Author perceptions of journal quality

Learned Publishing

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 225-235

  Regazzi, John J ^a   Aytac, Selenay ^a  

^a LONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 54949089009     PISSN: 09531513     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1087/095315108X288938     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Berg, B. L. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences (6th ed.). Boston, MA, Allyn and Bacon, 2006.
2. Tibbitts, G. Measuring Quality in Journal Publishing: New and Emerging Methods. Presentation at International Academy of Nurse Editors conference, London, August 2006. Available at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/press/ files/2006_08August03_INANE_Conference_London_GTV2.ppt
3. Rowlands, I. and Nicholas, D. New Journal Publishing Models: An International Survey of Senior Researchers. London, CIBER, 2005. Available at http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ciber/ciber_2005_survey_final.pdf
4. Mabe, M. A.. What Do Authors Care About? Presentation at the Fiesole Digital Collection Retreat, Oxford, 2003. Available at digital.casalini.it/retreat/2003_docs/Mabe.ppt
5. Chressanthis, G. A. and Chressanthis, J. D. 1993. The relationship between manuscript submission fees and journal quality. The Serials Librarian, 24: 71-86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J123v24n01_05
6. Gorman, G.E. and Calvert, P. J. 2001. Journal quality in the Asian region: results of a pilot study for the IFLA round table of library journals. The Serials Librarian, 41: 99-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/ J123v41n01_08
7. Franke, R.H., Edlund, T.W. and Oster, F. 1990. The development of strategic management: journal quality and article impact. Strategic Management Journal. 11: 243-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250110306
8. Nisonger, T.E. 2002.The relationship between international editorial board composition and citation measures in political science, business, and genetics journals. Scientometrics. 54: 257-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/ A:1016065929026
9. Garfield, E. 1955. Citation indexes to science: a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122: 108-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.122.3159.108
10. Yue, W., Wilson, C.S. and Boller, F. 2007. Peer assessment of journal quality in clinical neurology. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 95: 70-6. Available at http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/ picrender.fcgi?artid=1773051&blobtype=pdf
11. Saha, S. et al. 2003. Impact factor: a valid measure of journal quality? Journal of the Medical Library Association 91: 42-6. Available at http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/picrender.fcgi?artid=141186&blobtype=pdf
12. Frank, E. 1994. Authors' criteria for selecting journals. Journal of the American Medical Association 272: 163-4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama. 272.2.163
13. Björk, B-C. and Holmström, J. 2006. Benchmarking scientific journals from the submitting author's viewpoint. Learned Publishing, 19: 147-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/095315106776387002
14. Rowlands, I. et al. Scholarly Communication in the Digital Environment: What Do Authors Want? London, CIBER, 2004. Available at: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/ciber/ciber-pa-report.pdf.
15. Gleser, L.J. 1986. Some notes on refereeing, The American Statistician, 40: 310-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2684615
16. King, C.J. et al. Scholarly Communication: Academic Values and Sustainable Models. Berkeley CA, Center for Studies in Higher Education, 2006. Available at http://cshe.berkeley.edu/publications/docs/ scholarlycomm_report.pdf
17. Grimby, G. 2005. Some current aspects on publication, citation and impact factor for Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37: 337-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/16501970510
18. Schroter, S. 2005. Perception of open access publishing: interviews with journal authors. British Medical Journal, 330: 756. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1136/bmj.38359.695220.82
19. Regazzi, J.J. and Caliguiri, N.A. 2006. Publisher and author partnerships: a changing landscape. Learned Publishing, 19: 183-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/095315106777877485
20. Joseph, L.E. 2006. Image and figure quality: a study of Elsevier's earth and planetary sciences electronic journal back file package. Library Collections Acquisitions & Technical Services, 30 :162-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lcats.2006.12.002
21. Erdman, J.M. 2006. Image and figure quality: a case study of Elsevier geology titles. Library Collections, Acquisitions, & Technical Services, 30: 169-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lcats.2006.08.002
22. Sanger, L. What Strong Collaboration Means for Scholarly Publishing. Presentation to SSP 29th Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA, June 2007. Available at http://sspnet.org/documents/218_SSP%20paper.doc