Correction: Climate for women in climate science: Women scientists and the intergovernmental panel on climate change (Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2018) 115 (2060–2065) DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1710271115);Climate for women in climate science: Women scientists and the intergovernmental panel on climate change

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

Volumn 115, Issue 9, 2018, Pages 2060-2065

  Gay Antaki, Miriam ^a   Liverman, Diana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Climate change; Climate science; Intersectionality; IPCC; Women in science

Indexed keywords

ARGENTINA; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; BIODIVERSITY; BRAZIL; CANADA; CLIMATE CHANGE; ETHNICITY; FRANCE; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; INDIA; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERGOVERNMENTAL PANEL ON CLIMATE CHANGE; MEXICO; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRODUCTIVITY; PUBLICATION; SCIENTIST; SEX DIFFERENCE; SEXUALITY; SOCIAL DISCRIMINATION; SOCIOLOGY; SOUTH AFRICA; TREND STUDY; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES; WORKPLACE; FEMALE; GOVERNMENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; PUBLIC RELATIONS; RESEARCH; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; WOMEN'S RIGHTS;

CLIMATE CHANGE; COMMUNICATION; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; GOVERNMENT; HUMANS; INTERINSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS; RESEARCH; WOMEN; WOMEN'S RIGHTS;

EID: 85042721527     PISSN: 00278424     EISSN: 10916490     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1803793115     Document Type: Erratum

References (69)

