A cross-cultural comparison of teacher immediacy in American and Japanese college classrooms

Communication Research

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 431-451

  Neuliep, James W ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0031536837     PISSN: 00936502     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/009365097024004006     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Andersen, J. (1979). Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. In D. Nimmo (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 3 (pp. 543-559). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
2. Andersen, J. (1985). Nonverbal immediacy in interpersonal communication. In A. W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.), Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behavior (pp. 1-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3. Andersen, J., Norton, R. W., & Nussbaum, J. F. (1981). Three exploring relationships between perceived teacher communication behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 30, 377-392.
4. Bruning, J. L., & Kintz, B. L. (1968). Computational handbook of statistics. New York: Scott, Foresman.
5. Burgoon, J. K. (1978). A communication model of space violations: Explication and an initial test. Human Communication Research, 4, 129-142.
6. Burgoon, J. K, & Hale, J. L. (1988). Nonverbal expectancy violations: Model elaboration and application to immediacy behaviors. Communication Monographs, 55, 58-79.
7. Burgoon, J. K., & Jones, S. B. (1976). Toward a theory of personal space expectations and their violations. Human Communication Research, 2, 131-146.
8. Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39, 323-340.
9. Collier, M. J., & Powell, R. G. (1986, May). The effect of student culture/ethnicity on judgments of instructional communication. Paper presented at the annual convention of the International Communication Association, Chicago.
10. Comstock, J., Rowell, E., & Bowers, J. W. (1995). Food for thought: Teacher nonverbal immediacy, student learning and curvilinearity. Communication Education, 44, 251-266.
11. Condon, J. C. (1984). With respect to the Japanese: A guide for Americans. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
12. Fayer, J. M., Gorham J., & McCroskey, J. C. (1988). Teacher immediacy and student learning: A comparison between U.S. Mainland and Puerto Rican classrooms. In J. M. Fayer (Ed.), Puerto Rican Communication Studies (pp. 111-126). Caracas: Icanografica.
13. Gorham, J. (1988). The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 37, 40-53.
14. Gorham, J., & Zakahi, W. R. (1990). A comparison of teacher and student perceptions of immediacy and learning: Monitoring process and product. Communication Education, 39, 354-368.
15. Gudykunst, W. B., Matsumoto, Y., Ting-Tbomey, S., Nishida, T., Kim, K., & Heyman, S. (1996). The influence of cultural individualism-collectivism, self-construals, and individual values on communication styles across cultures. Human Communication Research, 22, 510-543.
16. Gudykunst, W. B., & Nishida, T. (1994). Bridging Japanese / North American differences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Gudykunst, W. B., & Ting-Toomey, S. (with Chua, E.). (1988). Cultural and interpersonal communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18. Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press/Doubleday.
19. Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organization: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
20. Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., & Wendt-Wasco, N. J. (1985). Teacher immediacy for affective learning in divergent college classes. Communication Quarterly, 33, 61-74.
21. Keesing, R. M. (1974). Theories of culture. Annual Review of Anthropology, 3, 73-97.
22. McCroskey, J. C., Richmond, V. P., Plax, T. G., & Kearney, P. (1985). Power in the classroom V: Behavior alteration techniques, communication training, and learning. Communication Education, 34, 214-226.
23. McCroskey, J. C., Richmond, V. P., Sallinen, A., Fayer, J. M., & Barraclough, R. A. (1995). A cross-cultural and multi-behavioral analysis of the relationship between nonverbal immediacy and teacher evaluation. Communication Education, 44, 281-291.
24. McCroskey, J. C., Sallinen, A., Fayer, J. M., Richmond, V. P., & Barraclough, R. A. (1996). Nonverbal immediacy and cognitive learning: A cross-cultural analysis. Communication Education, 45, 200-211.
25. Mehrabian, A. (1967). Attitudes inferred from nonimmediacy of verbal communication. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 294-295.
26. Mehrabian, A. (1981). Silent messages: Implicit communication of emotions and attitudes. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
27. Moore, A., Masterson, J. T., Christophel, D. M., & Shea, K. A. (1996). College teacher immediacy and student ratings of instruction. Communication Education, 45, 29-39.
28. Neuliep, J. W., (1995). A comparison of teacher immediacy in African-American and Euro-American college classrooms. Communication Education, 44, 267-277.
29. Okabe, R. (1983). Cultural assumptions of East and West: Japan and the United States. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Intercultural communication theory (pp. 21-44). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
30. Plax, T. G., Kearney, P., McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (1986). Power in the classroom VI: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy and affective learning. Communication Education, 35, 43-55.
31. Powell, R. G., & Harville, B., (1990). The effects of teacher immediacy and clarity on instructional outcomes: An intercultural assessment. Communication Education, 39, 369-379.
32. Richmond, V. P., Gorham, J., & McCroskey, J. C., (1987). The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning. In M. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 10, (pp. 574-590). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33. Sanders, J. A., & Wiseman, R. L. (1990). The effects of verbal and nonverbal immediacy on perceived cognitive, affective, and behavioral learning in the multicultural classroom. Communication Education, 39, 341-353.