Correction: Clinical virtual simulation in nursing education: Randomized controlled trial (Journal of Medical Internet Research (2019) 21:3 (e11529) DOI: 10.2196/11529);Clinical virtual simulation in nursing education: Randomized controlled trial

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2019, Pages

  Padilha, José Miguel ^a   Machado, Paulo Puga ^a   Ribeiro, Ana ^a   Ramos, José ^a   Costa, Patrício ^b,c  

^a Escola Superior de Enfermagem do Porto   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINHO   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Clinical virtual simulation; Nursing education; User computer interface; Virtual patient

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NURSING EDUCATION; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATION, NURSING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE;

EID: 85063293289     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14388871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2196/14155     Document Type: Erratum

References (36)

1. Prensky M. Digital natives, digital immigrants part 2: do they really think differently? On the Horizon 2001 Nov;9(6):1-6 [FREE Full _text] [doi: 10.1108/10748120110424843]
2. Prensky M. Digital natives, digital immigrants part 1. On the Horizon 2001 Sep;9(5):1-6. [doi: 10.1108/10748120110424816]
3. Heimann C, Prado C, de Moraes RR, Vidal G, Liberal D, Oliveira G, et al. [Acquiring nursing knowledge through the constructivist method]. Rev Esc Enferm USP 2013 Aug;47(4):997-1000 [FREE Full _text] [doi: 10.1590/S0080-623420130000400032] [Medline: 24310702]
4. Chi MT. Active-constructive-interactive: a conceptual framework for differentiating learning activities. Top Cogn Sci 2009 Jan;1(1):73-105 [FREE Full _text] [doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2008.01005.x] [Medline: 25164801]
5. Georg C, Zary N. Web-based virtual patients in nursing education: development and validation of theory-anchored design and activity models. J Med Internet Res 2014 Apr 10;16(4):e105 [FREE Full _text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.2556] [Medline: 24727709]
6. Pennaforte T, Moussa A, Loye N, Charlin B, Audétat MC. Exploring a new simulation approach to improve clinical reasoning teaching and assessment: randomized trial protocol. JMIR Res Protoc 2016 Feb 17;5(1):e26 [FREE Full _text] [doi: 10.2196/resprot.4938] [Medline: 26888076]
7. Liaw SY, Chan SW, Chen FG, Hooi SC, Siau C. Comparison of virtual patient simulation with mannequin-based simulation for improving clinical performances in assessing and managing clinical deterioration: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2014 Sep 17;16(9):e214 [FREE Full _text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.3322] [Medline: 25230684]
8. Hege I, Kononowicz AA, Adler M. A clinical reasoning tool for virtual patients: design-based research study. JMIR Med Educ 2017 Nov 02;3(2):e21 [FREE Full _text] [doi: 10.2196/mededu.8100] [Medline: 29097355]
9. Kneebone R. Evaluating clinical simulations for learning procedural skills: a theory-based approach. Acad Med 2005 Jun;80(6):549-553. [doi: 10.1097/00001888-200506000-00006] [Medline: 15917357]
10. Lapkin S, Fernandez R, Levett-Jones T, Bellchambers H. The effectiveness of using human patient simulation manikins in the teaching of clinical reasoning skills to undergraduate nursing students: a systematic review. JBI Libr Syst Rev 2010;8(16):661-694. [doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2010.05.005] [Medline: 27820553]
11. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Petrusa ER, Scalese RJ. A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003-2009. Med Educ 2010 Jan;44(1):50-63. [doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03547.x] [Medline: 20078756]
12. Yuan HB, Williams BA, Fang JB. The contribution of high-fidelity simulation to nursing students' confidence and competence: a systematic review. Int Nurs Rev 2012 Mar;59(1):26-33 [FREE Full _text] [doi: 10.1111/j.1466-7657.2011.00964.x]
13. Meakim C, Boese T, Decker S, Franklin AE, Gloe D, Lioce L, et al. Standards of Best Practice: Simulation Standard I: Terminology. Clin Simul Nurs 2013 Jun;9(6):S3-S11. [doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2013.04.001]
14. Batista R, Martins J, Pereira M, Mazzo A. [High-Fidelity Simulation in the Nursing Degree: gains perceived by students]. Rev Enf Ref 2014 Mar 15;4(1):135-144 [FREE Full _text] [doi: 10.12707/RIII13169] [Medline: 22153054]
15. Pinar G, Knight C, Gaioso V, Watts P, Dailey K, Britt S, et al. The effects of high fidelity simulation on nursing students' perceptions and self-efficacy of obstetric skills. Int Arch Nurs Health Care 2015 Dec 31;1(1):1-7. [doi: 10.23937/2469-5823/1510008]
