Where Should we Submit our Manuscript? An Analysis of Journal Submission Strategies

B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2009, Pages

  Heintzelman, Martin ^a   Nocetti, Diego ^a  

^a CLARKSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Economics journals; Submission strategies

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350592138     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19351682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2202/1935-1682.2340     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ofer H. Azar. Rejections and the importance of rst response times. International Journal of Social Economics, 31(3):259-274, 2004.
2. Ofer H. Azar. The review process in economics: Is it too fast? Southern Economic Journal, 72(2):482-491, 2005.
3. Ofer H. Azar. The slowdown in rst-response times in economics journals: Can it be bene cial? Economic Inquiry, 45(1):179{187, 2007.
4. Ofer H. Azar. Evolution of social norms with heterogeneous p: A general model and an application to the academic review process. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 65:420-435, 2008.
5. Damien Besancenot, Joao Faria, and Kim Huynh. Search and research: The inuence of editorial boards on journals' quality. Working papers, HAL, 2009.
6. Rebecca M. Blank. The e ects of double-blind versus single-blind reviewing: Experimental evidence from the american economic review. American Economic Review, 81(5):1041-1067, December 1991.
7. David W. E. Cabell, editor. Cabell's Directory of Publishing Opportunities in Economics and Finance. Cabell Publishing Company, 2004.
8. Glenn Ellison. The slowdown of the economics publishing process. Journal of Political Economy, 110(5), 2002.
9. Glenn Ellison. Evolving standards for academic publishing: A q-r theory. Journal of Political Economy, 110(5), 2002b.
10. Maxim Engers and Joshua S. Gans. Why referees are not paid (enough). American Economic Review, 88(5):1341-1349, December 1998.
11. Joao Ricardo Faria. The game academics play: Editors versus authors. Bulletin of Economic Research, 57:11-12, 2005a.
12. Joao Ricardo Faria. Is there a trade-o between domestic and international publications? The Journal of Socio-Economics, 34:269{280, 2005b.
13. Joshua S. Gans and George B. Shepherd. How are the mighty fallen: Rejected classic articles by leading economists. Journal of Economic Per- spectives, 8(1):165{179, 1994.
14. Daniel S. Hamermesh. The young economist's guide to professional etiquette. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6(1):169-179, Winter 1992.
15. Georey M. Hodgson and Harry Rothman. The editors and authors of economics journals: A case of institutional oligopoly. The Economic Journal, 109:F165-F186, February 1999.
16. Pantelis Kalaitzidakis, Theofanis P. Mamuneas, and Thanasis Stengos. Rankings of academic journals and institutions in economics. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1(6):1346-1366, December 2003.
17. David N. Laband and Michael J. Piette. Favoritism versus search for good papers: Empirical evidence regarding the behavior of journal editors. Journal of Political Economy, 102(1):194-203, 1994.
18. Derek Leslie. Are delays in academic publishing necessary. American Economic Review, 95(1):407-413, March 2005.
19. Mark J. McCabe and Christopher M. Snyder. Open access and academic journal quality. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 95(2):453-458, 2005.
20. Marshall H. Medo . Editorial favouritism in economics? Southern Economic Journal, 70:425-434, 2003.
21. Sharon Oster. The optimal order for submitting manuscripts. The Amer- ican Economic Review, 70(3):444-448, 1980.
22. Sharon Oster and Daniel S. Hamermesh. Aging and productivity among economists. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(1):154-156, February 1998.
23. Andrew J. Oswald. An examination of the reliability of prestigious scholarly journals: Evidence and implications for decision-makers. Economica, 74:21-31, 2007.
24. Martin L. Weitzman. Optimal search for the best alternative. Econometrica, 47(3):641-654, May 1979.