Citizen social science for more integrative and effective climate action: A science-policy perspective

Frontiers in Environmental Science

Volumn 7, Issue FEB, 2019, Pages

  Kythreotis, Andrew P ^a,b,c   Mantyka Pringle, Chrystal ^d,e   Mercer, Theresa G ^a   Whitmarsh, Lorraine E ^b,c   Corner, Adam ^c,f   Paavola, Jouni ^g   Chambers, Chris ^c   Miller, Byron A ^h   Castree, Noel ^i,j  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LINCOLN   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^c CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d University of Saskatchewan   (Canada)

^e Wildlife Conservation Society Canada   (Canada)

^f Climate Outreach and Information Network (COIN)   (United Kingdom)

^g UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^h UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^j UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

more..

Author keywords

Citizen agency and behavior; Citizen Social Science; Climate policy and governance; Co production and co learning; Science policy

Indexed keywords

EID: 85063511537     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2296665X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2019.00010     Document Type: Review

References (107)

1. Abbott, K. W. (2017). Orchestration: strategic ordering in polycentric climate governance. SSRN Electron. J. 30. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.10435.60962
2. Alston, M. (2014). Gender mainstreaming and climate change. Womens Stud. Int. Forum 47, 287-294. doi: 10.1016/j.wsif.2013.01.016
3. Anderson, K. (2015). Duality in climate science. Nat. Geosci. 8, 898-900. doi: 10.1038/ngeo2559
4. Bäckstrand, K., and Lövbrand, E. (2016). The road to paris: contending climate governance discourses in the post-copenhagen era. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 1-19. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2016.1150777
5. Bartlett, C., Marshall, M., and Marshall, A. (2012). Two-Eyed Seeing and other lessons learned within a co-learning journey of bringing together indigenous and mainstream knowledges and ways of knowing. J. Environ. Stud. Sci. 2, 331-340. doi: 10.1007/s13412-012-0086-8
6. Bedsted, B., Mathieu, Y., and Leyrit, C. (2015). World Wide Views on Climate and Energy. Available online at: http://climateandenergy.wwviews.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/WWviews-Result-Report_english_low.pdf
7. Beniston, M. (2013). Grand challenges in climate research. Front. Environ. Sci. 1:1. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2013.00001
8. Bernauer, T., and McGrath, L. F. (2016). Simple reframing unlikely to boost public support for climate policy. Nat. Clim. Chang 6, 680-683. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2948
9. Blue, G. (2015). Public deliberation with climate change: opening up or closing down policy options? Rev. Eur. Comp. Int. Environ. Law 24, 152-159. doi: 10.1111/reel.12122
10. Bonney, R., Shirk, J. L., Phillips, T. B., Wiggins, A., Ballard, H. L., Miller-Rushing, A. J., et al. (2014). Citizen science. Next steps for citizen science. Science 343, 1436-1437. doi: 10.1126/science.1251554
11. Bremer, S., and Meisch, S. (2017). Co-production in climate change research: reviewing different perspectives. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Chang 8:e482. doi: 10.1002/wcc.482
12. Brügger, A., Morton, T. A., and Dessai, S. (2015). Hand in hand: public endorsement of climate change mitigation and adaptation. PLoS ONE 10:e0124843. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124843
13. Burgess, H. K., DeBey, L. B., Froehlich, H. E., Schmidt, N., Theobald, E. J., Ettinger, A. K., et al. (2017). The science of citizen science: exploring barriers to use as a primary research tool. Biol. Conserv. 208, 113-120. doi: 10.1016/J.BIOCON.2016.05.014
14. Carvalho, A., Pinto-Coelho, Z., and Seixas, E. (2016). Listening to the public-enacting power: citizen access, standing and influence in public participation discourses. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 1-19. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2016.1149772
15. Carvalho, A., van Wessel, M., and Maeseele, P. (2017). Communication practices and political engagement with climate change: a research agenda. Environ. Commun. 11, 122-135. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2016.1241815
16. Castree, N., Adams, W. M., Barry, J., Brockington, D., Büscher, B., Corbera, E., et al. (2014). Changing the intellectual climate. Nat. Clim. Chang 4, 763-768. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2339
17. Climate Knowledge Brokers (2017). What is the CKB Group? Available online at: http://www.climateknowledgebrokers.net/what-is-ckb/(Accessed Nov 10, 2017)
18. Corbera, E., Calvet-Mir, L., Hughes, H., and Paterson, M. (2016). Patterns of authorship in the IPCC Working Group III report. Nat. Clim. Chang 6, 94-99. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2782
