Inherited allelic variants and novel karyotype changes influence fertility and genome stability in Brassica allohexaploids

New Phytologist

Volumn 223, Issue 2, 2019, Pages 965-978

  Gaebelein, Roman ^a   Schiessl, Sarah V ^a   Samans, Birgit ^b   Batley, Jacqueline ^c   Mason, Annaliese S ^a  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b TECHNISCHE HOCHSCHULE MITTELHESSEN   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

allopolyploids; Brassica; cytogenetics; genome evolution; meiosis genes; subgenome fractionation

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; CHROMOSOME; CYTOGENETICS; FERTILITY; FRACTIONATION; GENE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC MARKER; GENOME; GENOMICS; HERB; HYBRID; KARYOTYPE; MOLECULAR ANALYSIS; MUTATION; POLYPLOIDY;

BRASSICA;

ALLELE; BRASSICA; CHROMOSOME DELETION; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; FERTILITY; GENE DOSAGE; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE REARRANGEMENT; GENE TRANSLOCATION; GENETIC CROSS; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; INHERITANCE; KARYOTYPE; MEIOSIS; PLANT CHROMOSOME; PLANT GENOME; PLANT SEED; POLYPLOIDY;

ALLELES; BRASSICA; CHROMOSOME DELETION; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; CHROMOSOMES, PLANT; CROSSES, GENETIC; FERTILITY; GENE DOSAGE; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE REARRANGEMENT; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME, PLANT; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; INHERITANCE PATTERNS; KARYOTYPE; MEIOSIS; POLYPLOIDY; SEEDS; TRANSLOCATION, GENETIC;

