The relationship between nonverbal immediacy, student motivation, and perceived cognitive learning among Japanese college students

Japanese Psychological Research

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 73-85

  Pribyl, Charles B ^a   Sakamoto, Masahiro ^b   Keaten, James A ^c  

^a Japan Perf Management Consulting   (Japan)

^b BUNKYO GAKUIN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Nonverbal immediacy; Perceived cognitive learning; Student motivation

Indexed keywords

EID: 3042654727     PISSN: 00215368     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0021-5368.2004.00238.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Andersen, J. F. (1979). Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. In D. Nimmo (Ed.), Communication yearbook 3 (pp. 153-180). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
2. Andersen, P. A. (1985). Nonverbal immediacy in interpersonal communication. In A. W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.), Multichannel integrations of nonverbal behavior (pp. 1-36). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137-164). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4. Chesebro, J. L., & McCroskey, J. C. (2000). The relationship between students' reports of learning and their actual recall of lecture material: a validity test. Communication Education, 49, 297-301.
5. Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationship among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39, 323-340.
6. Gorham, J. (1988). The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 37, 40-53.
7. Grant, B. M., & Hennings, D. G. (1971). The teacher moves: An analysis of nonverbal activity. New York: Teachers College Press.
8. Guilford, J. P., & Fruchter, B. (1973). Fundamental statistics in psychology and education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
9. Hall, E. T. (1976), Beyond culture. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
10. Kearney, P. (1994). Nonverbal immediacy behaviors instrument. In R. B. Rubin, P. Palmgreen & H. E. Sypher (Eds.), Communication research measures: A sourcebook (pp. 238-241). New York: Guilford.
11. Kearney, P., Plax, T. G., Smith, V. R., & Sorensen, G. (1988). Effects of teacher immediacy and strategy type on college student resistance to on-task demands. Communication Education, 37, 54-67.
12. Keaten, J. A., Kelly, L., & Pribyl, C. B. (1997). Communication apprehension in Japan: Grade school through secondary school. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 21, 319-343.
13. Kelly, C., & Adachi, N. (1993). The chrysanthemum maze: Your Japanese colleagues. In P. Wadden (Ed.), A handbook for teaching English at Japanese colleges and universities (pp. 156-171). New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Kudoh, T., & Matsumoto, D. (1985). Cross-cultural examination of the semantic dimensions of body postures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1440-1446.
15. Larson, M. L. (1984). Meaning-based translation: A guide to cross-language equivalence. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
16. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1983). Social desirability scales: More substance than style. Journal of Consulting Clinical Psychology, 51, 882-888
17. McCroskey, J. C., Andersen, J. F., Richmond, V. P., & Wheeless, L. R. (1981). Communication apprehension of elementary and secondary students and teachers. Communication Education, 30, 122-132.
18. McCroskey, J. C., Richmond, V. P., Plax, T. G., & Kearney, P. (1985). Power in the classroom V: Behavioral alteration techniques, communication training and learning. Communication Education, 34, 214-226.
19. McCroskey, J. C., Richmond, V. P., Sallinen, A., Payer, J. A., & Barraclough, R. A. (1995). Analysis of the relationship between nonverbal immediacy and teacher evaluation. Communication Education, 44, 281-291.
20. Mehrabian, A. (1971). Silent messages. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
21. Moore, A., Masterson, J. T., Christophel, D. M., & Shea, K. A. (1996). College teacher immediacy and student ratings of instruction. Communication Education, 45, 29-39.
22. Neuliep, J. W. (1997). A cross-cultural comparison of teacher immediacy in American and Japanese college classrooms. Communication Research, 24, 431-451.
23. Powell, R. G., & Harville, B. (1990). The effects of teacher immediacy and clarity on instructional outcomes: An intercultural assessment. Communication Education, 39, 369-379.
24. Richmond, V. P., Gorham, J. S., & McCroskey, J. C. (1987). The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and cognitive learning. In M. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook 10 (pp. 188-198). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
25. Rubin, R. B., Palmgreen, P., & Sypher, H. E. (1994). Communication research measures: A sourcebook. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
26. Samovar, L. A., Porter, R. E., & Stefani, L. (1997). Communication between cultures. 3rd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
27. Ting-Toomey, S. (1988). A face negotiation theory. In Y. Kim & W. Gudykunst (Eds.), Theories in intercultural communication. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28. Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29. White, M. (1987). The Japanese educational challenge. Tokyo: Kondansha International.