Teacher nonverbal immediacy behaviors and student-perceived cognitive learning in Japan

International Journal of Phytoremediation

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 1998, Pages 45-56

  Hinkle, Lois L ^a  

^a WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0942295712     PISSN: 15226514     EISSN: 15497879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08824099809362096     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Andersen, J. F., 1978. The relationship between teacher immediacy and teaching effectiveness, Morgantown: West Virginia University. Unpublished doctoral dissertation
2. Andersen, P. A., 1985. “ Nonverbal immediacy in interpersonal communication ”. In Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behavior, Edited by: Siegman, A. W., and Feldstein, S., 1-36. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. th ed., Edited by: Samovar, L. A., and Porter, R. E., 256-274. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
4. th ed., Edited by: Samovar, L. A., and Porter, R. E., 244-255. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
5. Barnlund, D. C., 1985. Communication styles of Japanese and Americans: Images and realities, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
6. Boyer, L. M., Thompson, C. A., and Klopf, D. W., 1990. An comparison of immediacy among Japanese and Americans. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71: 65-66.
7. Burgoon, J., and Hale, J., 1988. Nonverbal expectancy violations: Model elaboration and application to immediacy behaviors. Communication Monographs, 55: 58-79.
8. Burroughs, N. F., 1990. The relationship of teacher immediacy and student compliance-resistance with learning, Morgantown: West Virginia University. Unpublished doctoral dissertation
9. Christophel, D. M., 1990. The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation and learning. Communication Education, 39: 323-340.
10. Collier, M. J., and Powell, R. G., The effect of student culture/ethnicity on judgments of instructional communication. Paper presented at the annual convention of the International Communication Association. Chicago, IL. May.
11. Frymier, A. B., 1992. The impact of teacher immediacy and affinity-seeking on students’ motivation and learning, West Virginia University. Doctoral dissertation
12. Gorham, J. S., and Zakahi, W. R., 1990. A comparison of teacher and student perceptions of immediacy and learning: Monitoring process and product. Communication Education, 39: 354-368.
13. Hambleton, R. K., and Kanjee, A., 1993. Enhancing the validity of cross-cultural studies: Improvements in instrument translation methods (ERIC Document Reproductive Service No. ED 362 537)
14. Hall, E. T., 1976. Beyond culture, Garden City, NY: Anchor Press.
15. Ikeda, T., and Beebe, S. A., 1992. A review of teacher nonverbal immediacy: Implications for research (ERIC Document Reproductive Service No. ED 349 592)
16. Kelley, D. H., and Gorham, J., 1988. Effects of immediacy on recall of information. Communication Education, 37: 298-306.
17. Klopf, D. W., Thompson, C. A., Ishii, S., and Sallinen-Kuparinen, A., 1991. Nonverbal immediacy differences among Japanese, Finish, and American university students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 73: 209-210.
18. Ma, R., 1990. An exploratory study of discontented responses in American and Chinese relationships. The Southern Communication Journal, 55: 305-318.
19. McCroskey, J. C., 1992. An introduction to communication in the classroom, Edina, MN: Burgess International Group, Inc.
20. McCroskey, J. C., and Richmond, V. P., 1992. “ Increasing teacher influence through immediacy ”. In Power in the classroom: Communication, control and concern Edited by: Richmond, V. P., and McCroskey, J. C., 101-119.
21. McCroskey, J. C., Richmond, V. P., Sallinen, A., Fayer, J. M., and Barraclough, R. A., 1995. A cross-cultural and multi-behavioral analysis of the relationship between nonverbal immediacy and teacher evaluation. Communication Education, 44
22. McCroskey, J. C., Sallinen, A., Fayer, J. M., Richmond, V. P., and Barraclough, R. A., 1996. Nonverbal immediacy and cognitive learning: A cross-culturalinvestigation. Communication Education, 45: 200-211.
23. McDaniel, E. R., 1993. Japanese nonverbal communication: A review and critique of literature (ERIC Document Reproductive Service No. ED 367 014)
24. Mehrabian, A., 1971. Silent messages, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
25. Neuliep, J. W., 1995. A comparison of teacher immediacy in African-American and Euro-American college classrooms. Communication Education, 44: 268-277.
26. Neuliep, J. W., An intercultural comparison of teacher immediacy in American and Japanese college classrooms. Paper presented at the meeting of the International Communication Association. Montreal, Quebec.
27. Plax, T. G., Karney, P., McCroskey, J. C., and Richmond, V. P., 1986. Power in the classroom VI: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immediacy and affective learning. Communication Education, 35: 43-55.
28. Powell, R. G., and Harville, B., 1990. The effects of teacher immediacy and clarity on instructional outcomes: An assessment. Communciation Education, 39: 370-379.
29. Richmond, V. P., 1990. Communication in the classroom: Power and motivation. Communication Education, 29: 181-195.
30. Richmond, V. P., and Gorham, J. S., 1992. Communication, learning, and affect in instruction, Edina, MN: Burgess International Group, Inc.
31. Richmond, V. P., 1992. Nonverbal communication in the classroom, Edina, MN: Burgess International Group, Inc.
32. Richmond, V. P., Gorham, J. S., and McCroskey, J. C., 1987. “ The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning ”. In Communication Yearbook Edited by: McLaughlin, M., Vol. 10, 574-590.
33. Sanders, J. A., and Wiseman, R. L., 1990. The effects of verbal and nonverbal teacher immediacy on perceived cognitive, affective, and behavioral learning in the multi-cultural classroom. Communication Education, 39: 341-353.