Implementing gamification in a university-level UML modeling course: A case study

Computer Applications in Engineering Education

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2019, Pages 332-343

  Jurgelaitis, Mantas ^a   Čeponienė, Lina ^a   Čeponis, Jonas ^a   Drungilas, Vaidotas ^a  

^a KAUNAS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Lithuania)

Author keywords

education; gamification; Moodle; UML; Unified Process

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION PROGRAMS; EDUCATION; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; LOCKS (FASTENERS); MOTIVATION; SOFTWARE DESIGN; STUDENTS; TEACHING; UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGE;

COMPUTER SCIENCE STUDENTS; GAMIFICATION; INTRINSIC MOTIVATION; ITS APPLICATIONS; MOODLE; UNIFIED PROCESS; UNIVERSITY LEVELS; UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGIES;

CURRICULA;

EID: 85055933835     PISSN: 10613773     EISSN: 10990542     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cae.22077     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. J. Arlow and I. Neustadt, Uml 2 and the unified process: Practical object-oriented analysis and design, Addison-Wesley Professional, 2005.
2. B. Barna and S. Fodor, An empirical study on the use of gamification on it courses at higher education, Adv. Intel. Syst. Comput. 715 (2018), 684–692.
3. P. Buckley and E. Doyle, Gamification and student motivation, Interact. Learn. Environ. 24 (2016), 1162–1175.
4. Y.-k. Chou, Actionable gamification—beyond points, badges, and leaderboards, Octalysis Media, Milpitas, CA, 2015.
5. V. Cosentino, S. Gerard, and J. Cabot, “A model-based approach to gamify the learning of modelling,” 5th Symposium on Conceptual Modelling Education (SCME 2017), 2017, pp. 15–24.
6. M. Csikszentmihalyi, Toward a psychology of optimal experience, Flow and the foundations of positive psychology (2014), 209–226.
7. S. Deterding et al., “From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining ‘gamification’,” MindTrek '11 Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, 2011, 2011, pp. 9–15.
8. S. Deterding et al., “Gamification: Toward a definition,” CHI 2011 gamification workshop proceedings, vol. 12, 2011, pp. 12–15.
9. D. Dicheva et al., Gamification in education: A systematic mapping study, Edu. Technol. Soc. 18 (2015), 75–88.
10. B. Fogg, “A behavior model for persuasive design,” Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, ACM, Claremont, California, USA, 2009, pp. 1–7.
11. A. Greeve and F. Massart, “Moodle plugins directory: Stash,” Moodle, 2018.
12. M.-B. Ibanez, A. Di-Serio, and C. Delgado-Kloos, Gamification for engaging computer science students in learning activities: A case study, IEEE Transaction on Learning Technologies 7 (2014).
13. C. Larman, Applying uml and patterns—An introduction to object-oriented analysis and design and the unified process, Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2001.
14. M. Laskowski and M. Badurowicz, “Gamification in higher education: A case study,” Human Capital without Borders: Knowledge and Learning Quality of Life Management, Knowledge and Learning International Conference 2014, 2014, pp. 971–975.
15. F. Massart, “Moodle plugins directory: Level up!,” Moodle, 2018.
16. S. Moisan and J.-P. Rigault, Teaching object-oriented modeling and uml to various audiences, Models in Software Engineering. MODELS 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6002 (2010), 40–54.
17. “Moodle platform,” Moodle, 2018.
18. J. C. Nunnally, Psychometric theory, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967.
19. S. O'Donovan, J. Gain, and P. Marais, A case study in the gamification of a university-level games development course, Proceedings of the South African Institute for Computer Scientists and Information Technologists Conference, 2013, pp. 242–251.
20. M. Petre, “Uml in practice,” Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Software Engineering, IEEE Press, 2013, pp. 722–731.
21. D. Py, L. Auxepaules, and M. Alonso, Diagram, a learning environment for initiation to object-oriented modeling with uml class diagrams, J. Interact. Learn. Res. Assoc. Advance. Comput. Educ. 24 (2013), 425–446.
22. D. Rosenberg and K. Scott, Applying use case driven object modeling with uml: An annotated e-commerce example, Addison Wesley, Redwood City, CA, 2001.
23. B. Rumpe, “Agile and uml-based methodology,” Agile modeling with uml, Springer, Cham, 2017.
24. R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being, Am. Psychol. 55 (2000), 68–78.
25. R. M. Ryan and E. L. Deci, Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions, Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 25 (2000), 54–67.
26. K. Scott, The unified process explained, Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing, Boston, MA, 2002.
27. G. Sedrakyan and M. Snoeck, Technology-enhanced support for learning conceptual modeling, Lect. Notes Bus. Inf. Process. 113 (2012), 435–449.
28. selfdeterminationtheory.org, “Intrinsic motivation inventory (imi),” 2018.
29. M. Snoeck, C. Michiels, and G. Dedene, Consistency by construction: The case of merode, Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2814 (2003), 105–117.
30. “Uml 2.5 specification,” Object Management Group, 2017.
31. B. Unhelkar, Software engineering with uml, Auerbach Publications, Boca Raton, FL, 2017.