Why do researchers decide to publish in questionable journals? A review of the literature

Learned Publishing

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2019, Pages 57-62

  Frandsen, Tove Faber ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85060538049     PISSN: 09531513     EISSN: 17414857     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/leap.1214     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Balehegn, M. (2017). Increased publication in predatory journals by developing countries' institutions: What it entails? And what can be done? International Information & Library Review, 49(2), 97–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2016.1278188
2. Banerjee, A. (2013). The publication rat race: Who will bell the cat? Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y. Patil University, 6(3), 219–220. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-2870.114636
3. Beall, J. (2017). What I learned from predatory publishers. Biochemia Medica, 27(2), 273–278. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2017.029
4. Björk, B. C., & Holmström, J. (2006). Benchmarking scientific journals from the submitting author's viewpoint. Learned Publishing, 19(2), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315106776387002
5. Björk, B.-C., & Öörni, A. (2009). A method for comparing scholarly journals as service providers to authors. Serials Review, 35(2), 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2009.03.001
6. Boukacem-Zeghmouri, C., Dillaerts, H., Lafouge, T., Bador, P., & Sauer-Avargues, A. (2018). French publishing attitudes in the open access era: The case of mathematics, biology, and computer science. Learned Publishing, 31(4), 345–354. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1169
7. Cheung, C. K. (2008). Audience matters: A study of how authors select educational journals. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 17(2), 191–201. https://doi.org/10.3860/taper.v17i2.731
8. Eriksson, S., & Helgesson, G. (2016). The false academy: Predatory publishing in science and bioethics. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy, 20, 163–170. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11019-016-9740-3
9. Eriksson, S., & Helgesson, G. (2017). Time to stop talking about ‘predatory journals’. Learned Publishing, 31, 181–183. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1135
10. Fanelli, D. (2009). How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS One, 4(5), e5738. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005738
11. Fanelli, D., Costas, R., & Larivière, V. (2015). Misconduct policies, academic culture and career stage, not gender or pressures to publish, affect scientific integrity. PLoS One, 10(6), e0127556. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127556
12. Ferris, L. E., & Winker, M. A. (2017). Ethical issues in publishing in predatory journals. Biochemia Medica, 27(2), 279–284. http://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2017.030
13. Frandsen, T. F. (2017). Are predatory journals undermining the credibility of science? A bibliometric analysis of citers. Scientometrics, 113(3), 1513–1528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2520-x
14. Frank, E. (1994). Authors' criteria for selecting journals. JAMA, 272(2), 163–164. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1994.03520020089026
15. Gordon, M. D. (1984). How authors select journals – A test of the reward maximization model of submission behavior. Social Studies of Science, 14(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631284014001003
16. Grančay, M., Vveinhardt, J., & Šumilo, Ē. (2017). Publish or perish: How central and eastern European economists have dealt with the ever-increasing academic publishing requirements 2000–2015. Scientometrics, 111(3), 1813–1837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2332-z
17. Grimes, D. R., Bauch, C. T., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2018). Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure. Royal Society Open Science, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.171511
18. Heintzelman, M., & Nocetti, D. (2009). Where should we submit our manuscript? An analysis of journal submission strategies. The BE Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 9(1), 1–26.
19. Hsieh, J. L. (2017). Author publication preferences and journal competition. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(2), 365–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23657
20. Knight, L. V., & Steinbach, T. A. (2008). Selecting an appropriate publication outlet: A comprehensive model of journal selection criteria for researchers in a broad range of academic disciplines. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 3, 59–79. https://doi.org/10.28945/51
21. Kolata, G. (2017, 31, October). Many academics are eager to publish in worthless journals. NY Times [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2017/10/30/science/predatory-journals-academics.html
22. Kurt, S. (2018). Why do authors publish in predatory journals? Learned Publishing, 31(2), 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1150
23. McCann, T. V., & Polacsek, M. (2018). False gold: Safely navigating open access publishing to avoid predatory publishers and journals. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 74(4), 809–817. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13483
24. Memon, A. R. (2017). Predatory journals spamming for publications: What should researchers do? Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(5), 1617–1639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9955-6
25. Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Cobey, K. D., Lalu, M. M., Galipeau, J., Avey, M. T., … Ziai, H. (2017). Stop this waste of people, animals and money. Nature, 549, 23–25. https://doi.org/10.1038/549023a
