse approaches to the development of self-regulation. Learning & Instruction, 10, 267-292.
72. Karpov, Y. V., & Bransford, J. D. (1995). L. S. Vygotsky and the doctrine of empirical and theoretical learning. Educational Psychologist, 30(2), 61-66.
73. Kelly, A., & Washtell, A. (1996). “Developmental education” in Russia. Early Child Development & Care, 124, 81-89.
74. Kinginger, C. (2002). Defining the zone of proximal development in US foreign language education. Applied Linguistics, 23, 240-261.
75. Kozulin, A. (1995). The learning process: Vygotsky’s theory in the mirror of its interpretations. School Psychology International, 16, 117-129.
76. Kozulin, A. (1998). Psycholological tools: A sociocultural approach to education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
77. Kozulin, A., & Presseisen, B. Z. (1995). Mediated learning experience and psychological tools: Vygotsky’s and Feuerstein’s perspectives in a study of student learning. Educational Psychologist, 30 (2), 67-75.
78. Kozyrev, A. V., & Turko, P. A. (2000). Professor L. S. Vygotsky’s “pedological school.” Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 38, 59-74.
79. Krafft, K. C., & Berk, L. E. (1998). Private speech in two preschools: Significance of open-ended activities and make-believe play for verbal self-regulation. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 13, 637-658.
80. Kravtsov, G. C., & Berezlizhkovskaya, E. L. (1999). The education of pre-school children. In M. Hedegaard & J. Lompscher (Eds.), Learning activity and development (pp. 311-326). Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
81. Lantolf, J. P., & Appel, G. (Eds.). (1996). Vygotskian approaches to second language research. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
82. Lawrence, J. A., & Valsiner, J. (1993). Conceptual roots of internalization: From transmission to transformation. Human Development, 36, 150–167.
83. Lee, C. D., & Smagorinsky, P. (Eds.). (2000). Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry. New York: Cambridge University Press.
84. Lerman, S. (1996). Intersubjectivity in mathematics learning: A challenge to the radical constructivist paradigm? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27 (2), 133-150.
85. Lerman, S. (2001). Cultural, discursive psychology: A sociocultural approach to studying the teaching and learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46 (1-3), 87-113.
86. Lidz, C. S. (1995). Dynamic assessment and the legacy of L.S. Vygotsky. School Psychology International, 16, 143-153.
87. Llyod, P., & Fernyhough, C. (Eds.). (1999a). Lev Vygotsky: Critical assessments: Volume 1 – Vygotsky’s theory. London: Routledge.
88. Llyod, P., & Fernyhough, C. (Eds.). (1999b). Lev Vygotsky: Critical assessments: Volume 2 – Thought and Language. London: Routledge.
89. Llyod, P., & Fernyhough, C. (Eds.). (1999c). Lev Vygotsky: Critical assessments: Volume 3 — The zone of proximal development. London: Routledge.
90. Llyod, P., & Fernyhough, C. (Eds.). (1999d). Lev Vygotsky: Critical assessments: Volume 4 — Future directions. London: Routledge.
91. Luckin, R. (2001). Designing children’s software to ensure productive interactivity through collaboration in the zone of proximal development (ZPD). Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 57-85.
92. Mahn, H. (1999). Vygotsky’s methodological contribution to sociocultural theory. Rase: Remedial & Special Education, 20 (6), 341-350.
93. Mahn, H., & John-Steiner, V. (2002). The gift of confidence: A Vygotskian view of emotions. In G. Wells & G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21st century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education (pp. 46-58). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
94. Mallory, B. L., & New, R. S. (1994). Social constructivist theory and principles of inclusion: Challenges for early childhood special education. Journal of Special Education, 28 (3), 322-337.
95. Manning, B. H., & Payne, B. D. (1993). A Vygotskian-based theory of teacher cognition: Toward the acquisition of mental reflection and self-regulation. Teaching & Teacher Education, 9 (4), 361-371.
96. Marcon, R. A. (1999). Differential impact of preschool models on development and early learning of inner-city children: A three-cohort study. Developmental Psychology, 35, 358-375.
97. Martin, L. M. W. (2000). The compatibility of Vygotsky’s theoretical framework with the developmental-interaction approach. In N. Nager, E. K. Shapiro (Eds.), Revisiting a progressive pedagogy: The developmental-interaction approach (pp. 73-93). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
98. Mayer, R. E., Schustack, M. W., & Blanton, W. E. (1999). What do children learn from using computers in an informal, collaborative setting? Educational Technology, 9, 27-31
99. Maynard, T. (2001). The student teacher and the school community of practice: A consideration of “learning as participation. Cambridge Journal of Education, 31 (1), 39-52.
