What I learned from predatory publishers

Biochemia Medica

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 273-278

  Beall, Jeffrey ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Journals; Open access; Predatory publishers; Research; Scholarly publishing

Indexed keywords

COUNTERFEIT DRUG; NUTRACEUTICAL;

ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE; ARTICLE; CONFLICT TEST; HOMEOPATHY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PUBLICATION; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; ACCESS TO INFORMATION; HUMAN; INTERNET; OPEN ACCESS PUBLISHING; PEER REVIEW; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; HUMANS; INTERNET; JOURNALISM; OPEN ACCESS PUBLISHING; PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; RESEARCH;

EID: 85020647350     PISSN: 13300962     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11613/BM.2017.029     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Farrell D, ed. Systems and procedures exchange center (SPEC) flyer. In: Serials control and deselection projects. 147th ed. Washington, NW: Association of research libraries, Office of management service, 1988. p. 1-2.
2. Beall J. Dangerous predatory publishers threaten medical research. J Korean Med Sci 2016;31:1511-3. https://doi. org/10.3346/jkms.2016.31.10.1511
3. Anonymous. Posterous. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posterous. Accessed February 9th 2017.
4. Moosa IA. A critique of the bucket classification of journals: The ABDC list as an example. Econ Rec 2016;92:448–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4932.12258
5. Gieryn TF. Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. Am Sociol Rev 1983;48:781-95. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095325
6. Beninger PG, Beall J, Shumway SE. Debasing the currency of science: The growing menace of predatory open access journals. J Shellfish Res 2016;35:1–5. https://doi. org/10.2983/035.035.0101