19. Corner, A., Whitmarsh, L., and Xenias, D. (2012). Uncertainty, scepticism and attitudes towards climate change: biased assimilation and attitude polarisation. Clim. Change 114, 463-478. doi: 10.1007/s10584-012-0424-6
20. Crona, B., Wutich, A., Brewis, A., and Gartin, M. (2013). Perceptions of climate change: linking local and global perceptions through a cultural knowledge approach. Clim. Change 119, 519-531. doi: 10.1007/s10584-013-0708-5
21. Darby, S. (2006). Social learning and public policy: Lessons from an energy-conscious village. Energy Policy 34, 2929-2940. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.04.013
22. Devine-Wright, P. (2013). Think global, act local? The relevance of place attachments and place identities in a climate changed world. Glob. Environ. Chang. 23, 61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.08.003
23. Dickinson, J. L., Shirk, J., Bonter, D., Bonney, R., Crain, R. L., Martin, J., et al. (2012). The current state of citizen science as a tool for ecological research and public engagement. Front. Ecol. Environ. 10, 291-297. doi: 10.1890/110236
24. Dodman, D., and Mitlin, D. (2013). Challenges for community-based adaptation: discovering the potential for transformation. J. Int. Dev. 25, 640-659. doi: 10.1002/jid.1772
25. Dunlap, R. E., and McCright, A. M. (2015). "Challenging climate change: the denial countermovement," in Climate Change and Society: Sociological Perspectives, eds R. E. Dunlap and R. J. Brulle (New York, NY: Oxford University Press), 480
26. Editorial (2015). Rise of the citizen scientist. Nature 524, 265. doi: 10.1038/524265a
27. Editorial, N. (2018). The best research is produced when researchers and communities work together. Nature 562, 7-7. doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-06855-7
28. Fischer, F. (1993). Citizen participation and the democratization of policy expertise: from theoretical inquiry to practical cases. Policy Sci. 26, 165-187. doi: 10.1007/BF00999715
29. Ford, J., Maillet, M., Pouliot, V., Meredith, T., Cavanaugh, A., Lwasa, S., et al. (2016). Adaptation and indigenous peoples in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Clim. Change 139, 429-443. doi: 10.1007/s10584-016-1820-0
30. Ford, J. D., Berrang-Ford, L., King, M., and Furgal, C. (2010). Vulnerability of Aboriginal health systems in Canada to climate change. Glob. Environ. Chang. 20, 668-680. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.05.003
31. Ford, J. D., Cameron, L., Rubis, J., Maillet, M., Nakashima, D., Willox, A. C., et al. (2016). Including indigenous knowledge and experience in IPCC assessment reports. Nat. Clim. Chang 6, 349-353. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2954
32. Ford, J. D., Tilleard, S. E., Berrang-Ford, L., Araos, M., Biesbroek, R., Lesnikowski, A. C., et al. (2016). Opinion: big data has big potential for applications to climate change adaptation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, 10729-10732. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1614023113
33. Gay-Antaki, M., and Liverman, D. (2018). Climate for women in climate science: women scientists and the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, 201710271. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1710271115
34. Gillard, R., Gouldson, A., Paavola, J., and Van Alstine, J. (2016). Transformational responses to climate change: beyond a systems perspective of social change in mitigation and adaptation. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Chang 7, 251-265. doi: 10.1002/wcc.384
35. Green, D., King, U., and Morrison, J. (2009). Disproportionate burdens: the multidimensional impacts of climate change on the health of Indigenous Australians. Med. J. Aust. 190, 4-5. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2009.tb02250.x
36. Groulx, M., Brisbois, M. C., Lemieux, C. J., Winegardner, A., and Fishback, L. A. (2017). A role for nature-based citizen science in promoting individual and collective climate change action? A Systematic Review of Learning Outcomes. Sci. Commun. 39, 45-76. doi: 10.1177/1075547016688324
37. Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination. Int. Organ. 46, 1. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300001442
38. Halton, M. (2018). Climate Change "impacts Women More Than Men"-BBC News. Available online at: http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-43294221 (Accessed Mar 10, 2018)
39. Hoffert, M. I., Caldeira, K., Benford, G., Criswell, D. R., Green, C., Herzog, H., et al. (2002). Advanced technology paths to global climate stability: energy for a greenhouse planet. Science 298, 981-987. doi: 10.1126/science.1072357
40. Hoffmann, M. J. (2011). Climate Governance at the Crossroads: Experimenting With a Global Response After Kyoto. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available online atat: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=8sOnHfu69GgC&pgis=1 (Accessed May 17, 2016)