1. Hulme M, Mahony M (2010) Climate change: What do we know about the IPCC? Prog Phys Geogr 34:705–718.
2. Corbera E, Calvet-Mir L, Hughes H, Paterson M (2015) Patterns of authorship in the IPCC Working Group III report. Nat Clim Change 6:94–99.
3. Ford JD, Vanderbilt W, Berrang-Ford L (2012) Authorship in IPCC AR5 and its implications for content: Climate change and indigenous populations in WGII. Clim Change 113:201–213.
4. Demeritt D (2001) The construction of global warming and the politics of science. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 91:307–337.
5. Carey M, Jackson M, Antonello A, Rushing J (2016) Glaciers, gender, and science: A feminist glaciology framework for global environmental change research. Prog Hum Geogr 40:770–793.
6. Ho-Lem C, Zerriffi H, Kandlikar M (2011) Who participates in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and why: A quantitative assessment of the national representation of authors in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Glob Environ Change 21:1308–1317.
7. Cortina LM (2008) Unseen injustice: Incivility as modern discrimination in organizations. Acad Manage Rev 33:55–75.
8. Hill C, Corbett C, St Rose A (2010) Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (American Association of University Women, Washington, DC).
9. Long JS, Fox MF (1995) Scientific careers: Universalism and particularism. Annu Rev Sociol 21:45–71.
10. Pearson WJ, Frehill LM, McNeely CL (2015) Advancing Women in Science and Engineering, eds Pearson WJ, Frehill LM, McNeely CL (Springer, Berlin).
11. White MS (1970) Psychological and social barriers to women in science. Science 170: 413–416.
12. Moss-Racusin CA, Dovidio JF, Brescoll VL, Graham MJ, Handelsman J (2012) Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 16474–16479.
13. Settles IH, Cortina LM, Malley J, Stewart AJ (2006) The climate for women in academic science: The good, the bad, and the changeable. Psychol Women Q 30:47–58.
14. Shen H (2013) Women in science: Women’s work. Nature 495:21.
15. Budden AE, et al. (2008) Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors. Trends Ecol Evol 23:4–6.
16. Dutt K, Pfaff DL, Bernstein AF, Dillard JS, Block CJ (2016) Gender differences in recommendation letters for postdoctoral fellowships in geoscience. Nat Geosci 9: 805–808.
17. Ceci SJ, Williams WM (2011) Understanding current causes of women’s underrepresentation in science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:3157–3162.
18. Parker K, Wang W (2013) Chapter 6: Time in Work and Leisure, Patterns by Gender and Family Structure. Pew Research Center. Available at www.pewsocialtrends.org/2013/03/14/chapter-6-time-in-work-and-leisure-patterns-by-gender-and-family-structure/. Accessed January 20, 2017.
19. Nielsen W, et al. (2017) Correction for Nielsen et al., opinion: Gender diversity leads to better science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:E2796.
20. Loder N (1999) Gender discrimination undermines science. Nature 402:337.
21. Campbell LG, Mehtani S, Dozier ME, Rinehart J (2013) Gender-heterogeneous working groups produce higher quality science. PLoS One 8:e79147.
22. Alaimo S (2009) Insurgent vulnerability and the carbon footprint of gender. Women Gender Res 3–4:22–35.
23. Armstrong MA, Jovanovic J (2015) Starting at the crossroads: Intersectional approaches to institutionally supporting underrepresented minority women STEM faculty. J Women Minor Sci Eng 21:141–157.
24. Beck S, et al. (2014) Towards a reflexive turn in the governance of global environmental expertise: The cases of the IPCC and the IPBES. GAIA Ecol Perspect Sci Soc 23: 80–87.
25. Maddrell A, Strauss K, Thomas NJ, Wyse S (2016) Mind the gap: Gender disparities still to be addressed in UK higher education geography. Area 48:48–56.
26. Luzzadder-Beach S, Macfarlane A (2000) The environment of gender and science: Status and perspectives of women and men in physical geography. Prof Geogr 52: 407–424.
27. Madge C, Bee A (1999) Women, science and identity: Interviews with female physical geographers. Area 31:335–348.
28. Bracken L, Mawdsley E (2004) “Muddy glee”: Rounding out the picture of women and physical geography fieldwork. Area 36:280–286.
29. Bee A, Madge C, Wellens J (1998) Women, gender, feminisms: Visiting physical geography. Area 30:195–196.
30. Crenshaw K (1989) Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist policies. Univ Chicago Leg Forum 140:139–167.
31. Harding SG (1986) The Science Question in Feminism (Cornell Univ Press, Ithaca, NY).
32. Cortina LM, Magley VJ, Williams JH, Langhout RD (2001) Incivility in the workplace: Incidence and impact. J Occup Health Psychol 6:64–80.
33. Settles IH, Cortina LM, Stewart AJ, Malley J (2007) Voice matters: Buffering the impact of a negative climate for women in science. Psychol Women Q 31:270–281.
34. De Vita L, Viteritti A, Sciannamblo M (2016) Re-thinking intersectionality through science and technology studies: Trajectories of women in technoscientific fields. Rass Ital Sociol 57:503–524.
35. Smooth WG (2016) Intersectionality and women’s advancement in the discipline and across the academy. Polit Groups Identities 4:513–528.
36. Nightingale AJ (2011) Bounding difference: Intersectionality and the material production of gender, caste, class and environment in Nepal. Geoforum 42:153–162.
37. Djoudi H, et al. (2016) Beyond dichotomies: Gender and intersecting inequalities in climate change studies. Ambio 45(Suppl 3):248–262.
38. Hausermann HE (2014) Unintended developments: Gender, environment, and collective governance in a Mexican ejido. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 104:784–800.