100. Meacham, S.J. (2001). Vygotsky and the blues: Re-reading cultural connections and conceptual development. Theory Into Practice, 40 (3), 190-97.
101. Mercer, N. (1994). The quality of talk in children’s joint activity at the computer. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 10, 24-32.
102. Missiuna, C. (1996). Assessing preschool children: Application of dynamic assessment techniques in the classroom. In M.G. Luther (Ed.). Dynamic assessment for instruction: From theory to application (pp. 158-167) Concord, Ontario, Canada: Captus Press.
103. Nassaji, H., & Swain, M. (2000). Vygotskian perspectives on corrective feedback in L2: The effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English articles. Language Awareness, 9 (1), 34-51.
104. Nelson, K. (1996). Language in cognitive development: The emergence of the mediated mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.
105. Newman, F., & Holzman, L. (1993). Lev Vygotsky: Revolutionary scientist. New York: Routledge.
106. Ohta, A. S. (1995). Applying sociocultural theory to an analysis of learner discourse: Learner-learner collaborative interaction in the zone of proximal development. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 6 (2), 93-121.
107. Pange, J., & Kontozisis, D. (2001). Introducing computers to kindergarten children based on Vygotsky’s theory about socio-cultural learning: The Greek perspective. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 193-202.
108. Parrila, R. K. (1995). Vygotskian views on language and planning in children. School Psychology International, 16 (2), 167-183.
109. Pellegrini, A. D. (1998). Play and the assessment of young children. In O. N. Saracho & B. Spodek (Eds.), Multiple perspectives on play in early childhood education (pp. 220-239). Buffalo, NY: SUNY University Press.
110. Popkewitz, T. S. (1998). Dewey, Vygotsky, and the social administration of the individual: Constructivist pedagogy as systems of ideas in historical spaces. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 535-570.
111. Powell, D. R. (1986). Research in review: Effects of program models and teaching practices. Young Children, 41, (6), 60-67.
112. Prawat, R. S. (2000). Dewey meets the “Mozart of Psychology” in Moscow: The untold story. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 663-696.
113. Prior, S. M., & Welling, K. A. (2001). “Read in your head”: A Vygotskian analysis of the transition from oral to silent reading. Reading Psychology, 22 (1), 1-15.
114. Robbins, D. (2001). Vygotsky’s psychology-philosophy: A metaphor for language theory and learning. New York: Plenum.
115. Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.
116. Rogoff, B., Mistry, J., Göncü, A., & Mosier, C. (1993). Guided participation in cultural activity by toddlers and caregivers. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58 (8, Serial No. 236).
117. Rogoff, B., Turkanis, C. G., & Bartlett, L. (2001). Learning together: Children and adults in a school community. New York: Oxford University Press.
118. Roschelle, J., & Teasley, S. (1994). The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O’Malley (Ed.), Computer-supported collaborative learning (pp. 69-97). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
119. Rowlands, S. (2000). Turning Vygotsky on his head: Vygotsky’s “scientifically based method” and the socioculturalist’s “social other.” Science & Education, 9, 537-575.
120. Rudneva, E. I. (2000). Vygotsky’s pedological distortions. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 38, 75-94.
121. Samaras, A. P. (1991). Transitions to competence: An investigation of adult mediation in preschoolers’ self-regulation with a microcomputer-based problem-solving task. Early Education & Development, 2, 181-196.
122. Samaras, A. P. (2000). Scaffolding preservice teachers’ learning. In N.J. Yelland (Ed.), Promoting meaningful learning (pp. 17-24). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
123. Samaras, A. P., & Gismondi, S. (1998). Scaffolds in the field: Vygotskian interpretation in a teacher education program. Teaching & Teacher Education, 14 (7), 715-733.
124. Sawyer, R. K. (1997). Pretend play as improvisation: Conversation in the preschool classroom. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
125. Saxe, G. B., Dawson, V., Fall, R., & Howard, S. (1996). Culture and children’s mathematical thinking. In R. Sternberg & T. Ben-Zeev (Eds.), The nature of mathematical thinking (pp. 119-144). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
126. Saxe, G. B., & Guberman, S R. (1998). Studying mathematics learning in collective activity. Learning and Instruction, 8(6), 489-501.