41. Hollin, G. J. S., and Pearce, W. (2015). Tension between scientific certainty and meaning complicates communication of IPCC reports. Nat. Clim. Chang 5, 753-756. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2672
42. Hoppner, C., and Whitmarsh, L. (2010). "Public engagement in climate action: policy and public expectations," in Engaging the Public with Climate Change: Behaviour Change and Communication, eds L. Whitmarsh, S. O'Neill, and I. Lorenzoni (London: Earthscan), 47-65
43. Howarth, C., Morse-Jones, S., Brooks, K., and Kythreotis, A. (2018). Co-producing UK climate change adaptation policy: an analysis of the 2012 and 2017 UK Climate Change Risk Assessments. Environ. Sci. Policy 89, 412-420. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.09.010
44. Howden, S. M., Soussana, J.-F., Tubiello, F. N., Chhetri, N., Dunlop, M., and Meinke, H. (2007). Adapting agriculture to climate change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.U.S.A. 104, 19691-19696. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0701890104
45. Howell, R., and Allen, S. (2017). People and planet: values, motivations and formative influences of individuals acting to mitigate climate change. Environ. Values 26, 131-155. doi: 10.3197/096327117X14847335385436
46. Howell, R., Capstick, S., and Whitmarsh, L. (2016). Impacts of adaptation and responsibility framings on attitudes towards climate change mitigation. Clim. Change 136, 445-461. doi: 10.1007/s10584-016-1627-z
47. Huggel, C., Scheel, M., Albrecht, F., Andres, N., Calanca, P., Jurt, C., et al. (2015). A framework for the science contribution in climate adaptation: experiences from science-policy processes in the Andes. Environ. Sci. Policy 47, 80-94. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.11.007
48. Hulme, M., and Mahony, M. (2010). Climate change: What do we know about the IPCC? Prog. Phys. Geogr. 34, 705-718. doi: 10.1177/0309133310373719
49. IPCC (2014). "Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability," in Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge, UK; New York, NY)
50. IPCC (2015). IPCC Factsheet: How Does the IPCC Review Process Work? Available online at: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/sites/2/2018/07/sr15_headline_statements.pdf (Accessed Jan 31, 2018)
51. Irwin, A. (1995). Citizen Science: A Study Of People, Expertise, and Sustainable Development. London; New York, NY: Routledge
52. Jasanoff, S. (2003). Technologies of humility: citizen participation in governing science. Minerva 41, 223-244. doi: 10.1023/A:1025557512320
53. Jasanoff, S., and Wynne, B. (1998). "Science and decisionmaking. Human choice and climate change," in Human Choice and Climate Change 1: The Societal Framework, eds S. Rayner and E. L. Malone (Colombus, OH: Batelle Press), 1-87
54. Jordan, A. J., Huitema, D., Hildén, M., van Asselt, H., Rayner, T. J., Schoenefeld, J., et al. (2015). Emergence of polycentric climate governance and its future prospects. Nat. Clim. Chang 5, 977-982. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2725
55. Karl, T. R., and Trenberth, K. E. (2003). Modern global climate change. Science 302, 1719-1723. doi: 10.1126/science.1090228
56. Kettle, N. P., Trainor, S. F., and Loring, P. A. (2017). Conceptualizing the science-practice interface: lessons from a collaborative network on the front-line of climate change. Front. Environ. Sci. 5:33. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2017.00033
57. Kinley, R. (2017). Climate change after Paris: from turning point to transformation. Climate Policy 17, 9-15. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2016.1191009
58. Kirchhoff, C. J., Carmen Lemos, M., and Dessai, S. (2013). Actionable knowledge for environmental decision making: broadening the usability of climate science. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 38, 393-414. doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-022112-112828
59. Koletsou, A., and Mancy, R. (2012). Which efficacy constructs for large-scale social dilemma problems? Individual and collective forms of/nefficacy and outcome expectancies in the context of climate change mitigation. Risk Manag. Spec. issue'Risk, Environ. Sustain. 13, 184-208. doi: 10.2307/41407073
60. Kuyper, J. W., Linnér, B. O., and Schroeder, H. (2018). Non-state actors in hybrid global climate governance: justice, legitimacy, and effectiveness in a post-Paris era. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Chang. 9:e497. doi: 10.1002/wcc.497
61. Kythreotis, A. (2012). Progress in global climate change politics? Reasserting national state territoriality in a 'post-political' world. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 36, 457-474. doi: 10.1177/0309132511427961
62. Kythreotis, A. (2015). Carbon pledges: alliances and ambitions. Nat. Clim. Chang. 5, 806-807. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2764