26. Moher, D., & Srivastava, A. (2015). You are invited to submit. BMC Medicine, 13(1), 180. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0423-3
27. NDR. (2018). More than 5,000 German scientists have published papers in pseudo-scientific journals [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://www.ndr.de/der_ndr/presse/More-than-5000-German-scientists-have-published-papers-in-pseudo-scientific-journals,fakescience178.html
28. Oermann, M. H., Nicoll, L. H., Chinn, P. L., Ashton, K. S., Conklin, J. L., Edie, A. H., … Williams, B. L. (2018). Quality of articles published in predatory nursing journals. Nursing Outlook, 66(1), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2017.05.005
29. Omobowale, A. O., Akanle, O., Adeniran, A. I., & Adegboyega, K. (2014). Peripheral scholarship and the context of foreign paid publishing in Nigeria. Current Sociology, 62(5), 666–684. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392113508127
30. Oransky, I. (2017, 6, September). Predatory journals: Not just a problem in developing world countries, says new Nature paper. Retraction Watch [Web log post]. Retrieved from https://retractionwatch.com/2017/09/06/predatory-journals-not-just-developing-world-countries-says-new-nature-paper/
31. Oster, S. (1980). The optimal order for submitting manuscripts. American Economic Review, 70(3), 444–448.
32. Ozcakar, L., Franchignoni, F., Kara, M., & Lasa, S. M. (2012). Choosing a scholarly journal during manuscript submission: The way how it rings true for physiatrists. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 48(4), 643–647.
33. Pepermans, G., & Rousseau, S. (2016). The decision to submit to a journal: Another example of a valence-consistent shift? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(6), 1372–1383. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23491
34. Pyne, D. (2017). The rewards of predatory publications at a small business school. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 48, 137–160. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.48.3.137
35. Regazzi, J. J., & Aytac, S. (2008). Author perceptions of journal quality. Learned Publishing, 21(3), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315108x288938
36. Roberts, J. (2016). Predatory journals: Illegitimate publishing and its threat to all readers and authors. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 13(12), 1830–1833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.10.008
37. Rowlands, I., & Nicholas, D. (2005). Scholarly communication in the digital environment: The 2005 survey of journal author behaviour and attitudes. ASLIB Proceedings, 57(6), 481–497. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012530510634226
38. Salinas, S., & Munch, S. B. (2015). Where should I send it? Optimizing the submission decision process. PLoS One, 10(1), e0115451. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115451
39. Sandesh, N., & Wahrekar, S. (2017). Choosing the scientific journal for publishing research work: Perceptions of medical and dental researchers. Clujul Medical, 90(2), 196–202. https://doi.org/10.15386/cjmed-704
40. Shamseer, L., Moher, D., Maduekwe, O., Turner, L., Barbour, V., Burch, R., … Shea, B. J. (2017). Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: Can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison. BMC Medicine, 15(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-017-0785-9
41. Shehata, A. M. K., & Elgllab, M. F. M. (2018). Where Arab social science and humanities scholars choose to publish: Falling in the predatory journals trap. Learned Publishing, 31(3), 222–229. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1167
42. Shen, C. Y., & Bjork, B. C. (2015). ‘Predatory’ open access: A longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Medicine, 13, 230. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2
43. Soreide, K., & Winter, D. C. (2010). Global survey of factors influencing choice of surgical journal for manuscript submission. Surgery, 147(4), 475–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.042
44. Steneck, N. H. (2006). Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-006-0006-y
45. Swan, A., & Brown, S. (2004). Authors and open access publishing. Learned Publishing, 17(3), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1087/095315104323159649
46. Tenopir, C., Dalton, E. D., Christian, L., Jones, M. K., McCabe, M., Smith, M., & Fish, A. (2017). Imagining a gold open access future: Attitudes, behaviors, and funding scenarios among authors of academic scholarship. College & Research Libraries, 78(6), 824. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.78.6.824
47. Tourangeau, R., & Yan, T. (2007). Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychological Bulletin, 133(5), 859–883. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.5.859
48. Umlauf, M. G. (2016). Predatory open access journals: Avoiding profiteers, wasted effort and fraud. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 22(Suppl. 1), 3–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12433
49. Wallace, F. H., & Perri, T. J. (2018). Economists behaving badly: Publications in predatory journals. Scientometrics, 115(2), 749–766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2690-1
50. Wijewickrema, M., & Petras, V. (2017). Journal selection criteria in an open access environment: A comparison between the medicine and social sciences. Learned Publishing, 30(4), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1113
51. Wong, T. E., Srikrishnan, V., Hadka, D., & Keller, K. (2017). A multi-objective decision-making approach to the journal submission problem. PLoS One, 12(6), e0178874. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178874
52. Xia, J., Harmon, J. L., Connolly, K. G., Donnelly, R. M., Anderson, M. R., & Howard, H. A. (2015). Who publishes in “predatory” journals? The Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(7), 1406–1417. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi