Dimensions of teacher immediacy as predictors of student learning: A Chinese perspective

Communication Research Reports

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 199-207

  Zhang, Qin ^a   Zhang, Jibiao ^b  

^a FAIRFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CENTRAL CHINA NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Affective Learning; Chinese; Cognitive Learning; Dimensions; Predictors; Teacher Immediacy

Indexed keywords

EID: 85068299439     PISSN: 08824096     EISSN: 17464099     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08824090600796419     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Andersen, J. F., (1979). Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teacher effectiveness. Communication Yearbook, 3, 543–559. [CSA]
2. Andersen, P. A., (1998). The cognitive valence theory of intimate communication. Progress in Communication Sciences, XIV, 39–72. [CSA]
3. Biggs, J. B., & Watkins, D. A., (2001). Insights into teaching the Chinese learner. In D. A., Watkins & J. B., Biggs (Eds.), Teaching the Chinese learner: Psychological and pedagogical perspectives (pp. 277–298). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Center.
4. Burgoon, J. K., (1978). A communication model of personal space violations: Explication and an initial test. Human Communication Research, 4, 129–142. [CROSSREF][CSA]
5. Burgoon, J. K., (1995). Cross-cultural and intercultural applications of expectancy violations theory. In R. L., Wiseman (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory (pp. 194–215). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Cappella, J. N., & Greene, J. O., (1982). A discrepancy-arousal explanation of mutual influence in expressive behavior for adult-adult and infant-adult interaction. Communication Monographs, 49, 89–114. [CSA]
7. Christensen, L. J., & Menzel, K. E., (1998). The linear relationship between student reports of teacher immediacy behaviors and perceptions of state motivation, and of cognitive, affective, and behavioral learning. Communication Education, 47, 82–90. [CSA]
8. Christophel, D. M., (1990). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39, 323–340. [CSA]
9. Frymier, A. B., (1994). A model of immediacy in the classroom. Communication Quarterly, 42, 133–144. [CSA]
10. Gorham, J., (1988). The relationship between verbal immediacy behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 37, 40–53. [CSA]
11. Hess, J. A., & Smythe, M. J., (2001). Is immediacy actually related to student cognitive learning? Communication Studies, 52, 197–219. [CSA]
12. Hinkle, L. J., (1998). Teacher nonverbal immediacy behaviors and student-perceived cognitive learning in Japan. Communication Research Reports, 15, 45–56. [CSA]
13. Johnson, S. C., & Miller, A. N., (2002). A cross-cultural study of immediacy, credibility, and learning in the U.S. and Kenya. Communication Education, 51, 280–292. [CROSSREF][CSA]
14. Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B., (1964). Taxonomy of education objectives, Handbook II: Affective domain. New York: David McKay.
15. McCroskey, J. C., Fayer, J. M., Richmond, V. P., Sallinen, A., & Barraclough, R. A., (1996a). A multi-cultural examination of the relationship between nonverbal immediacy and affective learning. Communication Quarterly, 44, 297–307. [CSA]
16. McCroskey, J. C., Sallinen, A., Fayer, J. M., Richmond, V. P., & Barraclough, R. A., (1996b). Nonverbal immediacy and cognitive learning: A cross-cultural investigation. Communication Education, 4, 200–211. [CSA]
17. Mottet, T. P., & Beebe, S. A., (2006). Foundations of instructional communication. In T. P., Mottet, V. P., Richmond, & J. C., McCroskey (Eds.), Handbook of instructional communication: Rhetorical and relational perspectives (pp. 3–32). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
18. Mottet, T., & Richmond, V., (1998). An inductive analysis of verbal immediacy: Alternative conceptualization of relational verbal approach/avoidance strategies. Communication Quarterly, 46, 25–40. [CSA]
19. Myers, S. A., Zhong, M., & Guan, S., (1998). Instructor immediacy in the Chinese college classroom. Communication Studies, 49, 240–254. [CSA]
20. Neuliep, J. W., (1995). A comparison of teacher immediacy in African-American and Euro-American college classrooms. Communication Education, 44, 267–277. [CSA]
21. Neuliep, J. W., (1997). A cross-cultural comparison of teacher immediacy in American and Japanese college classrooms. Communication Research, 24, 431–451. [CSA]
22. Oetzel, J. G., (1998). The effects of self-construals and ethnicity on self-reported conflict styles. Communication Reports, 11, 133–144. [CSA]
23. Plax, T. G., Kearney, P., McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P., (1986). Power in the classroom VI: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy and affective learning. Communication Education, 35, 43–55. [CSA]
24. Pribyl, C. B., Sakamoto, M., & Keaten, J. A., (2004). The relationship between nonverbal immediacy, student motivation, and perceived cognitive learning among Japanese college students. Japanese Psychological Research, 46, 73–85. [INFOTRIEVE][CROSSREF][CSA]
25. Rencher, A., (1995). Methods of multivariate analysis. New York: John Wiley.
26. Richmond, V. P., Gorham, J. S., & McCroskey, J. C., (1987). The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning. Communication Yearbook, 10, 574–590. [CSA]
27. Richmond, V. P., McCroskey, J. C., & Johnson, A. D., (2003). Development of the nonverbal immediacy scale (NIS): Measures of self- and other-perceived nonverbal immediacy. Communication Quarterly, 51, 504–517. [CSA]
28. Roach, K. D., & Byrne, P. R., (2001). A cross-cultural comparison of instructor communication in American and German classrooms. Communication Education, 50, 1–14. [CSA]
29. Roach, K. D., Cornett-DeVito, M. M., & DeVito, R., (2005). A cross-cultural comparison of instructor communication in American and French classrooms. Communication Quarterly, 53, 87–107. [CSA]
30. Robinson, R. Y., & Richmond, V. P., (1995). Validity of the verbal immediacy scale. Communication Research Reports, 12, 80–84. [CSA]
31. Sanders, J. A., & Wiseman, R. L., (1990). The effects of verbal and nonverbal teacher immediacy on perceived cognitive, affective, and behavioral learning in the multicultural classroom. Communication Education, 39, 341–353. [CSA]
32. Yu, J. H., Keown, C. F., & Jacobs, L. W., (1993). Attitude scale methodology: Cross-cultural implications. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 6, 45–64. [CROSSREF][CSA]
33. Zhang, Q., (2005a). Immediacy, humor, power distance and classroom communication apprehension in Chinese college classrooms. Communication Quarterly, 53, 109–124. [CSA]
34. Zhang, Q., (2005b). Teacher immediacy and classroom communication apprehension: A cross-cultural investigation. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 34, 50–64. [CSA]
35. Zhang, Q., (2006). Immediacy and out-of-class communication: A cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 30, 33–50. [CROSSREF][CSA]
36. Zhang, Q., & Oetzel, J. G., (2006a). Constructing and validating a teacher immediacy scale: A Chinese perspective. Communication Education, 55, 218–241. [CROSSREF][CSA]
37. Zhang, Q., & Oetzel, J. G., (2006b). A cross-cultural test of immediacy-learning models in Chinese classrooms. Communication Education, 55, 313–330. [CROSSREF][CSA]
38. Zhang, Q., & Zhang, J., (2005). Teacher clarity: Effects on classroom communication apprehension, student motivation, and learning in Chinese college classrooms. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 34, 255–266. [CSA]