63. Lahoz, W. A., and Schneider, P. (2014). Data assimilation: making sense of earth observation. Front. Environ. Sci. 2:16. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2014.00016
64. Larsen, K., and Gunnarsson-östling, U. (2009). Climate change scenarios and citizen-participation: Mitigation and adaptation perspectives in constructing sustainable futures. Habitat Int. 33, 260-266. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.10.007
65. Lassen, I., Horsbøl, A., Bonnen, K., and Pedersen, A. G. J. (2011). Climate change discourses and citizen participation: a case study of the discursive construction of citizenship in two public events. Environ. Commun. 5, 411-427. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2011.610809
66. Lawrence, N., Chambers, G., Morrison, S., O'Grady, G., Chambers, C., and Kythreotis, A. (2016). The evidence information service as a new platform for supporting evidence-based policy: a consultation of UK parliamentarians. Evid. Policy 13, 275-316. doi: 10.1332/174426416X14643531912169
67. Leach, M., Scoones, I., and Stirling, A. (2010). Governing epidemics in an age of complexity: narratives, politics and pathways to sustainability. Glob. Environ. Chang 20, 369-377. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.008
68. Lemos, M. C., Kirchhoff, C. J., and Ramprasad, V. (2012). Narrowing the climate information usability gap. Nat. Clim. Chang 2, 789-794. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1614
69. Leonard, S., Parsons, M., Olawsky, K., and Kofod, F. (2013). The role of culture and traditional knowledge in climate change adaptation: insights from East Kimberley, Australia. Glob. Environ. Chang 23, 623-632. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.012
70. Lövbrand, E., Beck, S., Chilvers, J., Forsyth, T., Hedrén, J., Hulme, M., et al. (2015). Who speaks for the future of Earth? How critical social science can extend the conversation on the Anthropocene. Glob. Environ. Chang 32, 211-218. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.03.012
71. Mahony, M., and Hulme, M. (2018). Epistemic geographies of climate change: science, space and politics. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 42, 395-424. doi: 10.1177/0309132516681485
72. Mantyka-Pringle, C. S., Jardine, T. D., Bradford, L., Bharadwaj, L., Kythreotis, A., Fresque-Baxter, J., et al. (2017). Bridging science and traditional knowledge to assess cumulative impacts of stressors on ecosystem health. Environ. Int. 102, 125-137. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2017.02.008
73. Mantyka-Pringle, C. S., Westman, C. N., Kythreotis, A., and Schindler, D. W. (2015). Honouring indigenous treaty rights for climate justice. Nat. Clim. Chang 5, 798-801. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2714
74. McCright, A. M. (2010). The effects of gender on climate change knowledge and concern in the American public. Popul. Environ. 32, 66-87. doi: 10.1007/s11111-010-0113-1
75. Mees, H., Crabbé, A., and Driessen, P. P. J. (2017). Conditions for citizen co-production in a resilient, efficient and legitimate flood risk governance arrangement. A tentative framework. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 19, 827-842. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2017.1299623
76. Miller, P., and Rose, N. (2017). "Political power beyond the State: problematics of government," in Foucault and Law, ed P. Fitzpatrick (London: Routledge), 191-224. doi: 10.4324/9781315094021-9
77. Morrison, T. H., Adger, W. N., Brown, K., Lemos, M. C., Huitema, D., and Hughes, T. P. (2017). Mitigation and adaptation in polycentric systems: sources of power in the pursuit of collective goals. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Clim. Chang. 8:e479. doi: 10.1002/wcc.479
78. Nisbet, M. C. (2009). Communicating climate change: why frames matter for public engagement. Environ. Sci. Policy Sustain. Dev. 51, 12-23. doi: 10.3200/ENVT.51.2.12-23
79. NSF (2015). Public Access Plan: Today's Data, Tomorrow's Discoveries: Increasing Access to the Results of Research Funded by the National Science Foundation (nsf15052). Available online at: https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2015/nsf15052/nsf15052.pdf (Accessed Jan 31, 2018)
80. NSF (2018). NSF Broader Impacts|NSFNational Science Foundation. Available online at: https://www.nsf.gov/od/oia/special/broaderimpacts/(Accessed Jan 31, 2018)
81. Obama, B. (2017). The irreversible momentum of clean energy. Science 13, 126-129. doi: 10.1126/science.aam6284
82. O'Brien, K. (2012). Global environmental change II: from adaptation to deliberate transformation. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 36, 667-676. doi: 10.1177/0309132511425767
83. Pearce, T. D., Ford, J. D., Laidler, G. J., Smit, B., Duerden, F., Allarut, M., et al. (2009). Community collaboration and climate change research in the Canadian Arctic. Polar Res. 28, 10-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-8369.2008.00094.x