EID: 85065030193     PISSN: 0028646X     EISSN: 14698137     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/nph.15804     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. Journal of Molecular Biology 215: 403–410.
2. Arumugam N, Mukhopadhyay A, Gupta V, Pental D, Pradhan AK. 1996. Synthesis of hexaploid (AABBCC) somatic hybrids: a bridging material for transfer of ‘tour’ cytoplasmic male sterility to different Brassica species. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 92: 762–768.
3. Aulchenko YS, Ripke S, Isaacs A, Van Duijn CM. 2007. GenABEL: an R library for genome-wide association analysis. Bioinformatics 23: 1294–1296.
4. Bayer PE, Hurgobin B, Golicz AA, Chan CKK, Yuan YX, Lee H, Renton M, Meng JL, Li RY, Long Y et al. 2017. Assembly and comparison of two closely related Brassica napus genomes. Plant Biotechnology Journal 15: 1602–1610.
5. Bhullar R, Nagarajan R, Bennypaul H, Sidhu GK, Sidhu G, Rustgi S, von Wettstein D, Gill KS. 2014. Silencing of a metaphase I-specific gene results in a phenotype similar to that of the Pairing homeologous 1 (Ph1) gene mutations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 111: 14187–14192.
6. Chalhoub B, Denoeud F, Liu S, Parkin IAP, Tang H, Wang X, Chiquet J, Belcram H, Tong C, Samans B et al. 2014. Early allopolyploid evolution in the post-Neolithic Brassica napus oilseed genome. Science 345: 950–953.
7. Chen CB, Marcus A, Li WX, Hu Y, Calzada JPV, Grossniklaus U, Cyr RJ, Ma H. 2002. The Arabidopsis ATK1 gene is required for spindle morphogenesis in male meiosis. Development 129: 2401–2409.
8. Cheng F, Sun RF, Hou XL, Zheng HK, Zhang FL, Zhang YY, Liu B, Liang JL, Zhuang M, Liu YX et al. 2016. Subgenome parallel selection is associated with morphotype diversification and convergent crop domestication in Brassica rapa and Brassica oleracea. Nature Genetics 48: 1218–1224.
9. Cifuentes M, Eber F, Lucas MO, Lode M, Chevre AM, Jenczewski E. 2010a. Repeated polyploidy drove different levels of crossover suppression between homoeologous chromosomes in Brassica napus allohaploids. Plant Cell 22: 2265–2276.
10. Cifuentes M, Grandont L, Moore G, Chèvre AM, Jenczewski E. 2010b. Genetic regulation of meiosis in polyploid species: new insights into an old question. New Phytologist 186: 29–36.
11. Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, Albers CA, Banks E, DePristo MA, Handsaker RE, Lunter G, Marth GT, Sherry ST et al. 2011. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27: 2156–2158.
12. De Muyt A, Pereira L, Vezon D, Chelysheva L, Gendrot G, Chambon A, Laine-Choinard S, Pelletier G, Mercier R, Nogue F et al. 2009. A high throughput genetic screen identifies new early meiotic recombination functions in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genetics 5: e1000654.
13. De Storme N, Mason AS. 2014. Plant speciation through chromosome instability and ploidy change: cellular mechanisms, molecular factors and evolutionary relevance. Current Plant Biology 1: 10–33.
14. Diaz M, Pecinka A. 2018. Scaffolding for repair: understanding molecular functions of the SMC5/6 complex. Genes 9: E36.
15. Emery M, Willis MMS, Hao Y, Barry K, Oakgrove K, Peng Y, Schmutz J, Lyons E, Pires JC, Edger PP et al. 2018. Preferential retention of genes from one parental genome after polyploidy illustrates the nature and scope of the genomic conflicts induced by hybridization. PLoS Genetics 14: e1007267.
16. FitzJohn RG, Armstrong TT, Newstrom-Lloyd LE, Wilton AD, Cochrane M. 2007. Hybridisation within Brassica and allied genera: evaluation of potential for transgene escape. Euphytica 158: 209–230.
17. Frandsen KJ. 1947. The experimental formation of Brassica napus L. var. oleifera DC. and Brassica carinata Braun. Dansk botanisk arkiv 12: 1–16.
18. Gaebelein R, Mason AS. 2018. Allohexaploids in the genus Brassica. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 37: 422–437.
19. Gaeta RT, Pires JC, Iniguez-Luy F, Leon E, Osborn TC. 2007. Genomic changes in resynthesized Brassica napus and their effect on gene expression and phenotype. Plant Cell 19: 3403–3417.
20. Grandke F, Snowdon R, Samans B. 2017. gsrc: an R package for genome structure rearrangement calling. Bioinformatics 33: 545–546.
21. Grandont L, Cuñado N, Coriton O, Huteau V, Eber F, Chèvre AM, Grelon M, Chelysheva L, Jenczewski E. 2014. Homoeologous chromosome sorting and progression of meiotic recombination in Brassica napus: ploidy does matter! Plant Cell 26: 1448–1463.
