Quality of articles published in predatory nursing journals

Nursing Outlook

Volumn 66, Issue 1, 2018, Pages 4-10

  Oermann, Marilyn H ^a   Nicoll, Leslie H ^b   Chinn, Peggy L ^c   Ashton, Kathleen S ^a   Conklin, Jamie L ^d   Edie, Alison H ^a   Amarasekara, Sathya ^a   Williams, Brittany L ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Maine Desk LLC   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^d DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Knowledge dissemination; Nursing literature; Open access; Peer review process; Predatory nursing journals; Publications

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ERROR; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NURSING DISCIPLINE; NURSING LITERATURE; NURSING RESEARCH; PEER REVIEW; PUBLICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; PUBLISHING; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

HUMANS; NURSING RESEARCH; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLISHING;

EID: 85020917567     PISSN: 00296554     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2017.05.005     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Beall, J., Canadian publisher has open access evil twin [Blog Post]. Retrieved from https://scholarlyoa.com/2016/02/09/canadian-publisher-has-open-access-evil-twin/, 2016.
2. Beall, J., Scam Publisher OMICS International Buying Legitimate Journals. Retrieved from; Available at https://scholarlyoa.com/2016/09/29/scam-publisher-omics-international-buying-legitimate-journals/, 2016 Retrieved from https://web-beta.archive.org/web/20161012004314/https://scholarlyoa.com/2016/09/29/scam-publisher-omics-international-buying-legitimate-journals/#more-8037.
3. Beall, J., Beall's List of Predatory Publishers 2017 [Blog Post]. Retrieved from; Available at https://scholarlyoa.com/2017/01/03/bealls-list-of-predatory-publishers-2017/, 2017 Retrieved from https://web-beta.archive.org/web/20170104115901/https://scholarlyoa.com/2017/01/03/bealls-list-of-predatory-publishers-2017/.
4. Bohannon, J., Who's afraid of peer review?. Science 342:6154 (2013), 60–65.
5. Esposito, J. (2016). What we tell society publishers about open access [Blog post]. The Scholarly Kitchen. Retrieved from https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2016/12/13/what-we-tell-society-publishers-about-open-access/.
6. Fitzpatrick, K., Giving it away: Sharing and the future of scholarly communication. Journal of Scholarly Publishing 43:4 (2012), 347–362.
7. Greco, A.N., The impact of disruptive and sustaining digital technologies on scholarly journals. Journal of Scholarly Publishing 48:1 (2016), 17–39.
8. Harris, P.A., Taylor, R., Thielke, R., Payne, J., Gonzalez, N., Conde, J.G., Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 42:2 (2009), 377–381.
9. INANE Predatory Publishing Collaborative. Predatory publishing: What editors need to know. Nurse Author & Editor, 24(3), 2014, 2.
10. Jamali, H.R., Nicholas, D., Watkinson, A., Herman, E., Tenopir, C., Levine, K., Nichols, F., How scholars implement trust in their reading, citing and publishing activities: Geographical differences. Library & Information Science Research 36:3-4 (2014), 192–202.
11. Moher, D., Srivastava, A., You are invited to submit…. BMC Medicine, 13, 2015, 180.
12. Nicoll, L.H., Chinn, P.L., Caught in the trap: The allure of deceptive publishers. Nurse Author & Editor, 25(4), 2015, 4.
13. Nicoll, L.H., Chinn, P.L., Writing in the digital age: Savvy publishing for healthcare professionals. 2015, Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA.
14. Oermann, M.H., Conklin, J.L., Nicoll, L.H., Chinn, P.L., Ashton, K.S., Edie, A.H., Budinger, S.C., Study of predatory open access nursing journals. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 48:6 (2016), 624–632.
15. Ray, M., An expanded approach to evaluating open access journals. Journal of Scholarly Publishing 47:4 (2016), 307–327.
16. Shen, C., Björk, B.C., “Predatory” open access: A longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics. BMC Medicine 13:230 (2015), 1–15.
17. Wicherts, J.M., Peer review quality and transparency of the peer-review process in open access and subscription journals. PLoS One, 11(1), 2016, e0147913.