Complexity theory

The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 73-90

  Larsen Freeman, Diane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85064360645     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203808184     Document Type: Chapter

References (74)

1. Atkinson, D., Churchill, E., Nishino, T., and Okada, H. (2007). Alignment and interaction in a sociocognitive approach to second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal 169—88.
2. Bates, E. and Elman, J. (2000). The ontogeny and phylogeny of language: A neural network perspective. In S. T. Parker and J. Langer (Eds.), Biology, brains, and behavior: The evolution of human development (pp. 89—130). Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.
3. Beckner, C., Blythe, R., Bybee, J., Christiansen, M. H., Croft, W., Ellis, N. C., Holland, J., Ke, J., Larsen-Freeman, D., and Schonemann, T. (2009). Language is a complex adaptive system: Position paper. Language Learning, 59 (Supplement 1), 1—27.
4. Bley-Vroman, R. (1983). The comparative fallacy in interlanguage studies: The case of systematicity Language Learning, 33, 1—17.
5. Bybee, J. (2006). From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82, 711—733.
6. Celce-Murcia, M. and Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). The grammar book. Boston: Heinle/Cengage.
7. Chomsky, N. (1959). A review of B. F. Skinner’s verbal behavior. Language, 34(1), 26—58.
8. Christiansen, M. H. and Chater, N. (Eds.). (2001). Connectionist psycholinguistics. Westport, CO: Ablex.
9. Cooper, D. (1999). Linguistic attractors: The cognitive dynamics of language acquisition and change. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
10. de Bot, K. (2008). Second language development as a dynamic process. The Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 166-178.
11. de Bot, K., Lowie, W., and Verspoor, M. (2005). Second language acquisition: An advanced resource book. London: Routledge.
12. de Bot, K., Lowie, W., and Verspoor, M. (2007). A dynamic systems approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 7-21, 51-55.
13. Dornyei, Z. (2009a). The psychology of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Dornyei, Z. (2009b). Individual differences: Interplay of learner characteristics and learning environment. Language Learning, 59, 230-248.
15. Ellis, N. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143-88.
16. Ellis, N. C. (2006). Selective attention and transfer phenomena in SLA: Contingency, cue competition, salience, interference, overshadowing, blocking, and perceptual learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 1-31.
17. Ellis, N. C. and Ferreira-Junior, F. (2009). Construction learning as a function of frequency, frequency distribution, and function. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 370-386.
18. Ellis, N. C. and Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). Language emergence: Implications for applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 27(4), 558-589.
19. Ellis, N. C. and Larsen-Freeman, D. (2009). Constructing a second language: Analyses and computational simulations ofthe emergence of linguistic constructions from usage. Language Learning, 59 (Supplement 1), 93-128.
20. Ellis, R. and Barkhuizen, G. (2005). Analysing learner language, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Elman, J., Bates, E., Johnson, M., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., and Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
22. Erdi, P. (2007). Complexity explained. New York: Springer.
23. Evans, J. (2007). The emergence of language: A dynamical systems account. In E. Hoff and M. Shatz (Eds.), Handbook of language development. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
24. Feldman, J. (2006). From molecule to metaphor. Cambridge, MA: Bradford/MIT Books.
25. Gershkoff-Stowe, L. and Thelen, E. (2004). U-shaped changes in behavior: A dynamic systems approach. Journal of Cognition and Development, 5, 11-36.
26. Gleick, J. (1987). Chaos: Making a new science. New York: Penguin Books.
27. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis. London: Harper and Row.
28. Goldberg, A. (2006). Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Hall, N. (Ed.). (1993). Exploring Chaos: A Guide to the new science of disorder. New York: Norton and Company.
30. Herdina, P. and Jessner, U. (2002). A dynamic model of multilingualism. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
31. Hopper, P. (1988). Emergent grammar and the a priori grammar postulate. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Linguistics in context: Connecting observation and understanding. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Company.
32. Jessner, U. (2008). A DST model of multilingualism and the role of metalinguistic awareness. The Modern Language Journal,92(ii), 270—283.
33. Johnson, N. (2007). Simply complexity. Oxford: Oneworld Publications.
34. Kramsch, C. (Ed.). (2002). Language acquisition and language socialization. London: Continuum.
35. Kramsch, C. (2008). Ecological perspectives on foreign language education. Language Teacher, 41(3), 389-408.
36. Kramsch, C. and Whiteside, A. (2008). Language ecology in multilingual settings: Towards a theory of symbolic competence. Applied Linguistics, 29(4), 645-671.
37. Kretzschmar, W. (2009). The linguistics of speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Larsen-Freeman, D. (1976). An explanation for the morpheme acquisition order of second language learners. Language Learning, 26, 125-34.