22. Griffiths S, Sharp R, Foote TN, Bertin I, Wanous M, Reader S, Colas I, Moore G. 2006. Molecular characterization of Ph1 as a major chromosome pairing locus in polyploid wheat. Nature 439: 749–752.
23. Gupta M, Atri C, Agarwal N, Banga SS. 2016. Development and molecular-genetic characterization of a stable Brassica allohexaploid. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 129: 2085–2100.
24. Henry IM, Dilkes BP, Tyagi A, Gao J, Christensen B, Comai L. 2014. The BOY NAMED SUE quantitative trait locus confers increased meiotic stability to an adapted natural allopolyploid of Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 26: 181–194.
25. Howard HW. 1942. The effect of polyploidy and hybridity on seed size in crosses between Brassica chinensis, B. carinata, amphidiploid B. chinensis-carinata and autotetraploid B. chinensis. Journal of Genetics 43: 105–119.
26. Iwasa S. 1964. Cytogenetic studies on the artificially raised trigenomic hexaploid hybrid forms in the genus Brassica. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University 13: 309–352.
27. Jenczewski E, Eber F, Grimaud A, Huet S, Lucas MO, Monod H, Chèvre AM. 2003. PrBn, a major gene controlling homeologous pairing in oilseed rape (Brassica napus) haploids. Genetics 164: 645–653.
28. Jiao YN, Wickett NJ, Ayyampalayam S, Chanderbali AS, Landherr L, Ralph PE, Tomsho LP, Hu Y, Liang HY, Soltis PS et al. 2011. Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms. Nature 473: 97–100.
29. Lagercrantz U, Lydiate DJ. 1996. Comparative genome mapping in Brassica. Genetics 144: 1903–1910.
30. Leitch AR, Leitch IJ. 2008. Genomic plasticity and the diversity of polyploid plants. Science 320: 481–483.
31. Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, Subgroup GPDP. 2009. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25: 2078–2079.
32. Li RQ, Yu C, Li YR, Lam TW, Yiu SM, Kristiansen K, Wang J. 2009. SOAP2: an improved ultrafast tool for short read alignment. Bioinformatics 25: 1966–1967.
33. Lightfoot J, Testori S, Barroso C, Martinez-Perez E. 2011. Loading of meiotic cohesin by SCC-2 is required for early processing of DSBs and for the DNA damage checkpoint. Current Biology 21: 1421–1430.
34. Liu SY, Liu YM, Yang XH, Tong CB, Edwards D, Parkin IAP, Zhao MX, Ma JX, Yu JY, Huang SM et al. 2014. The Brassica oleracea genome reveals the asymmetrical evolution of polyploid genomes. Nature Communications 5: 3930.
35. Liu Z, Adamczyk K, Manzanares-Dauleux M, Eber F, Lucas M-O, Delourme R, Chèvre AM, Jenczewski E. 2006. Mapping PrBn and other quantitative trait loci responsible for the control of homeologous chromosome pairing in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) haploids. Genetics 174: 1583–1596.
36. Lloyd A, Blary A, Charif D, Charpentier C, Tran J, Balzergue S, Delannoy E, Rigaill G, Jenczewski E. 2018. Homoeologous exchanges cause extensive dosage-dependent gene expression changes in an allopolyploid crop. New Phytologist 217: 367–377.
37. Lloyd A, Bomblies K. 2016. Meiosis in autopolyploid and allopolyploid Arabidopsis. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 30: 116–122.
38. Lloyd AH, Ranoux M, Vautrin S, Glover N, Fourment J, Charif D, Choulet F, Lassalle G, Marande W, Tran J et al. 2014. Meiotic gene evolution: can you teach a new dog new tricks? Molecular Biology and Evolution 31: 1724–1727.
39. Mallet J. 2007. Hybrid speciation. Nature Reviews 446: 279–283.
40. Mason AS, Higgins EE, Snowdon RJ, Batley J, Stein A, Werner C, Parkin IAP. 2017. A user guide to the Brassica 60K Illumina Infinium (TM) SNP genotyping array. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 130: 621–633.
41. Mason AS, Nelson MN, Yan GJ, Cowling WA. 2011. Production of viable male unreduced gametes in Brassica interspecific hybrids is genotype specific and stimulated by cold temperatures. BMC Plant Biology 11: 103.
42. Mason AS, Takahira J, Atri C, Samans B, Hayward A, Cowling WA, Batley J, Nelson MN. 2015. Microspore culture reveals complex meiotic behaviour in a trigenomic Brassica hybrid. BMC Plant Biology 15: 173.
43. Mason AS, Yan GJ, Cowling WA, Nelson MN. 2012. A new method for producing allohexaploid Brassica through unreduced gametes. Euphytica 186: 277–287.
44. Mizushima U, Katsuo K. 1953. On the fertility of artificial amphidiploid between Brassica nigra Koch and B. oleracea L. Tohoku Journal of Agricultural Research 4: 1–14.
45. 1 hybrids of B. juncea and B. nigra. Cytologia 6: 62–67.
46. Nagaharu U. 1935. Genome-analysis in Brassica with special reference to the experimental formation of B. napus and peculiar mode of fertilization. Japanese Journal of Botany 7: 389–452.
