A multi-cultural examination of the relationship between nonverbal immediacy and affective learning

International Journal of Phytoremediation

Volumn 44, Issue 3, 1996, Pages 297-307

  McCroskey, James C ^a   Fayer, Joan M ^b   Richmond, Virginia P ^c   Sallinen, Aino ^d   Barraclough, Robert A ^a  

^a WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO   (Puerto Rico)

^c KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ   (Finland)

Author keywords

Affective learning; Australia; Cross cultural; Finland; Immediacy; Instruction; Multi cultural; Puerto Rico

Indexed keywords

EID: 0005591369     PISSN: 15226514     EISSN: 15497879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01463379609370019     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Andersen, J. F., 1978. The relationship between teacher immediacy and teaching effectiveness, Morgantown: West Virginia University. Unpublished doctoral dissertation
2. Andersen, J. F., 1979. “ Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness ”. In Communication Yearbook 3, Edited by: Nimmo, D., 543–559. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
3. Andersen, P., and Andersen, J. F., 1982. “ Nonverbal immediacy in instruction ”. In Communication in the classroom: Original essays, Edited by: Barker, L. L., 98–120. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4. Bruning, J. L., and Kintz, B. L., 1968. Computational handbook of statistics, Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
5. Burroughs, N. F., 1990. The relationship of teacher immediacy and student compliance-resistance with learning, Morgantown: West Virginia University. Unpublished doctoral dissertation
6. Christophel, D. M., 1990a. The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning, Morgantown: West Virginia University. Unpublished doctoral dissertation
7. Christophel, D. M., 1990b. The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 37: 323–340.
8. Frymier, A. B., 1992. The impact of teacher immediacy and affinity-seeking on students’ motivation and learning, Morgantown: West Virginia University. Unpublished doctoral dissertation
9. Frymier, A. B., 1994. A model of immediacy in the classroom. Communication Education, 42: 133–144.
10. Gardner, J., and Andersen, J.F., 1980. The impact of lecturer nonverbal expressiveness on improving mediated instruction. Paper presented to the Eastern Communication Association convention. 1980, Ocean City, MD.
11. Gorham, J., and Zakahi, W. R., 1990. A comparison of teacher and student perceptions of immediacy and learning: Monitoring process and product. Communication Education, 39: 354–368.
12. Hurt, H. T., Scott, M D., and McCroskey, J. C., 1978. Communication in the Classroom, Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.
13. McCroskey, J. C., and Richmond, V. P., 1992. “ Increasing teacher influence through immediacy ”. In Power in the classroom: Communication, control, and concern, Edited by: Richmond, V. P., and McCroskey, J. C., 101–119. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. Mehrabian, A., 1969. Some referents and measures of nonverbal behavior. Behavioral Research Methods and Instrumentation, 1: 213–217.
15. Mehrabian, A., 1971. Silent messages, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
16. Plax, T. G., Kearney, P., McCroskey, J. C., and Richmond, V. P., 1986. Power in the classroom VI: Verbal control strategies, nonverbal immedicy, and affective learning. Communication Education, 35: 43–55.
17. Powell, R. G., and Harville, B., 1990. The effects of teacher immediacy and clarity on instructional outcomes: An intercultural assessment. Communication Education, 39: 369–379.
18. Richmond, V. P., 1990. Communication in the classroom: Power and motivation. Communication Education, 39: 181–195.
19. Richmond, V. P., Gorham, J. S., and McCroskey, J. C., 1987. “ The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning ”. In Communication yearbook 10, Edited by: McLaughlin, M. A., 574–590. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20. Sallinen-Kuparinen, A., 1986. “ Finnish communication reticence: Perceptions and self-reported behavior ”. In Studia Philologica Jyvaskylaensia, Vol. 19, Jyvaskyla: University of Jyvaskyla.
21. Sallinen-Kuparinen, A., 1992. Teacher communicator style. Communication Education, 41: 153–166.
22. Sanders, J. A., and Wiseman, R. L., 1990. The effects of verbal and nonverbal teacher immediacy on perceived cognitive, affective, and behavioral learning in the multicultural classroom. Communication Education, 39: 341–353.
23. Thomas, C. E., 1994. An analysis of teacher socio-communicative style as a predictor of classroom communication behaviors, student liking, motivation, and learning, Morgantown: West Virginia University. Unpublished doctoral dissertation
24. Thomas, C. E., Richmond, V. P., and McCroskey, J. C., 1994. The association between immediacy and socio-communicative style. Communication Research Reports, 77: 107–114.
25. Thompson, C. C., 1992. The relationships among teachers’ immediacy behaviors, credibility, and social style and students’ motivation and learning: Comparisons among cultures, Morgantown: West Virginia University. Unpublished doctoral dissertation
26. Werner, O., and Campbell, D., 1970. “ Translating, working through interpreters, and the problems of decentering ”. In A handbook of method in cultural anthropology, Edited by: Naroll, R., and Cohen, R., 398–420. New York: American Museum of History.