39. Perez C, et al. (2015) How resilient are farming households and communities to a changing climate in Africa? A gender-based perspective. Glob Environ Change 34:95–107.
40. Kaijser A, Kronsell A (2014) Climate change through the lens of intersectionality. Environ Polit 23:417–433.
41. Olsson L, et al. (2014) Livelihoods and poverty. Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, eds Field CB, et al. (Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge, UK), pp 793–832.
42. Robinson M (2015) Women must have a seat at the climate table. Outreach: A Multi-Stakeholder Magazine. Available at outreach.stakeholderforum.org/index.php/ previous-editions/cop-21-paris/edition-2-climate-and-gender/11909-women-must-have-a-seat-at-the-climate-table. Accessed March 6, 2017.
43. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2012) Promoting Gender Balance and Improving the Participation of Women in UNFCCC Negotiations and in the Representation of Parties in Bodies Established Pursuant to the Convention or the Kyoto Protocol (United Nations, General Assembly, New York).
44. Buckingham S (2010) Call in the women. Nature 468:502.
45. Gay-Antaki M (2016) “Now we have equality”: A feminist political ecology analysis of carbon markets in Oaxaca, Mexico. J Lat Am Geogr 15:49–66.
46. Denton F (2002) Climate change vulnerability, impacts, and adaptation: Why does gender matter? Gend Dev 10:10–20.
47. Arora-Jonsson S (2011) Virtue and vulnerability: Discourses on women, gender and climate change. Glob Environ Change 21:744–751.
48. Driouech MF, Niang AD, Ko Va C (2016) Women Advancing Climate and Climate Change Sciences (Women- ACS) Opening Charafat Afailal, Deputy Minister for Water Petteri Taalas, Secretary-General of WMO Hoesung Lee, Chair of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). COP22Marakech. Available at https://www.wcrp-climate.org/News-Highlights/2016/Flyers/Women_Advancing_Climate.pdf. Accessed March 6, 2017.
49. Buck HJ, Gammon AR, Preston CJ (2014) Gender and geoengineering. Hypatia 29: 651–669.
50. Glass JB (2015) We are the 20%: Updated statistics on female faculty in earth sciences. U.S. Women in the Geosciences: Practical, Positive Practices Toward Parity (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ), pp 17–22.
51. Fischer HW, Chhatre A (2013) Environmental citizenship, gender, and the emergence of a new conservation politics. Geoforum 50:10–19.
52. Nast HJ (1994) Women in the field: Critical feminist methodologies and theoretical perspectives. Prof Geogr 46:54–66.
53. Oester S, Cigliano JA, Hind-Ozan EJ, Parsons ECM (2017) Why conferences matter—an illustration from the International Marine Conservation Congress. Front Mar Sci 4:257.
54. LeMone MA, Waukau PL, LeMone MA, Waukau PL (1982) Women in meteorology. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 63:1266–1276.
55. Hartten LM, LeMone MA, Hartten LM, LeMone MA (2010) The evolution and current state of the atmospheric sciences “pipeline.” Bull Am Meteorol Soc 91:942–956.
56. Avallone LM, et al. (2013) Supporting the retention and advancement of women in the atmospheric sciences: What women are saying. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 94: 1313–1316.
57. MacPhee D, Canetto SS (2015) Women in academic atmospheric sciences. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 96:59–67.
58. Adams AS, et al. (2016) The earth science women’s network (ESWN): Community-driven mentoring for women in the atmospheric sciences. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 97: 345–354.
59. O’Connor P, Carvalho T, Vabø A, Cardoso S (2015) Gender in higher education: A critical review. The Palgrave International Handbook of Higher Education Policy and Governance (Palgrave Macmillan UK, London), pp 569–584.
60. Henley MM (2015) Women’s success in academic science: Challenges to breaking through the ivory ceiling. Sociol Compass 9:668–680.
61. Beddoes K, Pawley AL (2014) “Different people have different priorities”: Work–family balance, gender, and the discourse of choice. Stud High Educ 39:1573–1585.
62. Pawley A, Phillips C (2014) From the mouths of students: Two illustrations of narrative analysis to understand engineering education’s ruling relations as gendered and raced. ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition. Available at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/ 286836391_From_the_mouths_of_students_Two_illustrations_of_narrative_analysis_to_ understand_engineering_education’s_ruling_relations_as_gendered_and_raced. Accessed December 7, 2017.
63. Clancy KBH, Lee KMN, Rodgers EM, Richey C (2017) Double jeopardy in astronomy and planetary science: Women of color face greater risks of gendered and racial harassment. J Geophys Res Planets 122:1610–1623.
64. Nelson RG, Rutherford JN, Hinde K, Clancy KBH (2017) Signaling safety: Characterizing fieldwork experiences and their implications for career trajectories. Am Anthropol 119:710–722.
65. Haraway D (1988) Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Fem Stud 14:575–599.
66. Sayer LC (2005) Gender, time and inequality: Trends in women’s and men’s paid work, unpaid work and free time. Soc Forces 84:285–303.
67. Clancy KBH, Nelson RG, Rutherford JN, Hinde K (2014) Survey of academic field experiences (SAFE): Trainees report harassment and assault. PLoS One 9:e102172.
68. Robinson CV (2011) Women in science: In pursuit of female chemists. Nature 476: 273–275.
69. Dennehy TC, Dasgupta N (2017) Female peer mentors early in college increase women’s positive academic experiences and retention in engineering. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:5964–5969.