47. Olsson G. 1960a. Species crosses within the genus Brassica I. Artificial Brassica juncea Coss. Hereditas 46: 171–223.
48. Olsson G. 1960b. Species crosses within the genus Brassica II. Artificial Brassica napus L. Hereditas 46: 351–386.
49. Parkin IA, Koh C, Tang H, Robinson SJ, Kagale S, Clarke WE, Town CD, Nixon J, Krishnakumar V, Bidwell SL et al. 2014. Transcriptome and methylome profiling reveals relics of genome dominance in the mesopolyploid Brassica oleracea. Genome Biology 15: R77.
50. Pawlowski WP, Golubovskaya IN, Cande WZ. 2003. Altered nuclear distribution of recombination protein RAD51 in maize mutants suggests the involvement of RAD51 in meiotic homology recognition. Plant Cell 15: 1807–1816.
51. Péle A, Rousseau-Gueutin M, Chèvre AM. 2018. Speciation success of polyploid plants closely relates to the regulation of meiotic recombination. Frontiers in Plant Science 9: 907.
52. Prakash S. 1973. Artificial synthesis of Brassica juncea Coss. Genetica 44: 249–263.
53. Prakash S, Takahata Y, Kirti PB, Chopra VL. 1999. Cytogenetics. In: Gómez-Campo C, ed. Biology of Brassica coenospecies. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier Science B.V., 59–106.
54. Quinlan AR. 2014. BEDTools: the Swiss-Army tool for genome feature analysis. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics 47: 11.12.11–11.12.34.
55. R Core Team 2018. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. v.3.4.4. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
56. Samans B, Chalhoub B, Snowdon RJ. 2017. Surviving a genome collision: genomic signatures of allopolyploidization in the recent crop species Brassica napus. Plant Genome 10. doi: 10.3835/plantgenome2017.02.0013.
57. Schiessl SV, Huettel B, Kuehn D, Reinhardt R, Snowdon RJ. 2017. Post-polyploidisation morphotype diversification associates with gene copy number variation. Scientific Reports 7: 41845.
58. Schiessl S-V, Katche E, lhien E, Singh Chawla H, Mason AS. 2019. The role of genomic structural variation in the genetic improvement of polyploid crops. Crop Journal 7: 127–140.
59. Schubert V. 2009. SMC proteins and their multiple functions in higher plants. Cytogenetic and Genome Research 124: 202–214.
60. Schubert V, Weissleder A, Ali H, Fuchs J, Lermontova I, Meister A, Schubert I. 2009. Cohesin gene defects may impair sister chromatid alignment and genome stability in Arabidopsis thaliana. Chromosoma 118: 591–605.
61. Song KM, Lu P, Tang KL, Osborn TC. 1995. Rapid genome change in synthetic polyploids of Brassica and its implications for polyploid evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 92: 7719–7723.
62. Song QX, Chen ZJ. 2015. Epigenetic and developmental regulation in plant polyploids. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 24: 101–109.
63. Struss D, Bellin U, Röbbelen G. 1991. Development of B-genome chromosome addition lines of B. napus using different interspecific Brassica hybrids. Plant Breeding 106: 209–214.
64. Szadkowski E, Eber F, Huteau V, Lodé M, Huneau C, Belcram H, Coriton O, Manzanares-Dauleux MJ, Delourme R, King GJ et al. 2010. The first meiosis of resynthesized Brassica napus, a genome blender. New Phytologist 186: 102–112.
65. Vergara IA, Frech C, Chen N. 2012. CooVar: co-occurring variant analyzer. BMC Research Notes 5: 615.
66. Wang XW, Wang HZ, Wang J, Sun RF, Wu J, Liu SY, Bai YQ, Mun JH, Bancroft I, Cheng F et al. 2011. The genome of the mesopolyploid crop species Brassica rapa. Nature Genetics 43: 1035–1039.
67. Wendel JF, Lisch D, Hu GJ, Mason AS. 2018. The long and short of doubling down: polyploidy, epigenetics, and the temporal dynamics of genome fractionation. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 49: 1–7.
68. Woodhouse MR, Cheng F, Pires JC, Lisch D, Freeling M, Wang XW. 2014. Origin, inheritance, and gene regulatory consequences of genome dominance in polyploids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 111: 5283–5288.
69. Xiong ZY, Gaeta RT, Pires JC. 2011. Homoeologous shuffling and chromosome compensation maintain genome balance in resynthesized allopolyploid Brassica napus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 108: 7908–7913.
70. Yang J, Liu D, Wang X, Ji C, Cheng F, Liu B, Hu Z, Chen S, Pental D, Ju Y et al. 2016. The genome sequence of allopolyploid Brassica juncea and analysis of differential homoeolog gene expression influencing selection. Nature Genetics 48: 1225–1232.