16. Lopreiato JO. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Rockville, MD; 2016. Healthcare Simulation Dictionary URL: https://www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/quality-patient-safety/patient-safety-resources/research/simulation_dictionary/sim-dictionary.pdf [accessed 2019-02-11] [WebCite Cache ID _766yeNPXG]
17. Berman NB, Durning SJ, Fischer MR, Huwendiek S, Triola MM. The role for virtual patients in the future of medical education. Acad Med 2016 Dec;91(9):1217-1222. [doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001146] [Medline: 26959224]
18. Chang KK, Chung J, Wong T. Learning intravenous cannulation: a comparison of the conventional method and the CathSim Intravenous Training System. J Clin Nurs 2002 Jan;11(1):73-78. [Medline: 11845758]
19. Roh YS, Lee W, Chung H, Park Y. The effects of simulation-based resuscitation training on nurses' self-efficacy and satisfaction. Nurse Educ Today 2013 Feb;33(2):123-128. [doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.11.008] [Medline: 22153054]
20. Tsai SL, Chai S, Hsieh L, Lin S, Taur F, Sung W, et al. The use of virtual reality computer simulation in learning Port-A cath injection. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2008 Mar;13(1):71-87. [doi: 10.1007/s10459-006-9025-3] [Medline: 16944000]
21. Wilson-Sands C, Brahn P, Graves K. The effect of instructional method on cardiopulmonary resuscitation skill performance: a comparison between instructor-led basic life support and computer-based basic life support with voice-activated manikin. J Nurses Prof Dev 2015;31(5):E1-E7. [doi: 10.1097/NND.0000000000000203] [Medline: 26381346]
22. Johnson D, Flagg A, Dremsa T. Effects of using human patient simulator versus a CD-ROM on learning the management of patients exposed to chemical agents. US Army Med Dep J 2010:9-16. [Medline: 21181669]
23. Liaw SY, Wong L, Chan S, Ho J, Mordiffi S, Ang S, et al. Designing and evaluating an interactive multimedia web-based simulation for developing nurses' competencies in acute nursing care: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2015 Jan 12;17(1):e5-10 [FREE Full _text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.3853] [Medline: 25583029]
24. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007 May;39(2):175-191. [Medline: 17695343]
25. Duarte H. Perception of learning, satisfaction and self-efficacy of nursing students on high fidelity simulation. In: Leiria School of Health. Leiria: Polytechnic Institute of Leiria; 2015.
26. Nunes R, Schwarzer R, Jerusalém M. Perceived General Self-Efficacy Scale. Berlin University: Health Psychology; 1999. URL: http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~health/selfscal.htm
27. Schwarzer R, Jerusalém M. Generalized self-eEfficacy scale. In: Measures in Health Psychology: A User's Portfolio. Casual and Control Beliefs. Windsor, England: NFER-NELSON; 1995:A.
28. Scholz U, Gutiérrez Doña B, Sud S, Schwarzer R. Is general self-efficacy a universal construct? Eur J Psychol Assess 2002 Sep;18(3):242-251. [doi: 10.1027//1015-5759.18.3.242]
29. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
30. Padilha JM, Machado P, Ribeiro A, Ramos J. Clinical virtual simulation in nursing education. Clin Simul Nurs 2018 Feb;15:13-18 [FREE Full _text] [doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2017.09.005]
31. Tschannen D, Aebersold M, McLaughlin E, Bowen J, Fairchild J. Use of virtual simulations for improving knowledge transfer among baccalaureate nursing students. J Nurs Educ Pract 2012 May 13;2(3):15-24. [doi: 10.5430/jnep.v2n3p15]
32. Sperl-Hillen J, O'Connor PJ, Ekstrom HL, Rush WA, Asche SE, Fernandes OD, et al. Educating resident physicians using virtual case-based simulation improves diabetes management: a randomized controlled trial. Acad Med 2014 Dec;89(12):1664-1673 [FREE Full _text] [doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000406] [Medline: 25006707]
33. Tiffany JM, Hoglund B. Using virtual simulation to teach inclusivity: a case study. Clin Simul Nurs 2016 Apr;12(4):115-122. [doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2015.11.003]
34. Bandura A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1986:A.
35. Berman N, Fall LH, Smith S, Levine D, Maloney CG, Potts M, et al. Integration Strategies for Using Virtual Patients in Clinical Clerkships. Acad Med 2009;84(7):942-949. [doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181a8c668] [Medline: 19550193]
36. Huwendiek S, Duncker C, Reichert F, De Leng BA, Dolmans D, van der Vleuten CP, et al. Learner preferences regarding integrating, sequencing and aligning virtual patients with other activities in the undergraduate medical curriculum: A focus group study. Med Teach 2013 Nov;35(11):920-929. [doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.826790] [Medline: 24003850]