127. Schinke-Llano, L. (1993). On the value of a Vygotskian framework for SLA theory and research. Language Learning, 43 (1), 121-129.
128. Schinke-Llano, L. (1995). Re-envisioning the second language classroom: A Vygotskian approach. In F.R. Eckman (Ed.). Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy (pp. 21). New York: Plenum.
129. Vygotsky, L. S. (1997b). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky, Volume 4: Problems of the theory and history of psychology (R. W. Rieber & J. Wollock (Eds.), R. Van der Veer (Trans.). New York: Plenum.
130. Vygotsky, L. S. (1997c). Educational psychology. R. Silverman (Trans.). Boca Raton, FL: St. Lucie Press.
131. Vygotsky, L. S. (1998). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky, Volume 5: Child psychology. R.W. Rieber (Ed.). New York: Plenum.
132. Vygotsky, L. S. (1999). The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky, Volume 6: Scientific legacy. R.W. Rieber (Ed.). M.J Hall (Trans.). New York: Plenum.
133. Vygotsky, L. S., & Luria, A. R. (1993). Studies on the history of behavior: Ape, primitive, and child (V. I. Golod & J. E. Knox, Eds. and Trans.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. (Original work published 1930.)
134. Waschescio, U. (1998). The missing link: Social and cultural aspects in social constructivist theories. In F. Seeger, J. Voigt, & U. Waschescio (Eds.) (1998). The culture of the mathematics classroom (pp. 221-241). New York: Cambridge University Press.
135. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. New York: Blackwell.
136. Wells, G., & Claxton, G. (Eds.). (2002). Learning for life in the 21st century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
137. Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind in action. New York: Oxford University Press.
138. Wertsch, J. V., Rio, P., & Alvarez, A. (1995). Sociocultural studies of mind. New York: Cambridge University Press.
139. Winsler, A. (1998). Parent-child interaction and private speech in boys with ADHD. Applied Developmental Science, 2, 17-39.
140. Winsler, A., & Carlton, M. P. (2003). Observations of children’s task activities and social interactions in relation to teacher perceptions in a child-centered preschool: Are we leaving too much to chance? Early Education & Development, 14, 155-178.
141. Winsler, A., Carlton, M. P., & Barry, M. J. (2000). Age-related changes in preschool children’s systematic use of private speech in a natural setting. Journal of Child Language, 27, 665-687.
142. Winsler, A., De León, J. R., Wallace, B., Carlton, M. P, & Willson-Quayle, A. (In press). Private speech in preschool children: Developmental stability and change, across-task consistency, and relations with classroom behavior. Journal of Child Language.
143. Winsler, A., & Diaz, R. M. (1995). Private speech in the classroom: The effects of activity type, presence of others, classroom context, and mixed-age grouping. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 18, 463-488.
144. Winsler, A., Diaz, R. M., Atencio, D. J., McCarthy, E. M., & Adams Chabay, L. (2000). Verbal self-regulation over time in preschool children at-risk for attention and behavior problems. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 41, 875-886.
145. Winsler, A., Diaz, R. M., McCarthy, E. M., Atencio, D., & Adams Chabay, L. (1999). Mother-child interaction, private speech, and task performance in preschool children with behavior problems. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 40, 891-904.
146. Winsler, A., Diaz, R. M., & Montero, I. (1997). The role of private speech in the transition from collaborative to independent task performance in young children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 12, 59-79.
147. Winsler, A., & Naglieri, J. A. (in press). Overt and covert verbal problem-solving strategies: Developmental trends in use, awareness, and relations with task performance in children aged 5 to 17. Child Development.
148. Wood, E., & Bennett, N. (1998). Teachers’ theories of play: Constructivist or social constructivist? Early Child Development & Care, 140, 17-30.
149. Yang, O. S. (2000). Guiding children’s verbal plan and evaluation during free play: An application of Vygotsky’s genetic epistemology to the early childhood classroom. Early Childhood Education Journal, 28 (1), 3-10.
150. Zuckerman, G. A., Chudinova, E. V., & Khavkin, E. E. (1998). Inquiry as a pivotal element of knowledge acquisition within the Vygotskian paradigm: Building a science curriculum for the elementary school. Cognition & Instruction, 16 (2), 201-233.