Author publication preferences and journal competition

Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 68, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 365-377

  Hsieh, Ji Lung ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SCIENCE;

AUTHOR PROFILES; CORENESS; ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS; EDITORIAL BOARD; JOURNAL CITATION REPORTS; LIBRARY SCIENCE;

ECOLOGY;

LIBRARY SCIENCE; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING;

EID: 84962724787     PISSN: 23301635     EISSN: 23301643     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.23657     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Åström, F. (2007). Changes in the LIS research front: Time-sliced cocitation analyses of LIS journal articles, 1990–2004. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(7), 947–957.
2. Calcagno, V., Demoinet, E., Gollner, K., Guidi, L., Ruths, D., & De Mazancourt, C. (2012). Flows of research papers among scientific journals reveal hidden submission patterns. Science, 338(6110), 1065–1069.
3. Chen, C., Ibekwe-SanJuan, F., & Hou, J. (2010). The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: A multiple-perspective cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(7), 1386–1409.
4. Colwell, R.K., & Futuyma, D.J. (1971). On the measurement of niche breadth and overlap. Ecology, 52, 567–576.
5. Eagle, N., Macy, M., & Claxton, R. (2010). Network diversity and economic development. Science, 328(5981), 1029–1031.
6. Freeman, J., & Hannan, M.T. (1983). Niche width and the dynamics of organizational populations. American Journal of Sociology, 88(6), 1116–1145.
7. Hannan, M.T., & Freeman, J. (1993). Organizational ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Hirsch, J.E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572.
9. Hutchinson, G.E. (1957). Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 22, 415–427
10. Krebs, C.J. (1999). Ecological methodology (Vol. 620). Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.
11. McPherson, M. (1983). An ecology of affiliation. American Sociological Review, 48, 519–532.
12. Ni, C., Shaw, D., Lind, S.M., & Ding, Y. (2013). Journal impact and proximity: An assessment using bibliographic features. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(4), 802–817.
13. Ni, C., Sugimoto, C.R., & Jiang, J. (2013). Venue-author-coupling: A measure for identifying disciplines through author communities. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(2), 265–279.
14. Oster, S. (1980). The optimal order for submitting papers. The American Economic Review, 70(3), 444–448.
15. Page, S.E. (2008). The difference: How the power of diversity creates better groups, firms, schools, and societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16. Purvis, A., & Hector, A. (2000). Getting the measure of biodiversity. Nature, 405(6783), 212–219.
17. Rafols, I., & Leydesdorff, L. (2009). Content-based and algorithmic classifications of journals: Perspectives on the dynamics of scientific communication and indexer effects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(9), 1823–1835.
18. Rafols, I., & Meyer, M. (2010). Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics, 82(2), 263–287.
19. Rafols, I., Porter, A. L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(9), 1871–1887.
20. Rowlands, I., & Nicholas, D. (2005). Scholarly communication in the digital environment: The 2005 survey of journal author behaviour and attitudes. Aslib proceedings, 57(6), 481–497.
21. Shannon, C.E. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27, 379–423 and 623-656.
22. Simpson, E.H. (1949). Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163, 688.
23. Stirling, A. (1998). On the economics and analysis of diversity. Science Policy Research Unit (SPRU), Electronic Working Papers Series, 28, 1–156.
24. Stirling, A. (2007). A general framework for analysing diversity in science, technology and society. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 4(15), 707–719.
25. Swan, A., & Brown, S. (2004). Authors and open access publishing. Learned Publishing, 17(3), 219–224.
26. Waltman, L., & Van Eck, N.J. (2012). The inconsistency of the h-index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(2), 406–415.