39. Larsen-Freeman, D. (1995). On the Teaching and Learning of Grammar: Challenging the Myths. In F. Eckman, D. Highland, P. Lee, J. Mileham, and R. Rutkowski Weber (Eds.), Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
40. Larsen-Freeman, D. (1997). Chaos/complexity science and second language acquisition. Applied Linguistics,18, 141-65.
41. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2002a). Language acquisition and language use from a chaos/complexity theory perspective. In C. Kramsch (Ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization. London: Continuum.
42. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2002b). The grammar of choice. In E. Hinkel and S. Fotos (Eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2003). Teaching language: From grammar to grammaring. Boston: Heinle/Cengage.
44. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2005). Second language acquisition and the issue of fossilization: There is no end, and there is no state. In Z-H. Han and T. Odlin (Eds.), Studies of fossilization in second language acquisition. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
45. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27, 590-619.
46. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2007). Reflecting on the cognitive-social debate in second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 91 (focus volume), 773-787.
47. Larsen-Freeman, D. (2010). The dynamic co-adaption of cognitive and social views: A complexity theory perspective. In R. Batstone (Ed.), Sociocognitive perspective on language use and language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48. Larsen-Freeman, D. and Cameron, L. (2008). Complex systems and applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49. Lee, N. and Schumann, J. (2005). Neurobiological and evolutionary bases for child language acquisition abilities. Paper presented at the 14th World Congress of Applied Linguistics, AILA 2005, Madison, Wisconsin, July.
50. Lemke, J. (2002). Language development and identity: Multiple timescales in the social ecology of learning. In C. Kramsch (Ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization. London: Continuum.
51. MacWhinney, B. (1997). Implicit and explicit processes: Commentary. Studies in Second Language Acquisition,19, 277-281.
52. Macqueen, S. M. (2009). Patterns in second language writing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
53. Meara, P. (2004). Modelling vocabulary loss. Applied Linguistics,25, 137-55.
54. Meara, P. (2006). Emergent properties of multilingual lexicons. Applied Linguistics, 27, 620-44.
55. Meisel, J., Clahsen, H., and Pienemann, M. (1981). On determining developmental stages in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 3(2), 109-135.
56. Milroy, J. and Milroy, L. 1999. Authority in language. Third Edition, New York: Routledge.
57. Ortega, L. (2010). The bilingual turn in SLA. Plenary delivered at the Annual Conference of the American Association for Applied Linguistics. Atlanta, GA, March 8.
58. Rumelhart, D., and McClelland, J. (1986). On learning the past tenses of English verbs. In J. McClelland, D. Rumelhart, and the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition. Volume 2: Psychological and biological models (pp. 216-271). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
59. Sealey, A. (2009). Probabilities and surprises: A realist approach to identifying linguistic and social patterns, with reference to an oral history corpus. Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 215-235.
60. Smith, L., and Breazeal, C. (2007). The dynamic lift of developmental process. Developmental Science, 10(1), 61-68.
61. Spivey, M. (2007). The continuity of mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
62. Thelen, E. and Bates, E. (2003). Connectionism and dynamic systems: Are they really different? Developmental Science,6, 378-391.
63. Thelen, E. and Corbetta, D. (2002). Microdevelopment and dynamic systems: Applications to infant motor development. In N. Granott and J. Parziale (Eds.), Microdevelopment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64. Thelen, E. and Smith, L. (1994). A dynamicsystems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
65. Todeva, E. (2009). Multilingualism as a kaleidoscopic experience: The mini universes within. In E. Todeva and J. Cenoz (Eds.), The multiple realities of multilingualism (pp. 53-74). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
66. Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
67. Tucker, M., and Hirsh-Pasek, K. (1993). Systems and language: Implications for acquisition. In L. Smith and E. Thelen (Eds.), A dynamic systems approach to development: Applications (pp. 359-384). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
68. Waldrop, M. (1992). Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. New York: Simon and Schuster.
69. Weaver, W. (1948). Science and complexity. American Scientist,36 (4), 536-544.
70. van Geert, P. (1991). A dynamic systems model of cognitive and language growth. Psychological Review, 98, 3-53.
71. van Geert, P. (2003). Dynamic systems approaches and modeling of developmental processes. InJ. Valsiner and K. Connolly (Eds.), Handbook of developmental psychology. London: Sage.
72. van Geert, P. and van Dijk, M. (2002). Focus on variability: New tools to study intra-individual variability in developmental data. Infant Behavior and Development, 25, 340-374.
73. van Gelder, T. and Port, R. (1995). It’s about time: An overview of the dynamical approach to cognition. In R. Port and T. van Gelder (Eds.), Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
74. von Bertalanffy, L. (1950). An outline of general systems theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 1, 134-165.