84. Peters, M. (2017). Can democracy solve the sustainability crisis? Green politics, grassroots participation and the failure of the sustainability paradigm. Educ. Philos. Theory. 1-9. doi: 10.1080/00131857.2017.1388657
85. Petersen, A., Blackstock, J., and Morisetti, N. (2015). New leadership for a user-friendly IPCC. Nat. Clim. Chang 5, 909-911. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2766
86. Pidgeon, N., and Fischhoff, B. (2011). The role of social and decision sciences in communicating uncertain climate risks. Nat. Clim. Chang 1, 35-41. doi: 10.1038/nclimate1080
87. Pielke, R. A. (2007). The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge University Press
88. Purdam, K. (2014). Citizen social science and citizen data? Methodological and ethical challenges for social research. Curr. Sociol. 62, 374-392. doi: 10.1177/0011392114527997
89. RCUK (2014). Pathways to Impact. Available online at: http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/innovation/impacts/(Accessed Jan 6, 2015)
90. RCUK (2017). RCUK Policy on Open Access-Research Councils UK. Available online at: http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/research/openaccess/policy/(Accessed Jan 31, 2018)
91. Savo, V., Lepofsky, D., Benner, J. P., Kohfeld, K. E., Bailey, J., and Lertzman, K. (2016). Observations of climate change among subsistence-oriented communities around the world. Nat. Clim. Chang. 6, 462-473. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2958
92. Schweizer, S., Davis, S., and Thompson, J. L. (2013). Changing the conversation about climate change: a theoretical framework for place-based climate change engagement. Environ. Commun. 7, 42-62. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2012.753634
93. Scistarter (2018). Project finder results for climate change on SciStarter. Available online at: https://scistarter.com/finder?phrase=climate+change (Accessed Dec 10, 2018)
94. Shackley, S. (1997). The intergovernmental panal on climate change: consensual knowledge and global politics. Glob. Environ. Chang 7, 77-79. doi: 10.1016/S0959-3780(96)00035-0
95. Sörqvist, P. (2016). Grand challenges in environmental psychology. Front. Psychol. 7:583. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00583
96. Sprain, L., and Reinig, L. (2018). Citizens speaking as experts: expertise discourse in deliberative forums. Environ. Commun. 12, 357-369. doi: 10.1080/17524032.2017.1394894
97. Sui, D., Elwood, S., and Goodchild, M. (eds.). (2013). Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge: Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) in Theory and Practice. Dordrecht: Springer
98. Suiter, J., Farrell, D. M., and O'Malley, E. (2016). When do deliberative citizens change their opinions? Evidence from the Irish Citizens' Assembly. Int. Polit. Sci. Rev. 37, 198-212. doi: 10.1177/0192512114544068
99. Swart, R., Biesbroek, R., and Lourenão, T. C. (2014). Science of adaptation to climate change and science for adaptation. Front. Environ. Sci. 2:29. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2014.00029
100. Sweetman, J., and Whitmarsh, L. (2016). Climate Justice: high-status ingroup social models increase pro-environmental action through making actions seem more moral. Top. Cogn. Sci. 8, 196-221. doi: 10.1111/tops.12178
101. Turnhout, E., Dewulf, A., and Hulme, M. (2016). What does policy-relevant global environmental knowledge do? The cases of climate and biodiversity. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 18, 65-72. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.09.004
102. UN WomenWatch Women (2018). Gender Equality and Climate Change. Available online at: http://www.un.org/womenwatch/feature/climate_change/downloads/Women_and_Climate_Change_Factsheet.pdf (Accessed Mar 10, 2018)
103. Van Asselt, H. (2016). The role of non-state actors in reviewing ambition, implementation, and compliance under the paris agreement. Clim. Law 6, 91-108. doi: 10.1163/18786561-00601006
104. Vogel, B., and Henstra, D. (2015). Studying local climate adaptation: a heuristic research framework for comparative policy analysis. Glob. Environ. Chang 31, 110-120. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.001
105. Weisser, F., and Müller-Mahn, D. (2016). No place for the political: micro-geographies of the paris climate conference 2015. Antipode 49, 802-820. doi: 10.1111/anti.12290
106. Whitmarsh, L., and Corner, A. (2017). Tools for a new climate conversation: a mixed-methods study of language for public engagement across the political spectrum. Glob. Environ. Chang 42, 122-135. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.12.008
107. Whitmarsh, L., O'Neill, S., and Lorenzoni, I. (2010). Engaging the Public With Climate Change: Behaviour Change and Communication. London: Earthscan